Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

How To Not Strangle Your Coworkers: Resolving C...

Avatar for Arthur Doler Arthur Doler PRO
September 29, 2022

How To Not Strangle Your Coworkers: Resolving Conflict with Collaboration

Conflict at work is as inevitable as the tides - like the old joke says, if you put five software engineers in a room, you’ll have seven opinions. Whether the conflict is over what language to use, what frameworks are the new hotness, or even just tabs vs spaces, conflict can get ugly. Tempers flare, positions are staked out in absolute terms, feelings are hurt, working relationships are destroyed… if only there were a way to avoid the negative consequences.

What if I told you that there is? Let’s take a journey together towards a wholly different approach to conflict - a collaborative one. In this talk, you’ll learn how to use conflict to fuel better software, better teams, and better companies. You’ll learn how to structure your team’s environment to draw out good conflict, to squelch the bad conflict, and to handle conflict when it becomes personal. We’ll discuss how to manage different confrontational styles, avoid self-sealing prophecies, and even how to deal with conflict when you lack control. Conflict should fuel your progress, not hinder it - and after this talk, you can make that happen.

Avatar for Arthur Doler

Arthur Doler PRO

September 29, 2022

More Decks by Arthur Doler

Other Decks in Technology

Transcript

  1. 1. Two or more people… 2. Who hold differing or

    opposing… 3. Opinions or beliefs… 4. About something at work. @arthurdoler.com Some strong undergraduate paper first sentence energy here
  2. A DISAGREEMENT BECOMES A CONFLICT WHEN: 1) It’s important 2)

    You are interdependent with each other @arthurdoler.com Minson & Dorison, 2021
  3. A DISAGREEMENT BECOMES A CONFLICT WHEN: 1) It’s important 2)

    You are interdependent with each other 3) You both believe the evidence is on your side @arthurdoler.com Minson & Dorison, 2021
  4. Types of Conflict Psychological Safety as a Groundwork for Good

    Conflict Dealing with Emotions During Conflict Confrontational Styles Dealing with Conflict as an Individual Contributor @arthurdoler.com Time to get uncomfortable!
  5. 1. Set the Stage Frame the Work Emphasize Purpose 2.

    Invite Participation Demonstrate Situational Humility Practice Inquiry 3. Respond Productively Express Appreciation Destigmatize Failure Sanction Clear Violations @arthurdoler.com Edmonson, 2019
  6. RULES FOR A GOOD QUESTION 1) You don’t know the

    answer 2) You ask questions that do not limit responses to “Yes” or “No” 3) You phrase the question in a way that helps others share their thinking in a focused manner @arthurdoler.com Edmondson, 2019
  7. MODEL I SEEKS: •To “win” in a zero-sum game •To

    control the emotions of other participants •To enact concrete strategies to achieve those outcomes @arthurdoler.com Argyris and Schön, 1974
  8. MODEL II SEEKS: •To arrive at a win-win scenario •To

    accept and understand the emotions of the other participants •To avoid self-sealing processes @arthurdoler.com Argyris and Schön, 1974
  9. Initially, we either: Angrily swat down “incorrect” opinions Use moral

    language to batter our opponents down @arthurdoler.com Yeomans, Minson, Collins, Chen & Gino, 2020
  10. H.E.A.R. Hedging Emphasizing Agreement Acknowledgement Reframing to the Positive @arthurdoler.com

    Yeomans, Minson, Collins, Chen & Gino, 2020 – THIS PAPER IS UNDER REVIEW
  11. • Strictly passive approach • Hope that problems solve themselves

    • Rather than discuss conflict, they change subject, skip meetings, or leave the group altogether @arthurdoler.com Forsyth, 2010; Bayazit & Mannix, 2003
  12. • Passive, pro-social approach • Solves both large and small

    conflicts by giving in to others’ demands • Could be either genuine conversion or superficial compliance @arthurdoler.com Forsyth, 2010
  13. • Active, pro-self approach • Uses competitive, powerful tactics to

    intimidate • Use mandates, challenges, arguing, insults, accusing, complaining, vengeance, & even physical violence @arthurdoler.com Forsyth, 2010; Morrill, 1995
  14. • Active, pro-social, and pro-self approach • Identifies the issues

    underlying the dispute & works to identify a solution for both • Attempts to get both sides to consider each person’s outcomes @arthurdoler.com Forsyth, 2010
  15. •A mixed approach •Attempts to win over others by accepting

    some (but not all) of their demands @arthurdoler.com Forsyth, 2010
  16. THERE’S MORE THAN ONE TYPE OF CONFLICT, AND THEY AREN’T

    ALL BAD @arthurdoler.com Task, Relationship, and Process
  17. EMOTIONS ARE GOING TO HAPPEN IN CONFLICT, YOU CANNOT STOP

    THEM @arthurdoler.com Again, I wish we could
  18. TRYING TO CONTROL THEM USING MODEL I METHODS CREATES A

    SELFSEALING PROCESS @arthurdoler.com It locks you into that prison with no options
  19. YOU CAN OFFER EXPLICIT MOMENTS TO TALK ABOUT EMOTIONS, AND

    MODEL TALKING ABOUT EMOTIONS YOURSELF @arthurdoler.com Difficult, but necessary
  20. RECOGNIZING THE CONFRONTATIONAL STYLE OF THE OTHER PARTICIPANTS CAN HELP

    YOU ADJUST/WITHDRAW @arthurdoler.com This requires a bit of introspection and extrospection
  21. As an individual you can: Be aware of power dynamics

    Seek overlap in goals, or positions that fulfill all/most goals Pick your conflicts carefully @arthurdoler.com Engage with intention and direction