Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
How to Make Causal Inferences with Time-Series ...
Search
Sponsored
·
Your Podcast. Everywhere. Effortlessly.
Share. Educate. Inspire. Entertain. You do you. We'll handle the rest.
→
Matthew Blackwell
April 13, 2013
Science
2
210
How to Make Causal Inferences with Time-Series Cross-Sectional Data
Matthew Blackwell
April 13, 2013
Tweet
Share
Other Decks in Science
See All in Science
Performance Evaluation and Ranking of Drivers in Multiple Motorsports Using Massey’s Method
konakalab
0
160
PPIのみを用いたAIによる薬剤–遺伝子–疾患 相互作用の同定
tagtag
PRO
0
190
SpatialRDDパッケージによる空間回帰不連続デザイン
saltcooky12
0
180
タンパク質間相互作⽤を利⽤した⼈⼯知能による新しい薬剤遺伝⼦-疾患相互作⽤の同定
tagtag
PRO
0
170
Amusing Abliteration
ianozsvald
0
120
蔵本モデルが解き明かす同期と相転移の秘密 〜拍手のリズムはなぜ揃うのか?〜
syotasasaki593876
1
230
イロレーティングを活用した関東大学サッカーの定量的実力評価 / A quantitative performance evaluation of Kanto University Football Association using Elo rating
konakalab
0
210
シャボン玉の虹から原子も地震も重力も見える! 〜 物理の目「干渉縞」のすごい力 〜
syotasasaki593876
1
110
白金鉱業Meetup_Vol.20 効果検証ことはじめ / Introduction to Impact Evaluation
brainpadpr
2
1.7k
次代のデータサイエンティストへ~スキルチェックリスト、タスクリスト更新~
datascientistsociety
PRO
3
30k
academist Prize 4期生 研究トーク延長戦!「美は世界を救う」っていうけど、どうやって?
jimpe_hitsuwari
0
490
2025-05-31-pycon_italia
sofievl
0
150
Featured
See All Featured
Refactoring Trust on Your Teams (GOTO; Chicago 2020)
rmw
35
3.4k
<Decoding/> the Language of Devs - We Love SEO 2024
nikkihalliwell
1
150
Stop Working from a Prison Cell
hatefulcrawdad
274
21k
Beyond borders and beyond the search box: How to win the global "messy middle" with AI-driven SEO
davidcarrasco
3
66
Mobile First: as difficult as doing things right
swwweet
225
10k
Are puppies a ranking factor?
jonoalderson
1
3.1k
Un-Boring Meetings
codingconduct
0
220
The SEO Collaboration Effect
kristinabergwall1
0
380
The World Runs on Bad Software
bkeepers
PRO
72
12k
4 Signs Your Business is Dying
shpigford
187
22k
The Success of Rails: Ensuring Growth for the Next 100 Years
eileencodes
47
8k
Building a Scalable Design System with Sketch
lauravandoore
463
34k
Transcript
How to Make Causal Inferences with Time-Series Cross-Sectional Data Matthew
Blackwell University of Rochester Adam Glynn Harvard University
How to Make Causal Inferences with Time-Series Cross-Sectional Data
How to Make Causal Inferences with Time-Series Cross-Sectional Data Very
Carefully.
How to Make Causal Inferences with Time-Series Cross-Sectional Data Using
weights.
ۺ˞ ۢ˞ ۹˞ ۢ ۹ ۺ
What is the effect of A on Y? ۺ˞ ۢ˞
۹˞ ۢ ۹ ۺ
What is the effect of A on Y? contemporaneous ۺ˞
ۢ˞ ۹˞ ۢ ۹ ۺ
What is the effect of A on Y? treatment history
ۺ˞ ۢ˞ ۹˞ ۢ ۹ ۺ
Shouldn't we have more notation?
ۢ ۢ Ɛ ۢ Treatment history
Shouldn't we have more notation?
ۢ ۢ Ɛ ۢ Treatment history
Shouldn't we have more notation? Specific instance of a treatment history ۼ ۼ Ɛ ۼ
ۢ ۢ Ɛ ۢ Treatment history
ۺ ۼ Potential outcomes Shouldn't we have more notation? Specific instance of a treatment history ۼ ۼ Ɛ ۼ
The effect of history
The effect of history ণ ۼ ۼƓ
ۦ=ۺ ۼ ˞ ۺ ۼƓ ? Average Treatment History Effect
The effect of history ণ ۼ ۼƓ
ۦ=ۺ ۼ ˞ ۺ ۼƓ ? Average Treatment History Effect ATHE
The effect of history ণ ۼ ۼƓ
ۦ=ۺ ۼ ˞ ۺ ۼƓ ? Average Treatment History Effect 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ATHE
The effect of history ণ ۼ ۼƓ
ۦ=ۺ ۼ ˞ ۺ ۼƓ ? Average Treatment History Effect 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 vs ATHE
The effect of history
The effect of history Blip Effect ণ۽ ۼ ˞
ۦ=ۺ ۼ ˞ ˞ ۺ ۼ ˞ ?
The effect of history 1 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 vs 0 0 0 0 0 0 Blip Effect ণ۽ ۼ ˞ ۦ=ۺ ۼ ˞ ˞ ۺ ۼ ˞ ?
The effect of history 1 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 vs 0 0 0 0 0 0 Blip Effect ণ۽ ۼ ˞ ۦ=ۺ ۼ ˞ ˞ ۺ ۼ ˞ ?
The effect of history 1 0 0 0 0 vs
0 0 0 1 1 1 Blip Effect ণ۽ ۼ ˞ ۦ=ۺ ۼ ˞ ˞ ۺ ۼ ˞ ? 1 1 1
The effect of history 1 0 vs 1 1 1
Blip Effect ণ۽ ۼ ˞ ۦ=ۺ ۼ ˞ ˞ ۺ ۼ ˞ ? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
The effect of history
The effect of history Contemporaneous Effect of Treatment ণ
ۦ=ণ۽ ۼ ˞ ?
The effect of history Contemporaneous Effect of Treatment ণ
ۦ=ণ۽ ۼ ˞ ? CET
The effect of history 1 0 vs Contemporaneous Effect of
Treatment ণ ۦ=ণ۽ ۼ ˞ ? CET
The effect of history 1 0 vs Contemporaneous Effect of
Treatment ণ ۦ=ণ۽ ۼ ˞ ? CET Marginalize over the past
TSCS data under sequential ignorability Treatment is unrelated to the
potential outcomes ...conditional on the covariate history. ۺ ۼ е е ۢ ^۹ ۺ ˞ ۢ ܃˞ ۼ ˞
How conditioning leads you astray
How conditioning leads you astray ...for some questions.
How conditioning leads you astray ...for some questions. ۺ
૿ ۢ ଁ ۹ ଂ ۺ˞ ଃ ۢ˞
ۺ˞ ۢ˞ ۢ ۹ ۺ How conditioning leads you astray
...for some questions. ۺ ૿ ۢ ଁ ۹ ଂ ۺ˞ ଃ ۢ˞
ۺ˞ ۢ˞ ۢ ۹ ۺ How conditioning leads you astray
...for some questions. We “fix” these ۺ ૿ ۢ ଁ ۹ ଂ ۺ˞ ଃ ۢ˞
ۺ˞ ۢ˞ ۢ ۹ ۺ How conditioning leads you astray
...for some questions. We “fix” these ۺ ૿ ۢ ଁ ۹ ଂ ۺ˞ ଃ ۢ˞
ۺ˞ ۢ˞ ۢ ۹ ۺ How conditioning leads you astray
We “fix” these ...for some questions. ۺ ૿ ۢ ଁ ۹ ଂ ۺ˞ ଃ ۢ˞
ۺ˞ ۢ˞ ۢ ۹ ۺ How conditioning leads you astray
...for some questions. ۺ ૿ ۢ ଁ ۹ ଂ ۺ˞ ଃ ۢ˞
ۺ˞ ۢ˞ ۢ ۹ ۺ How conditioning leads you astray
এ૾ ...for some questions. ۺ ૿ ۢ ଁ ۹ ଂ ۺ˞ ଃ ۢ˞
ۺ˞ ۢ˞ ۢ ۹ ۺ How conditioning leads you astray
এ૾ ? ? ? ? ? ? ...for some questions. ۺ ૿ ۢ ଁ ۹ ଂ ۺ˞ ଃ ۢ˞
ۺ˞ ۢ˞ ۢ ۹ ۺ How conditioning leads you astray
এ૾ ? ? ? ? ? ? ...for some questions. CET: (1,0) vs (0,0) ATHE: (0,1) vs (0,0) ATHE: (1,1) vs (0,0) এ૾ ̪ এଁ ̪ এ૾ এଁ ۺ ૿ ۢ ଁ ۹ ଂ ۺ˞ ଃ ۢ˞
How weighting can help
ۺ˞ ۢ˞ ۢ ۹ ۺ How weighting can help
ۺ˞ ۢ˞ ۢ ۹ ۺ How weighting can help ۸܃
ಿ ܍ 2T=ۢ܃܍ ^ۢ˞ ۹ ۺ˞ ?
ۺ˞ ۢ˞ ۢ ۹ ۺ How weighting can help ۸܃
ಿ ܍ 2T=ۢ܃܍ ^ۢ˞ ۹ ۺ˞ ? We weight to create balance
ۺ˞ ۢ˞ ۢ ۹ ۺ How weighting can help We
weight to create balance ۸܃ ಿ ܍ 2T=ۢ܃܍ ^ۢ˞ ۹ ۺ˞ ?
ۺ˞ ۢ˞ ۢ ۹ ۺ How weighting can help ۸܃
ಿ ܍ 2T=ۢ܃܍ ^ۢ˞ ۹ ۺ˞ ? Unconfounded No posttreatment bias
How weighting can help
How weighting can help ۦ=ۺ ۼ ۼ˞ ?
ۦ۸ =ۺ ^ۢ ۼ ۢ˞ ۼ˞ ? ૿ ۼ ଁ ۼ˞
How weighting can help ۦ=ۺ ۼ ۼ˞ ?
ۦ۸ =ۺ ^ۢ ۼ ۢ˞ ۼ˞ ? ૿ ۼ ଁ ۼ˞ WLS
How weighting can help ۦ=ۺ ۼ ۼ˞ ?
ۦ۸ =ۺ ^ۢ ۼ ۢ˞ ۼ˞ ? ૿ ۼ ଁ ۼ˞ WLS CET: (1,0) vs (0,0) ATHE: (0,1) vs (0,0) ATHE: (1,1) vs (0,0) এ૾ ଁ ଁ
The Long Arm of the Democratic Peace?
The Long Arm of the Democratic Peace? Democracy in year
t War in year t
The Long Arm of the Democratic Peace? Democracy in year
t War in year t Democratic Peace Literature
The Long Arm of the Democratic Peace? Democracy in year
t War in year t Democratic Peace Literature History of Democracy
The Long Arm of the Democratic Peace? Democracy in year
t War in year t Democratic Peace Literature History of Democracy Can we estimate this?
%FQFOEFOU WBSJBCMF %JTQVUF #,5 .JTTQFDJĕFE *158 .PEFM $VNVMBUJWF .PEFM .4.
%FNPDSBDZ #MJQ ˞૿ଅˣˣˣ ૿ଅ૿ $VNVMBUJWF %FNPDSBDZ ˞૿૿૿ ˞૿૿ଃˣˣˣ ૿૿ଁ ૿૿ଂ (SPXUI ˞ଂଇଂଆˣˣˣ ˞ଃଂଅ૿ˣˣˣ 0CTFSWBUJPOT ଁ૿ ଃଃଇ ଁ૿ ଃଃଇ ଁ૿ ଃଃଇ /PUF ˣQ ˣˣQ ˣˣˣQ Revisiting Beck, Katz, and Tucker (1998)
%FQFOEFOU WBSJBCMF %JTQVUF #,5 .JTTQFDJĕFE *158 .PEFM $VNVMBUJWF .PEFM .4.
%FNPDSBDZ #MJQ ˞૿ଅˣˣˣ ૿ଅ૿ $VNVMBUJWF %FNPDSBDZ ˞૿૿૿ ˞૿૿ଃˣˣˣ ૿૿ଁ ૿૿ଂ (SPXUI ˞ଂଇଂଆˣˣˣ ˞ଃଂଅ૿ˣˣˣ 0CTFSWBUJPOT ଁ૿ ଃଃଇ ଁ૿ ଃଃଇ ଁ૿ ଃଃଇ /PUF ˣQ ˣˣQ ˣˣˣQ Revisiting Beck, Katz, and Tucker (1998)
Democracy in year t War in year t Economic Growth
in year t History of Democracy Misspecification of an ATHE Time-Varying Confounder
%FQFOEFOU WBSJBCMF %JTQVUF #,5 .JTTQFDJĕFE *158 .PEFM $VNVMBUJWF .PEFM .4.
%FNPDSBDZ #MJQ ˞૿ଅˣˣˣ ૿ଅ૿ $VNVMBUJWF %FNPDSBDZ ˞૿૿૿ ˞૿૿ଃˣˣˣ ૿૿ଁ ૿૿ଂ (SPXUI ˞ଂଇଂଆˣˣˣ ˞ଃଂଅ૿ˣˣˣ 0CTFSWBUJPOT ଁ૿ ଃଃଇ ଁ૿ ଃଃଇ ଁ૿ ଃଃଇ /PUF ˣQ ˣˣQ ˣˣˣQ Revisiting Beck, Katz, and Tucker (1998)
TSCS data under unmeasured confounding
TSCS data under unmeasured confounding ۺ܃ ۼ е е
ۢ܃ ^۹ ܃ ۢ ܃˞ ۼ ˞ ۶
TSCS data under unmeasured confounding Treatment is unrelated to the
potential outcomes ۺ܃ ۼ е е ۢ܃ ^۹ ܃ ۢ ܃˞ ۼ ˞ ۶
TSCS data under unmeasured confounding Treatment is unrelated to the
potential outcomes ...conditional on the covariate history ۺ܃ ۼ е е ۢ܃ ^۹ ܃ ۢ ܃˞ ۼ ˞ ۶
TSCS data under unmeasured confounding Treatment is unrelated to the
potential outcomes ...conditional on the covariate history ۺ܃ ۼ е е ۢ܃ ^۹ ܃ ۢ ܃˞ ۼ ˞ ۶ ...and a time-fixed unmeasured confounder.
How unit-specific weighting can help
How unit-specific weighting can help ۺ˞ ۢ˞ ۢ ۹ ۺ
۶
How unit-specific weighting can help ۺ˞ ۢ˞ ۢ ۹ ۺ
۶ ۸܃ ಿ ܍ 2T=ۢ܃܍ ^ۢ˞ ۹ ۺ˞ ۶?
How unit-specific weighting can help ۺ˞ ۢ˞ ۢ ۹ ۺ
۶ ۸܃ ಿ ܍ 2T=ۢ܃܍ ^ۢ˞ ۹ ۺ˞ ۶? Weighting balances the treatment groups.
ۺ˞ ۢ˞ ۢ ۹ ۺ How unit-specific weighting can help
۶ ۸܃ ಿ ܍ 2T=ۢ܃܍ ^ۢ˞ ۹ ۺ˞ ۶?
A weighting approach to fixed effects
A weighting approach to fixed effects 1 Estimate unit-specific probability
of treatment over time and construct weights.
A weighting approach to fixed effects 1 Estimate unit-specific probability
of treatment over time and construct weights. 2 Estimate a pooled outcome model with unit-specific weights
k-order sequential ignorability
k-order sequential ignorability ۺ܃ ۼ е е ۢ܃ ^۹
܃̂˞܅ ۢ ܃˞̂˞܅ ۼ ˞̂˞܅ ۶
k-order sequential ignorability Only the last k periods matter. ۺ܃
ۼ е е ۢ܃ ^۹ ܃̂˞܅ ۢ ܃˞̂˞܅ ۼ ˞̂˞܅ ۶
Blip effect: (1,0) vs (0,0) Time periods Blip effect 10
25 50 75 100 125 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
Blip effect: (1,0) vs (0,0) Time periods Blip effect 10
25 50 75 100 125 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
Pooled Blip effect: (1,0) vs (0,0) Time periods Blip effect
10 25 50 75 100 125 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 • • • • • •
Pooled Outcome fixed effects Blip effect: (1,0) vs (0,0) Time
periods Blip effect 10 25 50 75 100 125 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 • • • • • •
Pooled Outcome fixed effects Blip effect: (1,0) vs (0,0) IPTW
true weights Time periods Blip effect 10 25 50 75 100 125 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 • • • • • •
Pooled IPTW fixed effects Outcome fixed effects IPTW true weights
Blip effect: (1,0) vs (0,0) Time periods Blip effect 10 25 50 75 100 125 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 • • • • • •
Treatment History Effect: (1,1) vs (0,0) Time periods ATHE 10
25 50 75 100 125 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
Treatment History Effect: (1,1) vs (0,0) Time periods ATHE 10
25 50 75 100 125 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 Time periods ATHE 10 25 50 75 100 125 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
Pooled Treatment History Effect: (1,1) vs (0,0) Time periods ATHE
10 25 50 75 100 125 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 • • • • • •
Pooled Outcome fixed effects Treatment History Effect: (1,1) vs (0,0)
Time periods ATHE 10 25 50 75 100 125 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 • • • • • •
Pooled Outcome fixed effects IPTW true weights Treatment History Effect:
(1,1) vs (0,0) Time periods ATHE 10 25 50 75 100 125 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 • • • • • •
Pooled IPTW fixed effects Outcome fixed effects IPTW true weights
Treatment History Effect: (1,1) vs (0,0) Time periods ATHE 10 25 50 75 100 125 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 • • • • • •
How to make causal inferences with TSCS data
How to make causal inferences with TSCS data Very carefully
How to make causal inferences with TSCS data Very carefully
Even under strong assumptions, conditional estimators cannot recover ATHEs.
How to make causal inferences with TSCS data Very carefully
Using weights Even under strong assumptions, conditional estimators cannot recover ATHEs.
How to make causal inferences with TSCS data Very carefully
Using weights Even under strong assumptions, conditional estimators cannot recover ATHEs. A fixed effects weighting approach can recover ATHEs and CETs even with unmeasured confounding.