Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Sign up for free
Menu
Search
Features
All features
Private URLs
Password Protection
Custom URLS
Scheduled publishing
Remove Branding
Restrict embedding
Deck Collections
Notes
Features
All features
Private URLs
Password Protection
Custom URLS
Scheduled publishing
Remove Branding
Restrict embedding
Deck Collections
Notes
Explore
Featured decks
Featured speakers
Programming
Technology
Storyboards
Explore
Featured decks
Featured speakers
Programming
Technology
Storyboards
Pricing
Search
Sign in
Sign up for free
Regularizations of Inverse Problems
Search
Sponsored
·
Your Podcast. Everywhere. Effortlessly.
Share. Educate. Inspire. Entertain. You do you. We'll handle the rest.
→
Samuel Vaiter
September 06, 2013
Science
53
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Regularizations of Inverse Problems
GRETSI'13, Quartz, Brest, September 2013.
Samuel Vaiter
September 06, 2013
More Decks by Samuel Vaiter
See All by Samuel Vaiter
Low Complexity Regularizations: A ''Localization'' Result
svaiter
0
79
A First Look at Proximal Methods
svaiter
0
240
Fast Distributed Total Variation
svaiter
0
130
Low Complexity Regularizations: A Localization Result
svaiter
0
80
Low Complexity Regularizations: a Localization Result
svaiter
0
130
Model Selection with Partly Smooth Functions
svaiter
0
56
Low Complexity Models: Robustness
svaiter
0
82
Low Complexity Models: Robustness and Sensivity
svaiter
0
48
Recovery Guarantees for Low Complexity Models
svaiter
1
83
Other Decks in Science
See All in Science
TypeScript で WebAssembly を用いた 型安全なプラグイン設計
nagano
2
610
サンプル対応のない複数遺伝子発現プロファイルに対するテンソル分解型統合解析の要約
tagtag
PRO
0
250
データベース05: SQL(2/3) 結合質問
trycycle
PRO
0
1.3k
SAT ソルバーの仕組みと制約ソルバーへの応用
tsoh
1
230
Kritische evaluatie van GenAI-output voor literatuuronderzoek
voginip
0
240
JSAI2026企画セッションKS-14 インタビュー集『⼈⼯知能と哲学と四つの問い』が提起する⼈⼯知能のこれからの課題 趣旨説明 / JSAI2026 Special Session: A Collection of Interviews, “Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy, and Four Questions”
ykiyota
0
450
共生概念の整理と AIアライメントの構想
hiroakihamada
0
310
機械学習 - SVM
trycycle
PRO
2
1.2k
Conwayの法則を"ちゃんと"使うために — 原典でConwayは何を言っていたのか
bonotake
10
7.1k
Leitner Inauguration Lecture Chalmers University of Technology
xleitix
0
350
O(log n)-Approximation Algorithms for Bipartiteness Ratio
tasusu
0
190
データベース11: 正規化(1/2) - 望ましくない関係スキーマ
trycycle
PRO
0
1.7k
Featured
See All Featured
The Mindset for Success: Future Career Progression
greggifford
PRO
0
490
Sam Torres - BigQuery for SEOs
techseoconnect
PRO
0
540
What does AI have to do with Human Rights?
axbom
PRO
1
2.4k
Designing Dashboards & Data Visualisations in Web Apps
destraynor
232
55k
Why Your Marketing Sucks and What You Can Do About It - Sophie Logan
marketingsoph
0
410
Pawsitive SEO: Lessons from My Dog (and Many Mistakes) on Thriving as a Consultant in the Age of AI
davidcarrasco
0
240
Amusing Abliteration
ianozsvald
1
300
Leveraging LLMs for student feedback in introductory data science courses - posit::conf(2025)
minecr
1
390
Prompt Engineering for Job Search
mfonobong
0
450
Cheating the UX When There Is Nothing More to Optimize - PixelPioneers
stephaniewalter
287
14k
Navigating the moral maze — ethical principles for Al-driven product design
skipperchong
2
540
KATA
mclloyd
PRO
35
15k
Transcript
Régularisation de problèmes inverses Analyse unifiée de la robustesse Samuel
VAITER CNRS, CEREMADE, Université Paris-Dauphine, France Travaux en collaboration avec M. GOLBABAEE, G. PEYRÉ et J. FADILI
Linear Inverse Problems inpainting denoising super-resolution Forward model y =
x0 + w observations noise input operator
The Variational Approach x argmin x RN 1 2 ||y
x||2 2 + J(x) Data fidelity Regularity
The Variational Approach x argmin x RN 1 2 ||y
x||2 2 + J(x) Data fidelity Regularity J(x) = || x||2 J(x) = || x||1
The Variational Approach x argmin x RN 1 2 ||y
x||2 2 + J(x) Data fidelity Regularity J(x) = || x||2 J(x) = || x||1 sparsity analysis-sparsity group-sparsity nuclear norm Tikhonov Total Variation Anti-sparse Polyhedral L1 + TV ... atomic norm decomposable norm Candidate J
Objectives Model selection performance x0 x w Prior model J
Objectives Model selection performance x0 x w Prior model J
Objectives Model selection performance x0 x w Prior model J
How close ? in term of SNR in term of features
Union of Linear Models Union of models: T T linear
spaces
Union of Linear Models Union of models: T T linear
spaces T sparsity
Union of Linear Models Union of models: T T linear
spaces block sparsity T sparsity
Union of Linear Models Union of models: T T linear
spaces block sparsity T sparsity analysis sparsity
Union of Linear Models Union of models: T T linear
spaces block sparsity low rank T sparsity analysis sparsity
Union of Linear Models Union of models: T T linear
spaces block sparsity low rank Objective Encode T in a function T sparsity analysis sparsity
Gauges 1 J(x) J : RN R+ convex J( x)
= J(x), 0
Gauges 1 J(x) J : RN R+ convex C C
= {x : J(x) 1} J( x) = J(x), 0
Gauges 1 J(x) J : RN R+ convex C C
= {x : J(x) 1} Geometry of C Union of Models (T )T T x T x x 0 T0 x x 0 T0 x 0 x T T0 ||x||1 |x1|+||x2,3|| ||x|| ||x|| J( x) = J(x), 0
Subdifferential |x| 0
Subdifferential |x| 0
J(x) = RN : x , J(x ) J(x)+ ,
x x Subdifferential |x| 0
J(x) = RN : x , J(x ) J(x)+ ,
x x Subdifferential |x| 0 |·|(0) = [ 1,1] x = 0, |·|(x) = {sign(x)}
From the Subdifferential to the Model J(x) x 0 J(x)
x 0
From the Subdifferential to the Model J(x) x 0 J(x)
x 0 Tx= VectHull( J(x)) Tx Tx Tx = : supp( ) supp(x)
From the Subdifferential to the Model J(x) x 0 J(x)
x 0 ex = ProjTx ( J(x)) ex ex ex = sign(x) Tx= VectHull( J(x)) Tx Tx Tx = : supp( ) supp(x)
Regularizations and their Models J(x) = ||x||1 ex = sign(x)
Tx = : supp( ) supp(x) x x J(x) = b ||xb|| ex = (N (xb))b B Tx = : supp( ) supp(x) x N (xb) = xb/||xb|| J(x) = ||x||∗ ex =UV Tx = : U V = 0 x x =UΛV ∗ J(x) = ||x||∞ ex = |I| 1 sign(x) Tx = : I sign(xI ) x x I = {i : |xi | = ||x||∞}
Dual Certificates and Model Selection x argmin x RN 1
2 ||y x||2 2 + J(x) Hypothesis: Ker Tx0 = {0} J regular enough
Dual Certificates and Model Selection x argmin x RN 1
2 ||y x||2 2 + J(x) Hypothesis: Ker Tx0 = {0} J regular enough ¯ D = Im ri( J(x0)) Tight dual certificates: x = x0 J(x) x
Dual Certificates and Model Selection x argmin x RN 1
2 ||y x||2 2 + J(x) Hypothesis: 0 = ( + Tx0 ) ex0 Minimal norm pre-certificate: Tx = Tx0 and ||x x0|| = O(||w||) If 0 ¯ D,||w|| small enough and ||w||, then x is the unique solution. Moreover, [V. et al. 2013] 1: [Fuchs 2004] 1 2: [Bach 2008] Ker Tx0 = {0} J regular enough ¯ D = Im ri( J(x0)) Tight dual certificates: x = x0 J(x) x
Example: Sparse Deconvolution x = i xi (· i) J(x)
= ||x||1 Increasing : reduces correlation. reduces resolution. x0 x0
Example: Sparse Deconvolution x = i xi (· i) J(x)
= ||x||1 Increasing : reduces correlation. reduces resolution. x0 x0 I = j : x0[j] = 0 || 0,Ic || < 1 0 ¯ D support recovery || 0,Ic || 1 2 20
Example: 1D TV Denoising J(x) = || x||1 = Id
I = {i : ( x0)i = 0} x0
Example: 1D TV Denoising J(x) = || x||1 = Id
I = {i : ( x0)i = 0} x0 +1 1 0 = div( 0) where j I,( 0)j = 0 x0 I J || 0,Ic || < 1 Support stability
Example: 1D TV Denoising J(x) = || x||1 = Id
I = {i : ( x0)i = 0} x0 +1 1 0 = div( 0) where j I,( 0)j = 0 x0 I J || 0,Ic || < 1 Support stability x0 || 0,Ic || = 1 2-stability only
Conclusion Gauges: encode linear models as singular points
Conclusion Gauges: encode linear models as singular points Certificates: guarantees
of model selection / 2 robustness (see poster 208 for a pure robustness result)
Conclusion Merci de votre attention ! Gauges: encode linear models
as singular points Certificates: guarantees of model selection / 2 robustness (see poster 208 for a pure robustness result)