References !Consists of many different sections !Each section seems to have different roles and contents "What should we write in each section? "How to make sure the consistency?
intentionally redundant for better understanding !Repeat of the basic arguments in different resolution "Just focus on structuring the basic arguments! 1. Background 2. Methods 3. Experiments Methods Experiments Background Methods Experiments Background Background Methods Experiments
the overall performance, but how? ü Do they work as you hypothesized? ü Do they solve the problem you pointed out? Ø Confirming here that the methods mitigate the anisotropic distribution of token representations
Better Performance Apply X ü Overall performance ü Ablation study ✘ Focused analysis • As you don't have any guess on how/why X works here • "X does something awesome!" • You don't have any hypotheses to test regarding how/why X works ! Shallow contribution
Problem X Better Performance Apply X ü Overall performance ü Ablation study ü Focused analysis • You can check how X solves the problem based on hypotheses • That gives the explanation of why X works here ! Deeper insight into the limitation/generalization of X ! More critical contribution