Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Introducing the MSR2021 Shadow PC program

Introducing the MSR2021 Shadow PC program

Shadow PC is an initiative program that was run for the first time at MSR2021.
More detail about the program is at https://2021.msrconf.org/track/msr-2021-shadow-pc
The presentation video is at https://youtu.be/ReUXwmtIEk8

More Decks by Patanamon (Pick) Thongtanunam

Other Decks in Research

Transcript

  1. Shadow PC
    Patanamon (Pick)
    Thongtanunam Ayushi Rastogi
    Mining Software Repositories (MSR) 2021

    View Slide

  2. Manuscript
    Manuscript
    Manuscript
    What is Shadow PC?
    An initiative program that allows early-career researchers (ECRs) to gain
    the first-hand experience about the academic peer-review process
    Train the next generation of PC members
    Expose ECRs to the review process of the technical track
    Provide an opportunity for ECRs to be embedded in the community
    2

    View Slide

  3. Shadow PC Recruitment
    Open for self-nomination during Nov 1 - Dec 10, 2020
    Targeting PhD students, postdocs, new faculty members, and industry
    practitioners who never served as a PC member of the premier SE venues
    Publicize via various social network platforms, SEWorld, reach
    out to various SE communities & under-representative countries
    Received 162 applicants from a wide array of
    backgrounds from 36 countries
    3

    View Slide

  4. Shadow PC members
    106 Shadow PC members
    Selection based on research exp. & motivation while ensuring the diversity
    32 Countries Gender
    M
    F
    64%
    30%
    6%
    Occupation
    PhD Students
    75%
    Faculty
    members
    9%
    3%
    Industry
    practitioners
    Researchers
    4%
    Post-docs
    10%
    13 were invited as a
    MSR21 PC member
    Remaining is
    encouraged to re-apply
    48 Post-PhD applicants
    were shared with other
    PC chairs
    Unselected applicants
    4

    View Slide

  5. Shadow PC Reviewing Process
    Shadow reviews are conducted in a separate HotCRP instance from the MSR main track
    Review
    Each Shadow PC
    member was
    assigned with a load
    of 2 papers
    20 Jan -
    12 Feb
    Advisor check &
    Discussion
    An advisor check the
    quality of reviews.
    Shadow PCs discuss
    to reach consensus
    13-25 Feb
    Notify authors
    The reviews are
    shared with the
    authors of the papers
    9 Mar
    Select Papers
    40 out of 59 papers
    that opt-in Shadow
    PC were selected
    15 Jan
    Declare COI &
    Bidding
    Shadow PC declared
    conflicts of interest &
    bidded the papers
    11-18 Jan
    5

    View Slide

  6. Support for Shadow PCs
    Reviewing
    Guidelines & Tips
    Q&A with peers & Shadow PC chairs
    6

    View Slide

  7. Shadow PC Reviews
    5-6 reviews
    per paper
    A team of 26 advisors
    (5-10 reviews per advisor)
    680 messages
    (408 Shadow PC messages)
    Paper Acceptance:
    19
    40
    by Shadow PC
    14
    40
    by MSR PC
    by MSR PC
    Accepted Rejected
    by Shadow PC
    Accepted
    Rejected
    12
    19
    7
    2
    7

    View Slide

  8. Feedback from Shadow PC members
    Survey responses from 73 shadow PC members
    89%
    Better understand the academic
    peer review process
    94%
    Gain a new perspective of how
    actual pc member read/review the
    manuscript
    83% Received useful feedback from
    my advisor on how to write a
    good review
    98%
    Will recommend Shadow PC
    program to others
    “Great to read feedback on not only my reviews
    but also on other shadow PC members’ review”
    “It was my first time seeing the work behind the
    scenes that goes into discussing the papers and
    finalizing the decision.”
    “PC is to accept papers instead of rejecting
    papers.”
    “there is not often an opportunity to learn this
    (except if you are lucky and have a good
    supervisor/colleagues during your phd studies).” 8

    View Slide

  9. Feedback from Authors
    Survey responses from 27 authors
    78% Shadow PC reviews are clear and
    concise
    77% Shadow PC reviews are
    constructive and useful. They can
    improve my manuscript
    88%
    The language and tone used in
    Shadow PC reviews are
    appropriate
    82%
    Overall, I’m satisfied with the
    Shadow PC reviews
    “Receiving additional feedback and allowing new
    community members to become acquainted with
    the inner workings of a conference.”
    “to see if both PC's come to similar conclusions
    and also to give the young people in the shadow
    PC a chance to have a real PC experience”
    “We got better and more actionable feedback than
    from the shadow PC than from the main PC.”
    “I used some reviews in the camera-ready”
    9

    View Slide

  10. Reflection
    ● Benefits of Shadow PC program
    ○ SE community: a pool of diverse reviewers
    ○ Authors: additional feedback
    ○ Shadow PC: learn to review, engage, understand process
    ● Areas for improvement
    ○ Advisor: clear expectations, actual reviewer
    ○ Shadow PC: consistent experiences, training workshop
    ○ Timeline: shorter feedback loop
    ○ Program: rebuttal, distinguished reviewer, promote to main PC
    ● Future of reviewing
    ○ Shadow + experienced PC reviews (reduced workload)
    10
    96%
    Shadow PC
    82%
    Authors
    “MSR should hold the Shadow PC
    program again in the future”

    View Slide

  11. Special Thanks
    Kelly Blincoe
    MSR PC Co-Chair
    Mei Nagappan
    MSR PC Co-Chair
    Serge Demeyer
    Shadow PC
    Advisor Co-Chair
    Foutse Khomh
    Shadow PC
    Advisor Co-Chair
    11

    View Slide

  12. Huge Thanks to Shadow PC Advisors
    12

    View Slide

  13. Thanks to the Shadow PC members!
    13

    View Slide