Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Statistically significant taxonomy

Matt Jukes
February 18, 2017

Statistically significant taxonomy

Talk at World Information Architecture 2017 in Manchester by Jonathan Porton and myself.

Matt Jukes

February 18, 2017
Tweet

More Decks by Matt Jukes

Other Decks in Technology

Transcript

  1. The Office for National Statistics is the UK’s largest independent

    producer of official statistics. @jukesie @iauxbod
  2. The website had approximately [shed loads] pages & documents. Publishing

    an additional 
 [boat loads] a week. @jukesie @iauxbod
  3. The annual list of baby names is the single most

    popular release. @jukesie @iauxbod
  4. @jukesi e According to the Parliamentary Administration Select Committee;
 “The

    Office for National Statistics website makes figures hard to find and statistics are often presented in a confusing way..”
 
 @jukesie @iauxbod
  5. A respondent to the website satisfaction survey ended their response


    “The ONS website makes me want to cry..”
 
 @jukesie @iauxbod
  6. The previous taxonomy for the website had 1400 categories that

    went down five levels.
 
 @jukesie @iauxbod
  7. A number of the categories were in fact empty and

    reflected statistical publications that the ONS did not actually publish.
 
 @jukesie @iauxbod
  8. The site search was referred to as like 
 “..using

    Google on LSD”
 
 @jukesie @iauxbod
  9. Previous research - reviewed every minute of every usability test

    conducted on the website. Not the binge watch of choice!
 @jukesie @iauxbod
  10. Competitor analysis - just as applicable as private sector organisations.

    Lots of mini standardisations, but no real consistency @jukesie @iauxbod
  11. Content audit - what was there, why was it there

    and how the hell did it get there? Reviewed and consolidated structure and content. @jukesie @iauxbod
  12. Card sort - closed, compromised and complicated. Yet still a

    step forward. 200 participants, moderated and unmoderated.
 
 @jukesie @iauxbod
  13. Tree tests - proposed vs status quo and benchmarking the

    hell out of things. 100+ participants, moderated and unmoderated. Tested and iterated...a lot
 
 @jukesie @iauxbod
  14. The new (not quite a) taxonomy for the website has

    173 categories and three levels.
 
 @jukesie @iauxbod
  15. Real life gets in the way of implementing research no

    matter how comprehensive.
 
 @jukesie @iauxbod
  16. There was consensus as to what made up the main

    navigation categories - unfortunately nobody agreed what fitted under them.
 @jukesie @iauxbod
  17. Usability tests on live website show top level is essentially

    surplus to requirements. Exposing the 2nd level makes the user’s life so much simpler! @jukesie @iauxbod
  18. Content confuses as often as clarifies and specialised terminology is

    a burden even to expert users. 
 
 @jukesie @iauxbod
  19. In removing friction from publishing we had failed to capture

    sufficient metadata. This became a major issue.
 
 @jukesie @iauxbod
  20. Internal politics creep back in and the requirements of the

    ‘business’ start to crowd out the needs of the user.
 
 @jukesie @iauxbod