Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Statistically significant taxonomy
Search
Matt Jukes
February 18, 2017
Technology
0
130
Statistically significant taxonomy
Talk at World Information Architecture 2017 in Manchester by Jonathan Porton and myself.
Matt Jukes
February 18, 2017
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Matt Jukes
See All by Matt Jukes
Roadmaps and Missions for the Scottish Digital Academy
jukesie
0
1.2k
A ChatGTP Christmas Quiz
jukesie
0
350
Jukes - User Manual
jukesie
0
140
my adidas
jukesie
1
400
This is a team sport
jukesie
0
450
Working in the open works
jukesie
1
70
Digital is a team sport
jukesie
0
600
The importance of being open
jukesie
1
86
The Wrong Users?
jukesie
0
590
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
会社にデータエンジニアがいることでできるようになること
10xinc
8
1.2k
AI時代の大規模データ活用とセキュリティ戦略
ken5scal
1
270
ABEMAにおける 生成AI活用の現在地 / The Current Status of Generative AI at ABEMA
dekatotoro
0
450
GISエンジニアよ 現場に行け!
sudataka
1
140
薬屋のひとりごとにみるトラブルシューティング
tomokusaba
0
410
MCPサーバーを活用したAWSコスト管理
arie0703
0
130
あなたの知らない OneDrive
murachiakira
0
150
Telemetry APIから学ぶGoogle Cloud ObservabilityとOpenTelemetryの現在 / getting-started-telemetry-api-with-google-cloud
k6s4i53rx
0
160
サービスロボット最前線:ugoが挑むPhysical AI活用
kmatsuiugo
0
150
キャリアを支え組織力を高める「多層型ふりかえり」 / 20250821 Kazuki Mori
shift_evolve
PRO
2
190
生成AI利用プログラミング:誰でもプログラムが書けると 世の中どうなる?/opencampus202508
okana2ki
0
170
Claude Codeは仕様駆動の夢を見ない
gotalab555
23
7.3k
Featured
See All Featured
Six Lessons from altMBA
skipperchong
28
4k
Refactoring Trust on Your Teams (GOTO; Chicago 2020)
rmw
34
3.1k
A better future with KSS
kneath
239
17k
The Pragmatic Product Professional
lauravandoore
36
6.8k
Let's Do A Bunch of Simple Stuff to Make Websites Faster
chriscoyier
507
140k
Scaling GitHub
holman
462
140k
Exploring the Power of Turbo Streams & Action Cable | RailsConf2023
kevinliebholz
34
6k
Side Projects
sachag
455
43k
It's Worth the Effort
3n
186
28k
Statistics for Hackers
jakevdp
799
220k
The Web Performance Landscape in 2024 [PerfNow 2024]
tammyeverts
9
770
Practical Tips for Bootstrapping Information Extraction Pipelines
honnibal
PRO
23
1.4k
Transcript
A statistically significant taxonomy.
Matt Jukes ..formerly known as ‘Head of Product, Office for
National Statistics’
Jonathan Porton ..formerly known as ‘UX Architect, Office for National
Statistics’
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
The Office for National Statistics is the UK’s largest independent
producer of official statistics. @jukesie @iauxbod
The website gets approximately 500,000 visitors per month. @jukesie @iauxbod
The website had approximately [shed loads] pages & documents. Publishing
an additional [boat loads] a week. @jukesie @iauxbod
The annual list of baby names is the single most
popular release. @jukesie @iauxbod
@jukesi e @jukesi e @jukesie
The site was called “..a national embarrassment” in the
Financial Times. @jukesie @iauxbod
@jukesi e According to the Parliamentary Administration Select Committee; “The
Office for National Statistics website makes figures hard to find and statistics are often presented in a confusing way..” @jukesie @iauxbod
A respondent to the website satisfaction survey ended their response
“The ONS website makes me want to cry..” @jukesie @iauxbod
The previous taxonomy for the website had 1400 categories that
went down five levels. @jukesie @iauxbod
A number of the categories were in fact empty and
reflected statistical publications that the ONS did not actually publish. @jukesie @iauxbod
The site search was referred to as like “..using
Google on LSD” @jukesie @iauxbod
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
We had to persuade a risk-averse organisation to trust us.
@jukesie @iauxbod
Outlined and agreed the approach and methodology with ONS methodology
team. @jukesie @iauxbod
Web analytics - analysis to identify patterns within the taxonomy
@jukesie @iauxbod
None
Previous research - reviewed every minute of every usability test
conducted on the website. Not the binge watch of choice! @jukesie @iauxbod
Competitor analysis - just as applicable as private sector organisations.
Lots of mini standardisations, but no real consistency @jukesie @iauxbod
Content audit - what was there, why was it there
and how the hell did it get there? Reviewed and consolidated structure and content. @jukesie @iauxbod
Card sort - closed, compromised and complicated. Yet still a
step forward. 200 participants, moderated and unmoderated. @jukesie @iauxbod
Tree tests - proposed vs status quo and benchmarking the
hell out of things. 100+ participants, moderated and unmoderated. Tested and iterated...a lot @jukesie @iauxbod
None
None
None
The new (not quite a) taxonomy for the website has
173 categories and three levels. @jukesie @iauxbod
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the
mouth. Mike Tyson
Real life gets in the way of implementing research no
matter how comprehensive. @jukesie @iauxbod
There was consensus as to what made up the main
navigation categories - unfortunately nobody agreed what fitted under them. @jukesie @iauxbod
Usability tests on live website show top level is essentially
surplus to requirements. Exposing the 2nd level makes the user’s life so much simpler! @jukesie @iauxbod
Content confuses as often as clarifies and specialised terminology is
a burden even to expert users. @jukesie @iauxbod
In removing friction from publishing we had failed to capture
sufficient metadata. This became a major issue. @jukesie @iauxbod
Internal politics creep back in and the requirements of the
‘business’ start to crowd out the needs of the user. @jukesie @iauxbod
If I had my time again...
None
It should have been an open card sort.
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
@jukesi e Thanks. @jukesie and @iauxbod