Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
"진짜 되는" 투자 전략 찾기: 금융전략과 통계적 검정
Search
Sponsored
·
Your Podcast. Everywhere. Effortlessly.
Share. Educate. Inspire. Entertain. You do you. We'll handle the rest.
→
Beomjun Shin
July 23, 2016
Research
0
83
"진짜 되는" 투자 전략 찾기: 금융전략과 통계적 검정
2016년 7월 23일, 퀀트 스터디 그룹 발표 자료
Beomjun Shin
July 23, 2016
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Beomjun Shin
See All by Beomjun Shin
Convolution Transpose by yourself
shastakr
0
81
ML Productivity
shastakr
1
82
스마트폰 위의 딥러닝
shastakr
0
270
Design your CNN: historical inspirations
shastakr
0
37
Other Decks in Research
See All in Research
Off-Policy Evaluation and Learning for Matching Markets
yudai00
0
110
競合や要望に流されない─B2B SaaSでミニマム要件を決めるリアルな取り組み / Don't be swayed by competitors or requests - A real effort to determine minimum requirements for B2B SaaS
kaminashi
0
1.1k
An Open and Reproducible Deep Research Agent for Long-Form Question Answering
ikuyamada
0
350
From Data Meshes to Data Spaces
posedio
PRO
0
480
Proposal of an Information Delivery Method for Electronic Paper Signage Using Human Mobility as the Communication Medium / ICCE-Asia 2025
yumulab
0
260
視覚から身体性を持つAIへ: 巧緻な動作の3次元理解
tkhkaeio
1
220
COFFEE-Japan PROJECT Impact Report(海ノ向こうコーヒー)
ontheslope
0
1.1k
Φ-Sat-2のAutoEncoderによる情報圧縮系論文
satai
3
170
[SITA2025 Workshop] 空中計算による高速・低遅延な分散回帰分析
k_sato
0
130
SkySense V2: A Unified Foundation Model for Multi-modal Remote Sensing
satai
3
670
[IBIS 2025] 深層基盤モデルのための強化学習驚きから理論にもとづく納得へ
akifumi_wachi
20
9.8k
2026年3月1日(日)福島「除染土」の公共利用をかんがえる
atsukomasano2026
0
470
Featured
See All Featured
Improving Core Web Vitals using Speculation Rules API
sergeychernyshev
21
1.4k
Sharpening the Axe: The Primacy of Toolmaking
bcantrill
46
2.7k
How Fast Is Fast Enough? [PerfNow 2025]
tammyeverts
3
500
Redefining SEO in the New Era of Traffic Generation
szymonslowik
1
250
The Illustrated Children's Guide to Kubernetes
chrisshort
51
52k
Claude Code どこまでも/ Claude Code Everywhere
nwiizo
64
54k
StorybookのUI Testing Handbookを読んだ
zakiyama
31
6.6k
svc-hook: hooking system calls on ARM64 by binary rewriting
retrage
2
180
jQuery: Nuts, Bolts and Bling
dougneiner
65
8.4k
Building a A Zero-Code AI SEO Workflow
portentint
PRO
0
410
Organizational Design Perspectives: An Ontology of Organizational Design Elements
kimpetersen
PRO
1
650
Dominate Local Search Results - an insider guide to GBP, reviews, and Local SEO
greggifford
PRO
0
110
Transcript
" غח" ై ۚ ӝ Әਲ਼ۚҗ ా҅ Ѩ July 23,
2016 नߧળ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
௫ ୡࠁ ੌੌ 1. (ಂఠ࠙ࢳ) ࣻহח ߎਸ ࢜ݴ ߸ࣻܳ ݃ҳ
߸ഋ೧ࠄ 2. Ӓۧѱ ݆ࣻ ۚ(?)ਸ ٜ݅ѱ ػ 3. ߮݃ب ޅӝח ٜۚী ઝೠ -> द ബਯੌѢঠ..(?) 4. যו ࣽр 10֙ ־ ࣻܫ 160% ب ҡଳই ࠁח ۚ ߊѼೠ 5. (оࢸѨ&पࢸ҅) ৬৬! Ӕؘ Ѣ Ҋ ై೧ب غա...??? © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
(ಎ؊ݭణ) ߸ࣻܳ যڌѱ ࢎਊೞ? [߸ࣻ]ܳ [ӝ]۽ [߸ഋ]೧ ࠁҊ [ҙ]ীࢲ [ஏӝр]݅ఀ
ࠁਬ • ߸ࣻ: Value, Momentum, Quality • ӝ: 1ѐਘ, 1௪ఠ(=3ѐਘ), 1֙, 3~5֙ • ߸ഋ: пઙ زಣӐ, ݽݭథ, Valua9on Model • ҙ: Loser-Follow(contrarian), Winner-Follow • ஏӝр: 1ѐਘ, 1௪ఠ(=3ѐਘ), 1֙, 3~5֙ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
৬! ҡଳই ࠁח ۚ! © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July
23, 2016
Mul$ple Tes$ng Problem © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23,
2016
प ٘ SP500_YEARLY_VOL = 0.15 LENGTH = 252*10 SIZE =
100 DATEINDEX = pd.date_range(start="2011-01-01", periods=LENGTH) normal_walks = pd.DataFrame() for n in range(SIZE): normal_walks[n] = pd.Series( (np.random.normal( loc=0, scale=SP500_YEARLY_VOL / np.sqrt(252), size=(LENGTH, 1) ) + 1).cumprod(), index=DATEINDEX ) -> ࣻܫ 160%ח 100ߣ ೧ࠁݶ 1ߣ աৢ ࣻ ߆ী হ!1 1 ࣻܫ Normalਸ ٮܲҊ о, 10֙ زউ ైೠҊ о, S&P 500 ࣻળ Vola0lityܳ ࢎਊೣ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
೧Ѿ ߑߨ ? © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23,
2016
Sta$s$cs & Good Experiment Design! © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin,
July 23, 2016
ݾର • оࢸѨҗ पࢸ҅ • In-Sample ࠙ࢳ • p-value ৬
Mul/ple Tes/ng Problem ೖೞӝ • In/Out-Sample ࠙ࢳ • ಂఠ ࠙ࢳ • ೠ ߮݃ ࢸ • N࠙ਤ ࠙ࢳ प೯ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
ా҅ ӝࠄ ਊয • ా҅(sta&s&cs)? • ࠄ(sample)۽ࠗఠ ݽױ(popula&on)ਸ ਬ୶ೞח Ѫ
• ా҅(sta&s&c)? • ݽױ ౠਸ ୶ೞӝ ਤ೧ ࢠ۽ࠗఠ ҅ೞח ӏ • ࠄ࠙ನ(sampling distribu&on)? • ా҅(sta&s&c) ഛܫ࠙ನ • ࠄ࠙ನо ਃೞ. © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
ా҅ োण • ୡҗ ࣻܫ(Excess Return)ী ೠ ୶ਸ ೧ࠁ •
о1: ୡҗ ࣻܫ ӏ࠙ನܳ ٮܲ • о2: ࢠ ࣻ(୨ োب ࣻ) n • ഛܫ߸ࣻ • ా҅(sta,s,c) ח ਬب ੋ t-࠙ನ(ࠄ࠙ನ;sampling distribu,on)ਸ ٮܴ ঌ۰ઉ • ҙणਵ۽ Әਲ਼ীࢶ t-sta,s,c 2ܳ ֈযঠ ࢎਊೞחѦ۽ ߉ই٘۰ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
ӏ࠙ನܳ ٮܰחо? © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
p-value = type 1 error def. sta)s)c > cri)cal value
or significance level > p-value © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
power = 1 - type 2 error def. sta)s)c >
cri)cal value © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Type 1 Error, Type 2 Error © Quant Study, Beomjun
Shin, July 23, 2016
Low p-value or High p-value in Stock Return? © Quant
Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
T ా҅җ ࢥ࠺ਯ 2 2 r yearly returnۄ о, daily
return ܳ ғೞৈ োਯചػ ࢥ࠺ਯ۽ ࢎਊ. ݽ؛ Return, ח ߮݃ Return © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
ୡҗࣻ ઓೞחо? • ӈޖоࢸ: ୡҗࣻ হ ( ) = 'ژ
ۚ'ۄ ೞ • ݀оࢸ: ୡҗࣻ ( ) = 'ঌ ۚ'ۄ ೞ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
ҡଳই ࠁח(?) ۚ оࢸѨ from scipy.stats import t nyears =
10 yearly_sharpe = 0.75 tstat = yearly_sharpe * np.sqrt(nyears) pvalue = 1 - t.cdf(tstat, df=9) print(tstat, pvalue) # => 2.37170824513 0.0208959003886 • p-value: 2% • Ѣ ೧ࢳ: ঌۚۄҊ ೠ ۚ ঌۚੌ ഛܫ 98% • ଵػ ೧ࢳ1: ژۚੋؘ ঌۚۄҊ ೡ ഛܫ 2% • ଵػ ೧ࢳ2: ژۚੋؘ ژۚۄҊ ೡ ഛܫ 98% © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Base Rate=0.1 10ѐח ঌۚ, 90ѐח ژۚ ©
Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Sta$s$cal Power=0.8 10ѐ ঌۚ ୶ஏ ঌۚ
8ѐ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
P-value=0.02 90ѐ ژۚ ୶ஏ ঌۚ ѐ ©
Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Python Code N = 100 base_rate = 0.10 alpha =
0.02 beta = 0.2 contingency_table = pd.DataFrame( [ [ N*base_rate*(1-beta), # pred ঌ, real ঌ N*base_rate*beta # pred ঌ, real ژ ], [ N*(1-base_rate)*alpha, # pred ژ, real ঌ N*(1-base_rate)*(1-alpha) # pred ژ, real ژ ] ], index=pd.Series(["ঌۚ", "ژۚ"], name="True"), columns=pd.Series(["ঌۚ", "ژۚ"], name="Pred")) fdr = contingency_table.iloc[1, 0] / contingency_table.iloc[:, 0].sum() print("FDR:", fdr) contingency_table © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Con$ngency Table © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
P-value © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Power © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
False Discovery Rate © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23,
2016
P-valueী ೠ ೧ࢳ द ܻ • [ঌۚۄҊ ೠ ۚ ژۚੌ
ഛܫ] [2%] [X] • [ঌۚۄҊ ೠ ۚ ژۚੌ ഛܫ] False Discovery Rate(FDR)۽ [O] • [ژۚਸ ঌۚۄҊ ೡ ഛܫ] [2%] [O] • FDRਸ ஶ܀ೞח Ѫ ਃפ. © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Mul$ple Tes$ng Problem ࢎ۹1: ۨ٬ ۚী 100ѐ ےؒ ߸ചܳ
Ҋ ਗې ۚҗ P&L ਸ 2-sample t-test ೠҊ ೞ. 100ѐ ےؒ߸ചо ࠗ ޖೠ ࢚ട (base rate = 0)ীب p-valueܳ 5% ࣻળਵ۽ ౸ױೞݶ 5ѐח ਬೞѱ աৢ Ѫ. Ӓۧݶ Ӓ 5ѐ ۚਵ۽ ైೞݶ غחо? NO! ࢎ۹2: ୭Ҋ ై غח ߑߨ, 10000ݺ Ҋёীѱ Ӓ ߈ ղੌ झೖо য়ܲҊ ݫੌਸ ࠁղҊ աݠ ߈ ߈۽ ஏ Ѿҗܳ ࠁմ. Ѧ 10ߣ ߈ࠂೞݶ 10ݺ ҊёীѲ ղо 10ߣ ݽف ݏ ࣅ ػ. դ ୭ Ҋ ైੋо? NO! © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
೧Ѿೞח 2о ҙ • Family-Wise Error Rate(FWER) • ੋ ҙীࢲ
ױ 1ѐ type 1 errorо ߊࢤೞח Ѫب ೲਊೞ ঋח • 100ѐ పझա 10000ѐ పझա ױ 1ѐ type 1 errorب ߊࢤೞݶ উػ • False Discovery Rate(FDR) • ࠺ਯ ҙীࢲ type 1 errorо ߊࢤೞחѦ ೲਊೞ ঋח. • 100ѐ పझীࢲ 1ѐܳ ೲਊೞ ঋחݶ 10000ѐ పझীࢶ 100ѐܳ ೲ ਊೞ ঋח © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
FWER: Bonferroni’s Correc2on • 1ѐ పझ: p-value 5% • 10ѐ
పझ: p-value 5% -> 5/10 % • 100ѐ పझ: p-value 5% -> 5/100 % ࢤп. • ైۚ ইಫ۽ ۽ંо ইפӝ ٸޙী ઑӘ ਬೞѱ ࠊب غ ঋਸө? • ݅ড Nߣ పझо completely uncorrelatedݶ ਤۢ ೧ب ؼ Ѫ, ೞ ݅ perfectly correlated غݶ ࢎप࢚ పझח Nߣ ইפۄ 1ߣೠ ࣅ ػ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
FWER: Holm-Bonferroni Method • ծ p-value ࠗఠ ֫ p-value ࣽਵ۽
۳ • kח పझ ੋؙझ, M పझ പࣻ, \alphaח significance level • sta6s6c ࠙ನܳ ࢎਊೞח ѐ֛ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
FDR: Benjamini and Hochberg, Yeku9eli(BHY) • ֫ p-value ࠗఠ ծ
p-value ࣽਵ۽ ۳ • о וटೠ ߑߨ • harvey৯, о ೞҊ ঌ۰ ߑߨ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
ਃড • • Mul%ple Tes%ng Problem & Solu%on • Interpret
p-value © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Walk-Forward Tes/ng © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Terms • (Sta&s&cs) In-sample(IS) Data / Out-of-sample(OOS) Data • (Machine
Learning) Training Data / Valida&on Data / Test Data / Cross-Valida&on © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Avoid Overlap Bias © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23,
2016
അप प ࢸ҅: ण হח ݽ؛ 1. ୭Ӕ N֙ ؘఠܳ
Out-of-sample(OOS) ؘఠ, աݠܳ In-sample(IS) ؘ ఠ۽ ܻ࠙೧ك 2. IS ؘఠܳ оҊ पਸ ߈ࠂೠ • प ߈ࠂ ۽ ݽ؛ ߸ച, ۄఠ ߸ച۽ ҳࢿػ • ಌನݢझܳ ҙೠ പࣻܳ ߈٘द ӝ۾ೠ 3. о જও؍ TOP n ѐ ݽഋਸ OOS ؘఠী पೠ 4. प ౠࢿ࢚ য়ߡೖী ݒ ਬ೧ঠೣਵ۽ पਸ ݆ ߈ࠂೞ ঋח © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
അप प ࢸ҅: ण ח ݽ؛ 1. ୭Ӕ N֙ਸ प
ؘఠীࢲ ߓઁ೧ك(Holdout data;Test Data) 2. Walk Forward Tes9ng ۨ(ৈ۞ߥ IS/OSS ؘఠܳ )ਵ۽ పझܳ ߈ࠂೠ • Walk Forward Tes9ng ب ߈ࠂೞࠁݶ ѾҴ OSS ؘఠী য়ߡೖػ • ಌನݢझܳ ҙೠ പࣻܳ ߈٘द ӝ۾ೠ • प ߈ࠂ ۽ ݽ؛ ߸ച৬ ೞಌۄఠ ߸ച۽ ҳࢿػ 3. о જও؍ TOP n ѐ ݽഋਸ OOS ؘఠী पೠ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
୭Ҋ प Real Money Trading! © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin,
July 23, 2016
Common Evalua+on Metrics • t-sta&s&c; p-value • sharpe ra&o •
Annualized Return, Annual Vola)lity • CAGR • turnover • maxdrawdown © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Sharpe Ra)o details Risk-Free Rate (Variance is not affected by
constant) Benchmark © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Annualize Sharpe Ra/o © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23,
2016
Annualize Sharpe Ra/o • IID Return Assump.on(NO SERIAL COLLREATION! REAL?)
• Daily -> Yearly: • Monthly -> Yearly: © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Addi$onal evalua$on metrics(TODO..җઁ?) • sor%no ra%o • calmar ra%o •
traynor ra%o • informa%on ra%o • winning ra%o • RoMAD • beta, alpha © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
All that Gli)ers Is Not Gold: Sharpe Ra5o Specifically, we
find that commonly reported backtest evalua9on metrics like the Sharpe ra)o offer li.le value in predic)ng out of sample performance (R² < 0.025). In contrast, higher order moments, like vola)lity and maximum drawdown, as well as porEolio construc9on features, like hedging, show significant predic9ve value of relevance to quan9ta9ve finance prac99oners. - All that GliKers Is Not Gold. Quantopian © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
All that Gli)ers Is Not Gold: Vola3lity Moreover, risk metrics
that aim to quan3fy vola%lity alone like annual vola3lity (Pearson R² = 0.67; p < 0.0001), and maximum drawdown (Pearson R² = 0.34; p < 0.0001) had sta3s3cally significant correla3ons between their IS and OOS period - All that GliRers Is Not Gold. Quantopian © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
ਬೠ ߸ࣻ ӝ: 5࠙ਤ ಂఠ ࠙ࢳ & ߮݃ ࢸ ©
Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
ೠ ߮݃ ࢸ • Stock Picking • ߮݃ب ݽഋҗ э
ܻߖ۠य ӝ۽ प • ࠁా Equal Weighted Index • Single Asset • Buy and hold strategy ߮݃ܳ ਊೞৈ ݽ؛ ୡҗࣻܫ ҅ೠ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
߸ࣻ ߸ജ [߸ࣻ]ܳ [ӝ]۽ [߸ഋ]೧ ࠁҊ [ҙ]ীࢲ [ஏӝр]݅ఀ ࠁਬ •
߸ࣻ: Value, Momentum, Quality • ӝ: 1ѐਘ, 1௪ఠ(=3ѐਘ), 1֙, 3~5֙ • ߸ഋ: пઙ زಣӐ, ݽݭథ, Valua9on Model • ҙ: Loser-Follow(contrarian), Winner-Follow • ஏӝр: 1ѐਘ, 1௪ఠ(=3ѐਘ), 1֙, 3~5֙ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Remind! Common Mistakes © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23,
2016
1. Survivor-biased Data(Data Snooping) • NaN ؘఠ • ܻ Ҋػ
ਬפߡझ ೧Ѿ଼ • җѢ दীࢲ ਬפߡझ ؘఠ ࢎਊ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
2. Lookahead Bias • ؘఠ݃ ݽ؛ীࢲ पࣻೞӝ ए Overlap Bias
• য ߊ৬ ઙо ҙ҅ (য ઙоо աৡ ٍী ߊؽ) • ղо ݅ٚ ݽ؛ ইޖܻ ѐ౸ۄب 2008֙ ܻझ݅ ೖೡ ࣻ ݶ જ ۚ ؽ ೧Ѿ଼ • ؘఠ द ഛೞѱ ঈೞӝ(ؘఠ ಿ౹!) • "য়ט ઙо"ܳ NaNਵ۽ فҊ पೞӝ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
3. In-sample Backtes1ng • э ؘఠܳ فҊ ৈ۞ߣ ߈ࠂ प
റ э ؘఠীࢲ పझ ೧Ѿ଼ • Mul%ple Hypothesis Tes%ng য়ܨ ഛೞѱ ೧ೞӝ • प പࣻ/प ӝ۾ ԝԝೞѱ ۽Ӧ೧فӝ • IS/OOS పझ ೞӝ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
4. Market Impact, Slippage • ઙо Ѣېա زदഐо Ѣېীࢲ ղо
֍ ޙ оѺਸ ৢܽ • Ѣې ઙݾਸ ਬפߡझ۽ فҊ ݅ٚ ۚ • ೠ Rule of Thumb ҃ਵ۽ ٜ݅ ೧Ѿ଼ • ೠ ठܻೖܳ хউ೧ࢲ ߔపझ ࣻܫ ҅(e.g. S&P500 5bp, ઙ ݾ 50bp) • Ѣې ؘఠ ࢎਊೞӝ(Ѣې ֫ ઙݾ ࢎਊ; ࠁా ࣻ ҃ 10র ࢚?) © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
5. Overfi)ng Model • ߈ࠂਵ۽ in-sample ؘఠܳ فҊ "tweak" ೞҊ
"refine"ೠ ݽ؛ • ߸ࣻо ݆Ҋ ࠂೠ ݽ؛ ࢎਊೞӝ ೧Ѿ଼ • IS/OOS పझ ೞӝ • п ਬפߡझ ҳࢿ ನಫܻয় ࣻܫী ࠺ ࠁӝ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
6. Trus(ng stateful strategy luck • Rebalancing ӝী ٮۄ ݽ؛
ࢿמ ѱѱ ߄Ո(۠ ݽ؛ਸ stateful strategyۄ ೠ ) • Walk-forward Tes;ngীࢲب start pointܳ য٣۽ ೞջী ٮۄ ࢿמ ׳ۄ ೧Ѿ଼ • оמೠ ݽٚ ܻߖ۠य ӝ, द ࠗ ܰѱ فҊ प(٘ܳ ੜ ىঠೠ!)ೞҊ ࣻܫ Varianceܳ ಝࠁӝ • গୡী Varianceо ݶ ۚ ޖೞҊ ࢤп೧ঠೠ • ٮۄࢲ, ୭ೠ 'daily' ؘఠܳ ࢎਊೞӝ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
7. Procedure Overfi.ng • ইޖܻ ਤ पٜࣻਸ ઑबೞ؊ۄب җѢח
җѢ۽ ରੋ য় ߡೖ ߈٘द ߊࢤ ೧Ѿ଼ • ݒੌ पઁ ؘఠ۽ Paper Trading Nѐਘ ࢚ ೧ࠄ ٍ पઁ تਸ ֍ӝ • ٮۄࢲ, ୭ೠ ࣘੋ दझమ غب۾ ݒੌ ؘఠо ୶оؼ ࣻ ѱ दझమ ҳࢿೞӝ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
8. Random Strategy • ো աৡ ۚੌө? ইקө? • ࢎਊೠ
ؘఠ ԝԝೞѱ ಝࠁӝ • খ 1~7ߣ पࣻח بਵ۽ ೞח पࣻо ইפۄ ؘఠܳ ԝԝೞѱ ೖ ঋইࢲ ߊࢤೞח पࣻ ೧Ѿ଼ • p-value ҅ ١ ా҅ ӝߨ ࢎਊೞҊ ୭ࣗೠ पਸ ৈ۞ߣ ೧ࠁӝ • ݽٚ Input ؘఠী ೠ द҅ৌ ࠁӝ, NaN ؘఠ ਬޖ ࠁӝ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
9. Don't Forget Commission, Tax • ௫ۚ ӝࠄਵ۽ ݒݒഥਯ ֫.
ࣻࣻܐח ߈٘द хউ೧ঠೣ ೧Ѿ଼ • ࣻࣻܐ ݽ؛ ٜযр ߔపझ ҅ ۽ ٜ݅যفӝ • ࣻࣻܐ ҅ য۵ݶ ୭ࣗೠ ఢয়ߡח ҅ೞӝ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
We need our powerful backtest tool ! • ࣚए ࢎਊ
& ࡅܲ ࢎਊ • ਃ evalua)on metric ҅(return, turnover etc.) • п ઙݾ ҳࢿ ࠺ਯ • ࣻࣻܐ Ҋ۰ ࣻܫ ҅ • пઙ Visualiza)on © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Quant ױ࢚ • ־ҳա ࠁח ؘఠ۽ ۚ ٜ݅ӝ • Contrarian
vs Follower, ѾҴ Behavior ஏऱ? • Sinificanceܳ ӝূ ցޖաب ؘఠ • যڌѱ ա݅ ؘఠܳ ݅٘חо? © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Future Works • झझ۽ ٣పੌ ӝ • ೧৻ ૐӂࢎ ܻನ
झఠ٣ • ݒ HIT ֫ও؍ SSRN ಕಌ ࣁա • पઁ ైೞӝ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
References • wiki: Sensi+ve and specficity • The p value
and the base rate fallacy • Evalua+on Metrics • All that Gli@ers Is Not Gold • 9 Mistakes Quants Make that Cause Backtests to Lie by Tucker Balch, Ph.D © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Conven&onal Assump&ons © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016