Sculptural_Prints_Upload.pdf

Transcript

1. SPRING 2020 ONLINE CLASS SHEILA GOLOBOROTKO | ANDREW KOZLOWSKI Week Four: Sculptural Prints
2. Week 4 Homework: Sculptural Prints Metropolis (1927) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdtZv3XROnc Metropolis is a 1927 German expressionist science-fiction drama film directed by Fritz Lang. Made in Germany, Metropolis is set in a futuristic urban dystopia and follows the attempts of Freder, the wealthy son of the city master, and Maria, a saintly figure to the workers, to overcome the vast gulf separating the classes in their city and bring the workers together. The film's message is encompassed in the final inter-title*: "The Mediator Between the Head and the Hands Must Be the Heart". *Intertitles are title cards shown in middle of silent films as a narration piece; Intertitles are also used in the opening or ending of a film.
3. Week 4 Week Four: Sculptural Print Post: Sculptural Print Make sure to complete the sketchbook exercise before starting your sculptural print. Process: These are the initial rules you must follow to complete this project: 1. Use what you have: look around for the materials you have available. 2. Use old prints or any printed matter such as magazines, newspapers, cards, etc. 3. Create one or more dimensional elements; watch the videos posted in this module for inspiration. 4. Develop your own set of rules to create your piece. Goal: Post! • One photo of your set of rules • Three photos of your work in progress. • Two photos (or more) of your final Sculptural Print. • Reflection:
 Write one paragraph statement for the sculptural piece you created. What did you learn from setting up rules? Did you break them and recreated a new set during the process? What did you learn from this process? Whatever rules or parameters you choose to create your sculptural print, remember a golden rule you should always follow: The Mediator Between the Head and the Hands Must Be the Heart.
4. Who makes the rules?….or What is Conceptual Art? Conceptual art emerged as an art movement in the 1960s, critiquing the previously ruling modernist movement and its focus on the aesthetic. The term is usually used to refer to art from the mid-1960s to the mid-1970s. In Conceptualism, the idea or concept behind the work of art became more important than the actual technical skill or aesthetic. Conceptual artists used whichever materials and forms were most appropriate to get their ideas across. Joseph Kosuth Four Colours Four Words (Blue, Red, Yellow, Green) 1966
5. Sister Corita Kent Rules Late 60’s
6. Richard Serra Verb List. 1967–68
7. This resulted in vastly different types of artworks that could look like almost anything – from performance to writing to everyday objects. The artists explored the possibilities of art-as-idea and art-as-knowledge, using linguistic, mathematical, and process-oriented dimensions of thought as well as invisible systems, structures and processes for their art. Mel Ramsden (Art & Language Group) Secret Painting 1967-1968 Cildo Meireles Insertions into Ideological Circuits: Coca-Cola Project 1970
8. Sol LeWitt Four-Sided Pyramid Concrete blocks and mortar 180 3/8 x 398 1/2 x 382 1/4 in First installation 1997, fabricated 1999 Influenced by his time working in an architect’s office, LeWitt would use assistants to produce three-dimensional works he called "structures." He wrote: "An architect doesn't go off with a shovel and dig his foundation and lay every brick. He's still an artist." Instead of executing the works of art himself, LeWitt comes up with an idea or plan for his art, usually a set of simple instructions—sometimes with line drawings. He then hands over the written plan to his assistants, and they construct the work. LeWitt's instructions are both specific and open-ended so that the resulting work of art varies according to the interpretation made by the draftsperson producing the work of art. Sol LeWitt Top:
 Set-back skyscraper Bottom:
 Ziggurat Pyramid of Kukulkan, c. 987 Sol LeWitt Floor Structure Black Painted wood, 18 1/2 x 18 x 82 in 1965
9. Beginning in 1968, LeWitt created a series of works called the Drawing Series. Each piece consists of a simple set of instructions or a diagram to be followed and executed directly onto the wall (such as the instructions below for a wall drawing owned by the Tate). These works are purposefully temporal and can be produced not only by the artist himself, but also by other draftsmen, such as studio assistants. In this series, the artist places emphasis on the concept of the work rather than the physical manifestation. LeWitt wrote, “When an artist uses a conceptual form of art, it means that all of the planning and decisions are made beforehand and the execution is a perfunctory affair. Sol LeWitt’s Wall Drawing #50 A, 1970.
10. Instead of creating a single wall mural, Sol LeWitt created instructions on how to create what he called “wall drawings” so that they would be reproducible and could be created by a collaborative team of skilled artists or fabricators. He fully explored in his works the relationship between the idea and the final product, between outlining the concept and fully defining the work. In one of his essays he says “The system* is the work of art; the visual work of art is the proof of the system. The visual aspect can't be understood without understanding the system. It isn't what it looks like but what it is that is of basic importance”. “The idea becomes the machine that makes the art” Sol LeWitt
11. To that, when an organization or individual buys a LeWitt wall drawing, they receive two things, neither of which is the finished work of art. They get a certificate of authenticity and a detailed set of instructions—that is, they get the idea. To install the piece, they worked directly with LeWitt and now, since his death in 2007, work with LeWitt’s estate to hire one of his trained drafts-people to lead the installation.
12. On September 10, 2012, three members of the installation staff at the Modern joined one of the draftsmen from the Estate of Sol LeWitt and began to execute Wall Drawing #50 A. The instructions are simple: “A wall divided into four parts by lines drawn from corner to corner. Each section with three different colors made of parallel lines superimposed. Color pencil.” This is the first execution of the work since the Museum acquired it in 2010. The installation process for the 24’ x 16’ wall took five-and–a-half weeks (672 man-hours), and it is estimated that the drawing is composed of over 14,800 separate lines…to marvelous effect.
13. Between 1968 and his death in 2007, LeWitt created more than 1,270 wall drawings. Since his death, the works have continued to be executed, abiding closely to LeWitt’s specifications, though differing slightly each time due to the draftsmen’s interpretations of his instructions. In a sense, every new installation is a collaboration between a space, a draftsman, a wall, and LeWitt himself, composing posthumously. There is something wonderful and comforting about the fact that these works can’t be ruined, they can be created and destroyed a million times over, but they will not be lost. They exist as ideas. Sol LeWitt Wall Drawing #797 Blanton Museum of Art (Video link here.) (Video link here.)
14. The concept that fed Lombardi's conceptualism was that a clandestine economy, bound by no law, shuttled money between concerns in Texas, the Middle East, the Vatican and the Beltway. That money translated into oil barrels, or bundles of cocaine, or crates of arms, and inevitably manifested itself as ruthless power of the few over the many. Lombardi thought the best way to defeat this corrupt global cabal was to show it its own reflection. Lombardi's "narrative structures," as he called them, were based on information he culled from public documents, and while there is a sort of mad beauty to the crisscrossing arrows of his drawings, their main currency is not beauty but information, the feverish connections between the Saudis and the Bushes, between the millions shuttled from London to Riyadh and a brutally suppressed peasant uprising Latin America. He was like an investigative reporter whose medium just happened to be the schematic drawing. Mark Lombardi World Finance Corporation, ca. 1998 Graphite and collage on paper 20 × 27 1/2 in Mark Lombardi BCCI, ICIC, FAB c. 1972-91 (4th version) detail, 1996 Colored pencil and graphite on paper 52 × 138 in
15. John Cage: Chance Operations John Milton Cage Jr. (September 5, 1912 – August 12, 1992) was an American composer, music theorist, writer, philosopher, and artist. Cage studied Indian philosophy and Zen Buddhism in the late 1940s, and the I Ching became his source reference for life, using the guide as a random chance generator, as well as philosophical reference. Choice “Chance Operations” would seem a haphazard process, but these are structures, a series of strict rules that remove choice from the artist. Choice is what most artists most value. If you let go of choice, what remains in your artworks? “He numbered the different tools and asked which to use, then how many marks to make with each tool. Next he asked how many marks should be long, how many medium, how many short. He had with him a sheaf of pages showing I Ching-derived numbers, computer-printed and ready to use to get answers without the need to throw coins.” John Cage Chance Operations Objects and drawings
16. Chance Operations The basic principle is to remove one’s own intention from the work and hand that over to the oracle. Intention is always to some extent circumscribed by one’s own tastes and personality, whereas non-intention moves beyond like and dislike and becomes something more resembling an act of nature. “I use chance operations instead of operating according to my likes and dislikes. I use my work to change myself and I accept what the chance operations say. The I Ching says that if you don’t accept the chance operations you have no right to use them. Which is very clear, so that’s what I do. “The first thing the I Ching teaches us is acceptance. It essentially advances this lesson: if we want to use chance operations, then we must accept the results” John Cage Chance Operations Objects and drawings
17. “Interdeterminacy is the possibility of a unique form.” It results when sturctures within a composition generate unpredicatble outcomes. ‘If something is boring after two minutes, try it for four. If still boring, then eight. Then sixteen. Then thirty-two. Eventually one discovers that it is not boring at all.’ – John Cage John Cage Chance Operations Drawings
18. Hans Haacke (b. Cologne, Germany, 1936) took the fight inside the museum. His seminal installation, “MoMA Poll,” presented visitors with two transparent ballot boxes, a ballot and a sign that posed a question about the upcoming gubernatorial race: “Would the fact that Governor Rockefeller has not denounced President Nixon’s Indochina Policy be a reason for you not to vote for him in November?” (By the time the exhibition closed, roughly twice as many participants had answered “yes” as “no.”) MoMA did not censor the work, but not all institutions were as tolerant. Hans Haacke A yellow ballot used for Haacke’s “MoMA Poll.” 1970
19. Jenny Holzer (b. Gallipolis, Ohio, 1950) was 25 years old when she began compiling her “Truisms,” more than 250 cryptic maxims, terse commands and shrewd observations. Culled from world literature and philosophy, some of the one- liners are judgmental (“Any surplus is immoral”), others bleak (“Ideals are replaced by conventional goals at a certain age”), and a few echo the half-baked platitudes found in fortune cookies (“You must have one grand passion”). The most resonant are the political ones, none more so than “Abuse of power comes as no surprise.” After printing them as posters, which she pasted among real advertisements throughout downtown Manhattan, Holzer reproduced them on objects, including baseball caps, T-shirts and condoms. She projected them on the enormous Spectacolor LED board in Times Square in 1982, with smaller scrolling signs to evoke the digital clocks and screens through which we are continuously fed information (and told what to think) in urban environments. Holzer continues to use the “Truisms” today, incorporating them into electronic signs, benches, footstools and T-shirts. One of Jenny Holzer’s “Truisms” featured on a Spectacolor light board in Times Square as part of the Public Art Fund’s “Messages to the Public” exhibition (1982).
20. Felix Gonzalez-Torres (b. Cuba, 1957; d. 1996) came to New York City in 1979. When he created “Untitled” (Portrait of Ross in L.A.) in 1991, he was mourning the loss of his lover, Ross Laycock, who had died of AIDS- related illness that year. The installation ideally comprises 175 pounds of candies, wrapped in bright cellophane, an approximation of the body weight of a healthy adult male. Viewers are free to take pieces from the pile, and over the course of the exhibition, the work deteriorates, just as Laycock’s body did. The candies, however, may or may not be routinely replenished by the staff, evoking eternity and rebirth at the same time as they conjure mortality. Felix Gonzalez-Torres’s Portrait of Ross in L.A. 1991
21. Michael Asher Michael Asher Santa Monica Museum of Art 2008 Michael Asher (b. Los Angeles, 1943; d. 2012) spent his career responding to each gallery or museum space with site- specific works that illuminated the architectural or abstract qualities of the venue. When the Santa Monica Museum of Art (now the Institute of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles) approached the conceptualist in 2001 to mount an exhibition, he tapped into the history of the institution, recreating the wood or metal skeletons of all of the temporary walls that had been built for the 38 previous exhibitions. The result was a labyrinth of studs that effectively collapsed time and space, bringing multiple chapters of the museum’s history into the present. That work characterized his unique practice over more than 40 years: In 1970, Asher removed all the doors of an exhibition space at Pomona College in Claremont, Calif., to allow light, air and sound into the galleries, calling viewers’ attention to the ways such places are usually closed off — both literally and metaphorically — from the outside world; for a 1991 show at Paris’s Centre Pompidou, he searched all the books filed under “psychoanalysis” in the museum’s library for abandoned paper fragments, including bookmarks; in 1999, he created a volume listing nearly all of the artworks that the Museum of Modern Art in New York had deaccessioned since its founding — privileged information rarely made public.
22. Barbara Kruger When I hear the word culture, I take out my check book 1985 I Shop Therefore I Am 1987 Barbara Kruger (b. Newark, 1945) briefly studied at the Parsons School of Design in 1965, but her real education was in the world of magazines. She dropped out early on to work at Mademoiselle as an assistant to the art director, rapidly became head designer, and then switched to freelance, conceiving layouts for House & Garden, Vogue and Aperture, among other publications. Through these projects, Kruger learned how to command the viewer’s attention and manipulate desire. A close reader of Roland Barthes and other theorists focused on media, culture and the power of images, Kruger brought her professional life and philosophical leanings together in the early 1980s with her iconic works: agitprop images of terse, satirical slogans in white or black Futura Bold Oblique type on close-cropped images primarily from old magazines. They confront gender roles and sexuality, corporate greed and religion. Several of the most well-known indict consumerism, including 1985’s “Untitled (When I Hear the Word Culture, I Take Out My Checkbook),” in which the words slash across the face of a ventriloquist’s dummy, and “Untitled (I Shop Therefore I Am),” from 1987.
23. Catherine Opie (b. Sandusky, Ohio, 1961) In this photo, the artist faces away from the viewer, confronting us with her bare back, on which a house — the kind a child might draw — and two stick figures in skirts have been carved. The figures hold hands, completing the idyllic domestic dream, which, at the time was just that — a dream — for lesbian couples. This work and others responded to the national firestorm surrounding “obscenity” in art. In 1989, Senators Alfonse D’Amato and Jesse Helms had denounced “Piss Christ,” a photograph depicting a crucifix submerged in urine by Andres Serrano, which was part of a traveling exhibition that had received funding from the National Endowment for the Arts. A few weeks later, the Corcoran Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C. opted to cancel a show featuring homoerotic and sadomasochistic photographs by Robert Mapplethorpe, whose exhibition at the Institute of Contemporary Art at the University of Pennsylvania had also received federal funding. In 1990, the N.E.A. denied funding to four artists because of their explicit themes of frank sexuality, trauma or subjugation. (In 1998, the Supreme Court ruled that the N.E.A.’s statute was valid and did not result in discrimination against the artists, nor did it suppress their expression.) By creating and exhibiting these works when she did, Opie openly defied those looking to shame queer communities and censor their visibility in art. “She is an insider and an outsider,” wrote the Times art critic Holland Cotter on the occasion of Opie’s 2008 Guggenheim midcareer retrospective. “[Opie is] a documentarian and a provocateur; a classicist and a maverick; a trekker and a stay-at-home; a lesbian feminist mother who resists the gay mainstream; an American — birthplace: Sandusky, Ohio — who has serious arguments with her country and culture.” Catherine Opie’s Self-Portrait/Cutting 1993
24. MULTIPLE ONES Contemporary Perspectives in Printmedia Hunterdon Art Museum Clinton, NJ May 12 - September 2, 2018 Kwan Fong Gallery and William Rolland Gallery California Lutheran University Thousand Oaks, CA August 22, 2019 - October 23, 2019 Museum of Contemporary Art University of North Florida Jacksonville, FL April 30 - August 30, 2020 Curated by Sheila Goloborotko
25. Ruthann Godollei Sheila Goloborotko John Hitchcock Rebecca Gilbert Andrew Kozlowski Swoon Lauren Kussro Samantha Parker Salazar Marliee Salvator Guen Montgomery Justin Barfield Eszter Sziksz Andrew Raftery Vanessa B. Cruz Florence Gidez Brandie Grogan Jill Parisi Mizin Shin Nathan Meltz Shawn Bitters Politics Imaginary and Fictional Spatial and Structural Changes Collections and Treasures Time The sculptural prints in this exhibition have been created with simple and complex rules. The works deal with politics, the imaginary, the fictional, spatial and structural changes,—and time. As you look at the works in this exhibition, make a list of the rules you believe artists used for composing their work.
26. SHEILA GOLOBOROTKO Sistema: Screenprinted handcut Mylar variable dimensions, 2016 Opalka Gallery
27. Sheila Goloborotko Sistema: Screenprinted handcut Mylar, Variable Dimensions, 2016 Lufrano Gallery SHEILA GOLOBOROTKO Corrientes: Handcut aluminum, variable dimensions, 2016 CENTRO CULTURAL ATARAZANAS PIEDRA MÚCARA
28. Sheila Goloborotko Sistema: Screenprinted handcut Mylar, Variable Dimensions, 2016 Lufrano Gallery SHEILA GOLOBOROTKO Sistema: Screenprinted handcut Mylar, variable dimensions, 2016 Centro Cultural Atarazanas
29. Sheila Goloborotko Sistema: Screenprinted handcut Mylar, variable dimensions, 2016 Opalka Galery
30. Sheila Goloborotko Sistema: Screenprinted handcut Mylar, Variable Dimensions, 2016 Lufrano Gallery Sheila Goloborotko Sistema: Screenprinted handcut Mylar, variable dimensions, 2016 Kwan Fong Galery
31. Sheila Goloborotko Sistema: Screenprinted handcut Mylar, variable dimensions, 2016 Lufrano Gallery
32. Sheila Goloborotko Sistema: Screenprinted handcut Mylar, variable dimensions, 2016 Opalka Gallery (left) / Kwan Fong Gallery (right)
33. SHEILA GOLOBOROTKO /VANESSA B. CRUZ Synaesthesia, Video Animation, 2017 Kwan Fong Gallery
34. SHEILA GOLOBOROTKO /VANESSA B. CRUZ Synaesthesia, Video Animation, 2017 Kwan Fong Gallery
35. SHEILA GOLOBOROTKO /VANESSA B. CRUZ Synaesthesia, Video Animation, 2017 Kwan Fong Gallery
36. SHEILA GOLOBOROTKO /VANESSA B. CRUZ Synaesthesia, Video Animation, 2017 MOCA Jacksonville (top), UNF Recital Hall (bottom)
37. JOHN HITCHCOCK (left) /JUSTIN BARFIELD (floor) SHEILA GOLOBOROTKO/VANESSA B. CRUZ (center) / MARILEE SALVATOR (right) Kwan Fong Gallery
38. JUSTIN BARFIELD Scrap Pile: Paper, Rust, Wheat Paste, Variable Dimensions, 2014. Kwan Fong Gallery JUSTIN BARFIELD Scrap Pile: Paper, rust, wheat paste, variable dimensions, 2014. Kwan Fong Gallery
39. JUSTIN BARFIELD Scrap Pile: Paper, rust, wheat paste, variable dimensions, 2014. Kwan Fong Gallery
40. JUSTIN BARFIELD Scrap Pile: Paper, Rust, Wheat Paste, variable dimensions, 2014. Kwan Fong Gallery
41. JUSTIN BARFIELD Scrap Pile: Paper, Rust, Wheat Paste, variable dimensions, 2014. Kwan Fong Gallery
42. MARILEE SALVATOR Growth Patterns: Etching, screenprint and wood, variable dimensions, 2017 Kwan Fong Gallery
43. MARILEE SALVATOR Growth Patterns: Etching, screenprint and wood, variable dimensions, 2017 Kwan Fong Gallery
44. MARILEE SALVATOR Growth Patterns: Etching, screenprint and wood, variable dimensions, 2017 Hunterdon Art Museum
45. MARILEE SALVATOR Growth Patterns: Etching, screenprint and wood, variable dimensions, 2017 Kwan Fong Gallery
46. MARILEE SALVATOR Growth Patterns: Etching, screenprint and wood, variable dimensions, 2017 Kwan Fong Gallery
47. JOHN HITCHCOCK America, America: Inkjet on fabric flags, variable dimensions, 2019 Kwan Fong Gallery
48. JOHN HITCHCOCK America, America: Inkjet on fabric flags, variable dimensions, 2019 Kwan Fong Gallery
49. JOHN HITCHCOCK America, America: Inkjet on fabric flags, variable dimensions, 2019 Kwan Fong Gallery
50. JOHN HITCHCOCK The Protector: Screenprint on CNC cut wood, variable dimensions, 2017 Hunterdon Art Museum
52. ANDREW KOZLOWSKI Variable Collection: Vinyl cut, variable dimensions, 2019 William Rolland Gallery
53. ANDREW KOZLOWSKI Variable Collection: Vinyl cut, variable dimensions, 2019 William Rolland Gallery
54. ANDREW KOZLOWSKI Variable Collection: Vinyl cut, variable dimensions, 2019 William Rolland Gallery
55. ANDREW KOZLOWSKI Variable Collection: Vinyl cut, variable dimensions, 2019 Hunterdon Art Museum
56. ANDREW KOZLOWSKI Variable Collection: Vinyl cut, variable dimensions, 2019 Hunterdon Art Museum
57. ANDREW KOZLOWSKI Variable Collection: Vinyl cut, variable dimensions, 2019 William Rolland Gallery
58. ANDREW KOZLOWSKI Variable Collection: Vinyl cut, variable dimensions, 2019 Hunterdon Art Museum
59. REBECCA GILBERT Shine: Reduction woodcut mounted on foam core, 15” x 120”, 2012 William Rolland Gallery
60. REBECCA GILBERT Shine: Reduction woodcut mounted on foam core, 15” x 120”, 2012 William Rolland Gallery
61. REBECCA GILBERT Shine: Reduction woodcut mounted on foam core, 15” x 120”, 2012 William Rolland Gallery
62. REBECCA GILBERT Raise Bed Fortune Patch: Photo etchings, 24” x 36” x 36”, 2010-12 Hunterdon Art Museum
63. REBECCA GILBERT Raise Bed Fortune Patch: Photo etchings, 24” x 36” x 36”, 2010-12 Hunterdon Art Museum
64. REBECCA GILBERT Raise Bed Fortune Patch: Photo etchings, 24” x 36” x 36”, 2010-12 William Rolland Gallery
65. MIZIN SHIN How Things Are Made Vol.1 / Virtual City_1000: Handprinted woodcuts, variable dimensions, 2017 William Rolland Gallery
66. MIZIN SHIN How Things Are Made Vol.1: Handprinted woodcuts, variable dimensions, 2017 William Rolland Gallery
67. MIZIN SHIN How Things Are Made Vol.1: Handprinted woodcuts, variable dimensions, 2017 William Rolland Gallery
68. MIZIN SHIN How Things Are Made Vol.1: Handprinted woodcuts, variable dimensions, 2017 William Rolland Gallery
69. MIZIN SHIN How Things Are Made Vol.1 / Virtual City_1000: Handprinted woodcuts, Variable Dimensions, 2017 William Rolland Gallery
70. MIZIN SHIN How Things Are Made Vol.1 / Virtual City_1000: Handprinted woodcuts, variable dimensions, 2017 Hunterdom Art Museum
71. MIZIN SHIN How Things Are Made Vol.1 / Virtual City_1000: Handprinted woodcuts, variable dimensions, 2017 William Rolland Gallery
72. LAUREN KUSSRO We Held to Each Other so Tightly, We became as One: Screenprint and monotype, threads, beads, variable dimensions, 2013 William Rolland Gallery
73. LAUREN KUSSRO We Held to Each Other so Tightly, We became as One: Screenprint and monotype, threads, beads, variable dimensions, 2013 William Rolland Gallery
74. LAUREN KUSSRO We Held to Each Other so Tightly, We became as One: Screenprint and monotype, threads, beads, variable dimensions, 2013 William Rolland Gallery
75. LAUREN KUSSRO We Held to Each Other so Tightly, We became as One: Screenprint and monotype, threads, beads, variable dimensions, 2013 William Rolland Gallery
76. LAUREN KUSSRO We Held to Each Other so Tightly, We became as One: Screenprint and monotype, threads, beads, variable dimensions, 2013 William Rolland Gallery
77. LAUREN KUSSRO We Held to Each Other so Tightly, We became as One: Screenprint and monotype, threads, beads, variable dimensions, 2013 William Rolland Gallery
78. JILL PARISI Celestial: Etchings on Yushuki handmade paper, variable dimensions, 2015 William Rolland Gallery
79. JILL PARISI Celestial: Etchings on Yushuki handmade paper, variable dimensions, 2015 William Rolland Gallery
80. JILL PARISI Celestial: Etchings on Yushuki handmade paper, variable dimensions, 2015 William Rolland Gallery
81. JILL PARISI Celestial: Etchings on Yushuki handmade paper, variable dimensions, 2015 William Rolland Gallery
82. SHAWN BITTERS Yellowstone Dawn: Screenprint, gouache, and plexiglass, 27.5 diameter x 12”, 2017 William Rolland Gallery
83. SHAWN BITTERS Yellowstone Dawn: Screenprint, gouache, and plexiglass, 27.5 diameter x 12”, 2017 William Rolland Gallery
84. SHAWN BITTERS Yellowstone Dawn: Screenprint, gouache, and plexiglass, 27.5 diameter x 12”, 2017 Hunterdon Art Museum
85. SHAWN BITTERS Yellowstone Dawn: Screenprint, gouache, and plexiglass, 27.5 diameter x 12”, 2017 William Rolland Gallery
86. SHAWN BITTERS Yellowstone Dawn: Screenprint, gouache, and plexiglass, 27.5 diameter x 12”, 2017 Hunterdon Art Museum
87. NATHAN MELTZ Are You Ready for that Great Atomic Power? Part 6: Screenprint, variable dimensions, 2018 William Rolland Gallery
88. NATHAN MELTZ Are You Ready for that Great Atomic Power? Part 6: Screenprint, variable dimensions, 2018 William Rolland Gallery
89. NATHAN MELTZ Are You Ready for that Great Atomic Power? Part 6: Screenprint, variable dimensions, 2018 William Rolland Gallery
90. NATHAN MELTZ Are You Ready for that Great Atomic Power? Part 6: Screenprint, variable dimensions, 2018 William Rolland Gallery
91. NATHAN MELTZ Are You Ready for that Great Atomic Power? Part 6: Screenprint, variable dimensions, 2018 William Rolland Gallery
92. BRANDI GROGAN Excel: Screenprint on reclaimed wood, 28” x 18.5” x 3”, 2018 William Rolland Gallery
93. BRANDI GROGAN Excel: Screenprint on reclaimed wood, 28” x 18.5” x 3”, 2018 William Rolland Gallery
94. BRANDI GROGAN What is the Meaning of All This: Screenprint on reclaimed wood, 22.5” x 18” x 3”, 2018 William Rolland Gallery
95. BRANDI GROGAN What is the Meaning of All This: Screenprint on reclaimed wood, 22.5” x 18” x 3”, 2018 Hunterdon Art Museum
96. FLORENCE GIDEZ Endangered Architecture: Screenprint, illustration board, acrylic, 23” x 24” x 16”, 2019 William Rolland Gallery
97. FLORENCE GIDEZ Endangered Architecture: Screenprint, illustration board, acrylic, 23” x 24” x 16”, 2019 William Rolland Gallery
98. FLORENCE GIDEZ The Last Resort: Screenprint, illustration board, acrylic, 26” x 18.25” x 216.5, 2018 Hunterdon Art Museum
99. FLORENCE GIDEZ The Last Resort: Screenprint, illustration board, acrylic, 26” x 18.25” x 216.5, 2018 Hunterdon Art Museum
100. FLORENCE GIDEZ The Last Resort: Screenprint, illustration board, acrylic, 26” x 18.25” x 216.5, 2018 Hunterdon Art Museum
101. ANDREW RAFTERY The Autobiography of a Garden: Engraving transfer-printed on glazed white earthenware, 12.5” diameter each, 2009-20016 Hunterdon Art Museum
102. ANDREW RAFTERY The Autobiography of a Garden: Engraving transfer-printed on glazed white earthenware, 12.5” diameter each, 2009-20016
103. ANDREW RAFTERY The Autobiography of a Garden: Engraving transfer-printed on glazed white earthenware, 12.5” diameter each, 2009-20016 Hunterdon Art Museum
104. JANUARY Reading Seed Catalogs APRIL Edging the Beds JUNE Training a Passion Vine NOVEMBER Digging Dahlia Tubers
105. ANDREW RAFTERY The Autobiography of a Garden: Engraving transfer-printed on glazed white earthenware, 12.5” diameter each, 2009-20016 Hunterdon Art Museum
106. ANDREW RAFTERY The Autobiography of a Garden: Engraving transfer-printed on glazed white earthenware, 12.5” diameter each, 2009-20016 Rolland William Gallery
107. ESZTER SZIKSZ Scrap Pile: The Space Between Us (front): Screenprint, 6” x 9”, 2018 William Rolland Gallery
108. ESZTER SZIKSZ Universe (back): Screenprint, 12” diameter, 2018 William Rolland Gallery
109. ESZTER SZIKSZ Scrap Pile: The Space Between Us (front): Screenprint, 6” x 9”, 2018 William Rolland Gallery
110. ESZTER SZIKSZ Guardian: Video, screenprint on ice, 2014 William Rolland Gallery
111. ESZTER SZIKSZ Guardian: Video, screenprint on ice, 2014 Hunterdon Art Museum
112. ESZTER SZIKSZ Guardian: Video, screenprint on ice, 2014 William Rolland Gallery
113. ESZTER SZIKSZ Guardian: Video, screenprint on ice, 2014 William Rolland Gallery
114. SWOON Memento More E.V 2/12: Handprinted block print with coffee stain on cutout Mylar, 84” x 67”, 2018 William Rolland Gallery
115. SWOON Memento More E.V 2/12: Handprinted block print with coffee stain on cutout Mylar, 84” x 67”, 2018 William Rolland Gallery
116. SWOON Memento More E.V 2/12: Handprinted block print with coffee stain on cutout Mylar, 84” x 67”, 2018 William Rolland Gallery
117. SWOON Memento More E.V 2/12: Handprinted block print with coffee stain on cutout Mylar, 84” x 67”, 2018 William Rolland Gallery
118. SWOON Mini and the Sphynx: Handprinted block print with coffee stain on cutout Mylar, 84” x 76”, 2017 Hunterdon Art Museum
119. SWOON Mini and the Sphynx: Handprinted block print with coffee stain on cutout Mylar, 84” x 76”, 2017 Hunterdon Art Museum
120. GUEN MONTGOMERY Scrap Pile: Paper, Rust, Wheat Paste, Variable Dimensions, 2014 Kwan Fong Gallery GUEN MONTGOMERY What Do We Deserve: Silver-plated object with selective tarnish removal, 12” x 4” x 2”, 2017 William Rolland Gallery
121. GUEN MONTGOMERY What Do We Deserve: Silver-plated objects with selective tarnish removal, variable dimensions, 2017 William Rolland Gallery
122. GUEN MONTGOMERY Parse Knives, Bowl: Silver-plated objects with selective tarnish removal, variable dimensions, 2017 William Rolland Gallery
123. GUEN MONTGOMERY To Each Their Own, Eventually, Parse Knives, Bowl: Silver-plated objects with selective tarnish removal, variable dimensions, 2017 William Rolland Gallery
124. GUEN MONTGOMERY Eventually, Sugar Bowl: Silver-plated object with selective tarnish removal, 4” x 5” x 3”, 2016 William Rolland Gallery
125. RUTHANN GODOLLEI Infusion (Drink Me, for Flint): Laser cut stencil, sandblasted glass apothecary jar, adulterated water, letterpress label, 6” x 6” x 3”, 2017 William Rolland Gallery
126. RUTHANN GODOLLEI Infusion (Drink Me, for Flint): Laser cut stencil, sandblasted glass apothecary jar, adulterated water, letterpress label, 6” x 6” x 3”, 2017 Hunterdon Art Museum
127. RUTHANN GODOLLEI Caution Tape (for Philando Castle): Screenprint on plastic ribbon, variable dimensions, 2017 Hunterdon Art Museum
128. RUTHANN GODOLLEI Scrap Pile: Paper, Rust, Wheat Paste, Variable Dimensions, 2014 Kwan Fong Gallery RUTHANN GODOLLEI Caution Tape (for Philando Castle): Screenprint on plastic ribbon, variable dimensions, 2017 Hunterdon Art Museum
129. RUTHANN GODOLLEI Caution Tape (for Philando Castle): Screenprint on plastic ribbon, variable dimensions, 2017 William Rolland Gallery
130. RUTHANN GODOLLEI Caution Tape (for Philando Castle): Screenprint on plastic ribbon, variable dimensions, 2017 Hunterdon Art Museum
131. RUTHANN GODOLLEI Caution Tape (for Philando Castle): Screenprint on plastic ribbon, variable dimensions, 2017 William Rolland Gallery
132. SAMANTHA PARKER SALAZAR Rising (v.3): Handcut monotypes on paper, paint, vinyl, PEX pipe, variable dimensions, 2015 William Rolland Gallery
133. SAMANTHA PARKER SALAZAR Rising (v.3): Handcut monotypes on paper, paint, vinyl, PEX pipe, variable dimensions, 2015 William Rolland Gallery
134. SAMANTHA PARKER SALAZAR Rising (v.3): Handcut monotypes on paper, paint, vinyl, PEX pipe, variable dimensions, 2015 William Rolland Gallery
135. SAMANTHA PARKER SALAZAR Rising (v.3): Handcut monotypes on paper, paint, vinyl, PEX pipe, variable dimensions, 2015 William Rolland Gallery
136. SAMANTHA PARKER SALAZAR Rising (v.3): Handcut monotypes on paper, paint, vinyl, PEX pipe, variable dimensions, 2015 William Rolland Gallery
137. SAMANTHA PARKER SALAZAR Rising (v.3): Handcut monotypes on paper, paint, vinyl, PEX pipe, variable dimensions, 2015 William Rolland Gallery
138. SAMANTHA PARKER SALAZAR Rising (v.3): Handcut monotypes on paper, paint, vinyl, PEX pipe, variable dimensions, 2015 William Rolland Gallery
139. SAMANTHA PARKER SALAZAR Rising (v.3): Handcut monotypes on paper, paint, vinyl, PEX pipe, variable dimensions, 2015 William Rolland Gallery
140. SAMANTHA PARKER SALAZAR Rising (v.3): Handcut monotypes on paper, paint, vinyl, PEX pipe, variable dimensions, 2015 William Rolland Gallery
141. SAMANTHA PARKER SALAZAR Scrap Pile: Paper, Rust, Wheat Paste, Variable Dimensions, 2014 Kwan Fong Gallery SAMANTHA PARKER SALAZAR Rising (v.3): Handcut monotypes on paper, paint, vinyl, PEX pipe, variable dimensions, 2015 William Rolland Gallery