Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
"진짜 되는" 투자 전략 찾기: 금융전략과 통계적 검정
Search
Beomjun Shin
July 23, 2016
Research
0
75
"진짜 되는" 투자 전략 찾기: 금융전략과 통계적 검정
2016년 7월 23일, 퀀트 스터디 그룹 발표 자료
Beomjun Shin
July 23, 2016
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Beomjun Shin
See All by Beomjun Shin
Convolution Transpose by yourself
shastakr
0
71
ML Productivity
shastakr
1
75
스마트폰 위의 딥러닝
shastakr
0
260
Design your CNN: historical inspirations
shastakr
0
30
Other Decks in Research
See All in Research
データで診て考える合志市の渋滞と公共交通 ~めざせ 車1割削減、渋滞半減、公共交通2倍~
trafficbrain
0
470
SSII2023 医療支援における画像処理研究の動向と展望
moda0
0
110
クロスモーダル表現学習の研究動向: 音声関連を中心として
ryomasumura
3
610
Embodied AIについて / About Embodied AI
nttcom
1
580
Alexander Mielke Hellinger--Kantorovich (a.k.a. Wasserstein-Fisher-Rao) Spaces and Gradient Flows
jjzhu
3
190
Generative AI - practice and theory
gpeyre
1
590
媒介分析と疫学
kingqwert
0
110
Breaking Tradeoffs: Extremely Scalable Multi-Agent Pathfinding Algorithms
kei18
0
150
一般化ランダムフォレストの理論と統計的因果推論への応用
tomoshige_n
10
1.8k
継続的な研究費獲得のための考え方
moda0
2
440
Prompt Tuning から Fine Tuning への移行時期推定
icoxfog417
17
7.1k
Webスケールデータセットに対する実用的なポイズニング手法 / Poisoning Web-Scale Training Datasets is Practical
nttcom
0
120
Featured
See All Featured
ピンチをチャンスに:未来をつくるプロダクトロードマップ #pmconf2020
aki_iinuma
79
43k
The Pragmatic Product Professional
lauravandoore
26
5.8k
Writing Fast Ruby
sferik
622
60k
From Idea to $5000 a Month in 5 Months
shpigford
378
45k
Rebuilding a faster, lazier Slack
samanthasiow
74
8.2k
[Rails World 2023 - Day 1 Closing Keynote] - The Magic of Rails
eileencodes
8
1.3k
Templates, Plugins, & Blocks: Oh My! Creating the theme that thinks of everything
marktimemedia
20
1.8k
Let's Do A Bunch of Simple Stuff to Make Websites Faster
chriscoyier
501
140k
Responsive Adventures: Dirty Tricks From The Dark Corners of Front-End
smashingmag
245
20k
A Philosophy of Restraint
colly
197
16k
The Straight Up "How To Draw Better" Workshop
denniskardys
228
130k
Building Adaptive Systems
keathley
32
1.9k
Transcript
" غח" ై ۚ ӝ Әਲ਼ۚҗ ా҅ Ѩ July 23,
2016 नߧળ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
௫ ୡࠁ ੌੌ 1. (ಂఠ࠙ࢳ) ࣻহח ߎਸ ࢜ݴ ߸ࣻܳ ݃ҳ
߸ഋ೧ࠄ 2. Ӓۧѱ ݆ࣻ ۚ(?)ਸ ٜ݅ѱ ػ 3. ߮݃ب ޅӝח ٜۚী ઝೠ -> द ബਯੌѢঠ..(?) 4. যו ࣽр 10֙ ־ ࣻܫ 160% ب ҡଳই ࠁח ۚ ߊѼೠ 5. (оࢸѨ&पࢸ҅) ৬৬! Ӕؘ Ѣ Ҋ ై೧ب غա...??? © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
(ಎ؊ݭణ) ߸ࣻܳ যڌѱ ࢎਊೞ? [߸ࣻ]ܳ [ӝ]۽ [߸ഋ]೧ ࠁҊ [ҙ]ীࢲ [ஏӝр]݅ఀ
ࠁਬ • ߸ࣻ: Value, Momentum, Quality • ӝ: 1ѐਘ, 1௪ఠ(=3ѐਘ), 1֙, 3~5֙ • ߸ഋ: пઙ زಣӐ, ݽݭథ, Valua9on Model • ҙ: Loser-Follow(contrarian), Winner-Follow • ஏӝр: 1ѐਘ, 1௪ఠ(=3ѐਘ), 1֙, 3~5֙ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
৬! ҡଳই ࠁח ۚ! © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July
23, 2016
Mul$ple Tes$ng Problem © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23,
2016
प ٘ SP500_YEARLY_VOL = 0.15 LENGTH = 252*10 SIZE =
100 DATEINDEX = pd.date_range(start="2011-01-01", periods=LENGTH) normal_walks = pd.DataFrame() for n in range(SIZE): normal_walks[n] = pd.Series( (np.random.normal( loc=0, scale=SP500_YEARLY_VOL / np.sqrt(252), size=(LENGTH, 1) ) + 1).cumprod(), index=DATEINDEX ) -> ࣻܫ 160%ח 100ߣ ೧ࠁݶ 1ߣ աৢ ࣻ ߆ী হ!1 1 ࣻܫ Normalਸ ٮܲҊ о, 10֙ زউ ైೠҊ о, S&P 500 ࣻળ Vola0lityܳ ࢎਊೣ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
೧Ѿ ߑߨ ? © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23,
2016
Sta$s$cs & Good Experiment Design! © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin,
July 23, 2016
ݾର • оࢸѨҗ पࢸ҅ • In-Sample ࠙ࢳ • p-value ৬
Mul/ple Tes/ng Problem ೖೞӝ • In/Out-Sample ࠙ࢳ • ಂఠ ࠙ࢳ • ೠ ߮݃ ࢸ • N࠙ਤ ࠙ࢳ प೯ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
ా҅ ӝࠄ ਊয • ా҅(sta&s&cs)? • ࠄ(sample)۽ࠗఠ ݽױ(popula&on)ਸ ਬ୶ೞח Ѫ
• ా҅(sta&s&c)? • ݽױ ౠਸ ୶ೞӝ ਤ೧ ࢠ۽ࠗఠ ҅ೞח ӏ • ࠄ࠙ನ(sampling distribu&on)? • ా҅(sta&s&c) ഛܫ࠙ನ • ࠄ࠙ನо ਃೞ. © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
ా҅ োण • ୡҗ ࣻܫ(Excess Return)ী ೠ ୶ਸ ೧ࠁ •
о1: ୡҗ ࣻܫ ӏ࠙ನܳ ٮܲ • о2: ࢠ ࣻ(୨ োب ࣻ) n • ഛܫ߸ࣻ • ా҅(sta,s,c) ח ਬب ੋ t-࠙ನ(ࠄ࠙ನ;sampling distribu,on)ਸ ٮܴ ঌ۰ઉ • ҙणਵ۽ Әਲ਼ীࢶ t-sta,s,c 2ܳ ֈযঠ ࢎਊೞחѦ۽ ߉ই٘۰ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
ӏ࠙ನܳ ٮܰחо? © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
p-value = type 1 error def. sta)s)c > cri)cal value
or significance level > p-value © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
power = 1 - type 2 error def. sta)s)c >
cri)cal value © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Type 1 Error, Type 2 Error © Quant Study, Beomjun
Shin, July 23, 2016
Low p-value or High p-value in Stock Return? © Quant
Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
T ా҅җ ࢥ࠺ਯ 2 2 r yearly returnۄ о, daily
return ܳ ғೞৈ োਯചػ ࢥ࠺ਯ۽ ࢎਊ. ݽ؛ Return, ח ߮݃ Return © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
ୡҗࣻ ઓೞחо? • ӈޖоࢸ: ୡҗࣻ হ ( ) = 'ژ
ۚ'ۄ ೞ • ݀оࢸ: ୡҗࣻ ( ) = 'ঌ ۚ'ۄ ೞ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
ҡଳই ࠁח(?) ۚ оࢸѨ from scipy.stats import t nyears =
10 yearly_sharpe = 0.75 tstat = yearly_sharpe * np.sqrt(nyears) pvalue = 1 - t.cdf(tstat, df=9) print(tstat, pvalue) # => 2.37170824513 0.0208959003886 • p-value: 2% • Ѣ ೧ࢳ: ঌۚۄҊ ೠ ۚ ঌۚੌ ഛܫ 98% • ଵػ ೧ࢳ1: ژۚੋؘ ঌۚۄҊ ೡ ഛܫ 2% • ଵػ ೧ࢳ2: ژۚੋؘ ژۚۄҊ ೡ ഛܫ 98% © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Base Rate=0.1 10ѐח ঌۚ, 90ѐח ژۚ ©
Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Sta$s$cal Power=0.8 10ѐ ঌۚ ୶ஏ ঌۚ
8ѐ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
P-value=0.02 90ѐ ژۚ ୶ஏ ঌۚ ѐ ©
Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Python Code N = 100 base_rate = 0.10 alpha =
0.02 beta = 0.2 contingency_table = pd.DataFrame( [ [ N*base_rate*(1-beta), # pred ঌ, real ঌ N*base_rate*beta # pred ঌ, real ژ ], [ N*(1-base_rate)*alpha, # pred ژ, real ঌ N*(1-base_rate)*(1-alpha) # pred ژ, real ژ ] ], index=pd.Series(["ঌۚ", "ژۚ"], name="True"), columns=pd.Series(["ঌۚ", "ژۚ"], name="Pred")) fdr = contingency_table.iloc[1, 0] / contingency_table.iloc[:, 0].sum() print("FDR:", fdr) contingency_table © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Con$ngency Table © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
P-value © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Power © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
False Discovery Rate © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23,
2016
P-valueী ೠ ೧ࢳ द ܻ • [ঌۚۄҊ ೠ ۚ ژۚੌ
ഛܫ] [2%] [X] • [ঌۚۄҊ ೠ ۚ ژۚੌ ഛܫ] False Discovery Rate(FDR)۽ [O] • [ژۚਸ ঌۚۄҊ ೡ ഛܫ] [2%] [O] • FDRਸ ஶ܀ೞח Ѫ ਃפ. © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Mul$ple Tes$ng Problem ࢎ۹1: ۨ٬ ۚী 100ѐ ےؒ ߸ചܳ
Ҋ ਗې ۚҗ P&L ਸ 2-sample t-test ೠҊ ೞ. 100ѐ ےؒ߸ചо ࠗ ޖೠ ࢚ട (base rate = 0)ীب p-valueܳ 5% ࣻળਵ۽ ౸ױೞݶ 5ѐח ਬೞѱ աৢ Ѫ. Ӓۧݶ Ӓ 5ѐ ۚਵ۽ ైೞݶ غחо? NO! ࢎ۹2: ୭Ҋ ై غח ߑߨ, 10000ݺ Ҋёীѱ Ӓ ߈ ղੌ झೖо য়ܲҊ ݫੌਸ ࠁղҊ աݠ ߈ ߈۽ ஏ Ѿҗܳ ࠁմ. Ѧ 10ߣ ߈ࠂೞݶ 10ݺ ҊёীѲ ղо 10ߣ ݽف ݏ ࣅ ػ. դ ୭ Ҋ ైੋо? NO! © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
೧Ѿೞח 2о ҙ • Family-Wise Error Rate(FWER) • ੋ ҙীࢲ
ױ 1ѐ type 1 errorо ߊࢤೞח Ѫب ೲਊೞ ঋח • 100ѐ పझա 10000ѐ పझա ױ 1ѐ type 1 errorب ߊࢤೞݶ উػ • False Discovery Rate(FDR) • ࠺ਯ ҙীࢲ type 1 errorо ߊࢤೞחѦ ೲਊೞ ঋח. • 100ѐ పझীࢲ 1ѐܳ ೲਊೞ ঋחݶ 10000ѐ పझীࢶ 100ѐܳ ೲ ਊೞ ঋח © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
FWER: Bonferroni’s Correc2on • 1ѐ పझ: p-value 5% • 10ѐ
పझ: p-value 5% -> 5/10 % • 100ѐ పझ: p-value 5% -> 5/100 % ࢤп. • ైۚ ইಫ۽ ۽ંо ইפӝ ٸޙী ઑӘ ਬೞѱ ࠊب غ ঋਸө? • ݅ড Nߣ పझо completely uncorrelatedݶ ਤۢ ೧ب ؼ Ѫ, ೞ ݅ perfectly correlated غݶ ࢎप࢚ పझח Nߣ ইפۄ 1ߣೠ ࣅ ػ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
FWER: Holm-Bonferroni Method • ծ p-value ࠗఠ ֫ p-value ࣽਵ۽
۳ • kח పझ ੋؙझ, M పझ പࣻ, \alphaח significance level • sta6s6c ࠙ನܳ ࢎਊೞח ѐ֛ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
FDR: Benjamini and Hochberg, Yeku9eli(BHY) • ֫ p-value ࠗఠ ծ
p-value ࣽਵ۽ ۳ • о וटೠ ߑߨ • harvey৯, о ೞҊ ঌ۰ ߑߨ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
ਃড • • Mul%ple Tes%ng Problem & Solu%on • Interpret
p-value © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Walk-Forward Tes/ng © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Terms • (Sta&s&cs) In-sample(IS) Data / Out-of-sample(OOS) Data • (Machine
Learning) Training Data / Valida&on Data / Test Data / Cross-Valida&on © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Avoid Overlap Bias © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23,
2016
അप प ࢸ҅: ण হח ݽ؛ 1. ୭Ӕ N֙ ؘఠܳ
Out-of-sample(OOS) ؘఠ, աݠܳ In-sample(IS) ؘ ఠ۽ ܻ࠙೧ك 2. IS ؘఠܳ оҊ पਸ ߈ࠂೠ • प ߈ࠂ ۽ ݽ؛ ߸ച, ۄఠ ߸ച۽ ҳࢿػ • ಌನݢझܳ ҙೠ പࣻܳ ߈٘द ӝ۾ೠ 3. о જও؍ TOP n ѐ ݽഋਸ OOS ؘఠী पೠ 4. प ౠࢿ࢚ য়ߡೖী ݒ ਬ೧ঠೣਵ۽ पਸ ݆ ߈ࠂೞ ঋח © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
അप प ࢸ҅: ण ח ݽ؛ 1. ୭Ӕ N֙ਸ प
ؘఠীࢲ ߓઁ೧ك(Holdout data;Test Data) 2. Walk Forward Tes9ng ۨ(ৈ۞ߥ IS/OSS ؘఠܳ )ਵ۽ పझܳ ߈ࠂೠ • Walk Forward Tes9ng ب ߈ࠂೞࠁݶ ѾҴ OSS ؘఠী য়ߡೖػ • ಌನݢझܳ ҙೠ പࣻܳ ߈٘द ӝ۾ೠ • प ߈ࠂ ۽ ݽ؛ ߸ച৬ ೞಌۄఠ ߸ച۽ ҳࢿػ 3. о જও؍ TOP n ѐ ݽഋਸ OOS ؘఠী पೠ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
୭Ҋ प Real Money Trading! © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin,
July 23, 2016
Common Evalua+on Metrics • t-sta&s&c; p-value • sharpe ra&o •
Annualized Return, Annual Vola)lity • CAGR • turnover • maxdrawdown © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Sharpe Ra)o details Risk-Free Rate (Variance is not affected by
constant) Benchmark © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Annualize Sharpe Ra/o © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23,
2016
Annualize Sharpe Ra/o • IID Return Assump.on(NO SERIAL COLLREATION! REAL?)
• Daily -> Yearly: • Monthly -> Yearly: © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Addi$onal evalua$on metrics(TODO..җઁ?) • sor%no ra%o • calmar ra%o •
traynor ra%o • informa%on ra%o • winning ra%o • RoMAD • beta, alpha © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
All that Gli)ers Is Not Gold: Sharpe Ra5o Specifically, we
find that commonly reported backtest evalua9on metrics like the Sharpe ra)o offer li.le value in predic)ng out of sample performance (R² < 0.025). In contrast, higher order moments, like vola)lity and maximum drawdown, as well as porEolio construc9on features, like hedging, show significant predic9ve value of relevance to quan9ta9ve finance prac99oners. - All that GliKers Is Not Gold. Quantopian © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
All that Gli)ers Is Not Gold: Vola3lity Moreover, risk metrics
that aim to quan3fy vola%lity alone like annual vola3lity (Pearson R² = 0.67; p < 0.0001), and maximum drawdown (Pearson R² = 0.34; p < 0.0001) had sta3s3cally significant correla3ons between their IS and OOS period - All that GliRers Is Not Gold. Quantopian © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
ਬೠ ߸ࣻ ӝ: 5࠙ਤ ಂఠ ࠙ࢳ & ߮݃ ࢸ ©
Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
ೠ ߮݃ ࢸ • Stock Picking • ߮݃ب ݽഋҗ э
ܻߖ۠य ӝ۽ प • ࠁా Equal Weighted Index • Single Asset • Buy and hold strategy ߮݃ܳ ਊೞৈ ݽ؛ ୡҗࣻܫ ҅ೠ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
߸ࣻ ߸ജ [߸ࣻ]ܳ [ӝ]۽ [߸ഋ]೧ ࠁҊ [ҙ]ীࢲ [ஏӝр]݅ఀ ࠁਬ •
߸ࣻ: Value, Momentum, Quality • ӝ: 1ѐਘ, 1௪ఠ(=3ѐਘ), 1֙, 3~5֙ • ߸ഋ: пઙ زಣӐ, ݽݭథ, Valua9on Model • ҙ: Loser-Follow(contrarian), Winner-Follow • ஏӝр: 1ѐਘ, 1௪ఠ(=3ѐਘ), 1֙, 3~5֙ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Remind! Common Mistakes © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23,
2016
1. Survivor-biased Data(Data Snooping) • NaN ؘఠ • ܻ Ҋػ
ਬפߡझ ೧Ѿ଼ • җѢ दীࢲ ਬפߡझ ؘఠ ࢎਊ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
2. Lookahead Bias • ؘఠ݃ ݽ؛ীࢲ पࣻೞӝ ए Overlap Bias
• য ߊ৬ ઙо ҙ҅ (য ઙоо աৡ ٍী ߊؽ) • ղо ݅ٚ ݽ؛ ইޖܻ ѐ౸ۄب 2008֙ ܻझ݅ ೖೡ ࣻ ݶ જ ۚ ؽ ೧Ѿ଼ • ؘఠ द ഛೞѱ ঈೞӝ(ؘఠ ಿ౹!) • "য়ט ઙо"ܳ NaNਵ۽ فҊ पೞӝ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
3. In-sample Backtes1ng • э ؘఠܳ فҊ ৈ۞ߣ ߈ࠂ प
റ э ؘఠীࢲ పझ ೧Ѿ଼ • Mul%ple Hypothesis Tes%ng য়ܨ ഛೞѱ ೧ೞӝ • प പࣻ/प ӝ۾ ԝԝೞѱ ۽Ӧ೧فӝ • IS/OOS పझ ೞӝ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
4. Market Impact, Slippage • ઙо Ѣېա زदഐо Ѣېীࢲ ղо
֍ ޙ оѺਸ ৢܽ • Ѣې ઙݾਸ ਬפߡझ۽ فҊ ݅ٚ ۚ • ೠ Rule of Thumb ҃ਵ۽ ٜ݅ ೧Ѿ଼ • ೠ ठܻೖܳ хউ೧ࢲ ߔపझ ࣻܫ ҅(e.g. S&P500 5bp, ઙ ݾ 50bp) • Ѣې ؘఠ ࢎਊೞӝ(Ѣې ֫ ઙݾ ࢎਊ; ࠁా ࣻ ҃ 10র ࢚?) © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
5. Overfi)ng Model • ߈ࠂਵ۽ in-sample ؘఠܳ فҊ "tweak" ೞҊ
"refine"ೠ ݽ؛ • ߸ࣻо ݆Ҋ ࠂೠ ݽ؛ ࢎਊೞӝ ೧Ѿ଼ • IS/OOS పझ ೞӝ • п ਬפߡझ ҳࢿ ನಫܻয় ࣻܫী ࠺ ࠁӝ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
6. Trus(ng stateful strategy luck • Rebalancing ӝী ٮۄ ݽ؛
ࢿמ ѱѱ ߄Ո(۠ ݽ؛ਸ stateful strategyۄ ೠ ) • Walk-forward Tes;ngীࢲب start pointܳ য٣۽ ೞջী ٮۄ ࢿמ ׳ۄ ೧Ѿ଼ • оמೠ ݽٚ ܻߖ۠य ӝ, द ࠗ ܰѱ فҊ प(٘ܳ ੜ ىঠೠ!)ೞҊ ࣻܫ Varianceܳ ಝࠁӝ • গୡী Varianceо ݶ ۚ ޖೞҊ ࢤп೧ঠೠ • ٮۄࢲ, ୭ೠ 'daily' ؘఠܳ ࢎਊೞӝ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
7. Procedure Overfi.ng • ইޖܻ ਤ पٜࣻਸ ઑबೞ؊ۄب җѢח
җѢ۽ ରੋ য় ߡೖ ߈٘द ߊࢤ ೧Ѿ଼ • ݒੌ पઁ ؘఠ۽ Paper Trading Nѐਘ ࢚ ೧ࠄ ٍ पઁ تਸ ֍ӝ • ٮۄࢲ, ୭ೠ ࣘੋ दझమ غب۾ ݒੌ ؘఠо ୶оؼ ࣻ ѱ दझమ ҳࢿೞӝ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
8. Random Strategy • ো աৡ ۚੌө? ইקө? • ࢎਊೠ
ؘఠ ԝԝೞѱ ಝࠁӝ • খ 1~7ߣ पࣻח بਵ۽ ೞח पࣻо ইפۄ ؘఠܳ ԝԝೞѱ ೖ ঋইࢲ ߊࢤೞח पࣻ ೧Ѿ଼ • p-value ҅ ١ ా҅ ӝߨ ࢎਊೞҊ ୭ࣗೠ पਸ ৈ۞ߣ ೧ࠁӝ • ݽٚ Input ؘఠী ೠ द҅ৌ ࠁӝ, NaN ؘఠ ਬޖ ࠁӝ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
9. Don't Forget Commission, Tax • ௫ۚ ӝࠄਵ۽ ݒݒഥਯ ֫.
ࣻࣻܐח ߈٘द хউ೧ঠೣ ೧Ѿ଼ • ࣻࣻܐ ݽ؛ ٜযр ߔపझ ҅ ۽ ٜ݅যفӝ • ࣻࣻܐ ҅ য۵ݶ ୭ࣗೠ ఢয়ߡח ҅ೞӝ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
We need our powerful backtest tool ! • ࣚए ࢎਊ
& ࡅܲ ࢎਊ • ਃ evalua)on metric ҅(return, turnover etc.) • п ઙݾ ҳࢿ ࠺ਯ • ࣻࣻܐ Ҋ۰ ࣻܫ ҅ • пઙ Visualiza)on © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Quant ױ࢚ • ־ҳա ࠁח ؘఠ۽ ۚ ٜ݅ӝ • Contrarian
vs Follower, ѾҴ Behavior ஏऱ? • Sinificanceܳ ӝূ ցޖաب ؘఠ • যڌѱ ա݅ ؘఠܳ ݅٘חо? © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Future Works • झझ۽ ٣పੌ ӝ • ೧৻ ૐӂࢎ ܻನ
झఠ٣ • ݒ HIT ֫ও؍ SSRN ಕಌ ࣁա • पઁ ైೞӝ © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
References • wiki: Sensi+ve and specficity • The p value
and the base rate fallacy • Evalua+on Metrics • All that Gli@ers Is Not Gold • 9 Mistakes Quants Make that Cause Backtests to Lie by Tucker Balch, Ph.D © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016
Conven&onal Assump&ons © Quant Study, Beomjun Shin, July 23, 2016