Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Jonathan Busby

Energy Now Expo 2013
February 21, 2013
33

Jonathan Busby

The feasibility of an open-loop system

Energy Now Expo 2013

February 21, 2013
Tweet

Transcript

  1. © NERC All rights reserved An online screening tool for

    open loop feasibility Jon Busby, Corinna Abesser, Melinda Lewis and Andy Marchant British Geological Survey
  2. © NERC All rights reserved Where viable, open loop GSHPs

    can provide cost effective heating and cooling for large commercial and public buildings. Open Loop GSHP If yes ....
  3. © NERC All rights reserved To increase confidence at the

    early planning stage the British Geological Survey (BGS) and the Environment Agency (EA) have collaborated to develop a screening tool that gives planners and developers an initial indication of the depth, productivity and quality of potential aquifers that exist in a given area. What are the initial questions? Successful planning requires a consideration of ..... Bedrock aquifer potential layer Depth to source layer Protected areas layer Hydrogeology Regulations Economics Locations of bedrock aquifers Estimated productivity (water yields) Depth to the water (drilling/installation costs) Location of protected areas
  4. © NERC All rights reserved What type of tool? 

    The tool has been created for England and Wales at the 1:250,000 scale  It is accessed, free, on the web at http://mapapps2.bgs.ac.uk/gshpnational/home.html  At its top level the tool displays the viability for open loop GSHP as Where favourable means Aquifers are present with yields per borehole of at least 1 L s-1 with a maximum depth from the topographic surface of 300 m. These conditions are considered favourable for installations with a capacity ≥ 100 kWth  More detailed information is available by clicking on the favourable layers
  5. © NERC All rights reserved Elements of the tool? The

    tool is built from 5 layers  Bedrock aquifer potential layer – shows where aquifers are present at outcrop or concealed at depth that can provide a borehole yield of 1 L s-1. The possibility of variable yields from some carbonate rocks is highlighted.  Depth to source layer – Minimum drilling depth required to access the source  Protected areas layers – Distribution of protection zones in England and Wales  Groundwater quality layer – where available, data on scaling, corrosion and encrustation  Existing licensed abstractions layers - abstraction volumes that have been licensed by the Environment Agency in a given area for all available aquifers
  6. © NERC All rights reserved  Outcropping bedrock formations are

    classified as, o no suitable aquifer (including all aquifers with productivity <1 L/s) o moderate aquifer (1- 6 L/s) o good aquifer (> 6 L/s).  Concealed aquifers at depth (within 300 m) are considered from, Chalk Lower Greensand Corallian Great Oolite Inferior Oolite Sherwood Sandstone Magnesian Limestone But no yield estimate is given, multiple aquifers may occur at some localities  Superficial deposits are not considered Bedrock aquifer potential layer
  7. © NERC All rights reserved Depth to source layer There

    are three situations to consider A. Where the aquifer is unconfined it is the depth to the water table B. If superficial deposits are present it is the depth to the bedrock aquifer or the depth to the water table within the bedrock aquifer C. If the aquifer is concealed, it is the depth to the top of the aquifer
  8. © NERC All rights reserved Protected areas layer Derived from

    the following  Source Protection Zones (SPZ) Environment Agency zones (1-3) aggregated into a single category  National Parks in England and Wales Data from Natural England (NE) and by the Countryside Council for Wales (CCW) under an Open Government Licence  Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) Data from Natural England (NE) and by the Countryside Council for Wales (CCW) under an Open Government Licence A protected area doesn’t mean a GSHP is not possible; extra permissions and regulations may apply!
  9. © NERC All rights reserved Groundwater quality layer Three indices

    are presented  The Langelier Saturation Index (LSI) and Ryznar Stability Index (RSI) are empirically derived indices that indicate the tendency of the water to form/dissolve calcium carbonate scale Langelier (LSI) Ryznar (RSI) LSI > 0.4 RSI < 6 → Ca-Carbonate precipitation, scaling likely 0.4 > LSI > -0.4 6 < RSI < 7 → No dissolution or precipitation LSI < -0.4 RSI > 7 → Ca-Carbonate dissolution  The corrosiveness of the groundwater is given by the Larson-Skold Corrosive Index (LSCI) LRSI < 0.8 → No corrosion 0.8 < LRSI < 1.2 → Some corrosion possible LRSI > 1.2 → Corrosion likely  The potential for encrustation associated with high iron (Fe) concentration (≥ 500 μg Fe L-1) The tool returns data from a radius of 600 m from the selected point (limited to a max of 10 values). Note: only 2% of the area is covered by these data
  10. © NERC All rights reserved Existing licensed abstractions layer This

    layer gives the abstraction volumes that have been licensed by the Environment Agency within a radius of 600 m from the selected point (max 10 values) as of 12 August 2011. (Note: that less than the licensed volume may actually be being abstracted.) This data is useful because  It gives an indication of the actual volumes that can be abstracted  It gives an indication of where large abstractions are already licensed that may impact on new licenses being granted  It shows where there is an increased risk of interference between abstractions, potentially risking early thermal breakthrough
  11. © NERC All rights reserved Limitations of the tool 

    The tool is developed for open-loop, non-domestic schemes with > 100 kWth capacity.  The tool has been developed at the 1:250,000 scale and does not provide definitive answers at the site scale.  At depth, only the major concealed aquifers have been considered. Locally, other aquifers or superficial deposits may provide a viable resource.  Near outcrop boundaries, aquifer productivity may be less (aquifer thinning).  Sustainability of a scheme is not considered. Detailed planning of a large open loop GSHP would require further on- site investigation and interaction with the Environment Agency
  12. © NERC All rights reserved What next The tool can

    be accessed free from the BGS website www.bgs.ac.uk > Our research > Energy > Geothermal Energy > Open-loop GSHP screening tools Or directly at http://mapapps2.bgs.ac.uk/gshpnational/home.html Non technical and technical guides are available on the website Feedback and suggestions for further dissemination would be welcome Thank-you for your attention Jon Busby – British Geological Survey – Keyworth – Nottingham – UK Tel: +44 (0)115 9363440; e-mail [email protected]