Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Statistically significant taxonomy
Search
Matt Jukes
February 18, 2017
Technology
0
130
Statistically significant taxonomy
Talk at World Information Architecture 2017 in Manchester by Jonathan Porton and myself.
Matt Jukes
February 18, 2017
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Matt Jukes
See All by Matt Jukes
Roadmaps and Missions for the Scottish Digital Academy
jukesie
0
1.1k
A ChatGTP Christmas Quiz
jukesie
0
330
Jukes - User Manual
jukesie
0
120
my adidas
jukesie
1
380
This is a team sport
jukesie
0
400
Working in the open works
jukesie
1
67
Digital is a team sport
jukesie
0
570
The importance of being open
jukesie
1
86
The Wrong Users?
jukesie
0
570
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
データ資産をシームレスに伝達するためのイベント駆動型アーキテクチャ
kakehashi
PRO
2
550
開発スピードは上がっている…品質はどうする? スピードと品質を両立させるためのプロダクト開発の進め方とは #DevSumi #DevSumiB / Agile And Quality
nihonbuson
2
3k
個人開発から公式機能へ: PlaywrightとRailsをつなげた3年の軌跡
yusukeiwaki
11
3k
転生CISOサバイバル・ガイド / CISO Career Transition Survival Guide
kanny
3
1k
利用終了したドメイン名の最強終活〜観測環境を育てて、分析・供養している件〜 / The Ultimate End-of-Life Preparation for Discontinued Domain Names
nttcom
2
200
Developer Summit 2025 [14-D-1] Yuki Hattori
yuhattor
19
6.2k
一度 Expo の採用を断念したけど、 再度 Expo の導入を検討している話
ichiki1023
1
170
Platform Engineeringは自由のめまい
nwiizo
4
2.1k
技術的負債解消の取り組みと専門チームのお話 #技術的負債_Findy
bengo4com
1
1.3k
CZII - CryoET Object Identification 参加振り返り・解法共有
tattaka
0
380
7日間でハッキングをはじめる本をはじめてみませんか?_ITエンジニア本大賞2025
nomizone
2
1.8k
RSNA2024振り返り
nanachi
0
580
Featured
See All Featured
How GitHub (no longer) Works
holman
314
140k
Embracing the Ebb and Flow
colly
84
4.6k
Practical Tips for Bootstrapping Information Extraction Pipelines
honnibal
PRO
12
960
CSS Pre-Processors: Stylus, Less & Sass
bermonpainter
356
29k
GraphQLの誤解/rethinking-graphql
sonatard
68
10k
Java REST API Framework Comparison - PWX 2021
mraible
28
8.4k
Fontdeck: Realign not Redesign
paulrobertlloyd
83
5.4k
Measuring & Analyzing Core Web Vitals
bluesmoon
6
240
Large-scale JavaScript Application Architecture
addyosmani
511
110k
Building Better People: How to give real-time feedback that sticks.
wjessup
367
19k
The Cult of Friendly URLs
andyhume
78
6.2k
GitHub's CSS Performance
jonrohan
1030
460k
Transcript
A statistically significant taxonomy.
Matt Jukes ..formerly known as ‘Head of Product, Office for
National Statistics’
Jonathan Porton ..formerly known as ‘UX Architect, Office for National
Statistics’
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
The Office for National Statistics is the UK’s largest independent
producer of official statistics. @jukesie @iauxbod
The website gets approximately 500,000 visitors per month. @jukesie @iauxbod
The website had approximately [shed loads] pages & documents. Publishing
an additional [boat loads] a week. @jukesie @iauxbod
The annual list of baby names is the single most
popular release. @jukesie @iauxbod
@jukesi e @jukesi e @jukesie
The site was called “..a national embarrassment” in the
Financial Times. @jukesie @iauxbod
@jukesi e According to the Parliamentary Administration Select Committee; “The
Office for National Statistics website makes figures hard to find and statistics are often presented in a confusing way..” @jukesie @iauxbod
A respondent to the website satisfaction survey ended their response
“The ONS website makes me want to cry..” @jukesie @iauxbod
The previous taxonomy for the website had 1400 categories that
went down five levels. @jukesie @iauxbod
A number of the categories were in fact empty and
reflected statistical publications that the ONS did not actually publish. @jukesie @iauxbod
The site search was referred to as like “..using
Google on LSD” @jukesie @iauxbod
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
We had to persuade a risk-averse organisation to trust us.
@jukesie @iauxbod
Outlined and agreed the approach and methodology with ONS methodology
team. @jukesie @iauxbod
Web analytics - analysis to identify patterns within the taxonomy
@jukesie @iauxbod
None
Previous research - reviewed every minute of every usability test
conducted on the website. Not the binge watch of choice! @jukesie @iauxbod
Competitor analysis - just as applicable as private sector organisations.
Lots of mini standardisations, but no real consistency @jukesie @iauxbod
Content audit - what was there, why was it there
and how the hell did it get there? Reviewed and consolidated structure and content. @jukesie @iauxbod
Card sort - closed, compromised and complicated. Yet still a
step forward. 200 participants, moderated and unmoderated. @jukesie @iauxbod
Tree tests - proposed vs status quo and benchmarking the
hell out of things. 100+ participants, moderated and unmoderated. Tested and iterated...a lot @jukesie @iauxbod
None
None
None
The new (not quite a) taxonomy for the website has
173 categories and three levels. @jukesie @iauxbod
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the
mouth. Mike Tyson
Real life gets in the way of implementing research no
matter how comprehensive. @jukesie @iauxbod
There was consensus as to what made up the main
navigation categories - unfortunately nobody agreed what fitted under them. @jukesie @iauxbod
Usability tests on live website show top level is essentially
surplus to requirements. Exposing the 2nd level makes the user’s life so much simpler! @jukesie @iauxbod
Content confuses as often as clarifies and specialised terminology is
a burden even to expert users. @jukesie @iauxbod
In removing friction from publishing we had failed to capture
sufficient metadata. This became a major issue. @jukesie @iauxbod
Internal politics creep back in and the requirements of the
‘business’ start to crowd out the needs of the user. @jukesie @iauxbod
If I had my time again...
None
It should have been an open card sort.
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
@jukesi e Thanks. @jukesie and @iauxbod