Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Emerging materials for solar energy: matlockite...

Emerging materials for solar energy: matlockite, kesterite, perovskite, and beyond...

Invited presentation at the European Materials Research Society Spring Meeting in Strasbourg

Aron Walsh

May 22, 2017
Tweet

More Decks by Aron Walsh

Other Decks in Science

Transcript

  1. Emerging materials for solar energy: matlockite, kesterite, perovskite, and beyond…

    Prof. Aron Walsh Department of Materials Imperial College London, UK https://wmd-group.github.io @lonepair
  2. Solar Electricity and Fuel Electricity Solar Cells Chemical Energy Solar

    Fuels High efficiency (20 – 50%) Low efficiency (< 10%) Physics (electron–hole separation) is easier than chemistry (oxidation/reduction reactions) Fusion Reactor 174,000 Terawatts reaches the Earth’s surface
  3. Many Photovoltaic Technologies A. Polman et al, Science 352, 307

    (2016) High performance “Established” Fundamental research Theoretical limit for single-junction cell
  4. Challenge for Emerging Solar Cells GaAs efficiency is close to

    the theoretical limit, while Si is cheap. New systems must perform! Metal oxides Cu2 O (6%) Bi2 FeCrO6 (8%) Co3 O4 (<1%) Metal sulfides SnS (5%) Cu2 ZnSn(S,Se)4 (14%) Sb2 S3 (8%) Metal halides CsSnI3 (10%) CH3 NH3 PbI3 (22%) CH(NH2 )2 PbI3 (20%) Examples of materials studied for thin-film photovoltaics
  5. Talk Outline: Perovskites & Beyond A. Perovskites (ABX3 ) –

    what can we learn? B. Kesterites (A2 BCX4 ) – danger, low voltage! C. Tin Sulfides (Ax Bx ) – two elements, many problems. D. Beyond (Ax By Xz ) – exploring new materials.
  6. Hybrid Organic–Inorganic Perovskites Brief History (1958) – Photoconductivity in CsPbI3

    (Møller) (1978) – Synthesis of CH3 NH3 PbI3 (Weber) (1994) – Metallic transition in CH3 NH3 SnI3 (Mitzi) (2009) – Perovskite dye cell (Miyasaka) (2013) – Planar thin-film solar cell (Snaith) Inorganic CsPbI3 Hybrid CH3 NH3 PbI3 or MAPI
  7. Why Hybrid Perovskites? Essentials for Solar Cells • Strong optical

    absorption (Eg ~ 1.6 eV) • Light electron and hole masses (conductive) • Easy to synthesise (cheap and scalable) Advanced Features • Large dielectric constants: carrier separation (weak excitons) and transport (low scattering) • Slow e-h recombination: low losses, large VOC o Relativistic effects – spin-orbit coupling o Polar domains – dynamic fluctuations
  8. Perovskites: Model vs Reality Plastic crystal behaviour probed by Quasi-Elastic

    Neutron Scattering (P. Barnes, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8124); 2D IR Spectroscopy (A. Bakulin, DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01555); Inelastic X-ray Scattering (S. Billinge, DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00381) with simulations
  9. Phase Transitions in CH3 NH3 PbI3 A. D. Wright et

    al, Nature Comm. 7, 11755 (2016) Dynamic disorder Static disorder
  10. Dynamic Processes in Perovskites Faster (fs) Slower (ps) Electrons and

    Holes Effective semiconductors Lattice Vibrations Symmetry breaking and carrier separation Molecular Rotations Large static dielectric constant Ions and Charged Defects “Self healing” and hysteresis What is moving in perovskite solar cells? Acc. Chem. Res. 49, 528 (2016)
  11. Dynamic Processes in Perovskites Faster (fs) Slower (ps) Electrons and

    Holes Effective semiconductors Lattice Vibrations Symmetry breaking and carrier separation Molecular Rotations Large static dielectric constant Ions and Charged Defects “Self healing” and hysteresis What is moving in perovskite solar cells? Acc. Chem. Res. 49, 528 (2016)
  12. Talk Outline: Perovskites & Beyond A. Perovskites (ABX3 ) –

    what can we learn? B. Kesterites (A2 BCX4 ) – danger, low voltage! C. Tin Sulfides (Ax Bx ) – two elements, many problems. D. Beyond (ABX) – exploring new materials.
  13. Kesterite Quaternary Semiconductors 2 4 2 1×1×2 zincblende superlattice First

    Cu2 ZnSn(S,Se)4 (CZTS) solar cell 1988; 12.6% by IBM (2014); 13.8% report from DGIST (2016) High-thoughput Density Functional Theory: Phys. Rev. B 79, 165211 (2009)
  14. • Mixed phase samples, e.g. Cu2 ZnSnS4 à Cu2 SnS3

    + ZnS • Cation disorder, e.g. Cu-Zn; Cu-Sn; Zn-Sn mixing • Deep level defects, i.e. fast non-radiative recombination • Interface reactions, e.g. MoS2 formation at back contact Challenging for experiment, theory and simulation! Issues for Kesterite Solar Cells Wallace, Mitzi and Walsh, ACS Energy Letters 2, 776 (2017) Champion solar cells suffer from large voltage deficits, e.g. for CZTS (Eg = 1.5 eV), VOC = 0.7 V
  15. Call for CZTS Support Wallace, Mitzi and Walsh, ACS Energy

    Letters 2, 776 (2017) A focused research effort could help overcome efficiency bottlenecks
  16. 2017 STARCELL Network (EU-H2020) http://www.starcell.eu A large consortium (led by

    IREC, Spain) to improve the performance of kesterite photovoltaics
  17. Talk Outline: Perovskites & Beyond A. Perovskites (ABX3 ) –

    what can we learn? B. Kesterites (A2 BCX4 ) – danger, low voltage! C. Tin Sulfides (Ax Bx ) – two elements, many problems. D. Beyond (ABX) – exploring new materials.
  18. Tin Sulfide: Mixed Phases Phase competition: Sn(II) and Sn(IV) compounds

    L. A. Burton and A. Walsh, J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 24262 (2012) Sn(II) 5s25p0 Sn(IV) 5s05p0 Sterically active lone pair [asymmetric coordination] e.g. SnO, SnS Octahedral or tetrahedral environments e.g. SnO2 , SnS2
  19. Tin Sulfide: Mixed Phases Phase competition: Sn(II) and Sn(IV) compounds

    Predicted phase diagrams: Skelton et al, J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 6446 (2017)
  20. Tin Sulfide: Mixed Phases Phase competition: Sn(II) and Sn(IV) compounds

    Predicted phase diagrams: Skelton et al, J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 6446 (2017)
  21. Tin Sulfide: Electronic Challenges Device issues with Fermi level pinning

    Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 132111 (2013); Phys. Rev. Appl. 6, 014009 (2016)
  22. Tin Sulfide: π-SnS New cubic phase can be grown in

    thin-films using a variety of deposition techniques Golan, Nano Lett 15, 2174 (2015); Skelton et al, APL Materials 5, 036101 (2017) • Previously misidentified as “zincblende” phase • Structure solved on basis of X-ray and electron diffraction • Phonon stable (PBEsol) • Eg = 1.7 eV (HSE06 + SOC) • Chiral: non-linear optics
  23. Talk Outline: Perovskites & Beyond A. Perovskites (ABX3 ) –

    what can we learn? B. Kesterites (A2 BCX4 ) – danger, low voltage! C. Tin Sulfides (Ax Bx ) – two elements, many problems. D. Beyond (ABX) – exploring new materials.
  24. Solar Energy Shopping List • Low-cost and non-toxic elements •

    Direct optical bandgap (1 – 2 eV) • Easy to deposit and scale-up production • Semiconductor with low carrier concentrations • Tolerant to impurities and microstructure • Chemically stable at interfaces • Workfunction matched to electrical contacts
  25. Computational Screening Descriptors A. M. Ganose et al, Chem. Comm.

    53, 20 (2017) BAND GAP OPTICAL ABSORPTION EFFECTIVE MASS DEFECT PHYSICS e-h RECOMBINATION BAND OFFSETS
  26. V-VI-VII Chalcohalide Semiconductors Energy Environmental Science 8, 838 (2015); APL

    108, 112103 (2016) Trivalent cation with monovalent & divalent anions V VI VII Bi O F Sb S Cl Se Br Te I Ferroelectrics Photocatalysts Solar Cell Absorbers Topological Conductors
  27. V-VI-VII Chalcohalide Semiconductors Energy Environmental Science 8, 838 (2015); APL

    108, 112103 (2016) Trivalent cation with monovalent & divalent anions V VI VII Bi O F Sb S Cl Se Br Te I Ferroelectrics Photocatalysts Solar Cell Absorbers Topological Conductors
  28. Conclusion and Outlook Many new materials being studied for solar

    energy conversion. Challenge is translation to efficient devices. Theory and simulation can help to identify and overcome bottlenecks. Project Collaborators: Keith Butler, Jarvist Frost, Jonathan Skelton, Lucy Whalley, Ruoxi Yang, Suzy Wallace (ICL); Simon Billinge (Columbia); Mark van Schilfgaarde (Kings); Bruno Erhler (AMOLF) Funding: ERC; EPSRC; Royal Society; Leverhulme Slides: https://speakerdeck.com/aronwalsh
  29. Screening New Photoactive Materials Sustainability index From Searching over 4

    Trillion Compounds… D. W. Davies et al, Chem 1, 617 (2016); https://github.com/WMD-group/SMACT