basis for beliefs and the foundation for behavior — they are universal and permanent, transcending culture and time • By contrast, values are expressions of relative importance of desirable attributes — they are by nature more malleable and may change over time or may be naturally in conflict • e.g., honesty and integrity are principles; industriousness and resilience are values • Principles and values are both important!
— if they are universal truths, why make them explicit? • And if we make explicit principles that human behavior will occasionally contravene, are we institutionalizing hypocrisy? • This is exactly why we must make them explicit: making clear our principles allows our future selves to be guided by (in the words of Abraham Lincoln) the “better angels of our nature”
small as they are in the large — and it behooves an organization as much as a nation to elucidate its principles • Organizations reasonably conflate principles and values and integrate them into their mission — but they all combine to express the deeper purpose of the endeavor • Purpose is one of the factors in Daniel Pink’s triad of intrinsic motivation: autonomy, mastery, and purpose
“Kick butt and have fun” • This was heavily loaded: “kick butt” carried the implication of a fair fight (viz. Sun’s championing of open systems in the 1980s) • The culture of Sun was more fully expressed by Scott McNealy, albeit as an epitaph: Kicked butt, had fun, didn’t cheat, loved our customers, changed computing forever. • Scott elaborated upon this in his farewell e-mail to Sun employees…
Web 2.0 generation, the ethos shifted • Google: “Don’t be evil” • Facebook: “Move fast and break things” • Which brings us to Amazon’s Leadership Principles…
principles • And in as much as these are to be principles, there are some important ones missing: integrity, honesty, decency! • Some of them aren’t even values! • They contradict one another sufficiently that they can be used to justify essentially any action • The danger isn’t so much in these “principles” themselves (many of them represent laudable traits), but rather in how they mistakenly inspire the next generation…
generation is that software companies are now coming into contact with the much broader economy • These software companies see themselves as disruptors — and they often rely on skirting (or outright violating) regulation or other norms • These companies are tautologically new; they lack any inherited wisdom or humility — and they view that as a strength • When they mimic Amazon by codifying their own principles and values, the results are predictably calamitous…
it don’t rent it • Super-pumpedness • Optimistic leadership • Champion’s mind set • Celebrate cities • Inside out • Making bold bets • Make magic • Always be hustlin’ • Principled confrontation • Let builders build • Being yourself • Obsession with the customer
values of optimization and disruption to seep into our organizational thinking • But what is right for software is not necessarily right for society! • That software is eating the world does not mean that societal constraints no longer apply! • Software is on the cusp of yet broader societal impact — and at a time when our society is increasingly divided and fractured • We have a greater burden to society than ever before — and we need to start acting that way
with consolidation into relatively fewer entities, the potential for abuse is great • There are many grey areas; principles must be elucidated to assure individuals exercise sound judgement! • Companies must explicitly treat decency, integrity, and the law as constraints on the problems that they endeavor to solve! • So: kick butt, have fun, don’t cheat, love your customers — and let’s lead the world to a better future!