Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Statistically significant taxonomy
Search
Matt Jukes
February 18, 2017
Technology
130
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Statistically significant taxonomy
Talk at World Information Architecture 2017 in Manchester by Jonathan Porton and myself.
Matt Jukes
February 18, 2017
More Decks by Matt Jukes
See All by Matt Jukes
Roadmaps and Missions for the Scottish Digital Academy
jukesie
0
1.3k
A ChatGTP Christmas Quiz
jukesie
0
400
Jukes - User Manual
jukesie
0
160
my adidas
jukesie
1
430
This is a team sport
jukesie
0
520
Working in the open works
jukesie
1
76
Digital is a team sport
jukesie
0
630
The importance of being open
jukesie
1
95
The Wrong Users?
jukesie
0
630
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
事業価値を⽣み出すSREへ SREが担うべき意思決定の5層
kenta_hi
2
2.4k
ポストモーテム! DDoSからサイトは守れた。 でもビジネスは守れなかった。
bengo4com
0
2k
AIペネトレーションテスト・ セキュリティ検証「AgenticSec」紹介資料
laysakura
2
8.1k
スタートアップにおけるアジャイルの実践について #shibuyagile
murabayashi
3
2.1k
テスト設計の本質を改めて考えてみる~生成AIを活用する時代だからこそ、作ったテストの説明性を高めよう~
yamasaki696
1
400
AI時代における最適なQA組織の作り方
ymty
3
470
FinOps X 2026 Recap from Engineer Side #JapanFinOps
chacco38
0
270
AIに「使われる」時代のSaaS戦略 〜既存WebAPIのMCPサーバー化における開発ノウハウ〜
ekispert_api
0
300
ループエンジニアリングでE2Eテストを実践
noriyukitakei
0
320
『AIに負けない』より『AIと遊ぶ』」〜ワクワクが最強のテスト・QA学習戦略_公開用
odan611
2
520
フルカイテン株式会社 エンジニア向け採用資料
fullkaiten
0
11k
初めてのDatabricks勉強会
taka_aki
2
250
Featured
See All Featured
Organizational Design Perspectives: An Ontology of Organizational Design Elements
kimpetersen
PRO
1
760
AI Search: Where Are We & What Can We Do About It?
aleyda
0
7.7k
Leo the Paperboy
mayatellez
8
1.9k
Building a Scalable Design System with Sketch
lauravandoore
463
34k
Effective software design: The role of men in debugging patriarchy in IT @ Voxxed Days AMS
baasie
0
440
A Soul's Torment
seathinner
6
3k
The Hidden Cost of Media on the Web [PixelPalooza 2025]
tammyeverts
2
340
How to audit for AI Accessibility on your Front & Back End
davetheseo
0
460
Building a Modern Day E-commerce SEO Strategy
aleyda
45
9.1k
RailsConf 2023
tenderlove
30
1.5k
BBQ
matthewcrist
89
10k
How to Create Impact in a Changing Tech Landscape [PerfNow 2023]
tammyeverts
55
3.4k
Transcript
A statistically significant taxonomy.
Matt Jukes ..formerly known as ‘Head of Product, Office for
National Statistics’
Jonathan Porton ..formerly known as ‘UX Architect, Office for National
Statistics’
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
The Office for National Statistics is the UK’s largest independent
producer of official statistics. @jukesie @iauxbod
The website gets approximately 500,000 visitors per month. @jukesie @iauxbod
The website had approximately [shed loads] pages & documents. Publishing
an additional [boat loads] a week. @jukesie @iauxbod
The annual list of baby names is the single most
popular release. @jukesie @iauxbod
@jukesi e @jukesi e @jukesie
The site was called “..a national embarrassment” in the
Financial Times. @jukesie @iauxbod
@jukesi e According to the Parliamentary Administration Select Committee; “The
Office for National Statistics website makes figures hard to find and statistics are often presented in a confusing way..” @jukesie @iauxbod
A respondent to the website satisfaction survey ended their response
“The ONS website makes me want to cry..” @jukesie @iauxbod
The previous taxonomy for the website had 1400 categories that
went down five levels. @jukesie @iauxbod
A number of the categories were in fact empty and
reflected statistical publications that the ONS did not actually publish. @jukesie @iauxbod
The site search was referred to as like “..using
Google on LSD” @jukesie @iauxbod
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
We had to persuade a risk-averse organisation to trust us.
@jukesie @iauxbod
Outlined and agreed the approach and methodology with ONS methodology
team. @jukesie @iauxbod
Web analytics - analysis to identify patterns within the taxonomy
@jukesie @iauxbod
None
Previous research - reviewed every minute of every usability test
conducted on the website. Not the binge watch of choice! @jukesie @iauxbod
Competitor analysis - just as applicable as private sector organisations.
Lots of mini standardisations, but no real consistency @jukesie @iauxbod
Content audit - what was there, why was it there
and how the hell did it get there? Reviewed and consolidated structure and content. @jukesie @iauxbod
Card sort - closed, compromised and complicated. Yet still a
step forward. 200 participants, moderated and unmoderated. @jukesie @iauxbod
Tree tests - proposed vs status quo and benchmarking the
hell out of things. 100+ participants, moderated and unmoderated. Tested and iterated...a lot @jukesie @iauxbod
None
None
None
The new (not quite a) taxonomy for the website has
173 categories and three levels. @jukesie @iauxbod
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the
mouth. Mike Tyson
Real life gets in the way of implementing research no
matter how comprehensive. @jukesie @iauxbod
There was consensus as to what made up the main
navigation categories - unfortunately nobody agreed what fitted under them. @jukesie @iauxbod
Usability tests on live website show top level is essentially
surplus to requirements. Exposing the 2nd level makes the user’s life so much simpler! @jukesie @iauxbod
Content confuses as often as clarifies and specialised terminology is
a burden even to expert users. @jukesie @iauxbod
In removing friction from publishing we had failed to capture
sufficient metadata. This became a major issue. @jukesie @iauxbod
Internal politics creep back in and the requirements of the
‘business’ start to crowd out the needs of the user. @jukesie @iauxbod
If I had my time again...
None
It should have been an open card sort.
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
@jukesi e Thanks. @jukesie and @iauxbod