locally in a provider system - privacy consents - organizational policies - jurisdictional policies stored in a centralized database As jurisdictional and organizational policies are always subject to change: What it would be preferable for organizational/jurisdictional policies to be expressed in a centralized or a locally way?
information.These consents overcome default organizational/jurisdictional sharing policies (share/don’t share) • Using the policy decision point/rules engine to segment data based on privacy consents • Using “privacy metadata” to help the policy decision point/rules engine adjudicate privacy consents
version of the Data Segmentation for Privacy Implementation Guidance (IG): http://wiki.siframework.org/Data+Segmentation+for+Privacy+Standards+and+Harmonization View the paper written by Scott Weinstein & Ioana Singureanu: http://wiki.siframework.org/Data+Segmentation+for+Privacy+Paper References
expressed in a centralized or a locally way? It may be preferable for organizational/jurisdictional policies to be expressed in a centralized way (either on a website or in a database), so that when policies change the local systems do not have to correct every policy for every patient in their system.
standards experts, health IT vendors… to discuss technological solutions that would allow for this behavioural health information to be sent with metadata or data that explain the protections that must be afford and particularly the importance of not redisclosing this information beyond that sharing that take place in accordance with the patient wishes. How Does DSP4S it protect against redisclosure of confidential patient information?