Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Design Systems and Component Based Frontend
Search
Bilal Çınarlı
June 27, 2019
Programming
0
120
Design Systems and Component Based Frontend
Bilal Çınarlı
June 27, 2019
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Bilal Çınarlı
See All by Bilal Çınarlı
Accessible By Default!
bcinarli
0
54
Aninda Yüklenen Uygulamalar
bcinarli
0
110
Iletisimin Mühendisligi
bcinarli
0
53
Independently together: better developer experience & App performance
bcinarli
1
460
Developer Experience: How happy are your engineers?
bcinarli
0
260
Micro Applications: Divide & Conquer
bcinarli
2
1.1k
Lightning Fast Web Applications
bcinarli
1
540
WebAssembly - is it the future for the Web?
bcinarli
0
130
Why Performance Matters
bcinarli
0
170
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
PicoRuby on Rails
makicamel
2
130
ペアプロ × 生成AI 現場での実践と課題について / generative-ai-in-pair-programming
codmoninc
2
18k
GPUを計算資源として使おう!
primenumber
1
120
なぜ適用するか、移行して理解するClean Architecture 〜構造を超えて設計を継承する〜 / Why Apply, Migrate and Understand Clean Architecture - Inherit Design Beyond Structure
seike460
PRO
3
780
地方に住むエンジニアの残酷な現実とキャリア論
ichimichi
5
1.6k
Hack Claude Code with Claude Code
choplin
4
2.2k
Agentic Coding: The Future of Software Development with Agents
mitsuhiko
0
110
Rails Frontend Evolution: It Was a Setup All Along
skryukov
0
160
0626 Findy Product Manager LT Night_高田スライド_speaker deck用
mana_takada
0
180
The Modern View Layer Rails Deserves: A Vision For 2025 And Beyond @ RailsConf 2025, Philadelphia, PA
marcoroth
2
400
明示と暗黙 ー PHPとGoの インターフェイスの違いを知る
shimabox
2
520
AIプログラマーDevinは PHPerの夢を見るか?
shinyasaita
1
230
Featured
See All Featured
ReactJS: Keep Simple. Everything can be a component!
pedronauck
667
120k
Improving Core Web Vitals using Speculation Rules API
sergeychernyshev
18
970
BBQ
matthewcrist
89
9.7k
The Myth of the Modular Monolith - Day 2 Keynote - Rails World 2024
eileencodes
26
2.9k
Side Projects
sachag
455
42k
Thoughts on Productivity
jonyablonski
69
4.7k
Automating Front-end Workflow
addyosmani
1370
200k
Producing Creativity
orderedlist
PRO
346
40k
How STYLIGHT went responsive
nonsquared
100
5.6k
Designing for humans not robots
tammielis
253
25k
Why Our Code Smells
bkeepers
PRO
336
57k
Visualization
eitanlees
146
16k
Transcript
Design Systems & Component Based Frontend
Bilal Çınarlı Frontend Architect Software Engineer @Adidas @bcinarli github.com/bcinarli bcinarli.com
None
Harmony from Intuit, GEL – Global Experience Language from BBC,
Material from Google, Lightning from Salesforce, AirBNB’s Visual Language, Joystick from EA, Fluent from Microsoft, Plasma from WeWork, Polaris from Shopify, Lonely Planet, Swarm from Meetup, Canvas from Hubspot …and aDL from Adidas
What is a design system?
A collection of reusable components, guided by clear standards, that
can be assembled together to build any number of applications.
None
A design system is a combination of style, components, and
voice.
It is scalable at any level
Provides consistency between different pages and applications
With the set of rules and guides, increases the efficiency
Enhances the teamwork and eases the on-boarding of new members
http://bit.do/yarnds
http://bit.do/adl_
Components
Components support levels of abstraction in an application. It is
layered and feature-based.
Individual components provide decoupling which leads to better unit testings
and stability.
Design system and Components combine mostly in UI layer where
your presentation occurs
Besides, components can also communicate with the data layer while
rendering our content.
…and with the standardisation, it improves quality.
None
How Popular Libraries Think?
Build encapsulated components that manage their own state, then compose
them to make complex UIs.
Components define areas of responsibility in your UI that let
you reuse these sets of UI functionality.
It’s an abstraction that allows us to build large-scale applications
composed of small, self-contained, and often reusable components.
But the mainly, they should have a responsibility over a
single part.
None
How to Organise?
Define your folder structure based on their functionalities
Think of everything is sort-of a pluggable component. In most
cases, when you remove it, you should expect no traces left.
// DON’T . !"" controllers | !"" cart.js | #""
checkout.js !"" models | !"" cart.js | #"" checkout.js #"" views !"" cart.pug #"" checkout.pug // DO . !"" cart | !"" index.js | #"" template.pug #"" checkout !"" index.js #"" template.pug
…and tests are a part of your components.
// add test specs . !"" cart | !"" index.js
| !"" test.spec.js | #"" template.pug #"" checkout !"" index.js !"" test.spec.js #"" template.pug
Separate config and scripts away from your components.
. !"" config | !"" index.js | #"" server.js !""
scripts | !"" build.sh | #"" post-install.sh !"" test | !"" index.js | #"" setup.spec.js !"" cart | !"" index.js | !"" test.spec.js | #"" template.pug #"" checkout !"" index.js !"" test.spec.js #"" template.pug
Keep HTML and CSS separate in your source code and
never inline manually
// DON’T <p style="margin: 10px 0; padding: 0;">Hello World! </p>
// DO .content-text { margin: 10px 0; padding: 0; } <p class="content- text">Hello World!</p>
Always think about specificity in CSS, try to avoid creating
specific selectors
// DON’T #main .article .title span { font-size: 32px; font-weight:
bold; } // DO .main-article-title { font-size: 32px; font-weight: bold; }
Do not write the code you are going to overwrite
// DON’T .content { display: flex; max-width: 1280px; margin: 0
auto; } .article { width: 900px; } .supplementary { width: 380px; } @media screen and (min-width: 48.0625em) and (max-width: 64em) { .article { width: 644px; } } @media screen and (max-width: 48em) { .content { flex-direction: column; } .article, .supplementary { width: 100%; } } // DO .content { max-width: 1280px; margin: 0 auto; } @media screen and (min-width: 48.0625em) { .content { display: flex; } .article { flex: 1; } .supplementary { width: 380px; } }
A way to unify different frameworks?
Web components are a set of web platform APIs that
allow you to create new custom, reusable, encapsulated HTML tags to use in web pages and web apps.
Custom components and widgets build on the Web Component standards,
will work across modern browsers, and can be used with any JavaScript library or framework that works with HTML.
<script type="module" src=“components/nav/app- drawer“></script> <app-drawer raised class=“indigo">raised</app-drawer>
<script> class AppDrawer extends HTMLElement {...} window.customElements.define('app-drawer', AppDrawer); </script> <app-drawer></app-drawer>
Good part, all JS frameworks outputs to HTML. Theoretically, we
can use any popular JS library to create Web Components
What is more?
Having self-contained, reusable components helps to turn you app to
micro frontends
… that can have independent deployment, build, coding
… leads to autonomous teams
… and you can have a shell that orchestrates which
micro frontend to load
… with the “Best Friend of Frontend"
Your components should not know what the dependencies are in
behind the curtains you are using.
It should only aware of which functions are available for
a particular action.
Every dependency comes with a technical debt for the future.
Thank you @bcinarli