Upgrade to PRO for Only $50/Year—Limited-Time Offer! 🔥
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Statistically significant taxonomy
Search
Matt Jukes
February 18, 2017
Technology
0
130
Statistically significant taxonomy
Talk at World Information Architecture 2017 in Manchester by Jonathan Porton and myself.
Matt Jukes
February 18, 2017
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Matt Jukes
See All by Matt Jukes
Roadmaps and Missions for the Scottish Digital Academy
jukesie
0
1.2k
A ChatGTP Christmas Quiz
jukesie
0
360
Jukes - User Manual
jukesie
0
140
my adidas
jukesie
1
410
This is a team sport
jukesie
0
470
Working in the open works
jukesie
1
72
Digital is a team sport
jukesie
0
610
The importance of being open
jukesie
1
88
The Wrong Users?
jukesie
0
610
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
知っていると得する!Movable Type 9 の新機能を徹底解説
masakah
0
220
Microsoft Agent 365 を 30 分でなんとなく理解する
skmkzyk
1
410
計算機科学をRubyと歩む 〜DFA型正規表現エンジンをつくる~
ydah
3
100
MS Ignite 2025で発表されたFoundry IQをRecap
satodayo
3
240
タグ付きユニオン型を便利に使うテクニックとその注意点
uhyo
2
690
日本Rubyの会の構造と実行とあと何か / hokurikurk01
takahashim
4
710
Uncertainty in the LLM era - Science, more than scale
gaelvaroquaux
0
620
著者と読み解くAIエージェント現場導入の勘所 Lancers TechBook#2
smiyawaki0820
10
4.2k
手動から自動へ、そしてその先へ
moritamasami
0
230
Modern Data Stack大好きマンが語るSnowflakeの魅力
sagara
0
280
生成AI・AIエージェント時代、データサイエンティストは何をする人なのか?そして、今学生であるあなたは何を学ぶべきか?
kuri8ive
2
1.9k
All About Sansan – for New Global Engineers
sansan33
PRO
1
1.3k
Featured
See All Featured
How to Think Like a Performance Engineer
csswizardry
28
2.3k
Agile that works and the tools we love
rasmusluckow
331
21k
Designing Experiences People Love
moore
142
24k
RailsConf 2023
tenderlove
30
1.3k
Easily Structure & Communicate Ideas using Wireframe
afnizarnur
194
17k
Become a Pro
speakerdeck
PRO
30
5.7k
GraphQLの誤解/rethinking-graphql
sonatard
73
11k
Intergalactic Javascript Robots from Outer Space
tanoku
273
27k
A designer walks into a library…
pauljervisheath
210
24k
RailsConf & Balkan Ruby 2019: The Past, Present, and Future of Rails at GitHub
eileencodes
140
34k
Mobile First: as difficult as doing things right
swwweet
225
10k
The Art of Programming - Codeland 2020
erikaheidi
56
14k
Transcript
A statistically significant taxonomy.
Matt Jukes ..formerly known as ‘Head of Product, Office for
National Statistics’
Jonathan Porton ..formerly known as ‘UX Architect, Office for National
Statistics’
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
The Office for National Statistics is the UK’s largest independent
producer of official statistics. @jukesie @iauxbod
The website gets approximately 500,000 visitors per month. @jukesie @iauxbod
The website had approximately [shed loads] pages & documents. Publishing
an additional [boat loads] a week. @jukesie @iauxbod
The annual list of baby names is the single most
popular release. @jukesie @iauxbod
@jukesi e @jukesi e @jukesie
The site was called “..a national embarrassment” in the
Financial Times. @jukesie @iauxbod
@jukesi e According to the Parliamentary Administration Select Committee; “The
Office for National Statistics website makes figures hard to find and statistics are often presented in a confusing way..” @jukesie @iauxbod
A respondent to the website satisfaction survey ended their response
“The ONS website makes me want to cry..” @jukesie @iauxbod
The previous taxonomy for the website had 1400 categories that
went down five levels. @jukesie @iauxbod
A number of the categories were in fact empty and
reflected statistical publications that the ONS did not actually publish. @jukesie @iauxbod
The site search was referred to as like “..using
Google on LSD” @jukesie @iauxbod
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
We had to persuade a risk-averse organisation to trust us.
@jukesie @iauxbod
Outlined and agreed the approach and methodology with ONS methodology
team. @jukesie @iauxbod
Web analytics - analysis to identify patterns within the taxonomy
@jukesie @iauxbod
None
Previous research - reviewed every minute of every usability test
conducted on the website. Not the binge watch of choice! @jukesie @iauxbod
Competitor analysis - just as applicable as private sector organisations.
Lots of mini standardisations, but no real consistency @jukesie @iauxbod
Content audit - what was there, why was it there
and how the hell did it get there? Reviewed and consolidated structure and content. @jukesie @iauxbod
Card sort - closed, compromised and complicated. Yet still a
step forward. 200 participants, moderated and unmoderated. @jukesie @iauxbod
Tree tests - proposed vs status quo and benchmarking the
hell out of things. 100+ participants, moderated and unmoderated. Tested and iterated...a lot @jukesie @iauxbod
None
None
None
The new (not quite a) taxonomy for the website has
173 categories and three levels. @jukesie @iauxbod
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the
mouth. Mike Tyson
Real life gets in the way of implementing research no
matter how comprehensive. @jukesie @iauxbod
There was consensus as to what made up the main
navigation categories - unfortunately nobody agreed what fitted under them. @jukesie @iauxbod
Usability tests on live website show top level is essentially
surplus to requirements. Exposing the 2nd level makes the user’s life so much simpler! @jukesie @iauxbod
Content confuses as often as clarifies and specialised terminology is
a burden even to expert users. @jukesie @iauxbod
In removing friction from publishing we had failed to capture
sufficient metadata. This became a major issue. @jukesie @iauxbod
Internal politics creep back in and the requirements of the
‘business’ start to crowd out the needs of the user. @jukesie @iauxbod
If I had my time again...
None
It should have been an open card sort.
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
@jukesi e Thanks. @jukesie and @iauxbod