Lock in $30 Savings on PRO—Offer Ends Soon! ⏳
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Qubism: self-similar visualization of a many-bo...
Search
Piotr Migdał
January 10, 2013
Science
1
470
Qubism: self-similar visualization of a many-body wavefunction
Article, code and more:
http://qubism.wikidot.com/
Piotr Migdał
January 10, 2013
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Piotr Migdał
See All by Piotr Migdał
Detecting trypophobia triggers (with deep learning)
pmigdal
1
320
Teaching Machine Learning
pmigdal
7
1.6k
A game needs to framework
pmigdal
1
220
Visualizing word coincidences
pmigdal
1
78
Dreams, Drugs and ConvNets
pmigdal
1
920
{Machine, Deep} Learning for software engineers
pmigdal
1
2.2k
Lightning talk - Teaching machine learning
pmigdal
0
1.8k
Interaktywna wizualizacja danych w d3.js
pmigdal
2
710
Gry naukowe, moja gra kwantowa
pmigdal
0
240
Other Decks in Science
See All in Science
生成AIと学ぶPythonデータ分析再入門-Pythonによるクラスタリング・可視化をサクサク実施-
datascientistsociety
PRO
4
1.9k
Performance Evaluation and Ranking of Drivers in Multiple Motorsports Using Massey’s Method
konakalab
0
130
風の力で振れ幅が大きくなる振り子!? 〜タコマナローズ橋はなぜ落ちたのか〜
syotasasaki593876
1
170
PPIのみを用いたAIによる薬剤–遺伝子–疾患 相互作用の同定
tagtag
0
120
NDCG is NOT All I Need
statditto
2
2.6k
データベース02: データベースの概念
trycycle
PRO
2
990
データベース11: 正規化(1/2) - 望ましくない関係スキーマ
trycycle
PRO
0
1k
安心・効率的な医療現場の実現へ ~オンプレAI & ノーコードワークフローで進める業務改革~
siyoo
0
420
【論文紹介】Is CLIP ideal? No. Can we fix it?Yes! 第65回 コンピュータビジョン勉強会@関東
shun6211
5
2.1k
MCMCのR-hatは分散分析である
moricup
0
530
AIによる科学の加速: 各領域での革新と共創の未来
masayamoriofficial
0
310
機械学習 - DBSCAN
trycycle
PRO
0
1.4k
Featured
See All Featured
Unlocking the hidden potential of vector embeddings in international SEO
frankvandijk
0
120
[SF Ruby Conf 2025] Rails X
palkan
0
550
The Straight Up "How To Draw Better" Workshop
denniskardys
239
140k
Leveraging Curiosity to Care for An Aging Population
cassininazir
1
130
Deep Space Network (abreviated)
tonyrice
0
18
How to Build an AI Search Optimization Roadmap - Criteria and Steps to Take #SEOIRL
aleyda
1
1.8k
Leadership Guide Workshop - DevTernity 2021
reverentgeek
0
160
Performance Is Good for Brains [We Love Speed 2024]
tammyeverts
12
1.3k
Easily Structure & Communicate Ideas using Wireframe
afnizarnur
194
17k
Evolution of real-time – Irina Nazarova, EuRuKo, 2024
irinanazarova
9
1.1k
Tips & Tricks on How to Get Your First Job In Tech
honzajavorek
0
390
Mozcon NYC 2025: Stop Losing SEO Traffic
samtorres
0
75
Transcript
self-similar visualization of many-body wavefunctions QUBISM: presented by: Piotr Migdał
(ICFO, Barcelona)
Don’t take plots for granted!
None
None
bar chart - William Playfair (1786) scatter plot - Francis
Galton (a century later)
Dmitri Mendeleev | Periodic Table of Elements (1869) periodic table
- Dimitri Mendeleev (1869)
Back to the quantum world
↵|"i + |#i
↵|"i + |#i ⇠ = ↵| i + |•i
↵|"i + |#i ⇠ = ↵| i + |•i ⇠
= ↵|0i + |1i
↵|"i + |#i ⇠ = ↵| i + |•i ⇠
= ↵|0i + |1i ↵00 |00i + ↵01 |01i + ↵10 |10i + ↵11 |11i
↵|"i + |#i ⇠ = ↵| i + |•i ⇠
= ↵|0i + |1i ↵00 |00i + ↵01 |01i + ↵10 |10i + ↵11 |11i ↵000 |000i + ↵001 |001i + ↵010 |010i + ↵011 |011i + ↵100 |100i + ↵101 |101i + ↵110 |110i + ↵111 |111i
↵|"i + |#i ⇠ = ↵| i + |•i ⇠
= ↵|0i + |1i 2n complex parameters ↵00 |00i + ↵01 |01i + ↵10 |10i + ↵11 |11i ↵000 |000i + ↵001 |001i + ↵010 |010i + ↵011 |011i + ↵100 |100i + ↵101 |101i + ↵110 |110i + ↵111 |111i
None
None
00 01 10 11
00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11
10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 |101000i
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 |101000i
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 |101000i
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 |101000i
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 |101000i
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 FM: 000000... FM: 111111...
00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01
10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 00 01 00 01 10 11 10 11 FM: 000000... FM: 111111... AFM: 010101... AFM: 101010...
Examples
Dicke state |01i + |10i p 2
Dicke state |01i + |10i p 2 00 10 01
11
Dicke state (|0011i + |0101i +|0110i + |1001i +|1010i +
|1100i) / p 6
Dicke state particles zeros ones 6 3 3
Dicke state particles zeros ones 8 4 4
Dicke state particles zeros ones 10 5 5
Dicke state particles zeros ones 12 6 6
Dicke state particles zeros ones 14 7 7
Product state (↵|0i + |1i)n
Heisenberg AFM X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 (periodic boundary
cond.)
Heisenberg AFM (1,2) (3,4) (5,6) (7,8) ... X ~ Si
· ~ Si+1 (periodic boundary cond.)
Heisenberg AFM (1,2) (3,4) (5,6) (7,8) ... (n,1) (2,3) (4,5)
(6,7) ... X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 (periodic boundary cond.)
Heisenberg AFM (1,2) (3,4) (5,6) (7,8) ... (n,1) (2,3) (4,5)
(6,7) ... X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 (open boundary cond.)
It works for any qudit 1D spin chains
-- -0 -+ 0- 00 0+ +- +0 ++ +
qutrits (spin-1) 0 -
AKLT state Affleck, Lieb, Kennedy and Tasaki (| +i +
|00i + | + i)/ p 3 + 1 3 ⇣ ~ Si · ~ Si+1 ⌘2 X ~ Si · ~ Si+1
AKLT state particles 4 Affleck, Lieb, Kennedy and Tasaki +
1 3 ⇣ ~ Si · ~ Si+1 ⌘2 X ~ Si · ~ Si+1
AKLT state Affleck, Lieb, Kennedy and Tasaki + 1 3
⇣ ~ Si · ~ Si+1 ⌘2 X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 particles 6
AKLT state Affleck, Lieb, Kennedy and Tasaki + 1 3
⇣ ~ Si · ~ Si+1 ⌘2 X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 particles 8
AKLT state Affleck, Lieb, Kennedy and Tasaki + 1 3
⇣ ~ Si · ~ Si+1 ⌘2 X ~ Si · ~ Si+1 particles 10
Alternative qubistic schemes
00 01 11 10 anti-ferromagnetic ferromagnetic
Heisenberg AFM X ~ Si · ~ Si+1
X z i z i+1 X x i Ising transverse
field
X z i z i+1 X x i Ising transverse
field = 1
X z i z i+1 X x i Ising transverse
field
X z i z i+1 X x i Ising transverse
field = 1
None
Product state
Product state Dicke half-filled
Product state Dicke half-filled Ising transverse field (ground state)
Product state Dicke half-filled Ising transverse field (ground state) Heisenberg
(ground state)
You can see entanglement
entanglement: (1,2) vs (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,...)
entanglement: (1,2) vs (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt rank: A A A A
1 (not entangled)
entanglement: (1,2) vs (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt rank: A A A A
1 (not entangled) A B B C 3 (entangled!)
entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt rank:
entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt rank: A A A A
A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled)
entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt rank: A A A A
A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled) A
A B B B B entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt
rank: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled) A
A B B B B entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt
rank: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled) A B B C B C C B C C C A
A B B B B entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt
rank: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled) A B B C B C C D B C C D C D D A B B C B C C B C C C A
A B B B B entanglement: (1,2,3,4) vs (5,6,7,8,9,...) Schmidt
rank: A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 1 (not entangled) A B B C B C C D B C C D C D D A B B C B C C B C C C A 5 (entangled!) A B B C B C C D B C C D C D D E
{|0i, |1i}⌦4 {|+i, | i}⌦4 ⌦4 x ⌦4 z Schmidt
number: 1 2 2 3 4 |0000i |GHZi |Wi Dicke half-filling
Renyi fractal dimension (and box counting)
AKLT ground state also works for qutrits (e.g. spin-1) log(4)
log(3) ⇡ 1 . 26 and its fractal dimension
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
1 1.2 1.4 1.6 dq arctan(K) q=0 q=0.5 q=1 q=2 q =104 X ( i ) z ( i +1) z ( i ) x Ising transverse field surface-like line-like point-like
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
1 1.2 1.4 1.6 dq arctan(K) q=0 q=0.5 q=1 q=2 q =104 X ( i ) z ( i +1) z ( i ) x Ising transverse field = 1 surface-like line-like point-like
And how about going the other way?
Jose I. Latorre, arXiv:quant-ph/0510031 (2005) QPEG! matrix product states for
image compression JPEG?
Javier Rodriguez-Laguna Piotr Migdał Miguel Ibanez Berganza Maciej Lewenstein German
Sierra
http://qubism.wikidot.com/ Thanks! paper, code, etc: J.Rodriguez-Laguna, P. Migdał, M. Ibánez
Berganza, M. Lewenstein and G. Sierra. Qubism: self-similar visualization of many-body wavefunctions. New J. Phys. 14, 053028 (2012), arXiv:1112.3560.
None