Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Smalltalk on Rubinius
Search
gogaruco
September 27, 2011
1
63
Smalltalk on Rubinius
by Konstantin Haase
gogaruco
September 27, 2011
Tweet
Share
More Decks by gogaruco
See All by gogaruco
Wesley Beary at GoGaRuCo 2011
gogaruco
2
59
CouchDB & Ruby - You're doing it wrong
gogaruco
5
290
Ruby Javascript and the Mobile Web
gogaruco
1
79
KidsRuby: Think of the Children
gogaruco
1
160
Writing your own Programming Language to Understand Ruby better
gogaruco
3
91
Go for the Rubyist
gogaruco
3
260
Fast Rails Tests
gogaruco
1
170
Featured
See All Featured
Taking LLMs out of the black box: A practical guide to human-in-the-loop distillation
inesmontani
PRO
3
2.1k
How to train your dragon (web standard)
notwaldorf
97
6.5k
Chrome DevTools: State of the Union 2024 - Debugging React & Beyond
addyosmani
10
1.1k
What’s in a name? Adding method to the madness
productmarketing
PRO
24
4k
The Web Performance Landscape in 2024 [PerfNow 2024]
tammyeverts
12
1.1k
Impact Scores and Hybrid Strategies: The future of link building
tamaranovitovic
0
220
Claude Code どこまでも/ Claude Code Everywhere
nwiizo
64
53k
SEOcharity - Dark patterns in SEO and UX: How to avoid them and build a more ethical web
sarafernandez
0
140
Stewardship and Sustainability of Urban and Community Forests
pwiseman
0
130
Claude Code のすすめ
schroneko
67
220k
First, design no harm
axbom
PRO
2
1.1k
Effective software design: The role of men in debugging patriarchy in IT @ Voxxed Days AMS
baasie
0
250
Transcript
Smalltalk On Rubinius Konstantin Haase
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Why implement Smalltalk on Rubinius?
Why create a programming language?
Why create?
"When you don't create things, you become defined by your
tastes rather than ability. Your tastes only narrow and exclude people. So create." why the lucky stiff
Why a programming language?
About programming languages: "I don’t like any of them, and
I don’t think any of them are suitable for the real programming problems of today, whether for systems or for end-users" Alan Kay
Problem Oriented Programming Languages Cairo (~120k SLOC in C) rewritten
in less than 400 lines
Why Smalltalk?
Why Rubinius?
None
1 + 1 1 + 1
this is it this.is.it
GoGaRuCo rock: #hard GoGaRuCo.rock :hard
doc convertFrom: #xml to: #yaml doc.convert(:xml, :ruby)
doc convertFrom: #xml to: #yaml doc.convert from: :xml, to: :ruby
[ 42 ] proc { 42 }
anArray do: [ :each | each doSomething ] an_array.each do
|element| element.do_something end
Textmate version = 2 ifTrue: [ 'no way' ] ifFalse:
[ 'thought so' ] if Textmate.version == 2 "no way" else "thought so" end
Storage current store: #foo; store: #bar storage = Storage.current storage.store
:foo storage.store :bar
Smalltalk claims to look like: 'English'. Judge yourself. Does it.
Ruby.claims.to.look. like "English" Judge.yourself; Does.it?
Reak github.com/rkh/Reak Like Squeak but with R File based (as
opposed to image based)
None
The Rubinius Compiler Pure Ruby Modular and Flexible lib/compiler
None
Parsing with KPeg github.com/evanphx/kpeg
" from Reak.AST.Self " grammar: g [ ^ g str:
'self' ] # from Reak::AST::Return def bootstrap_grammar(g) g.seq "^", :sp, g.t(:expression) end
Rubinius Bytecode
$ rbx compile -B -e 'puts "Hello World"' 0000: push_self
0001: push_literal "Hello World" 0003: allow_private 0004: send_stack :puts, 1
$ rbx compile -B -e 'puts "Hello World"' 0000: push_self
0001: push_literal "Hello World" 0003: allow_private 0004: send_stack :puts, 1
$ rbx compile -B -e 'puts "Hello World"' 0000: push_self
0001: push_literal "Hello World" 0003: allow_private 0004: send_stack :puts, 1
$ rbx compile -B -e 'puts "Hello World"' 0000: push_self
0001: push_literal "Hello World" 0003: allow_private 0004: send_stack :puts, 1
$ rbx compile -B -e 'puts "Hello World"' 0000: push_self
0001: push_literal "Hello World" 0003: allow_private 0004: send_stack :puts, 1
class Object dynamic_method(:display) do |g| g.push_self g.push_local(0) # first argument
g.send(:puts, 1, true) g.ret end end display "Hello World"
Reusing the Rubinius tool chain
None
class Reak::Compiler < Rubinius::Compiler class Parser < Stage stage :parser
next_stage Generator end end
class CustomNode < Reak::AST::Base def self.bootstrap_grammar(g) # grammar definition end
def bytecode(g) # bytecode definition end end
class ConstantAccess < Rubinius::AST::ConstantAccess include Reak::AST::Node Reak::AST::Primary.push self def self.bootstrap_grammar(g)
g.t /[A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9_]*/ end # no bytecode definition necessary end
Rubinius.AST.TrueLiteral subclass: #TrueLiteral [ Reak.AST.Primary push: self. self include: Reak.AST.Node.
self class >> grammar: g [ ^ g str: 'true' ]. ]
" Remember cascades? " g pushSelf; pushLocal: 0; send: #puts
args: 1 private: true; ret.
Reak.AST.Base subclass: #Cascade [ Reak.AST.Expression push: self. bytecode: g [
g pushSelf. cascadedSends do: [:send | g dup. send bytecode: g. g pop ]. lastSend bytecode: g. ] ]
Thanks! github.com / rkh / presentations