Upgrade to PRO for Only $50/Year—Limited-Time Offer! 🔥
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Extending Foodcritic with new rules
Search
Andrew Crump
February 04, 2014
Programming
2
660
Extending Foodcritic with new rules
Config Management Camp, Gent on 4th February 2014
Andrew Crump
February 04, 2014
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Andrew Crump
See All by Andrew Crump
Porting a small project from Go to Rust
acrmp
0
16
Docker and Cloud Foundry
acrmp
0
110
Continuous Delivery with Cloud Foundry
acrmp
1
110
Patterns for treating infrastructure as code
acrmp
1
300
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
ソフトウェア設計の課題・原則・実践技法
masuda220
PRO
26
22k
AIの誤りが許されない業務システムにおいて“信頼されるAI” を目指す / building-trusted-ai-systems
yuya4
6
2.4k
從冷知識到漏洞,你不懂的 Web,駭客懂 - Huli @ WebConf Taiwan 2025
aszx87410
1
1.2k
Developing static sites with Ruby
okuramasafumi
0
260
AIコーディングエージェント(Manus)
kondai24
0
160
チームをチームにするEM
hitode909
0
300
React Native New Architecture 移行実践報告
taminif
1
150
DSPy Meetup Tokyo #1 - はじめてのDSPy
masahiro_nishimi
1
160
dnx で実行できるコマンド、作ってみました
tomohisa
0
140
LLM Çağında Backend Olmak: 10 Milyon Prompt'u Milisaniyede Sorgulamak
selcukusta
0
110
【CA.ai #3】ワークフローから見直すAIエージェント — 必要な場面と“選ばない”判断
satoaoaka
0
230
著者と進める!『AIと個人開発したくなったらまずCursorで要件定義だ!』
yasunacoffee
0
120
Featured
See All Featured
Building Applications with DynamoDB
mza
96
6.8k
Become a Pro
speakerdeck
PRO
31
5.7k
No one is an island. Learnings from fostering a developers community.
thoeni
21
3.5k
ReactJS: Keep Simple. Everything can be a component!
pedronauck
666
130k
Designing for humans not robots
tammielis
254
26k
The Art of Delivering Value - GDevCon NA Keynote
reverentgeek
16
1.8k
Fight the Zombie Pattern Library - RWD Summit 2016
marcelosomers
234
17k
The Success of Rails: Ensuring Growth for the Next 100 Years
eileencodes
47
7.8k
Bootstrapping a Software Product
garrettdimon
PRO
307
120k
Statistics for Hackers
jakevdp
799
230k
Making Projects Easy
brettharned
120
6.5k
Keith and Marios Guide to Fast Websites
keithpitt
413
23k
Transcript
Extending foodcritic with new rules #cfgmgmtcamp #getchef
Overview
What is foodcritic?
A lint tool for your cookbooks
47 Built-in Rules
Goal: Identify problems in your cookbooks
file "/var/lib/foo" do owner "root" group "root" mode 644 action
:create end
file "/var/lib/foo" do owner "root" group "root" mode 644 action
:create end
$ foodcritic . FC006: Mode should be quoted or fully
specified when setting file permissions: ./ recipes/default.rb:9
file "/var/lib/foo" do owner "root" group "root" mode "644" action
:create end
Goal: Encourage discussion on the subjective stuff
execute "wget 'http:// example.org/' -Ofoo" do action :run end
execute "wget 'http:// example.org/' -Ofoo" do action :run end
$ foodcritic . FC041: Execute resource used to run curl
or wget commands: ./recipes/ default.rb:9
remote_file "foo" do source "http://example.org/" end
Goal: Write your own rules
# Specify rules on # the command line $ foodcritic
-I your_rule.rb . ! # You can also # package your rules # as a gem
How does it work?
Static code analysis
Example: Declaring resources in a loop
# The original recipe %w{foo bar baz}.each do |pkg| package
pkg end
# This is what Chef sees at converge time package[foo]
package[bar] package[baz]
# This is what foodcritic sees %w{foo bar baz}.each do
|pkg| package pkg end
Peter Zotov @whitequark fucking ruby and its fucking parser, how
does it even work?! I *still* have no idea
# recipe with a single resource file '/etc/foo' do mode
0600 content 'bar' end
pry> Ripper.sexp(code)
=> [:program, [[:method_add_block, [:command, [:@ident, "file", [2, 0]], [:args_add_block, [[:string_literal,
[:string_content, [:@tstring_content, "/ etc/foo", [2, 6]]]]], false]], [:do_block, nil, [[:command, [:@ident, "mode", [3, 2]], [:args_add_block, [[:@int, "0600", [3, 7]]], false]], [:command, [:@ident, "content", [4, 2]], [:args_add_block, [[:string_literal, [:string_content, [:@tstring_content, "bar", [4, 11]]]]], false]]]]]]]
Those are some deeply nested arrays
Ruby lets us build terse yet powerful expressions
But the path to a node in the tree is
important
<? XML ?> An elegant weapon for a more civilised
age
XPath //method_add_block/ command/ ident[@value="mode"]
ANTLR 4.2 SNAPSHOT "xpath/pattern matching for parse trees"
The structure of a rule
rule "FC123", "Name" do recipe do |ast| # some #
expression end end
cookbook environment library metadata resource role Hooks recipe do |ast|
ast.xpath(..) end
rule "FC123", "Name" do recipe do |ast| # some #expression
end end
Ruby returns the last expression Foodcritic converts the last expression
to matches
Let’s walk through the code for FC006
rule "FC006", "Mode should be quoted or fully specified when
setting file permissions" do
# We pass an array of tags in, common tags
include 'correctness' and 'style' tags %w{correctness files}
recipe do |ast| ast.xpath(%q{a/ long/xpath/string}) end
# any mode identifier // ident[@value='mode']/ ! # we need
to go up one parent::command/ ! # a literal integer descendant::int
# filtering again [ ! # needs to be less
# than five digits # long string-length(@value) < 5
# match 644 not 0644 and not( starts-with(@value, "0") and
string length(@value) = 4 ) ! # stop filtering ]
# choose the line num # to show to the
end # user /ancestor:: method_add_block # do this if the AST # node does not have # a descendant node # with a position
Pry is awesome and is a must for developing FC
rules
Drop a pry binding in your rule and explore pry>
ls pry> a_method() pry> whereami
rule "FC123", "Name" do recipe do |ast| binding.pry end end
pry> ast.xpath( '//do_block/command/ ident')
Tip: Chef now includes Pry as a runtime dependency as
of 11.8.0.
ancestor child descendant following parent preceding Axes
XPath expressions can be annoying ! Here’s some I prepared
earlier
attribute_access declared_dependencies find_resources notifications resource_attribute? resources_by_type searches API Foodcritic
all? any? find group_by inject map select Ruby Enumerable
Testing it actually works
Trust is really important - false positives undermine that trust
in the tool
Foodcritic core rules test against lots of examples
Examples: | environment_name | show_warning | | production | should
not | | pre_production | should not | | production-eu | should not | | production2 | should not | | Production | should not | | EU West | should | | production (eu-west) | should |
Different syntax in recipes results in different AST trees
Different Ruby versions can mean different AST trees 1.9.2, 1.9.3
and 2.0.0
Ok. I have my automated examples passing. I should be
good right?
Ok. I have my automated examples passing. I should be
good right? Nee! Non! No!
Test against a large corpus of real cookbooks
Ideas
Suggest Chef Sugar FC789: Use Chef Sugar to simplify platform
check
Spot duplication across recipes FC678: Compose recipes to reduce duplication
Validate recipe package names FC567: Package not present in distribution
What’s next?
Backlog of issues that could use your help!
Hack Afternoon
Thanks! @acrmp foodcritic.io freenode #chef
Extending foodcritic with new rules #cfgmgmtcamp #getchef