Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
One Lump or Two? - Storyboard
Search
Chloe
August 02, 2022
Storyboards
1
1.9k
One Lump or Two? - Storyboard
Chloe
August 02, 2022
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Chloe
See All by Chloe
Cast On
chloelemay
0
150
Would you like that Hot or Iced
chloelemay
0
16
See Spot Run
chloelemay
0
930
Cast On - Storyboard, Pt. 2
chloelemay
0
370
Cast On - Storyboard, Pt. 1
chloelemay
0
430
Cozy Cottage
chloelemay
0
540
Neat and Messy
chloelemay
0
310
Other Decks in Storyboards
See All in Storyboards
SpongeBob Squarepants
ryankramer83
0
240
You Will Be Okay Original Fanimatic
natca
0
130
Frog & Toad - The Letter
eleisiya
0
490
My_Little_Angel_PROLOGUE.pdf
vpazam
PRO
0
760
The Mishap
vinneeeee
0
740
Wind Coast
towermeower
0
150
The Wizard's Soup - The Acid Trip Scene
ohnoitsjjgibson
0
110
Witch_s_Meal.pdf
mwilson03
0
110
Amphibia - Fight at the Museum
eleisiya
0
500
Wallykazam! test boards
vpazam
PRO
0
730
A Walking Challenge
ayang
0
110
Last Fry
vinneeeee
0
210
Featured
See All Featured
Raft: Consensus for Rubyists
vanstee
136
6.6k
[RailsConf 2023] Rails as a piece of cake
palkan
49
4.7k
Code Reviewing Like a Champion
maltzj
519
39k
Six Lessons from altMBA
skipperchong
26
3.4k
Clear Off the Table
cherdarchuk
91
320k
The Cult of Friendly URLs
andyhume
77
6k
ParisWeb 2013: Learning to Love: Crash Course in Emotional UX Design
dotmariusz
109
6.9k
RailsConf 2023
tenderlove
28
840
In The Pink: A Labor of Love
frogandcode
139
22k
How GitHub (no longer) Works
holman
311
140k
The Power of CSS Pseudo Elements
geoffreycrofte
71
5.3k
GraphQLとの向き合い方2022年版
quramy
43
13k
Transcript
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None