Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Extending Foodcritic with new rules
Search
Andrew Crump
February 04, 2014
Programming
2
670
Extending Foodcritic with new rules
Config Management Camp, Gent on 4th February 2014
Andrew Crump
February 04, 2014
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Andrew Crump
See All by Andrew Crump
Porting a small project from Go to Rust
acrmp
0
17
Docker and Cloud Foundry
acrmp
0
110
Continuous Delivery with Cloud Foundry
acrmp
1
110
Patterns for treating infrastructure as code
acrmp
1
300
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
Claude Codeと2つの巻き戻し戦略 / Two Rewind Strategies with Claude Code
fruitriin
0
140
インターン生でもAuth0で認証基盤刷新が出来るのか
taku271
0
190
16年目のピクシブ百科事典を支える最新の技術基盤 / The Modern Tech Stack Powering Pixiv Encyclopedia in its 16th Year
ahuglajbclajep
5
1k
今から始めるClaude Code超入門
448jp
8
8.9k
コマンドとリード間の連携に対する脅威分析フレームワーク
pandayumi
1
460
CSC307 Lecture 04
javiergs
PRO
0
660
フロントエンド開発の勘所 -複数事業を経験して見えた判断軸の違い-
heimusu
7
2.8k
副作用をどこに置くか問題:オブジェクト指向で整理する設計判断ツリー
koxya
1
610
登壇資料を作る時に意識していること #登壇資料_findy
konifar
4
1.4k
CSC307 Lecture 02
javiergs
PRO
1
780
CSC307 Lecture 03
javiergs
PRO
1
490
humanlayerのブログから学ぶ、良いCLAUDE.mdの書き方
tsukamoto1783
0
200
Featured
See All Featured
The Curious Case for Waylosing
cassininazir
0
240
HDC tutorial
michielstock
1
390
Accessibility Awareness
sabderemane
0
53
RailsConf 2023
tenderlove
30
1.3k
Context Engineering - Making Every Token Count
addyosmani
9
660
Code Reviewing Like a Champion
maltzj
527
40k
Measuring Dark Social's Impact On Conversion and Attribution
stephenakadiri
1
130
SEO for Brand Visibility & Recognition
aleyda
0
4.2k
Navigating the moral maze — ethical principles for Al-driven product design
skipperchong
2
250
A Tale of Four Properties
chriscoyier
162
24k
Become a Pro
speakerdeck
PRO
31
5.8k
Rails Girls Zürich Keynote
gr2m
96
14k
Transcript
Extending foodcritic with new rules #cfgmgmtcamp #getchef
Overview
What is foodcritic?
A lint tool for your cookbooks
47 Built-in Rules
Goal: Identify problems in your cookbooks
file "/var/lib/foo" do owner "root" group "root" mode 644 action
:create end
file "/var/lib/foo" do owner "root" group "root" mode 644 action
:create end
$ foodcritic . FC006: Mode should be quoted or fully
specified when setting file permissions: ./ recipes/default.rb:9
file "/var/lib/foo" do owner "root" group "root" mode "644" action
:create end
Goal: Encourage discussion on the subjective stuff
execute "wget 'http:// example.org/' -Ofoo" do action :run end
execute "wget 'http:// example.org/' -Ofoo" do action :run end
$ foodcritic . FC041: Execute resource used to run curl
or wget commands: ./recipes/ default.rb:9
remote_file "foo" do source "http://example.org/" end
Goal: Write your own rules
# Specify rules on # the command line $ foodcritic
-I your_rule.rb . ! # You can also # package your rules # as a gem
How does it work?
Static code analysis
Example: Declaring resources in a loop
# The original recipe %w{foo bar baz}.each do |pkg| package
pkg end
# This is what Chef sees at converge time package[foo]
package[bar] package[baz]
# This is what foodcritic sees %w{foo bar baz}.each do
|pkg| package pkg end
Peter Zotov @whitequark fucking ruby and its fucking parser, how
does it even work?! I *still* have no idea
# recipe with a single resource file '/etc/foo' do mode
0600 content 'bar' end
pry> Ripper.sexp(code)
=> [:program, [[:method_add_block, [:command, [:@ident, "file", [2, 0]], [:args_add_block, [[:string_literal,
[:string_content, [:@tstring_content, "/ etc/foo", [2, 6]]]]], false]], [:do_block, nil, [[:command, [:@ident, "mode", [3, 2]], [:args_add_block, [[:@int, "0600", [3, 7]]], false]], [:command, [:@ident, "content", [4, 2]], [:args_add_block, [[:string_literal, [:string_content, [:@tstring_content, "bar", [4, 11]]]]], false]]]]]]]
Those are some deeply nested arrays
Ruby lets us build terse yet powerful expressions
But the path to a node in the tree is
important
<? XML ?> An elegant weapon for a more civilised
age
XPath //method_add_block/ command/ ident[@value="mode"]
ANTLR 4.2 SNAPSHOT "xpath/pattern matching for parse trees"
The structure of a rule
rule "FC123", "Name" do recipe do |ast| # some #
expression end end
cookbook environment library metadata resource role Hooks recipe do |ast|
ast.xpath(..) end
rule "FC123", "Name" do recipe do |ast| # some #expression
end end
Ruby returns the last expression Foodcritic converts the last expression
to matches
Let’s walk through the code for FC006
rule "FC006", "Mode should be quoted or fully specified when
setting file permissions" do
# We pass an array of tags in, common tags
include 'correctness' and 'style' tags %w{correctness files}
recipe do |ast| ast.xpath(%q{a/ long/xpath/string}) end
# any mode identifier // ident[@value='mode']/ ! # we need
to go up one parent::command/ ! # a literal integer descendant::int
# filtering again [ ! # needs to be less
# than five digits # long string-length(@value) < 5
# match 644 not 0644 and not( starts-with(@value, "0") and
string length(@value) = 4 ) ! # stop filtering ]
# choose the line num # to show to the
end # user /ancestor:: method_add_block # do this if the AST # node does not have # a descendant node # with a position
Pry is awesome and is a must for developing FC
rules
Drop a pry binding in your rule and explore pry>
ls pry> a_method() pry> whereami
rule "FC123", "Name" do recipe do |ast| binding.pry end end
pry> ast.xpath( '//do_block/command/ ident')
Tip: Chef now includes Pry as a runtime dependency as
of 11.8.0.
ancestor child descendant following parent preceding Axes
XPath expressions can be annoying ! Here’s some I prepared
earlier
attribute_access declared_dependencies find_resources notifications resource_attribute? resources_by_type searches API Foodcritic
all? any? find group_by inject map select Ruby Enumerable
Testing it actually works
Trust is really important - false positives undermine that trust
in the tool
Foodcritic core rules test against lots of examples
Examples: | environment_name | show_warning | | production | should
not | | pre_production | should not | | production-eu | should not | | production2 | should not | | Production | should not | | EU West | should | | production (eu-west) | should |
Different syntax in recipes results in different AST trees
Different Ruby versions can mean different AST trees 1.9.2, 1.9.3
and 2.0.0
Ok. I have my automated examples passing. I should be
good right?
Ok. I have my automated examples passing. I should be
good right? Nee! Non! No!
Test against a large corpus of real cookbooks
Ideas
Suggest Chef Sugar FC789: Use Chef Sugar to simplify platform
check
Spot duplication across recipes FC678: Compose recipes to reduce duplication
Validate recipe package names FC567: Package not present in distribution
What’s next?
Backlog of issues that could use your help!
Hack Afternoon
Thanks! @acrmp foodcritic.io freenode #chef
Extending foodcritic with new rules #cfgmgmtcamp #getchef