Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Statistically significant taxonomy
Search
Sponsored
·
Ship Features Fearlessly
Turn features on and off without deploys. Used by thousands of Ruby developers.
→
Matt Jukes
February 18, 2017
Technology
130
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Statistically significant taxonomy
Talk at World Information Architecture 2017 in Manchester by Jonathan Porton and myself.
Matt Jukes
February 18, 2017
More Decks by Matt Jukes
See All by Matt Jukes
Roadmaps and Missions for the Scottish Digital Academy
jukesie
0
1.2k
A ChatGTP Christmas Quiz
jukesie
0
400
Jukes - User Manual
jukesie
0
160
my adidas
jukesie
1
430
This is a team sport
jukesie
0
520
Working in the open works
jukesie
1
76
Digital is a team sport
jukesie
0
630
The importance of being open
jukesie
1
95
The Wrong Users?
jukesie
0
630
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
なぜ Platform Engineering の土台に Kubernetes を選ぶのか
r4ynode
1
570
地球に⽣きるAI —GeoAIと「中間領域」— / AI Living on Earth — GeoAI and the “Intermediate Layer” —
ykiyota
0
280
DevOps Agentで始めるAWS運用 〜フロンティアエージェントが変える運用の現場〜
nyankotaro
1
380
AGENTS.mdとSkillsで始めるAIエージェント活用
sonoda_mj
2
190
FinOps × AIエージェントで実現する コストインシデントの自動調査
oasis1994liveforever
0
120
プロダクト開発から業務改善コンサルまで。事業全体へ「染み出す」ことで広がるエンジニアの可能性
ham0215
0
100
200個のGitHubリポジトリを横断調査したかった
icck
0
110
2026TECHFRESH畢業分享會 - Lightning Talk - 打造精準高效的 MCP 設計模式與測試實務
line_developers_tw
PRO
0
770
Chainlitで作るお手軽チャットUI
ynt0485
0
190
2026TECHFRESH畢業分享會 - 原生還是跨平台? App 開發踩坑實錄
line_developers_tw
PRO
0
770
LLMと共に進化するプロセスを目指して
ymatsuwitter
12
4k
EventBridge Connection
_kensh
5
690
Featured
See All Featured
How to Think Like a Performance Engineer
csswizardry
28
2.6k
Agile Actions for Facilitating Distributed Teams - ADO2019
mkilby
0
200
The Cult of Friendly URLs
andyhume
79
6.9k
コードの90%をAIが書く世界で何が待っているのか / What awaits us in a world where 90% of the code is written by AI
rkaga
62
44k
Designing for Performance
lara
611
70k
GraphQLの誤解/rethinking-graphql
sonatard
75
12k
The Invisible Side of Design
smashingmag
302
52k
CoffeeScript is Beautiful & I Never Want to Write Plain JavaScript Again
sstephenson
162
16k
Fireside Chat
paigeccino
42
3.9k
DBのスキルで生き残る技術 - AI時代におけるテーブル設計の勘所
soudai
PRO
65
55k
It's Worth the Effort
3n
188
29k
実際に使うSQLの書き方 徹底解説 / pgcon21j-tutorial
soudai
PRO
201
75k
Transcript
A statistically significant taxonomy.
Matt Jukes ..formerly known as ‘Head of Product, Office for
National Statistics’
Jonathan Porton ..formerly known as ‘UX Architect, Office for National
Statistics’
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
The Office for National Statistics is the UK’s largest independent
producer of official statistics. @jukesie @iauxbod
The website gets approximately 500,000 visitors per month. @jukesie @iauxbod
The website had approximately [shed loads] pages & documents. Publishing
an additional [boat loads] a week. @jukesie @iauxbod
The annual list of baby names is the single most
popular release. @jukesie @iauxbod
@jukesi e @jukesi e @jukesie
The site was called “..a national embarrassment” in the
Financial Times. @jukesie @iauxbod
@jukesi e According to the Parliamentary Administration Select Committee; “The
Office for National Statistics website makes figures hard to find and statistics are often presented in a confusing way..” @jukesie @iauxbod
A respondent to the website satisfaction survey ended their response
“The ONS website makes me want to cry..” @jukesie @iauxbod
The previous taxonomy for the website had 1400 categories that
went down five levels. @jukesie @iauxbod
A number of the categories were in fact empty and
reflected statistical publications that the ONS did not actually publish. @jukesie @iauxbod
The site search was referred to as like “..using
Google on LSD” @jukesie @iauxbod
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
We had to persuade a risk-averse organisation to trust us.
@jukesie @iauxbod
Outlined and agreed the approach and methodology with ONS methodology
team. @jukesie @iauxbod
Web analytics - analysis to identify patterns within the taxonomy
@jukesie @iauxbod
None
Previous research - reviewed every minute of every usability test
conducted on the website. Not the binge watch of choice! @jukesie @iauxbod
Competitor analysis - just as applicable as private sector organisations.
Lots of mini standardisations, but no real consistency @jukesie @iauxbod
Content audit - what was there, why was it there
and how the hell did it get there? Reviewed and consolidated structure and content. @jukesie @iauxbod
Card sort - closed, compromised and complicated. Yet still a
step forward. 200 participants, moderated and unmoderated. @jukesie @iauxbod
Tree tests - proposed vs status quo and benchmarking the
hell out of things. 100+ participants, moderated and unmoderated. Tested and iterated...a lot @jukesie @iauxbod
None
None
None
The new (not quite a) taxonomy for the website has
173 categories and three levels. @jukesie @iauxbod
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the
mouth. Mike Tyson
Real life gets in the way of implementing research no
matter how comprehensive. @jukesie @iauxbod
There was consensus as to what made up the main
navigation categories - unfortunately nobody agreed what fitted under them. @jukesie @iauxbod
Usability tests on live website show top level is essentially
surplus to requirements. Exposing the 2nd level makes the user’s life so much simpler! @jukesie @iauxbod
Content confuses as often as clarifies and specialised terminology is
a burden even to expert users. @jukesie @iauxbod
In removing friction from publishing we had failed to capture
sufficient metadata. This became a major issue. @jukesie @iauxbod
Internal politics creep back in and the requirements of the
‘business’ start to crowd out the needs of the user. @jukesie @iauxbod
If I had my time again...
None
It should have been an open card sort.
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
@jukesi e Thanks. @jukesie and @iauxbod