Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Statistically significant taxonomy
Search
Matt Jukes
February 18, 2017
Technology
140
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Statistically significant taxonomy
Talk at World Information Architecture 2017 in Manchester by Jonathan Porton and myself.
Matt Jukes
February 18, 2017
More Decks by Matt Jukes
See All by Matt Jukes
Roadmaps and Missions for the Scottish Digital Academy
jukesie
0
1.3k
A ChatGTP Christmas Quiz
jukesie
0
410
Jukes - User Manual
jukesie
0
160
my adidas
jukesie
1
440
This is a team sport
jukesie
0
530
Working in the open works
jukesie
1
76
Digital is a team sport
jukesie
0
640
The importance of being open
jukesie
1
95
The Wrong Users?
jukesie
0
630
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
CloudWatchから始めるAWS監視
butadora
0
320
『三匹の子ぶた』から学ぶネットワークセキュリティの昔と今 / Network Security: Then and Now Through the Lens of The Three Little Pigs
nttcom
1
1.6k
【CEDEC2026】次世代デジタルカードゲームのサーバー設計と運用 〜『Shadowverse: Worlds Beyond』の舞台裏~
cygames
PRO
0
590
OSPN.JPバージョンアップ作業進捗のご報告 / 20260801-osc26kyoto
akkiesoft
0
210
検索技術知識0のエンジニアが広告検索システムを内製化して運用するまで
lycorptech_jp
PRO
0
210
コンポーネント名には何を含めるべきなのか? / what-should-be-included-in-component-names
airrnot1106
0
250
メルカリのグローバルアプリで挑んだ AlloyDB 運用と課題解決の実践記
hatappi
0
110
[しろおび夏祭り2026] チャットするAIから、作業するAIへ - 使われ方の変化と、その裏側で起きていること
kk0n
0
1.5k
個人OSSが、机の上から世界に広がるまでの話
shinyasaita
1
330
A Bag-of-Documents Model for Query Specificity
dtunkelang
0
210
SmartHR Engineering Team Deck
smarthr
0
170
Issue設計から始める仕様駆動開発 / 20260731 Mizuki Hirata
shift_evolve
PRO
1
120
Featured
See All Featured
Exploring the relationship between traditional SERPs and Gen AI search
raygrieselhuber
PRO
2
4.2k
YesSQL, Process and Tooling at Scale
rocio
174
15k
Jamie Indigo - Trashchat’s Guide to Black Boxes: Technical SEO Tactics for LLMs
techseoconnect
PRO
0
560
Documentation Writing (for coders)
carmenintech
77
5.4k
Taking LLMs out of the black box: A practical guide to human-in-the-loop distillation
inesmontani
PRO
3
2.3k
Building AI with AI
inesmontani
PRO
1
1.1k
From π to Pie charts
rasagy
0
240
The agentic SEO stack - context over prompts
schlessera
0
860
First, design no harm
axbom
PRO
2
1.2k
The Pragmatic Product Professional
lauravandoore
37
7.4k
svc-hook: hooking system calls on ARM64 by binary rewriting
retrage
2
430
CSS Pre-Processors: Stylus, Less & Sass
bermonpainter
360
30k
Transcript
A statistically significant taxonomy.
Matt Jukes ..formerly known as ‘Head of Product, Office for
National Statistics’
Jonathan Porton ..formerly known as ‘UX Architect, Office for National
Statistics’
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
The Office for National Statistics is the UK’s largest independent
producer of official statistics. @jukesie @iauxbod
The website gets approximately 500,000 visitors per month. @jukesie @iauxbod
The website had approximately [shed loads] pages & documents. Publishing
an additional [boat loads] a week. @jukesie @iauxbod
The annual list of baby names is the single most
popular release. @jukesie @iauxbod
@jukesi e @jukesi e @jukesie
The site was called “..a national embarrassment” in the
Financial Times. @jukesie @iauxbod
@jukesi e According to the Parliamentary Administration Select Committee; “The
Office for National Statistics website makes figures hard to find and statistics are often presented in a confusing way..” @jukesie @iauxbod
A respondent to the website satisfaction survey ended their response
“The ONS website makes me want to cry..” @jukesie @iauxbod
The previous taxonomy for the website had 1400 categories that
went down five levels. @jukesie @iauxbod
A number of the categories were in fact empty and
reflected statistical publications that the ONS did not actually publish. @jukesie @iauxbod
The site search was referred to as like “..using
Google on LSD” @jukesie @iauxbod
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
We had to persuade a risk-averse organisation to trust us.
@jukesie @iauxbod
Outlined and agreed the approach and methodology with ONS methodology
team. @jukesie @iauxbod
Web analytics - analysis to identify patterns within the taxonomy
@jukesie @iauxbod
None
Previous research - reviewed every minute of every usability test
conducted on the website. Not the binge watch of choice! @jukesie @iauxbod
Competitor analysis - just as applicable as private sector organisations.
Lots of mini standardisations, but no real consistency @jukesie @iauxbod
Content audit - what was there, why was it there
and how the hell did it get there? Reviewed and consolidated structure and content. @jukesie @iauxbod
Card sort - closed, compromised and complicated. Yet still a
step forward. 200 participants, moderated and unmoderated. @jukesie @iauxbod
Tree tests - proposed vs status quo and benchmarking the
hell out of things. 100+ participants, moderated and unmoderated. Tested and iterated...a lot @jukesie @iauxbod
None
None
None
The new (not quite a) taxonomy for the website has
173 categories and three levels. @jukesie @iauxbod
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the
mouth. Mike Tyson
Real life gets in the way of implementing research no
matter how comprehensive. @jukesie @iauxbod
There was consensus as to what made up the main
navigation categories - unfortunately nobody agreed what fitted under them. @jukesie @iauxbod
Usability tests on live website show top level is essentially
surplus to requirements. Exposing the 2nd level makes the user’s life so much simpler! @jukesie @iauxbod
Content confuses as often as clarifies and specialised terminology is
a burden even to expert users. @jukesie @iauxbod
In removing friction from publishing we had failed to capture
sufficient metadata. This became a major issue. @jukesie @iauxbod
Internal politics creep back in and the requirements of the
‘business’ start to crowd out the needs of the user. @jukesie @iauxbod
If I had my time again...
None
It should have been an open card sort.
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
@jukesi e Thanks. @jukesie and @iauxbod