Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Senior Design Project

Senior Design Project

Final Design Review (FDR) presentation for my Senior Design Project (ME 170) at the University of California, Merced. The project tied for 1st Place in the People's Choice category at the 2012 Innovate to Grow Competition (https://eng.ucmerced.edu/innovatetogrow).

Avatar for David Larson

David Larson

May 09, 2012
Tweet

Other Decks in Technology

Transcript

  1. Mission Statement Develop a micro–hydro turbine power generation system for

    the University of California, Merced campus. 9 May 2012 3
  2. Overview •  Competitive payback period •  Low cost •  Irrigation

    canals •  Micro-hydro turbines •  Simple design 9 May 2012 5
  3. Canal Velocity Estimates 9 May 2012 7 0.001 0.002 0.003

    0.004 0.005 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 Slope [é] Velocity [m/s]
  4. Canal Power Estimates 9 May 2012 8 0.5 1 1.5

    2 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Velocity [m/s] Power in the canal [kW] P = 1 2 !AV3
  5. Design Requirements •  Compatible with current power systems (60Hz, 120

    RMS VAC) •  Takes advantage of canal flow (low head) •  Noninvasive/in-stream •  Produce 1 – 4 kW 9 May 2012 9
  6. Engineering Risks •  Preventing water contamination •  Securing the location

    •  Maximizing battery bank life •  Quality control 14 9 May 2012
  7. Cost Estimate Power system x 1 $ 8,400 Array frame

    x 8 $ 5,808 Savonius turbine x 24 $ 7,824 Generators x 24 $ 4,776 TOTAL $ 26,808 9 May 2012 22
  8. Payback Period 9 May 2012 23 Assumes: 24/7 operation for

    7 months per year & $0.11 per kWh Hydrovolts: 4 portable turbines; Poseidon: 24 turbine array
  9. System Features ü  Competitive payback period ü  Compatible with power

    infrastructure ü  Innovative design ü  4 kW peak ü  Expandable 9 May 2012 25