Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Statistically significant taxonomy
Search
Matt Jukes
February 18, 2017
Technology
130
0
Share
Statistically significant taxonomy
Talk at World Information Architecture 2017 in Manchester by Jonathan Porton and myself.
Matt Jukes
February 18, 2017
More Decks by Matt Jukes
See All by Matt Jukes
Roadmaps and Missions for the Scottish Digital Academy
jukesie
0
1.2k
A ChatGTP Christmas Quiz
jukesie
0
390
Jukes - User Manual
jukesie
0
150
my adidas
jukesie
1
420
This is a team sport
jukesie
0
510
Working in the open works
jukesie
1
75
Digital is a team sport
jukesie
0
620
The importance of being open
jukesie
1
93
The Wrong Users?
jukesie
0
620
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
Angular Architecture Revisited Modernizing Angular Architectural Patterns
rainerhahnekamp
0
100
目的ファーストのハーネス設計 ~ハーネスの変更容易性を高めるための優先順位~
gotalab555
9
3.4k
小説執筆のハーネスエンジニアリング
yoshitetsu
0
860
AndroidアプリとCopilot Studioの統合
nakasho
0
180
MySQL 9.7がやってきた ~これまでのあらすじと基本情報~ @ 日本MySQLユーザ会会2026年04月 / mysql97-yattekita
sakaik
0
120
今年注目する!データ分析プラットフォームでのAIの活用
nayuts
0
170
運用システムにおけるデータ活用とPlatform
sansantech
PRO
0
140
Google Cloud Next '26 の裏でこっそりリリースされたCloud Number Registry & Cloud Hub コスト分析 を試してみた
hikaru1001
0
120
Pure Intonation on Browser: Building a Sequencer with Ruby
nagachika
0
300
要件定義の精度を高めるための型と生成AIの活用 / Using Types and Generative AI to Improve the Accuracy of Requirements Definition
haru860
0
100
Route 53 Global Resolver で高額課金発生!
otanikohei2023
0
130
バイブコーディングで3倍早く⚪⚪を作ってみた
samakada
0
200
Featured
See All Featured
JAMstack: Web Apps at Ludicrous Speed - All Things Open 2022
reverentgeek
1
430
A Guide to Academic Writing Using Generative AI - A Workshop
ks91
PRO
1
280
DBのスキルで生き残る技術 - AI時代におけるテーブル設計の勘所
soudai
PRO
64
54k
Deep Space Network (abreviated)
tonyrice
0
130
Agile Leadership in an Agile Organization
kimpetersen
PRO
0
140
Imperfection Machines: The Place of Print at Facebook
scottboms
270
14k
Exploring the relationship between traditional SERPs and Gen AI search
raygrieselhuber
PRO
2
3.9k
Building a Modern Day E-commerce SEO Strategy
aleyda
45
9k
Six Lessons from altMBA
skipperchong
29
4.2k
Accessibility Awareness
sabderemane
1
110
How GitHub (no longer) Works
holman
316
150k
Conquering PDFs: document understanding beyond plain text
inesmontani
PRO
4
2.6k
Transcript
A statistically significant taxonomy.
Matt Jukes ..formerly known as ‘Head of Product, Office for
National Statistics’
Jonathan Porton ..formerly known as ‘UX Architect, Office for National
Statistics’
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
The Office for National Statistics is the UK’s largest independent
producer of official statistics. @jukesie @iauxbod
The website gets approximately 500,000 visitors per month. @jukesie @iauxbod
The website had approximately [shed loads] pages & documents. Publishing
an additional [boat loads] a week. @jukesie @iauxbod
The annual list of baby names is the single most
popular release. @jukesie @iauxbod
@jukesi e @jukesi e @jukesie
The site was called “..a national embarrassment” in the
Financial Times. @jukesie @iauxbod
@jukesi e According to the Parliamentary Administration Select Committee; “The
Office for National Statistics website makes figures hard to find and statistics are often presented in a confusing way..” @jukesie @iauxbod
A respondent to the website satisfaction survey ended their response
“The ONS website makes me want to cry..” @jukesie @iauxbod
The previous taxonomy for the website had 1400 categories that
went down five levels. @jukesie @iauxbod
A number of the categories were in fact empty and
reflected statistical publications that the ONS did not actually publish. @jukesie @iauxbod
The site search was referred to as like “..using
Google on LSD” @jukesie @iauxbod
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
We had to persuade a risk-averse organisation to trust us.
@jukesie @iauxbod
Outlined and agreed the approach and methodology with ONS methodology
team. @jukesie @iauxbod
Web analytics - analysis to identify patterns within the taxonomy
@jukesie @iauxbod
None
Previous research - reviewed every minute of every usability test
conducted on the website. Not the binge watch of choice! @jukesie @iauxbod
Competitor analysis - just as applicable as private sector organisations.
Lots of mini standardisations, but no real consistency @jukesie @iauxbod
Content audit - what was there, why was it there
and how the hell did it get there? Reviewed and consolidated structure and content. @jukesie @iauxbod
Card sort - closed, compromised and complicated. Yet still a
step forward. 200 participants, moderated and unmoderated. @jukesie @iauxbod
Tree tests - proposed vs status quo and benchmarking the
hell out of things. 100+ participants, moderated and unmoderated. Tested and iterated...a lot @jukesie @iauxbod
None
None
None
The new (not quite a) taxonomy for the website has
173 categories and three levels. @jukesie @iauxbod
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the
mouth. Mike Tyson
Real life gets in the way of implementing research no
matter how comprehensive. @jukesie @iauxbod
There was consensus as to what made up the main
navigation categories - unfortunately nobody agreed what fitted under them. @jukesie @iauxbod
Usability tests on live website show top level is essentially
surplus to requirements. Exposing the 2nd level makes the user’s life so much simpler! @jukesie @iauxbod
Content confuses as often as clarifies and specialised terminology is
a burden even to expert users. @jukesie @iauxbod
In removing friction from publishing we had failed to capture
sufficient metadata. This became a major issue. @jukesie @iauxbod
Internal politics creep back in and the requirements of the
‘business’ start to crowd out the needs of the user. @jukesie @iauxbod
If I had my time again...
None
It should have been an open card sort.
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
@jukesi e Thanks. @jukesie and @iauxbod