Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Regularizations of Inverse Problems
Search
Samuel Vaiter
September 06, 2013
Science
0
48
Regularizations of Inverse Problems
GRETSI'13, Quartz, Brest, September 2013.
Samuel Vaiter
September 06, 2013
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Samuel Vaiter
See All by Samuel Vaiter
Low Complexity Regularizations: A ''Localization'' Result
svaiter
0
66
A First Look at Proximal Methods
svaiter
0
220
Fast Distributed Total Variation
svaiter
0
120
Low Complexity Regularizations: A Localization Result
svaiter
0
69
Low Complexity Regularizations: a Localization Result
svaiter
0
120
Model Selection with Partly Smooth Functions
svaiter
0
42
Low Complexity Models: Robustness
svaiter
0
68
Low Complexity Models: Robustness and Sensivity
svaiter
0
39
Recovery Guarantees for Low Complexity Models
svaiter
1
78
Other Decks in Science
See All in Science
あなたに水耕栽培を愛していないとは言わせない
mutsumix
1
280
学術講演会中央大学学員会府中支部
tagtag
PRO
0
360
良書紹介04_生命科学の実験デザイン
bunnchinn3
0
140
MATSUO Makiko
genomethica
0
110
データベース15: ビッグデータ時代のデータベース
trycycle
PRO
0
460
AI(人工知能)の過去・現在・未来 —AIは人間を超えるのか—
tagtag
PRO
0
160
Performance Evaluation and Ranking of Drivers in Multiple Motorsports Using Massey’s Method
konakalab
0
160
機械学習 - ニューラルネットワーク入門
trycycle
PRO
0
960
20260220 OpenIDファウンデーション・ジャパン ご紹介 / 20260220 OpenID Foundation Japan Intro
oidfj
0
240
俺たちは本当に分かり合えるのか? ~ PdMとスクラムチームの “ずれ” を科学する
bonotake
2
2k
タンパク質間相互作⽤を利⽤した⼈⼯知能による新しい薬剤遺伝⼦-疾患相互作⽤の同定
tagtag
PRO
0
180
先端因果推論特別研究チームの研究構想と 人間とAIが協働する自律因果探索の展望
sshimizu2006
3
800
Featured
See All Featured
"I'm Feeling Lucky" - Building Great Search Experiences for Today's Users (#IAC19)
danielanewman
231
22k
DevOps and Value Stream Thinking: Enabling flow, efficiency and business value
helenjbeal
1
150
What does AI have to do with Human Rights?
axbom
PRO
1
2k
Neural Spatial Audio Processing for Sound Field Analysis and Control
skoyamalab
0
210
Organizational Design Perspectives: An Ontology of Organizational Design Elements
kimpetersen
PRO
1
640
Writing Fast Ruby
sferik
630
63k
The State of eCommerce SEO: How to Win in Today's Products SERPs - #SEOweek
aleyda
2
9.9k
Code Review Best Practice
trishagee
74
20k
GitHub's CSS Performance
jonrohan
1032
470k
What the history of the web can teach us about the future of AI
inesmontani
PRO
1
470
Helping Users Find Their Own Way: Creating Modern Search Experiences
danielanewman
31
3.1k
Raft: Consensus for Rubyists
vanstee
141
7.4k
Transcript
Régularisation de problèmes inverses Analyse unifiée de la robustesse Samuel
VAITER CNRS, CEREMADE, Université Paris-Dauphine, France Travaux en collaboration avec M. GOLBABAEE, G. PEYRÉ et J. FADILI
Linear Inverse Problems inpainting denoising super-resolution Forward model y =
x0 + w observations noise input operator
The Variational Approach x argmin x RN 1 2 ||y
x||2 2 + J(x) Data fidelity Regularity
The Variational Approach x argmin x RN 1 2 ||y
x||2 2 + J(x) Data fidelity Regularity J(x) = || x||2 J(x) = || x||1
The Variational Approach x argmin x RN 1 2 ||y
x||2 2 + J(x) Data fidelity Regularity J(x) = || x||2 J(x) = || x||1 sparsity analysis-sparsity group-sparsity nuclear norm Tikhonov Total Variation Anti-sparse Polyhedral L1 + TV ... atomic norm decomposable norm Candidate J
Objectives Model selection performance x0 x w Prior model J
Objectives Model selection performance x0 x w Prior model J
Objectives Model selection performance x0 x w Prior model J
How close ? in term of SNR in term of features
Union of Linear Models Union of models: T T linear
spaces
Union of Linear Models Union of models: T T linear
spaces T sparsity
Union of Linear Models Union of models: T T linear
spaces block sparsity T sparsity
Union of Linear Models Union of models: T T linear
spaces block sparsity T sparsity analysis sparsity
Union of Linear Models Union of models: T T linear
spaces block sparsity low rank T sparsity analysis sparsity
Union of Linear Models Union of models: T T linear
spaces block sparsity low rank Objective Encode T in a function T sparsity analysis sparsity
Gauges 1 J(x) J : RN R+ convex J( x)
= J(x), 0
Gauges 1 J(x) J : RN R+ convex C C
= {x : J(x) 1} J( x) = J(x), 0
Gauges 1 J(x) J : RN R+ convex C C
= {x : J(x) 1} Geometry of C Union of Models (T )T T x T x x 0 T0 x x 0 T0 x 0 x T T0 ||x||1 |x1|+||x2,3|| ||x|| ||x|| J( x) = J(x), 0
Subdifferential |x| 0
Subdifferential |x| 0
J(x) = RN : x , J(x ) J(x)+ ,
x x Subdifferential |x| 0
J(x) = RN : x , J(x ) J(x)+ ,
x x Subdifferential |x| 0 |·|(0) = [ 1,1] x = 0, |·|(x) = {sign(x)}
From the Subdifferential to the Model J(x) x 0 J(x)
x 0
From the Subdifferential to the Model J(x) x 0 J(x)
x 0 Tx= VectHull( J(x)) Tx Tx Tx = : supp( ) supp(x)
From the Subdifferential to the Model J(x) x 0 J(x)
x 0 ex = ProjTx ( J(x)) ex ex ex = sign(x) Tx= VectHull( J(x)) Tx Tx Tx = : supp( ) supp(x)
Regularizations and their Models J(x) = ||x||1 ex = sign(x)
Tx = : supp( ) supp(x) x x J(x) = b ||xb|| ex = (N (xb))b B Tx = : supp( ) supp(x) x N (xb) = xb/||xb|| J(x) = ||x||∗ ex =UV Tx = : U V = 0 x x =UΛV ∗ J(x) = ||x||∞ ex = |I| 1 sign(x) Tx = : I sign(xI ) x x I = {i : |xi | = ||x||∞}
Dual Certificates and Model Selection x argmin x RN 1
2 ||y x||2 2 + J(x) Hypothesis: Ker Tx0 = {0} J regular enough
Dual Certificates and Model Selection x argmin x RN 1
2 ||y x||2 2 + J(x) Hypothesis: Ker Tx0 = {0} J regular enough ¯ D = Im ri( J(x0)) Tight dual certificates: x = x0 J(x) x
Dual Certificates and Model Selection x argmin x RN 1
2 ||y x||2 2 + J(x) Hypothesis: 0 = ( + Tx0 ) ex0 Minimal norm pre-certificate: Tx = Tx0 and ||x x0|| = O(||w||) If 0 ¯ D,||w|| small enough and ||w||, then x is the unique solution. Moreover, [V. et al. 2013] 1: [Fuchs 2004] 1 2: [Bach 2008] Ker Tx0 = {0} J regular enough ¯ D = Im ri( J(x0)) Tight dual certificates: x = x0 J(x) x
Example: Sparse Deconvolution x = i xi (· i) J(x)
= ||x||1 Increasing : reduces correlation. reduces resolution. x0 x0
Example: Sparse Deconvolution x = i xi (· i) J(x)
= ||x||1 Increasing : reduces correlation. reduces resolution. x0 x0 I = j : x0[j] = 0 || 0,Ic || < 1 0 ¯ D support recovery || 0,Ic || 1 2 20
Example: 1D TV Denoising J(x) = || x||1 = Id
I = {i : ( x0)i = 0} x0
Example: 1D TV Denoising J(x) = || x||1 = Id
I = {i : ( x0)i = 0} x0 +1 1 0 = div( 0) where j I,( 0)j = 0 x0 I J || 0,Ic || < 1 Support stability
Example: 1D TV Denoising J(x) = || x||1 = Id
I = {i : ( x0)i = 0} x0 +1 1 0 = div( 0) where j I,( 0)j = 0 x0 I J || 0,Ic || < 1 Support stability x0 || 0,Ic || = 1 2-stability only
Conclusion Gauges: encode linear models as singular points
Conclusion Gauges: encode linear models as singular points Certificates: guarantees
of model selection / 2 robustness (see poster 208 for a pure robustness result)
Conclusion Merci de votre attention ! Gauges: encode linear models
as singular points Certificates: guarantees of model selection / 2 robustness (see poster 208 for a pure robustness result)