Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Look ma' I know my algorithms!
Search
Lucia Escanellas
October 24, 2014
Programming
7
470
Look ma' I know my algorithms!
RubyConf Argentina 2014
Lucia Escanellas
October 24, 2014
Tweet
Share
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
インターン生でもAuth0で認証基盤刷新が出来るのか
taku271
0
190
2026年 エンジニアリング自己学習法
yumechi
0
140
組織で育むオブザーバビリティ
ryota_hnk
0
180
Rust 製のコードエディタ “Zed” を使ってみた
nearme_tech
PRO
0
180
CSC307 Lecture 08
javiergs
PRO
0
670
開発者から情シスまで - 多様なユーザー層に届けるAPI提供戦略 / Postman API Night Okinawa 2026 Winter
tasshi
0
200
humanlayerのブログから学ぶ、良いCLAUDE.mdの書き方
tsukamoto1783
0
200
AIで開発はどれくらい加速したのか?AIエージェントによるコード生成を、現場の評価と研究開発の評価の両面からdeep diveしてみる
daisuketakeda
1
2.5k
Basic Architectures
denyspoltorak
0
680
AI Agent の開発と運用を支える Durable Execution #AgentsInProd
izumin5210
7
2.3k
並行開発のためのコードレビュー
miyukiw
0
180
dchart: charts from deck markup
ajstarks
3
990
Featured
See All Featured
Six Lessons from altMBA
skipperchong
29
4.1k
What's in a price? How to price your products and services
michaelherold
247
13k
Money Talks: Using Revenue to Get Sh*t Done
nikkihalliwell
0
150
Bootstrapping a Software Product
garrettdimon
PRO
307
120k
Navigating the Design Leadership Dip - Product Design Week Design Leaders+ Conference 2024
apolaine
0
180
It's Worth the Effort
3n
188
29k
How to make the Groovebox
asonas
2
1.9k
The Psychology of Web Performance [Beyond Tellerrand 2023]
tammyeverts
49
3.3k
4 Signs Your Business is Dying
shpigford
187
22k
For a Future-Friendly Web
brad_frost
182
10k
Believing is Seeing
oripsolob
1
55
The Spectacular Lies of Maps
axbom
PRO
1
520
Transcript
Look ma’, I know my algorithms!
Lucia Escanellas raviolicode
Attributions https://flic.kr/p/6DDvQP https://flic.kr/p/qv5Zp https://flic.kr/p/6SaZsP https://flic.kr/p/edauSN https://flic.kr/p/4uNfK8 https://flic.kr/p/o9ggdk https://flic.kr/p/6kfuHz https://flic.kr/p/5kBtbS
Speed Speed
Zen Elegance Elegance
Toolbox
Theory Theory
This example Not so common
FROM >30HS TO 18 S
WHY USE ORDERS? ALGORITHMS ARE POWERFUL AVOID TRAPS IN RUBY
WHY USE ORDERS? ALGORITHMS ARE POWERFUL AVOID TRAPS IN RUBY
WHY USING ORDERS? ALGORITHMS ARE POWERFUL AVOID TRAPS IN RUBY
Let’s have a look at the PROBLEM
Ordered array How many pairs (a,b) where a ≠ b
-100 <= a + b <= 100
Array: [-100, 1, 100]
Array: [-100, 1, 100] (-100, 1), (-100, 100), (1, 100)
Array: [-100, 1, 100] (-100, 1), (-100, 100), (1, 100)
-100 + 1 = 99 YES
Array: [-100, 1, 100] (-100, 1), (-100, 100), (1, 100)
-100 + 100 = 0 YES
Array: [-100, 1, 100] (-100, 1), (-100, 100), (1, 100)
1 + 100 = 101 NO
Array: [-100, 1, 100] (-100, 1), (-100, 100), (1, 100)
Result: 2
First solution Combinations of 2 elements Filter by: -100 <=
a + b <= 100
def count! combinations = @numbers.combination(2).to_a! ! combinations! .map{ |a,b| a
+ b }! .select do |sum|! sum.abs <= THRESHOLD! end.size! end
10K takes 10s BUT 100M takes 30hs
Time to buy a NEW LAPTOP!
Big O notation How WELL an algorithm SCALES as the
DATA involved INCREASES
Calc Array size (length=N) Count elements one by one: O(N)
Calc Array size (length=N) Count elements one by one: O(N)
Length stored in variable: O(1)
Graphical Math Properties Order Mathematical Properties
Remember: f < g => O(f + g) = O(g)
O(K . f) = O(f) O(1) < O(ln N) < O(N) < O(N2) < O(eN)
Ex: Binary Search Find 7 in [1, 2, 3, 4,
5, 6, 7, 8] 1. element in the middle is 5 2. 5 == 7 ? NO 3. 5 < 7 ? YES => Find 7 in [6, 7, 8] Step 1
! Find 7 in [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7, 8] 1. element in the middle is 7 2. 7 == 7 ? YES! FOUND IT!! Step 2
Ex: Binary Search Worst case: ceil ( Log2 N )
23 = 8 ONLY 3 steps
Typical examples Access to a Hash O(1) Binary search O(log
N) Sequential search O(N) Traverse a matrix NxN O(N2)
DON’T JUST BELIEVE ME fooplot.com
BUT raviolicode, I’m getting BORED
I WANT CONCURRENCY I WANT CONCURRENCY
wait… was it Concurrency? or Parallelism?
None
None
None
None
None
None
GIL+CPU-bound NO I/O OPERATIONS concurrency = OVERHEAD
NOT what I was expecting
Parallelism... Parallelism
None
What do we REALLY get? O(N2 / cores) = O(N
2 ) jRubyGo Scala
NO Spoilers O(N2) O(N.log(N)) O(N)
THINKING algorithms is as IMPORTANT as ANY OTHER technique
BYE.
Wait! It's still slow. Wait! It’s still SLOW
Given [1,2,3,4,5] Take 1, then print [5,4,3,2] Take 2, then
print [5,4,3] and so on…
What’s the ORDER of this code? @nums.each_with_index do |a,i|! !
puts @nums.slice(i+1,N).reverse! .inspect! end
What’s the ORDER of this code? @nums.each_with_index do |a,i|! !
puts @nums.slice(i+1,N).reverse! .inspect! end Looks like O(N)
What’s the ORDER of this code? @nums.each_with_index do |a,i|! !
puts @nums.slice(i+1,N).reverse! .inspect! end Behaves like O(N2)
Let’s Look at the DOCS Ruby-Doc.org ! #reverse
O(N) hidden! O(N)!
What’s the ORDER of this code? @nums.each_with_index do |a,i|! !
puts @nums.slice(i+1,N).reverse! .inspect! end O(N2)!
Leaky abstractions LEAKY ABSTRACTIONS
All Non-trivial abstractions are LEAKY to some degree
ABSTRACTIONS DO NOT really SIMPLIFY as they were meant to
Knowing THE ALGORITHMS Behind everyday methods PAYS OFF
Thanks :) Thanks :)