Group Research Data Working Group Steering Committee Contents Working Group JPCOAR: Japan Consortium for Open Access Repository (2016.7- ) A nationwide community in Japan https://jpcoar.repo.nii.ac.jp/ 662member institutions (as of 2021.3)
repositories criteria are spreading internationally Ref: Figure 1. Evolution of Instruments for Assessing Trustworthy Data Repositories. http://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2021-001
Most of existing evaluation criteria based on domain-specific repository practices Have different philosophies and/or concepts than institutional repositories Recent movement by publishers have been promoted to this situation Ref: Repository Features to Help Researchers: An invitation to a dialogue (formerly Data Repository Selection: Criteria That Matter) https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4084762
many others have published concerns about the selection criteria to raise awareness of their potential harm in the community” Example: * It threatens to exclude many repositories and limit options for researchers
OpenAIRE interview: Kathleen Shearer on COAR's newest community framework https://www.openaire.eu/kathleen-shearer-on-coar-s-newest-community-framework It was developed and vetted with a wide community of stakeholders including smaller repos Diversity A lot of other frameworks were developed specifically for a certain type of content (e.g. research data) Content agnostic It is based on other recommendations and frameworks Standardized
3 Release of Japanese translation Embodiment and implementation of the framework Analysis and improvement based on the practice Done Ongoing Planning Talked by: Koh Sugawara Talked by: Masashi Kawai