JavaScript code necessary for that page. When a page is loaded by the browser, its JavaScript code runs and makes the page fully interactive. (This process is called hydration.)****
simple: render HTML pages on the server, and inject placeholders or slots around highly dynamic regions. These placeholders/slots contain the server-rendered HTML output from their corresponding widget. They denote regions that can then be "hydrated" on the client into small self-contained widgets, reusing their server- rendered initial HTML.
can deliver instant loading web applications at any size or complexity. Your sites and apps can boot with about 1kb of JS (regardless of application complexity), and achieve consistent performance at scale. Astroとの姿勢の違いが出ていて面白いね（sites and apps）
possible. Qwik applications startup fast because there is a minimal amount of JavaScript code to execute. (At its simplest, a Qwik application only needs about 1KB of JavaScript to become interactive.)
have to download all of the component code associated with the current page. ii. The frameworks have to execute the templates associated with the components on the page to rebuild the listener location and the internal component tree. Qwik is different because it does not require hydration to resume an application on the client. Not requiring hydration is what makes the Qwik application startup instantaneous.
Nope, in production Qwik uses a lot of information generated during SSR to start prefetching only the bits of interactivity of the current page as soon as possible (ASAP), this way when the user clicks or interacts, the JS is already downloaded.
architecture) popularized by Astro is about preventing full-page hydration, where all existing components in the page need to be downloaded and executed, and instead breaking the app into islands of interactivity. Islands that developers need to manually define, and then manually describe in which situations they should be hydrated. Islands that can not communicate between each other. Instead, Qwik components does not hydrate at all. Qwik achieves this through a powerful serialization system, that serializes only the necesary state the reactivity graph, so app can resumes without eagarly running any JS. We think resumability scales without the negative trade-offs of partial hydration.
in the server and resuming execution in the client without having to replay and download all of the application logic. A good mental model is that Qwik applications at any point in their lifecycle can be serialized and moved to a different VM instance (server to browser). There, the application simply resumes where the serialization stopped. No hydration is required. This is why we say that Qwik applications don't hydrate; they resume.
the application state into HTML so that the state can be restored as part of hydration. In this way, they are very similar to Qwik. However, Qwik has state management more tightly integrated into the lifecycle of the components. In practice, this means that component can be delay- loaded independently from the state of the component. This is not easily achievable in existing frameworks because component props are usually created by the parent component. This creates a chain reaction. In order to restore component X, its parents need to be restored as well. Qwik allows any component to be resumed without the parent component code being present.
asazutaiga
daitasu
yusukebe
kuranuki
kntkymt
licux
arkw
simotin13
kawayu
myui
geekplus_tech
wagyu
fadis
bermonpainter
rakko
caitiem20
aleyda
seathinner
jnunemaker
sergeychernyshev
helmedeiros
afnizarnur
nikkihalliwell
cassininazir
frankvandijk
