Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Statistically significant taxonomy
Search
Matt Jukes
February 18, 2017
Technology
130
0
Share
Statistically significant taxonomy
Talk at World Information Architecture 2017 in Manchester by Jonathan Porton and myself.
Matt Jukes
February 18, 2017
More Decks by Matt Jukes
See All by Matt Jukes
Roadmaps and Missions for the Scottish Digital Academy
jukesie
0
1.2k
A ChatGTP Christmas Quiz
jukesie
0
400
Jukes - User Manual
jukesie
0
150
my adidas
jukesie
1
430
This is a team sport
jukesie
0
510
Working in the open works
jukesie
1
75
Digital is a team sport
jukesie
0
620
The importance of being open
jukesie
1
94
The Wrong Users?
jukesie
0
630
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
情シスがMCP環境導入時に打ちのめされる認可の崖
oidfj
0
450
Python開発環境にハーネス適用を検討する
yuuka51
1
510
freee-mcpを Local→Remote で出してわかった MCP認可実装のリアル
terara
3
630
管理アカウント単一運用からAWS Organizationsに移行するの大変で滅
hiramax
0
240
なぜハノーバーメッセに行くべきなのか 〜初参加だから語れること〜
tanakaseiya
0
110
AI時代に求められる思考のパラダイムシフト
nrinetcom
PRO
1
150
AI時代に改めて考える、ドメイン駆動設計 - モデリングが「AIへの共通言語」になる
littlehands
7
2.4k
イベントで大活躍する電子ペーパー名札 〜その3〜 / ビジュアルプログラミングIoTLT vol.23
you
PRO
0
140
ルール・ロール・ツールを創る / Creating Rules, Roles and Tools
ks91
PRO
0
170
『家族アルバム みてね』における インシデント対応との向き合い方 / Approach incident response in Family Album
kohbis
2
190
責任あるソフトウェアエンジニアリングの紹介4章・5章 / RSE_Ch4-5
ido_kara_deru
0
340
AIAgentと取り組むKaggle
508shuto
2
560
Featured
See All Featured
Mind Mapping
helmedeiros
PRO
1
200
Navigating Team Friction
lara
192
16k
We Analyzed 250 Million AI Search Results: Here's What I Found
joshbly
1
1.3k
Stewardship and Sustainability of Urban and Community Forests
pwiseman
0
210
Data-driven link building: lessons from a $708K investment (BrightonSEO talk)
szymonslowik
1
1.1k
Fight the Zombie Pattern Library - RWD Summit 2016
marcelosomers
234
17k
How to train your dragon (web standard)
notwaldorf
97
6.6k
Visual Storytelling: How to be a Superhuman Communicator
reverentgeek
2
540
A Tale of Four Properties
chriscoyier
163
24k
Faster Mobile Websites
deanohume
310
31k
Unsuck your backbone
ammeep
672
58k
The Myth of the Modular Monolith - Day 2 Keynote - Rails World 2024
eileencodes
28
3.5k
Transcript
A statistically significant taxonomy.
Matt Jukes ..formerly known as ‘Head of Product, Office for
National Statistics’
Jonathan Porton ..formerly known as ‘UX Architect, Office for National
Statistics’
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
The Office for National Statistics is the UK’s largest independent
producer of official statistics. @jukesie @iauxbod
The website gets approximately 500,000 visitors per month. @jukesie @iauxbod
The website had approximately [shed loads] pages & documents. Publishing
an additional [boat loads] a week. @jukesie @iauxbod
The annual list of baby names is the single most
popular release. @jukesie @iauxbod
@jukesi e @jukesi e @jukesie
The site was called “..a national embarrassment” in the
Financial Times. @jukesie @iauxbod
@jukesi e According to the Parliamentary Administration Select Committee; “The
Office for National Statistics website makes figures hard to find and statistics are often presented in a confusing way..” @jukesie @iauxbod
A respondent to the website satisfaction survey ended their response
“The ONS website makes me want to cry..” @jukesie @iauxbod
The previous taxonomy for the website had 1400 categories that
went down five levels. @jukesie @iauxbod
A number of the categories were in fact empty and
reflected statistical publications that the ONS did not actually publish. @jukesie @iauxbod
The site search was referred to as like “..using
Google on LSD” @jukesie @iauxbod
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
We had to persuade a risk-averse organisation to trust us.
@jukesie @iauxbod
Outlined and agreed the approach and methodology with ONS methodology
team. @jukesie @iauxbod
Web analytics - analysis to identify patterns within the taxonomy
@jukesie @iauxbod
None
Previous research - reviewed every minute of every usability test
conducted on the website. Not the binge watch of choice! @jukesie @iauxbod
Competitor analysis - just as applicable as private sector organisations.
Lots of mini standardisations, but no real consistency @jukesie @iauxbod
Content audit - what was there, why was it there
and how the hell did it get there? Reviewed and consolidated structure and content. @jukesie @iauxbod
Card sort - closed, compromised and complicated. Yet still a
step forward. 200 participants, moderated and unmoderated. @jukesie @iauxbod
Tree tests - proposed vs status quo and benchmarking the
hell out of things. 100+ participants, moderated and unmoderated. Tested and iterated...a lot @jukesie @iauxbod
None
None
None
The new (not quite a) taxonomy for the website has
173 categories and three levels. @jukesie @iauxbod
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the
mouth. Mike Tyson
Real life gets in the way of implementing research no
matter how comprehensive. @jukesie @iauxbod
There was consensus as to what made up the main
navigation categories - unfortunately nobody agreed what fitted under them. @jukesie @iauxbod
Usability tests on live website show top level is essentially
surplus to requirements. Exposing the 2nd level makes the user’s life so much simpler! @jukesie @iauxbod
Content confuses as often as clarifies and specialised terminology is
a burden even to expert users. @jukesie @iauxbod
In removing friction from publishing we had failed to capture
sufficient metadata. This became a major issue. @jukesie @iauxbod
Internal politics creep back in and the requirements of the
‘business’ start to crowd out the needs of the user. @jukesie @iauxbod
If I had my time again...
None
It should have been an open card sort.
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
@jukesi e Thanks. @jukesie and @iauxbod