Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Statistically significant taxonomy
Search
Matt Jukes
February 18, 2017
Technology
0
130
Statistically significant taxonomy
Talk at World Information Architecture 2017 in Manchester by Jonathan Porton and myself.
Matt Jukes
February 18, 2017
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Matt Jukes
See All by Matt Jukes
Roadmaps and Missions for the Scottish Digital Academy
jukesie
0
1.1k
A ChatGTP Christmas Quiz
jukesie
0
320
Jukes - User Manual
jukesie
0
120
my adidas
jukesie
1
380
This is a team sport
jukesie
0
390
Working in the open works
jukesie
1
67
Digital is a team sport
jukesie
0
570
The importance of being open
jukesie
1
85
The Wrong Users?
jukesie
0
570
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
dbtを中心にして組織のアジリティとガバナンスのトレードオンを考えてみた
gappy50
0
230
GeometryReaderやスクロールを用いた表現と紐解き方
fumiyasac0921
0
100
実践! ソフトウェアエンジニアリングの価値の計測 ── Effort、Output、Outcome、Impact
nomuson
0
2k
20250116_自部署内でAmazon Nova体験会をやってみた話
riz3f7
1
100
AWSマルチアカウント統制環境のすゝめ / 20250115 Mitsutoshi Matsuo
shift_evolve
0
110
あなたの知らないクラフトビールの世界
miura55
0
120
ABWGのRe:Cap!
hm5ug
1
120
商品レコメンドでのexplicit negative feedbackの活用
alpicola
1
350
Evolving Architecture
rainerhahnekamp
3
250
Git scrapingで始める継続的なデータ追跡 / Git Scraping
ohbarye
5
490
Kotlin Multiplatformのポテンシャル
recruitengineers
PRO
2
150
KMP with Crashlytics
sansantech
PRO
0
240
Featured
See All Featured
Agile that works and the tools we love
rasmusluckow
328
21k
How to Think Like a Performance Engineer
csswizardry
22
1.3k
Producing Creativity
orderedlist
PRO
343
39k
Put a Button on it: Removing Barriers to Going Fast.
kastner
60
3.6k
Sharpening the Axe: The Primacy of Toolmaking
bcantrill
38
1.9k
Building Applications with DynamoDB
mza
93
6.2k
Chrome DevTools: State of the Union 2024 - Debugging React & Beyond
addyosmani
3
240
Adopting Sorbet at Scale
ufuk
74
9.2k
The Myth of the Modular Monolith - Day 2 Keynote - Rails World 2024
eileencodes
19
2.3k
Unsuck your backbone
ammeep
669
57k
Making Projects Easy
brettharned
116
6k
Navigating Team Friction
lara
183
15k
Transcript
A statistically significant taxonomy.
Matt Jukes ..formerly known as ‘Head of Product, Office for
National Statistics’
Jonathan Porton ..formerly known as ‘UX Architect, Office for National
Statistics’
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
The Office for National Statistics is the UK’s largest independent
producer of official statistics. @jukesie @iauxbod
The website gets approximately 500,000 visitors per month. @jukesie @iauxbod
The website had approximately [shed loads] pages & documents. Publishing
an additional [boat loads] a week. @jukesie @iauxbod
The annual list of baby names is the single most
popular release. @jukesie @iauxbod
@jukesi e @jukesi e @jukesie
The site was called “..a national embarrassment” in the
Financial Times. @jukesie @iauxbod
@jukesi e According to the Parliamentary Administration Select Committee; “The
Office for National Statistics website makes figures hard to find and statistics are often presented in a confusing way..” @jukesie @iauxbod
A respondent to the website satisfaction survey ended their response
“The ONS website makes me want to cry..” @jukesie @iauxbod
The previous taxonomy for the website had 1400 categories that
went down five levels. @jukesie @iauxbod
A number of the categories were in fact empty and
reflected statistical publications that the ONS did not actually publish. @jukesie @iauxbod
The site search was referred to as like “..using
Google on LSD” @jukesie @iauxbod
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
We had to persuade a risk-averse organisation to trust us.
@jukesie @iauxbod
Outlined and agreed the approach and methodology with ONS methodology
team. @jukesie @iauxbod
Web analytics - analysis to identify patterns within the taxonomy
@jukesie @iauxbod
None
Previous research - reviewed every minute of every usability test
conducted on the website. Not the binge watch of choice! @jukesie @iauxbod
Competitor analysis - just as applicable as private sector organisations.
Lots of mini standardisations, but no real consistency @jukesie @iauxbod
Content audit - what was there, why was it there
and how the hell did it get there? Reviewed and consolidated structure and content. @jukesie @iauxbod
Card sort - closed, compromised and complicated. Yet still a
step forward. 200 participants, moderated and unmoderated. @jukesie @iauxbod
Tree tests - proposed vs status quo and benchmarking the
hell out of things. 100+ participants, moderated and unmoderated. Tested and iterated...a lot @jukesie @iauxbod
None
None
None
The new (not quite a) taxonomy for the website has
173 categories and three levels. @jukesie @iauxbod
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the
mouth. Mike Tyson
Real life gets in the way of implementing research no
matter how comprehensive. @jukesie @iauxbod
There was consensus as to what made up the main
navigation categories - unfortunately nobody agreed what fitted under them. @jukesie @iauxbod
Usability tests on live website show top level is essentially
surplus to requirements. Exposing the 2nd level makes the user’s life so much simpler! @jukesie @iauxbod
Content confuses as often as clarifies and specialised terminology is
a burden even to expert users. @jukesie @iauxbod
In removing friction from publishing we had failed to capture
sufficient metadata. This became a major issue. @jukesie @iauxbod
Internal politics creep back in and the requirements of the
‘business’ start to crowd out the needs of the user. @jukesie @iauxbod
If I had my time again...
None
It should have been an open card sort.
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
@jukesi e Thanks. @jukesie and @iauxbod