to my heart - power. In technology, people talk a lot about power. The attraction of technology itself is (and has been, since early humanity mastered basic tools) the amplification of human power. Power is not what defines us, but still: without power, we have nothing. Humanity’s unique capacity is to have ideas - to have visions, desires, to conceive of and reach for things that don't yet exist. We aren’t human without ideas, but still:
Power isn't just an inessential attribute of human endeavour, it's an intrinsic part of it. Power makes ideas meaningful in the world. So naturally, we judge technology by its power. But even though technological power is inextricably connected to what it is to be human, while technological power is fascinating and important, I think there is an even more important kind of power.
influence and affect others. That is, power over the way the world is, and the way the world works. I have always been full of ideas, but power has been more elusive. If ideas without power are useless, then I confess that I have been fairly useless for most of my life. I want power. I don’t want to feel useless. I want to be able to influence and affect other people, and the world.
this kind of talk, but I want to talk about this and like this precisely because other people are more reluctant to. Not having more power seems to trouble other people less than it bothers me. Maybe, other people are more content with the power they have. Maybe, they feel less useless. Maybe they are simply happier, nicer people who don’t resent the power they don’t have. Maybe they just don’t like to admit such things. But I am shameless, so I will happily talk about them in public.
useless. I want to insist that this is true, and also that it applies to all kinds of power - not just the technological power that you are comfortable talking about, but also the power over other people that perhaps you are not so thrilled to be asked to discuss. Power is what makes ideas, and the people who have them, useful. I would like you to take this equation of power and usefulness seriously; we’ll come back to it later.
an economy of power, just as there is an economy of money, and that in the economy of power some people are haves and some people are have-nots. One of the reasons is that people are reluctant to talk very directly about power in this way is the same reason that people tend to be reluctant to talk about money or salaries.
power is like talking about money. It’s not considered polite. It makes for awkward situations. Social encounters are easier when we don't place these subjects flatly, baldly on the table. Of course we can talk about power (or money) in general, in the abstract, from a safe distance. Very respectable, socially acceptable people discuss economics and politics without awkwardness at all. But that distance is crucial. They’re not talking about how much they earn, or you earn. It’s not personal. Talk about this sort of thing too brazenly, and people will shuffle very uncomfortably. Just try starting a conversation this evening at the conference dinner about how much power or money your fellow diners have compared to each other if you’d like to discover how welcome a subject it is.
too important to be polite about. Power means a change you can make in the world, influence over other people, and we can’t afford to allow mere discomfort to stop us talking about it.
power if that’s what is necessary. I've felt the lack of power very keenly sometimes. The more you want to make a difference in the world, the more ideas you have, the more likely you are to feel useless, because you are useless unless you hold power.
wasn’t as useful as I felt I ought to be, until I discovered how to be involved in open-source software, where I managed to get hold of the power that had been so elusive all my life.
able to get hold of power because the economy of power in the open-source movement is not what it is elsewhere. You may have noticed that money is jealously guarded. People tend not to leave it lying around. The same goes for power, as you will have discovered if you ever tried to get into government or into the cockpit of an airliner. Basically, people who have money and power also know what's good for them. But weirdly, in the world of open-source software, power is simply left lying around for you to pick up. It's that very rare thing, unguarded power. It's not even simply left lying around, it's actually given away.
speaking of real power, including life- changing, career-determining, power over others. It was there for the taking; I took it, and of course many other people have helped themselves too.
think this matters, and yet people are too polite, too nice, too friendly (not envious and resentful enough, like I am) to notice it, or talk about it or question it.
gets said about so much power, and I think one reason for that is that people simple don’t realise how much power is at stake. Let’s take this seriously by looking at an example. As conference organisers, of DjangoCon Europe this year, we determined where 350 or so people spent a week of their lives. We determined that they would travel to Cardiff. We determined when they would do it, and what they would do when they got there; we determined what they ate, when they ate, what they heard about, what experiences they would have. We determined who would speak, who’d get a platform, whose voice would be heard. All these things were determined on the basis of what we wanted to achieve - our ideas, and our values, and our picture of the how the world should be. That’s a lot to determine on behalf of other people. (Don’t dismiss even the most basic things like conference dates or when people eat as being insignificant. Every date on the calendar has cultural significance for someone; Passover or Ramadan might not have much meaning for you or me, but there are plenty of people for whom they do. Just imagine if the biggest event in your software community were held over Christmas.)
someone in a position of power in a community, you can’t not exercise this power. The decent mild and polite people who have put a huge amount of work into this PyCon UK are quietly shaking their heads and thinking: but no, that's not how I see it; I wasn't wielding power, imposing my agenda on 450 people, I was just helping organise a PyCon and trying to be useful. They are wrong. As I've said, even when you are making decisions that have to be made (such as choosing a date) rather than explicitly pursuing an aim (such as having more women speakers or speakers from minorities) you are imposing your choices and asserting your values and steering the world in a certain direction. So you can’t not exercise this power…
out. The point about political choices is that you can’t choose not to make them. If you positively want not to pursue a political agenda, that means you are following a political agenda, because you are putting your weight behind the status quo, you are endorsing the current distribution of power - it’s a choice like any other. The fact is that a conference is organised in the organiser's image, and reflects the organiser's ideology. DjangoCon wasn't me throwing my weight around, it was me throwing around the weight of the entire Django community, not to mention well over one hundred thousand pounds of its money.
picked up the power they’ve found lying around, to be trusted with it? How is this power actually being used? How have I used the power I helped myself to?
very obviously and clearly, what has happened as a result, what people do when they take the opportunity to pick up some of this power that has generously been left there for the taking. In the Python community for example:
quite apart from Python itself, led by some genuinely good people. Django’s the one I know best, but it’s far from the only one, led by genuinely decent, thoughtful, responsible people who have helped create safe, useful, valuable software and safe, kind, generous communities.
PyCons that fill the calendar right across the year and across the world, led by generous and hard-working people who want to do nothing more than share the things they have benefitted from with other people. (Events like this PyCon of course, and people like John Pinner.)
Django Girls, that have changed people’s lives, but that sprang out of seemingly nowhere, that picked up the power and wielded it as if they were born with it, to change a small part of the world in a way that makes it better, that opens up opportunities to new people, in a way that once again does its best to share the power.
that are not wrong. In fact, as far as I can see it, there’s little to complain about. The way power is used by the people who pick it up really seems to be pretty good.
lot of agreement that things have worked well, in fact right here we have two problems we should take seriously before we can declare ourselves confident.
a Django core developer, and a member of the Django Software Foundation; I was the chair of DjangoCon Europe this year and it was a big success, and I led the organisation of Python Namibia this year, and that was a success too, and then there was Django Weekend and another DjangoCon Europe last year and so on. Things look pretty good from here! Things look pretty good to me. But maybe, now that I have all this power, I’m not actually in the best position to hear about, to be aware of, to understand any problems with the way it has worked. So, let’s not be too confident just because things seem rosy to us, especially if things look rosy from a position of power, and let’s not ever get confident that we understand how things seem for people who don’t have power.
might actually be pretty good now, but if there's one thing we know about power it’s how quickly it can change hands, fall into the wrong ones, be used in ways that harm instead of help people, especially ones who have less of it. Things might be pretty good now, but we have no guarantees at all that they will continue to be. Sometimes things go bad suddenly, taking us by surprise so that by the time we realise it’s too late. Sometimes they go bad slowly, so that we don’t notice it happening and then by the time we realise it’s too late.
the fact that we leave power lying around is a problem; in fact, I think that has been one of the defences against abuse of power that the open-source software movement has enjoyed. I think it's something importantly and fundamentally right in our economy of power. But I do think that just because we leave it lying around for others to pick up should not mean that we don't keep our eyes on it.
to look for power where it’s hiding, and see it at work, and how it works, especially in places where we don’t realise it is - and it’s everywhere. We need to watch it, be aware of it, be sensitive to it, and understand what is happening to it. And for that to happen, we have to talk about it and think about it in ways that we are not used to doing. It's easy for me to talk and think about it, because by nature I am a desirable combination of being resentful of my lack of power, envious of the power of others, eager for power, and shameless in admitting it. Other people are not so lucky.
have power, you must acknowledge it - even if the very idea that the work you’re doing (running a conference, serving a software community, managing an open-source software project) constitutes power gives you the creeps. It’s your duty to acknowledge the power you have, because it helps ensure that you don’t forget to consider how other people will be affected by what you think, decide and do. It’s your duty to, because almost nothing is more potentially dangerous than a person who is oblivious to the fact that they hold power over others. It’s your duty to, because if you don’t acknowledge that you hold power, you have no way to understand that other people can be excluded by it - even if that’s the opposite of what you want. It’s absolutely not enough merely not to want that to happen - you need to understand your own power to make sure it doesn’t.
there for the taking. It’s yours to have. There seems to be an unlimited supply of it. One of the amazing things about the economy of power in open-source software is that when you take it, it doesn’t have to mean taking it away from anyone else. It’s what economists call a non-rival good - my acquiring it doesn’t deprive you of it. In fact it’s often an anti-rival good - one that the more I take of it, the more there is available for you. Another remarkable thing is that people who do have power seem to welcome sharing it. (Even me; I may be envious of power I don’t have, but I am not jealous of the power that I do.) You don’t have to fight for it; much of the time you don’t even need to ask for it. Just pick it up and start using it. You may not be in a position of power right now, but the economy of power we enjoy in this movement gives you plenty of opportunities to engage with it. Ask questions. Have ideas. Make suggestions. Do things. Remind it that you’re there. It’s relatively easy to do all these things in our world of open-source software, in our economy where power is an anti-rival good.
power we have, or to take the power that’s available to us, if we fail to recognise power for what it is, if we’re too squeamish to name it and too polite to talk about it in the first place. So even though you’ve been well-educated by the structures of power, all your lives, not to be resentful if you lack it, not to be envious of the power of others, not to be eager for it, and to find it a bit shameful if you do, please try to take this seriously enough to shake off that conditioning so that you can talk about power clearly, properly and openly. It might be uncomfortable to start conversations about power, but it won’t actually hurt. And the more you do it, and the more everyone does it, the less uncomfortable it will become.
began with the claim that ideas without power are useless, and that there’s an important equation between power and usefulness. In fact, in our open-source economy of power where power is freely- available for the taking, exercising power is actually the same thing as being useful. That is, being of service is the same as having power. Normally we think of these as being opposed to each other, that if some people have power then others must relegated to roles of mere service, as far as that power is concerned. In our economy of power, they are not.
you take the power that’s lying around for the taking is by being of service. Influence comes from service. The power that is lying around for the taking is work that needs to be done. I mean this in practical ways and at every level: If you review a pull request for an open-source project, that’s service; it’s also a tug of influence, however small, that you have just asserted over that project and its future. If you contribute a line to some documentation, that’s service; it’s also your idea of what the software is, being made concrete. If you contribute a feature to a software project, that’s service; it’s also your vision becoming reality, not just for yourself, but everyone who uses it. If you serve a conference by helping organise it, you’re imbuing it with your values, steering it with your influence. If you put yourself to work, generously and usefully, on behalf of any project or event or initiative or undertaking, you’re exercising power that will affect other people.
career-determining, power over others, genuine political power, and it’s a very good thing. I think that here, in our Python world, power is in the hands of the right people, who have already achieved some very remarkable things with it, who have been of excellent service, and who positively want to share that power with others - with you, with people like you, if you haven’t already picked it up. Our defence against abuse of that power is not to guard it jealously; on the contrary, we’re safer if we do leave power lying around. In fact, abuse of power is anyway less of a threat than power’s inadvertent tendency to exclude, for those of us with power not to realise the subtle ways it keeps out the people who don’t have it. Our defence against both threats, whether deliberate abuse or inadvertent exclusion, is the same: to talk about it, recognise it, and take it.
and be of service, and don’t be reluctant to let your ideas turn into real things through it, and don’t be afraid to let your values influence the world through it. Don’t be ashamed of the idea of taking power, because here in our part of the world, taking part is the same thing as taking power.
use … what I mean is: ! What I really want is to be of use. And mostly, I think that is all that anybody really wants. Take part. Take power. Be useful.
evildmp
yuj1osm
tokushun
pfn
z63d
hirotomotaguchi
bengo4com
recruitengineers
yokawasa
marsee101
hiashisan
ysakotch
rokuosan
lara
malarkey
productmarketing
eileencodes
jeffersonlam
marcelosomers
destraynor
keithpitt
thekraken
lauravandoore
addyosmani
