Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Extending Foodcritic with new rules
Search
Andrew Crump
February 04, 2014
Programming
2
660
Extending Foodcritic with new rules
Config Management Camp, Gent on 4th February 2014
Andrew Crump
February 04, 2014
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Andrew Crump
See All by Andrew Crump
Porting a small project from Go to Rust
acrmp
0
15
Docker and Cloud Foundry
acrmp
0
110
Continuous Delivery with Cloud Foundry
acrmp
1
110
Patterns for treating infrastructure as code
acrmp
1
300
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
🔨 小さなビルドシステムを作る
momeemt
4
670
Testing Trophyは叫ばない
toms74209200
0
860
旅行プランAIエージェント開発の裏側
ippo012
2
890
Laravel Boost 超入門
fire_arlo
2
210
go test -json そして testing.T.Attr / Kyoto.go #63
utgwkk
3
290
ぬるぬる動かせ! Riveでアニメーション実装🐾
kno3a87
1
210
モバイルアプリからWebへの横展開を加速した話_Claude_Code_実践術.pdf
kazuyasakamoto
0
320
はじめてのMaterial3 Expressive
ym223
2
260
rage against annotate_predecessor
junk0612
0
160
CloudflareのChat Agent Starter Kitで簡単!AIチャットボット構築
syumai
2
480
AI Coding Agentのセキュリティリスク:PRの自己承認とメルカリの対策
s3h
0
200
How Android Uses Data Structures Behind The Scenes
l2hyunwoo
0
420
Featured
See All Featured
What's in a price? How to price your products and services
michaelherold
246
12k
CSS Pre-Processors: Stylus, Less & Sass
bermonpainter
358
30k
The Language of Interfaces
destraynor
161
25k
Measuring & Analyzing Core Web Vitals
bluesmoon
9
580
Stop Working from a Prison Cell
hatefulcrawdad
271
21k
Unsuck your backbone
ammeep
671
58k
The Psychology of Web Performance [Beyond Tellerrand 2023]
tammyeverts
49
3k
CoffeeScript is Beautiful & I Never Want to Write Plain JavaScript Again
sstephenson
162
15k
VelocityConf: Rendering Performance Case Studies
addyosmani
332
24k
What’s in a name? Adding method to the madness
productmarketing
PRO
23
3.7k
Typedesign – Prime Four
hannesfritz
42
2.8k
The Pragmatic Product Professional
lauravandoore
36
6.9k
Transcript
Extending foodcritic with new rules #cfgmgmtcamp #getchef
Overview
What is foodcritic?
A lint tool for your cookbooks
47 Built-in Rules
Goal: Identify problems in your cookbooks
file "/var/lib/foo" do owner "root" group "root" mode 644 action
:create end
file "/var/lib/foo" do owner "root" group "root" mode 644 action
:create end
$ foodcritic . FC006: Mode should be quoted or fully
specified when setting file permissions: ./ recipes/default.rb:9
file "/var/lib/foo" do owner "root" group "root" mode "644" action
:create end
Goal: Encourage discussion on the subjective stuff
execute "wget 'http:// example.org/' -Ofoo" do action :run end
execute "wget 'http:// example.org/' -Ofoo" do action :run end
$ foodcritic . FC041: Execute resource used to run curl
or wget commands: ./recipes/ default.rb:9
remote_file "foo" do source "http://example.org/" end
Goal: Write your own rules
# Specify rules on # the command line $ foodcritic
-I your_rule.rb . ! # You can also # package your rules # as a gem
How does it work?
Static code analysis
Example: Declaring resources in a loop
# The original recipe %w{foo bar baz}.each do |pkg| package
pkg end
# This is what Chef sees at converge time package[foo]
package[bar] package[baz]
# This is what foodcritic sees %w{foo bar baz}.each do
|pkg| package pkg end
Peter Zotov @whitequark fucking ruby and its fucking parser, how
does it even work?! I *still* have no idea
# recipe with a single resource file '/etc/foo' do mode
0600 content 'bar' end
pry> Ripper.sexp(code)
=> [:program, [[:method_add_block, [:command, [:@ident, "file", [2, 0]], [:args_add_block, [[:string_literal,
[:string_content, [:@tstring_content, "/ etc/foo", [2, 6]]]]], false]], [:do_block, nil, [[:command, [:@ident, "mode", [3, 2]], [:args_add_block, [[:@int, "0600", [3, 7]]], false]], [:command, [:@ident, "content", [4, 2]], [:args_add_block, [[:string_literal, [:string_content, [:@tstring_content, "bar", [4, 11]]]]], false]]]]]]]
Those are some deeply nested arrays
Ruby lets us build terse yet powerful expressions
But the path to a node in the tree is
important
<? XML ?> An elegant weapon for a more civilised
age
XPath //method_add_block/ command/ ident[@value="mode"]
ANTLR 4.2 SNAPSHOT "xpath/pattern matching for parse trees"
The structure of a rule
rule "FC123", "Name" do recipe do |ast| # some #
expression end end
cookbook environment library metadata resource role Hooks recipe do |ast|
ast.xpath(..) end
rule "FC123", "Name" do recipe do |ast| # some #expression
end end
Ruby returns the last expression Foodcritic converts the last expression
to matches
Let’s walk through the code for FC006
rule "FC006", "Mode should be quoted or fully specified when
setting file permissions" do
# We pass an array of tags in, common tags
include 'correctness' and 'style' tags %w{correctness files}
recipe do |ast| ast.xpath(%q{a/ long/xpath/string}) end
# any mode identifier // ident[@value='mode']/ ! # we need
to go up one parent::command/ ! # a literal integer descendant::int
# filtering again [ ! # needs to be less
# than five digits # long string-length(@value) < 5
# match 644 not 0644 and not( starts-with(@value, "0") and
string length(@value) = 4 ) ! # stop filtering ]
# choose the line num # to show to the
end # user /ancestor:: method_add_block # do this if the AST # node does not have # a descendant node # with a position
Pry is awesome and is a must for developing FC
rules
Drop a pry binding in your rule and explore pry>
ls pry> a_method() pry> whereami
rule "FC123", "Name" do recipe do |ast| binding.pry end end
pry> ast.xpath( '//do_block/command/ ident')
Tip: Chef now includes Pry as a runtime dependency as
of 11.8.0.
ancestor child descendant following parent preceding Axes
XPath expressions can be annoying ! Here’s some I prepared
earlier
attribute_access declared_dependencies find_resources notifications resource_attribute? resources_by_type searches API Foodcritic
all? any? find group_by inject map select Ruby Enumerable
Testing it actually works
Trust is really important - false positives undermine that trust
in the tool
Foodcritic core rules test against lots of examples
Examples: | environment_name | show_warning | | production | should
not | | pre_production | should not | | production-eu | should not | | production2 | should not | | Production | should not | | EU West | should | | production (eu-west) | should |
Different syntax in recipes results in different AST trees
Different Ruby versions can mean different AST trees 1.9.2, 1.9.3
and 2.0.0
Ok. I have my automated examples passing. I should be
good right?
Ok. I have my automated examples passing. I should be
good right? Nee! Non! No!
Test against a large corpus of real cookbooks
Ideas
Suggest Chef Sugar FC789: Use Chef Sugar to simplify platform
check
Spot duplication across recipes FC678: Compose recipes to reduce duplication
Validate recipe package names FC567: Package not present in distribution
What’s next?
Backlog of issues that could use your help!
Hack Afternoon
Thanks! @acrmp foodcritic.io freenode #chef
Extending foodcritic with new rules #cfgmgmtcamp #getchef