Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Regularizations of Inverse Problems
Search
Sponsored
·
Your Podcast. Everywhere. Effortlessly.
Share. Educate. Inspire. Entertain. You do you. We'll handle the rest.
→
Samuel Vaiter
September 06, 2013
Science
51
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Regularizations of Inverse Problems
GRETSI'13, Quartz, Brest, September 2013.
Samuel Vaiter
September 06, 2013
More Decks by Samuel Vaiter
See All by Samuel Vaiter
Low Complexity Regularizations: A ''Localization'' Result
svaiter
0
78
A First Look at Proximal Methods
svaiter
0
240
Fast Distributed Total Variation
svaiter
0
120
Low Complexity Regularizations: A Localization Result
svaiter
0
79
Low Complexity Regularizations: a Localization Result
svaiter
0
130
Model Selection with Partly Smooth Functions
svaiter
0
53
Low Complexity Models: Robustness
svaiter
0
81
Low Complexity Models: Robustness and Sensivity
svaiter
0
43
Recovery Guarantees for Low Complexity Models
svaiter
1
82
Other Decks in Science
See All in Science
不動産業界における業界特化のデータ整備とAI活用 ─Vertical DataとVertical AI─
estie
1
930
Tensor Factorization Meets Deformed Information Geometry: Convex Relaxation under Deformed Algebra
gkazunii
0
130
摂理と合理の肉体改造 — AI時代の減量を支える観測・制御・継続
kiyoshi
0
3.2k
データベース11: 正規化(1/2) - 望ましくない関係スキーマ
trycycle
PRO
0
1.7k
1. CPC理論の展開と集合的知能モデル(JSAI2026 KS-27 集合的予測符号化と新たな知性の時代)
hayashiyus884
1
340
(CVPR2026) Back to Basics: Let Denoising Generative Models Denoise
shumpei777
0
310
Understanding CVP Waveforms: Interpretation and Clinical Implications in Anesthesiology
taka88
0
810
生成AIと司法書士の未来.pdf
tagtag
PRO
0
160
TypeScript で WebAssembly を用いた 型安全なプラグイン設計
nagano
2
600
AlgorithAlgorihms for Decision Making
mickey_kubo
0
130
機械学習 - K-means & 階層的クラスタリング
trycycle
PRO
0
2k
Van Dare naar Durf
voginip
0
290
Featured
See All Featured
The #1 spot is gone: here's how to win anyway
tamaranovitovic
3
1.1k
Helping Users Find Their Own Way: Creating Modern Search Experiences
danielanewman
31
3.3k
Breaking role norms: Why Content Design is so much more than writing copy - Taylor Woolridge
uxyall
1
380
Testing 201, or: Great Expectations
jmmastey
46
8.2k
The Director’s Chair: Orchestrating AI for Truly Effective Learning
tmiket
1
280
Gemini Prompt Engineering: Practical Techniques for Tangible AI Outcomes
mfonobong
2
490
The AI Revolution Will Not Be Monopolized: How open-source beats economies of scale, even for LLMs
inesmontani
PRO
3
3.7k
Six Lessons from altMBA
skipperchong
29
4.5k
The Limits of Empathy - UXLibs8
cassininazir
1
610
How to Create Impact in a Changing Tech Landscape [PerfNow 2023]
tammyeverts
56
3.4k
Claude Code のすすめ
schroneko
67
230k
How to Ace a Technical Interview
jacobian
281
24k
Transcript
Régularisation de problèmes inverses Analyse unifiée de la robustesse Samuel
VAITER CNRS, CEREMADE, Université Paris-Dauphine, France Travaux en collaboration avec M. GOLBABAEE, G. PEYRÉ et J. FADILI
Linear Inverse Problems inpainting denoising super-resolution Forward model y =
x0 + w observations noise input operator
The Variational Approach x argmin x RN 1 2 ||y
x||2 2 + J(x) Data fidelity Regularity
The Variational Approach x argmin x RN 1 2 ||y
x||2 2 + J(x) Data fidelity Regularity J(x) = || x||2 J(x) = || x||1
The Variational Approach x argmin x RN 1 2 ||y
x||2 2 + J(x) Data fidelity Regularity J(x) = || x||2 J(x) = || x||1 sparsity analysis-sparsity group-sparsity nuclear norm Tikhonov Total Variation Anti-sparse Polyhedral L1 + TV ... atomic norm decomposable norm Candidate J
Objectives Model selection performance x0 x w Prior model J
Objectives Model selection performance x0 x w Prior model J
Objectives Model selection performance x0 x w Prior model J
How close ? in term of SNR in term of features
Union of Linear Models Union of models: T T linear
spaces
Union of Linear Models Union of models: T T linear
spaces T sparsity
Union of Linear Models Union of models: T T linear
spaces block sparsity T sparsity
Union of Linear Models Union of models: T T linear
spaces block sparsity T sparsity analysis sparsity
Union of Linear Models Union of models: T T linear
spaces block sparsity low rank T sparsity analysis sparsity
Union of Linear Models Union of models: T T linear
spaces block sparsity low rank Objective Encode T in a function T sparsity analysis sparsity
Gauges 1 J(x) J : RN R+ convex J( x)
= J(x), 0
Gauges 1 J(x) J : RN R+ convex C C
= {x : J(x) 1} J( x) = J(x), 0
Gauges 1 J(x) J : RN R+ convex C C
= {x : J(x) 1} Geometry of C Union of Models (T )T T x T x x 0 T0 x x 0 T0 x 0 x T T0 ||x||1 |x1|+||x2,3|| ||x|| ||x|| J( x) = J(x), 0
Subdifferential |x| 0
Subdifferential |x| 0
J(x) = RN : x , J(x ) J(x)+ ,
x x Subdifferential |x| 0
J(x) = RN : x , J(x ) J(x)+ ,
x x Subdifferential |x| 0 |·|(0) = [ 1,1] x = 0, |·|(x) = {sign(x)}
From the Subdifferential to the Model J(x) x 0 J(x)
x 0
From the Subdifferential to the Model J(x) x 0 J(x)
x 0 Tx= VectHull( J(x)) Tx Tx Tx = : supp( ) supp(x)
From the Subdifferential to the Model J(x) x 0 J(x)
x 0 ex = ProjTx ( J(x)) ex ex ex = sign(x) Tx= VectHull( J(x)) Tx Tx Tx = : supp( ) supp(x)
Regularizations and their Models J(x) = ||x||1 ex = sign(x)
Tx = : supp( ) supp(x) x x J(x) = b ||xb|| ex = (N (xb))b B Tx = : supp( ) supp(x) x N (xb) = xb/||xb|| J(x) = ||x||∗ ex =UV Tx = : U V = 0 x x =UΛV ∗ J(x) = ||x||∞ ex = |I| 1 sign(x) Tx = : I sign(xI ) x x I = {i : |xi | = ||x||∞}
Dual Certificates and Model Selection x argmin x RN 1
2 ||y x||2 2 + J(x) Hypothesis: Ker Tx0 = {0} J regular enough
Dual Certificates and Model Selection x argmin x RN 1
2 ||y x||2 2 + J(x) Hypothesis: Ker Tx0 = {0} J regular enough ¯ D = Im ri( J(x0)) Tight dual certificates: x = x0 J(x) x
Dual Certificates and Model Selection x argmin x RN 1
2 ||y x||2 2 + J(x) Hypothesis: 0 = ( + Tx0 ) ex0 Minimal norm pre-certificate: Tx = Tx0 and ||x x0|| = O(||w||) If 0 ¯ D,||w|| small enough and ||w||, then x is the unique solution. Moreover, [V. et al. 2013] 1: [Fuchs 2004] 1 2: [Bach 2008] Ker Tx0 = {0} J regular enough ¯ D = Im ri( J(x0)) Tight dual certificates: x = x0 J(x) x
Example: Sparse Deconvolution x = i xi (· i) J(x)
= ||x||1 Increasing : reduces correlation. reduces resolution. x0 x0
Example: Sparse Deconvolution x = i xi (· i) J(x)
= ||x||1 Increasing : reduces correlation. reduces resolution. x0 x0 I = j : x0[j] = 0 || 0,Ic || < 1 0 ¯ D support recovery || 0,Ic || 1 2 20
Example: 1D TV Denoising J(x) = || x||1 = Id
I = {i : ( x0)i = 0} x0
Example: 1D TV Denoising J(x) = || x||1 = Id
I = {i : ( x0)i = 0} x0 +1 1 0 = div( 0) where j I,( 0)j = 0 x0 I J || 0,Ic || < 1 Support stability
Example: 1D TV Denoising J(x) = || x||1 = Id
I = {i : ( x0)i = 0} x0 +1 1 0 = div( 0) where j I,( 0)j = 0 x0 I J || 0,Ic || < 1 Support stability x0 || 0,Ic || = 1 2-stability only
Conclusion Gauges: encode linear models as singular points
Conclusion Gauges: encode linear models as singular points Certificates: guarantees
of model selection / 2 robustness (see poster 208 for a pure robustness result)
Conclusion Merci de votre attention ! Gauges: encode linear models
as singular points Certificates: guarantees of model selection / 2 robustness (see poster 208 for a pure robustness result)