Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Regularizations of Inverse Problems
Search
Samuel Vaiter
September 06, 2013
Science
50
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Regularizations of Inverse Problems
GRETSI'13, Quartz, Brest, September 2013.
Samuel Vaiter
September 06, 2013
More Decks by Samuel Vaiter
See All by Samuel Vaiter
Low Complexity Regularizations: A ''Localization'' Result
svaiter
0
74
A First Look at Proximal Methods
svaiter
0
230
Fast Distributed Total Variation
svaiter
0
120
Low Complexity Regularizations: A Localization Result
svaiter
0
77
Low Complexity Regularizations: a Localization Result
svaiter
0
130
Model Selection with Partly Smooth Functions
svaiter
0
49
Low Complexity Models: Robustness
svaiter
0
80
Low Complexity Models: Robustness and Sensivity
svaiter
0
41
Recovery Guarantees for Low Complexity Models
svaiter
1
80
Other Decks in Science
See All in Science
HDC tutorial
michielstock
2
710
力学系から見た現代的な機械学習
hanbao
4
4.2k
アクシズを探せ! 各勢力の位置関係についての考察
miu_crescent
PRO
1
370
Rashomon at the Sound: Reconstructing all possible paleoearthquake histories in the Puget Lowland through topological search
cossatot
0
1k
Bear-safety-running
akirun_run
0
150
MATSUO Makiko
genomethica
0
150
YouTubeにおける撤回論文の参照実態 / metascience-meetup2026
corgies
3
290
AI(人工知能)の過去・現在・未来 ~AIは人類を越えるのか~
tagtag
PRO
0
100
俺たちは本当に分かり合えるのか? ~ PdMとスクラムチームの “ずれ” を科学する
bonotake
2
2.4k
データベース02: データベースの概念
trycycle
PRO
2
1.2k
Physical AIを支えるWeights & Biases
olachinkei
1
370
Testing the Longevity Bottleneck Hypothesis
chinson03
0
320
Featured
See All Featured
Leading Effective Engineering Teams in the AI Era
addyosmani
9
2k
Thoughts on Productivity
jonyablonski
76
5.2k
Navigating Algorithm Shifts & AI Overviews - #SMXNext
aleyda
1
1.3k
Impact Scores and Hybrid Strategies: The future of link building
tamaranovitovic
0
310
Why Your Marketing Sucks and What You Can Do About It - Sophie Logan
marketingsoph
0
170
How People are Using Generative and Agentic AI to Supercharge Their Products, Projects, Services and Value Streams Today
helenjbeal
1
210
How Software Deployment tools have changed in the past 20 years
geshan
0
34k
JavaScript: Past, Present, and Future - NDC Porto 2020
reverentgeek
52
6k
YesSQL, Process and Tooling at Scale
rocio
174
15k
ピンチをチャンスに:未来をつくるプロダクトロードマップ #pmconf2020
aki_iinuma
128
56k
Put a Button on it: Removing Barriers to Going Fast.
kastner
60
4.3k
Highjacked: Video Game Concept Design
rkendrick25
PRO
1
390
Transcript
Régularisation de problèmes inverses Analyse unifiée de la robustesse Samuel
VAITER CNRS, CEREMADE, Université Paris-Dauphine, France Travaux en collaboration avec M. GOLBABAEE, G. PEYRÉ et J. FADILI
Linear Inverse Problems inpainting denoising super-resolution Forward model y =
x0 + w observations noise input operator
The Variational Approach x argmin x RN 1 2 ||y
x||2 2 + J(x) Data fidelity Regularity
The Variational Approach x argmin x RN 1 2 ||y
x||2 2 + J(x) Data fidelity Regularity J(x) = || x||2 J(x) = || x||1
The Variational Approach x argmin x RN 1 2 ||y
x||2 2 + J(x) Data fidelity Regularity J(x) = || x||2 J(x) = || x||1 sparsity analysis-sparsity group-sparsity nuclear norm Tikhonov Total Variation Anti-sparse Polyhedral L1 + TV ... atomic norm decomposable norm Candidate J
Objectives Model selection performance x0 x w Prior model J
Objectives Model selection performance x0 x w Prior model J
Objectives Model selection performance x0 x w Prior model J
How close ? in term of SNR in term of features
Union of Linear Models Union of models: T T linear
spaces
Union of Linear Models Union of models: T T linear
spaces T sparsity
Union of Linear Models Union of models: T T linear
spaces block sparsity T sparsity
Union of Linear Models Union of models: T T linear
spaces block sparsity T sparsity analysis sparsity
Union of Linear Models Union of models: T T linear
spaces block sparsity low rank T sparsity analysis sparsity
Union of Linear Models Union of models: T T linear
spaces block sparsity low rank Objective Encode T in a function T sparsity analysis sparsity
Gauges 1 J(x) J : RN R+ convex J( x)
= J(x), 0
Gauges 1 J(x) J : RN R+ convex C C
= {x : J(x) 1} J( x) = J(x), 0
Gauges 1 J(x) J : RN R+ convex C C
= {x : J(x) 1} Geometry of C Union of Models (T )T T x T x x 0 T0 x x 0 T0 x 0 x T T0 ||x||1 |x1|+||x2,3|| ||x|| ||x|| J( x) = J(x), 0
Subdifferential |x| 0
Subdifferential |x| 0
J(x) = RN : x , J(x ) J(x)+ ,
x x Subdifferential |x| 0
J(x) = RN : x , J(x ) J(x)+ ,
x x Subdifferential |x| 0 |·|(0) = [ 1,1] x = 0, |·|(x) = {sign(x)}
From the Subdifferential to the Model J(x) x 0 J(x)
x 0
From the Subdifferential to the Model J(x) x 0 J(x)
x 0 Tx= VectHull( J(x)) Tx Tx Tx = : supp( ) supp(x)
From the Subdifferential to the Model J(x) x 0 J(x)
x 0 ex = ProjTx ( J(x)) ex ex ex = sign(x) Tx= VectHull( J(x)) Tx Tx Tx = : supp( ) supp(x)
Regularizations and their Models J(x) = ||x||1 ex = sign(x)
Tx = : supp( ) supp(x) x x J(x) = b ||xb|| ex = (N (xb))b B Tx = : supp( ) supp(x) x N (xb) = xb/||xb|| J(x) = ||x||∗ ex =UV Tx = : U V = 0 x x =UΛV ∗ J(x) = ||x||∞ ex = |I| 1 sign(x) Tx = : I sign(xI ) x x I = {i : |xi | = ||x||∞}
Dual Certificates and Model Selection x argmin x RN 1
2 ||y x||2 2 + J(x) Hypothesis: Ker Tx0 = {0} J regular enough
Dual Certificates and Model Selection x argmin x RN 1
2 ||y x||2 2 + J(x) Hypothesis: Ker Tx0 = {0} J regular enough ¯ D = Im ri( J(x0)) Tight dual certificates: x = x0 J(x) x
Dual Certificates and Model Selection x argmin x RN 1
2 ||y x||2 2 + J(x) Hypothesis: 0 = ( + Tx0 ) ex0 Minimal norm pre-certificate: Tx = Tx0 and ||x x0|| = O(||w||) If 0 ¯ D,||w|| small enough and ||w||, then x is the unique solution. Moreover, [V. et al. 2013] 1: [Fuchs 2004] 1 2: [Bach 2008] Ker Tx0 = {0} J regular enough ¯ D = Im ri( J(x0)) Tight dual certificates: x = x0 J(x) x
Example: Sparse Deconvolution x = i xi (· i) J(x)
= ||x||1 Increasing : reduces correlation. reduces resolution. x0 x0
Example: Sparse Deconvolution x = i xi (· i) J(x)
= ||x||1 Increasing : reduces correlation. reduces resolution. x0 x0 I = j : x0[j] = 0 || 0,Ic || < 1 0 ¯ D support recovery || 0,Ic || 1 2 20
Example: 1D TV Denoising J(x) = || x||1 = Id
I = {i : ( x0)i = 0} x0
Example: 1D TV Denoising J(x) = || x||1 = Id
I = {i : ( x0)i = 0} x0 +1 1 0 = div( 0) where j I,( 0)j = 0 x0 I J || 0,Ic || < 1 Support stability
Example: 1D TV Denoising J(x) = || x||1 = Id
I = {i : ( x0)i = 0} x0 +1 1 0 = div( 0) where j I,( 0)j = 0 x0 I J || 0,Ic || < 1 Support stability x0 || 0,Ic || = 1 2-stability only
Conclusion Gauges: encode linear models as singular points
Conclusion Gauges: encode linear models as singular points Certificates: guarantees
of model selection / 2 robustness (see poster 208 for a pure robustness result)
Conclusion Merci de votre attention ! Gauges: encode linear models
as singular points Certificates: guarantees of model selection / 2 robustness (see poster 208 for a pure robustness result)