Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Statistically significant taxonomy
Search
Sponsored
·
Ship Features Fearlessly
Turn features on and off without deploys. Used by thousands of Ruby developers.
→
Matt Jukes
February 18, 2017
Technology
0
130
Statistically significant taxonomy
Talk at World Information Architecture 2017 in Manchester by Jonathan Porton and myself.
Matt Jukes
February 18, 2017
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Matt Jukes
See All by Matt Jukes
Roadmaps and Missions for the Scottish Digital Academy
jukesie
0
1.2k
A ChatGTP Christmas Quiz
jukesie
0
390
Jukes - User Manual
jukesie
0
150
my adidas
jukesie
1
410
This is a team sport
jukesie
0
490
Working in the open works
jukesie
1
74
Digital is a team sport
jukesie
0
610
The importance of being open
jukesie
1
89
The Wrong Users?
jukesie
0
620
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
ブロックテーマでサイトをリニューアルした話 / 2026-01-31 Kansai WordPress Meetup
torounit
0
340
KubeCon + CloudNativeCon NA ‘25 Recap, Extensibility: Gateway API / NRI
ladicle
0
170
Vitest Highlights in Angular
rainerhahnekamp
0
120
SREの仕事を自動化する際にやっておきたい5つのポイント
jacopen
6
1.2k
30万人の同時アクセスに耐えたい!新サービスの盤石なリリースを支える負荷試験 / SRE Kaigi 2026
genda
1
110
しろおびセキュリティへ ようこそ
log0417
0
250
AI時代、1年目エンジニアの悩み
jin4
1
140
オープンウェイトのLLMリランカーを契約書で評価する / searchtechjp
sansan_randd
3
550
Tebiki Engineering Team Deck
tebiki
0
23k
Werner Vogelsが14年間 問い続けてきたこと
yusukeshimizu
2
300
Contract One Engineering Unit 紹介資料
sansan33
PRO
0
13k
クレジットカード決済基盤を支えるSRE - 厳格な監査とSRE運用の両立 (SRE Kaigi 2026)
capytan
6
1.8k
Featured
See All Featured
Side Projects
sachag
455
43k
Jess Joyce - The Pitfalls of Following Frameworks
techseoconnect
PRO
1
62
What's in a price? How to price your products and services
michaelherold
247
13k
Beyond borders and beyond the search box: How to win the global "messy middle" with AI-driven SEO
davidcarrasco
1
46
Paper Plane (Part 1)
katiecoart
PRO
0
3.8k
How to Build an AI Search Optimization Roadmap - Criteria and Steps to Take #SEOIRL
aleyda
1
1.9k
How to Talk to Developers About Accessibility
jct
2
120
Information Architects: The Missing Link in Design Systems
soysaucechin
0
750
Bootstrapping a Software Product
garrettdimon
PRO
307
120k
Rebuilding a faster, lazier Slack
samanthasiow
85
9.4k
Mobile First: as difficult as doing things right
swwweet
225
10k
WENDY [Excerpt]
tessaabrams
9
36k
Transcript
A statistically significant taxonomy.
Matt Jukes ..formerly known as ‘Head of Product, Office for
National Statistics’
Jonathan Porton ..formerly known as ‘UX Architect, Office for National
Statistics’
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
The Office for National Statistics is the UK’s largest independent
producer of official statistics. @jukesie @iauxbod
The website gets approximately 500,000 visitors per month. @jukesie @iauxbod
The website had approximately [shed loads] pages & documents. Publishing
an additional [boat loads] a week. @jukesie @iauxbod
The annual list of baby names is the single most
popular release. @jukesie @iauxbod
@jukesi e @jukesi e @jukesie
The site was called “..a national embarrassment” in the
Financial Times. @jukesie @iauxbod
@jukesi e According to the Parliamentary Administration Select Committee; “The
Office for National Statistics website makes figures hard to find and statistics are often presented in a confusing way..” @jukesie @iauxbod
A respondent to the website satisfaction survey ended their response
“The ONS website makes me want to cry..” @jukesie @iauxbod
The previous taxonomy for the website had 1400 categories that
went down five levels. @jukesie @iauxbod
A number of the categories were in fact empty and
reflected statistical publications that the ONS did not actually publish. @jukesie @iauxbod
The site search was referred to as like “..using
Google on LSD” @jukesie @iauxbod
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
We had to persuade a risk-averse organisation to trust us.
@jukesie @iauxbod
Outlined and agreed the approach and methodology with ONS methodology
team. @jukesie @iauxbod
Web analytics - analysis to identify patterns within the taxonomy
@jukesie @iauxbod
None
Previous research - reviewed every minute of every usability test
conducted on the website. Not the binge watch of choice! @jukesie @iauxbod
Competitor analysis - just as applicable as private sector organisations.
Lots of mini standardisations, but no real consistency @jukesie @iauxbod
Content audit - what was there, why was it there
and how the hell did it get there? Reviewed and consolidated structure and content. @jukesie @iauxbod
Card sort - closed, compromised and complicated. Yet still a
step forward. 200 participants, moderated and unmoderated. @jukesie @iauxbod
Tree tests - proposed vs status quo and benchmarking the
hell out of things. 100+ participants, moderated and unmoderated. Tested and iterated...a lot @jukesie @iauxbod
None
None
None
The new (not quite a) taxonomy for the website has
173 categories and three levels. @jukesie @iauxbod
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the
mouth. Mike Tyson
Real life gets in the way of implementing research no
matter how comprehensive. @jukesie @iauxbod
There was consensus as to what made up the main
navigation categories - unfortunately nobody agreed what fitted under them. @jukesie @iauxbod
Usability tests on live website show top level is essentially
surplus to requirements. Exposing the 2nd level makes the user’s life so much simpler! @jukesie @iauxbod
Content confuses as often as clarifies and specialised terminology is
a burden even to expert users. @jukesie @iauxbod
In removing friction from publishing we had failed to capture
sufficient metadata. This became a major issue. @jukesie @iauxbod
Internal politics creep back in and the requirements of the
‘business’ start to crowd out the needs of the user. @jukesie @iauxbod
If I had my time again...
None
It should have been an open card sort.
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
@jukesi e Thanks. @jukesie and @iauxbod