Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Qubism: self-similar visualization of a many-bo...
Search
Piotr Migdał
January 10, 2013
Science
1
360
Qubism: self-similar visualization of a many-body wavefunction
Article, code and more:
http://qubism.wikidot.com/
Piotr Migdał
January 10, 2013
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Piotr Migdał
See All by Piotr Migdał
Detecting trypophobia triggers (with deep learning)
pmigdal
1
270
Teaching Machine Learning
pmigdal
7
1.6k
A game needs to framework
pmigdal
1
190
Visualizing word coincidences
pmigdal
1
73
Dreams, Drugs and ConvNets
pmigdal
1
890
{Machine, Deep} Learning for software engineers
pmigdal
1
2.1k
Lightning talk - Teaching machine learning
pmigdal
0
1.7k
Interaktywna wizualizacja danych w d3.js
pmigdal
2
670
Gry naukowe, moja gra kwantowa
pmigdal
0
230
Other Decks in Science
See All in Science
機械学習 - K近傍法 & 機械学習のお作法
trycycle
PRO
0
1.1k
創薬における機械学習技術について
kanojikajino
16
5.3k
機械学習 - 授業概要
trycycle
PRO
0
190
データベース09: 実体関連モデル上の一貫性制約
trycycle
PRO
0
680
データベース03: 関係データモデル
trycycle
PRO
1
120
統計学入門講座 第2回スライド
techmathproject
0
130
点群ライブラリPDALをGoogleColabにて実行する方法の紹介
kentaitakura
1
290
データベース10: 拡張実体関連モデル
trycycle
PRO
0
680
Quelles valorisations des logiciels vers le monde socio-économique dans un contexte de Science Ouverte ?
bluehats
1
390
LayerXにおける業務の完全自動運転化に向けたAI技術活用事例 / layerx-ai-jsai2025
shimacos
1
1.1k
機械学習 - ニューラルネットワーク入門
trycycle
PRO
0
780
データベース02: データベースの概念
trycycle
PRO
2
750
Featured
See All Featured
No one is an island. Learnings from fostering a developers community.
thoeni
21
3.3k
How To Stay Up To Date on Web Technology
chriscoyier
790
250k
Understanding Cognitive Biases in Performance Measurement
bluesmoon
29
1.8k
Done Done
chrislema
184
16k
4 Signs Your Business is Dying
shpigford
184
22k
How to Think Like a Performance Engineer
csswizardry
24
1.7k
Raft: Consensus for Rubyists
vanstee
140
7k
Exploring the Power of Turbo Streams & Action Cable | RailsConf2023
kevinliebholz
32
5.9k
Cheating the UX When There Is Nothing More to Optimize - PixelPioneers
stephaniewalter
281
13k
Evolution of real-time – Irina Nazarova, EuRuKo, 2024
irinanazarova
8
790
ReactJS: Keep Simple. Everything can be a component!
pedronauck
667
120k
Making the Leap to Tech Lead
cromwellryan
134
9.3k
Transcript
self-similar visualization of many-body wavefunctions QUBISM: presented by: Piotr Migdał
(ICFO, Barcelona)
Don’t take plots for granted!
None
None
bar chart - William Playfair (1786) scatter plot - Francis
Galton (a century later)
Dmitri Mendeleev | Periodic Table of Elements (1869) periodic table
- Dimitri Mendeleev (1869)
Back to the quantum world
↵|"i + |#i
↵|"i + |#i ⇠ = ↵| i + |•i
↵|"i + |#i ⇠ = ↵| i + |•i ⇠
= ↵|0i + |1i
↵|"i + |#i ⇠ = ↵| i + |•i ⇠
= ↵|0i + |1i ↵00 |00i + ↵01 |01i + ↵10 |10i + ↵11 |11i
↵|"i + |#i ⇠ = ↵| i + |•i ⇠
= ↵|0i + |1i ↵00 |00i + ↵01 |01i + ↵10 |10i + ↵11 |11i ↵000 |000i + ↵001 |001i + ↵010 |010i + ↵011 |011i + ↵100 |100i + ↵101 |101i + ↵110 |110i + ↵111 |111i
↵|"i + |#i ⇠ = ↵| i + |•i ⇠
= ↵|0i + |1i 2n complex parameters ↵00 |00i + ↵01 |01i + ↵10 |10i + ↵11 |11i ↵000 |000i + ↵001 |001i + ↵010 |010i + ↵011 |011i + ↵100 |100i + ↵101 |101i + ↵110 |110i + ↵111 |111i
None
None
00 01 10 11
00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11
10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 |101000i
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 |101000i
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 |101000i
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 |101000i
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 |101000i
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 FM: 000000... FM: 111111...
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 FM: 000000... FM: 111111... AFM: 010101... AFM: 101010...
Examples
Dicke state |01i + |10i p 2
Dicke state |01i + |10i p 2 00 10 01
11
Dicke state (|0011i + |0101i +|0110i + |1001i +|1010i +
|1100i) / p 6
Dicke state particles zeros ones 6 3 3
Dicke state particles zeros ones 8 4 4
Dicke state particles zeros ones 10 5 5
Dicke state particles zeros ones 12 6 6
Dicke state particles zeros ones 14 7 7
Product state (↵|0i + |1i)n
Heisenberg AFM X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 (periodic boundary
cond.)
Heisenberg AFM (1,2) (3,4) (5,6) (7,8) ... X ~ Si
· ~ Si+1 (periodic boundary cond.)
Heisenberg AFM (1,2) (3,4) (5,6) (7,8) ... (n,1) (2,3) (4,5)
(6,7) ... X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 (periodic boundary cond.)
Heisenberg AFM (1,2) (3,4) (5,6) (7,8) ... (n,1) (2,3) (4,5)
(6,7) ... X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 (open boundary cond.)
It works for any qudit 1D spin chains
-- -0 -+ 0- 00 0+ +- +0 ++ +
qutrits (spin-1) 0 -
AKLT state Affleck, Lieb, Kennedy and Tasaki (| +i +
|00i + | + i)/ p 3 + 1 3 ⇣ ~ Si · ~ Si+1 ⌘2 X ~ Si · ~ Si+1
AKLT state particles 4 Affleck, Lieb, Kennedy and Tasaki +
1 3 ⇣ ~ Si · ~ Si+1 ⌘2 X ~ Si · ~ Si+1
AKLT state Affleck, Lieb, Kennedy and Tasaki + 1 3
⇣ ~ Si · ~ Si+1 ⌘2 X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 particles 6
AKLT state Affleck, Lieb, Kennedy and Tasaki + 1 3
⇣ ~ Si · ~ Si+1 ⌘2 X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 particles 8
AKLT state Affleck, Lieb, Kennedy and Tasaki + 1 3
⇣ ~ Si · ~ Si+1 ⌘2 X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 particles 10
Alternative qubistic schemes
00 01 11 10 anti-ferromagnetic ferromagnetic
Heisenberg AFM X ~ Si · ~ Si+1
X z i z i+1 X x i Ising transverse
field
X z i z i+1 X x i Ising transverse
field = 1
X z i z i+1 X x i Ising transverse
field
X z i z i+1 X x i Ising transverse
field = 1
None
Product state
Product state Dicke half-filled
Product state Dicke half-filled Ising transverse field (ground state)
Product state Dicke half-filled Ising transverse field (ground state) Heisenberg
(ground state)
You can see entanglement
entanglement: (1,2) vs (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,...)
entanglement: (1,2) vs (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt rank: A A A A
1 (not entangled)
entanglement: (1,2) vs (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt rank: A A A A
1 (not entangled) A B B C 3 (entangled!)
entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt rank:
entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt rank: A A A A
A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled)
entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt rank: A A A A
A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled) A
A B B B B entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt
rank: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled) A
A B B B B entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt
rank: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled) A B B C B C C B C C C A
A B B B B entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt
rank: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled) A B B C B C C D B C C D C D D A B B C B C C B C C C A
A B B B B entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt
rank: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled) A B B C B C C D B C C D C D D A B B C B C C B C C C A 5 (entangled!) A B B C B C C D B C C D C D D E
{|0i, |1i}⌦4 {|+i, | i}⌦4 ⌦4 x ⌦4 z Schmidt
number: 1 2 2 3 4 |0000i |GHZi |Wi Dicke half-filling
Renyi fractal dimension (and box counting)
AKLT ground state also works for qutrits (e.g. spin-1) log(4)
log(3) ⇡ 1 . 26 and its fractal dimension
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
1 1.2 1.4 1.6 dq arctan(K) q=0 q=0.5 q=1 q=2 q =104 X ( i ) z ( i +1) z ( i ) x Ising transverse field surface-like line-like point-like
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
1 1.2 1.4 1.6 dq arctan(K) q=0 q=0.5 q=1 q=2 q =104 X ( i ) z ( i +1) z ( i ) x Ising transverse field = 1 surface-like line-like point-like
And how about going the other way?
Jose I. Latorre, arXiv:quant-ph/0510031 (2005) QPEG! matrix product states for
image compression JPEG?
Javier Rodriguez-Laguna Piotr Migdał Miguel Ibanez Berganza Maciej Lewenstein German
Sierra
http://qubism.wikidot.com/ Thanks! paper, code, etc: J.Rodriguez-Laguna, P. Migdał, M. Ibánez
Berganza, M. Lewenstein and G. Sierra. Qubism: self-similar visualization of many-body wavefunctions. New J. Phys. 14, 053028 (2012), arXiv:1112.3560.
None