Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Statistically significant taxonomy
Search
Sponsored
·
Ship Features Fearlessly
Turn features on and off without deploys. Used by thousands of Ruby developers.
→
Matt Jukes
February 18, 2017
Technology
0
130
Statistically significant taxonomy
Talk at World Information Architecture 2017 in Manchester by Jonathan Porton and myself.
Matt Jukes
February 18, 2017
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Matt Jukes
See All by Matt Jukes
Roadmaps and Missions for the Scottish Digital Academy
jukesie
0
1.2k
A ChatGTP Christmas Quiz
jukesie
0
390
Jukes - User Manual
jukesie
0
150
my adidas
jukesie
1
410
This is a team sport
jukesie
0
490
Working in the open works
jukesie
1
74
Digital is a team sport
jukesie
0
610
The importance of being open
jukesie
1
89
The Wrong Users?
jukesie
0
620
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
広告の効果検証を題材にした因果推論の精度検証について
zozotech
PRO
0
170
AIエージェントを開発しよう!-AgentCore活用の勘所-
yukiogawa
0
160
SREが向き合う大規模リアーキテクチャ 〜信頼性とアジリティの両立〜
zepprix
0
450
AWS Network Firewall Proxyを触ってみた
nagisa53
1
230
マーケットプレイス版Oracle WebCenter Content For OCI
oracle4engineer
PRO
5
1.6k
SREチームをどう作り、どう育てるか ― Findy横断SREのマネジメント
rvirus0817
0
240
顧客の言葉を、そのまま信じない勇気
yamatai1212
1
350
Context Engineeringが企業で不可欠になる理由
hirosatogamo
PRO
3
580
Bill One 開発エンジニア 紹介資料
sansan33
PRO
4
17k
生成AIを活用した音声文字起こしシステムの2つの構築パターンについて
miu_crescent
PRO
2
200
プロダクト成長を支える開発基盤とスケールに伴う課題
yuu26
4
1.3k
All About Sansan – for New Global Engineers
sansan33
PRO
1
1.3k
Featured
See All Featured
CSS Pre-Processors: Stylus, Less & Sass
bermonpainter
359
30k
How to Grow Your eCommerce with AI & Automation
katarinadahlin
PRO
0
110
It's Worth the Effort
3n
188
29k
XXLCSS - How to scale CSS and keep your sanity
sugarenia
249
1.3M
Why Mistakes Are the Best Teachers: Turning Failure into a Pathway for Growth
auna
0
51
GraphQLの誤解/rethinking-graphql
sonatard
74
11k
Leading Effective Engineering Teams in the AI Era
addyosmani
9
1.6k
AI in Enterprises - Java and Open Source to the Rescue
ivargrimstad
0
1.1k
Practical Orchestrator
shlominoach
191
11k
A better future with KSS
kneath
240
18k
How to build a perfect <img>
jonoalderson
1
4.9k
Money Talks: Using Revenue to Get Sh*t Done
nikkihalliwell
0
150
Transcript
A statistically significant taxonomy.
Matt Jukes ..formerly known as ‘Head of Product, Office for
National Statistics’
Jonathan Porton ..formerly known as ‘UX Architect, Office for National
Statistics’
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
The Office for National Statistics is the UK’s largest independent
producer of official statistics. @jukesie @iauxbod
The website gets approximately 500,000 visitors per month. @jukesie @iauxbod
The website had approximately [shed loads] pages & documents. Publishing
an additional [boat loads] a week. @jukesie @iauxbod
The annual list of baby names is the single most
popular release. @jukesie @iauxbod
@jukesi e @jukesi e @jukesie
The site was called “..a national embarrassment” in the
Financial Times. @jukesie @iauxbod
@jukesi e According to the Parliamentary Administration Select Committee; “The
Office for National Statistics website makes figures hard to find and statistics are often presented in a confusing way..” @jukesie @iauxbod
A respondent to the website satisfaction survey ended their response
“The ONS website makes me want to cry..” @jukesie @iauxbod
The previous taxonomy for the website had 1400 categories that
went down five levels. @jukesie @iauxbod
A number of the categories were in fact empty and
reflected statistical publications that the ONS did not actually publish. @jukesie @iauxbod
The site search was referred to as like “..using
Google on LSD” @jukesie @iauxbod
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
We had to persuade a risk-averse organisation to trust us.
@jukesie @iauxbod
Outlined and agreed the approach and methodology with ONS methodology
team. @jukesie @iauxbod
Web analytics - analysis to identify patterns within the taxonomy
@jukesie @iauxbod
None
Previous research - reviewed every minute of every usability test
conducted on the website. Not the binge watch of choice! @jukesie @iauxbod
Competitor analysis - just as applicable as private sector organisations.
Lots of mini standardisations, but no real consistency @jukesie @iauxbod
Content audit - what was there, why was it there
and how the hell did it get there? Reviewed and consolidated structure and content. @jukesie @iauxbod
Card sort - closed, compromised and complicated. Yet still a
step forward. 200 participants, moderated and unmoderated. @jukesie @iauxbod
Tree tests - proposed vs status quo and benchmarking the
hell out of things. 100+ participants, moderated and unmoderated. Tested and iterated...a lot @jukesie @iauxbod
None
None
None
The new (not quite a) taxonomy for the website has
173 categories and three levels. @jukesie @iauxbod
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the
mouth. Mike Tyson
Real life gets in the way of implementing research no
matter how comprehensive. @jukesie @iauxbod
There was consensus as to what made up the main
navigation categories - unfortunately nobody agreed what fitted under them. @jukesie @iauxbod
Usability tests on live website show top level is essentially
surplus to requirements. Exposing the 2nd level makes the user’s life so much simpler! @jukesie @iauxbod
Content confuses as often as clarifies and specialised terminology is
a burden even to expert users. @jukesie @iauxbod
In removing friction from publishing we had failed to capture
sufficient metadata. This became a major issue. @jukesie @iauxbod
Internal politics creep back in and the requirements of the
‘business’ start to crowd out the needs of the user. @jukesie @iauxbod
If I had my time again...
None
It should have been an open card sort.
1.What we faced 2.What we did 3.What we learned 4.Questions
@jukesi e Thanks. @jukesie and @iauxbod