$30 off During Our Annual Pro Sale. View Details »

Searching for signposts of failed white dwarf supernovae

jjhermes
October 19, 2021

Searching for signposts of failed white dwarf supernovae

Colloquium, 45 min. October 2021: MIT Astrophysics Colloquium, Cambridge, MA, USA.

jjhermes

October 19, 2021
Tweet

More Decks by jjhermes

Other Decks in Science

Transcript

  1. Searching for signposts of
    failed white dwarf supernovae
    h"p://jjherm.es
    @jotajotahermes
    J.J. Hermes
    Mark Garlick

    View Slide

  2. JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 2
    What is a normal ‘White Dwarf’?
    • a stellar remnant that
    is no longer fusing in
    its core
    • the endpoints of
    everything < 8 M¤
    • electron degeneracy
    limits WD mass to <
    1.4 M¤
    A ‘typical’ 0.6 solar-mass
    white dwarf
    electron degenerate
    C/O core
    (r = 8500 km)
    non-degenerate He
    layer
    (260 km)
    non-degenerate H
    layer
    (30 km)

    View Slide

  3. • a stellar remnant that is
    no longer fusing in its
    core
    • the endpoints of
    everything < 8 M¤
    • we need a way to grow
    the WD mass above the
    Chandrasekhar limit
    • a stellar remnant that is
    no longer fusing in its
    core
    • the endpoints of
    everything < 8 M¤
    • electron degeneracy
    limits WD mass to <
    1.4 M¤
    JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 3
    Type Ia Supernova: Fully Disrupted White Dwarfs
    HST: SN1994D
    A ‘typical’ 0.6 solar-mass
    white dwarf
    electron degenerate
    C/O core
    (r = 8500 km)

    View Slide

  4. JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 4
    We Now Often Observe WDs in the Act of Merging!
    Average distance between Earth and Moon:
    Brown et al. 2011; Hermes et
    al. 2012
    M
    2
    = 0.51 M
    ¤
    M
    1
    = 0.26 M
    ¤
    SDSSJ0651+2844 is a 12.75-min WD+WD binary

    View Slide

  5. JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 5
    We Now Often Observe WDs in the Act of Merging!
    SDSSJ0651+2844 is a 12.75-min WD+WD binary
    Hermes et al. 2022,
    in prep.

    View Slide

  6. Hermes et al. 2022,
    in prep.
    JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 6
    Expected dPorb
    /dt =
    (-0.263 ± 0.020) ms/yr from GR
    Observed dPorb
    /dt =
    (-0.28688 ± 0.00072) ms/yr!
    M
    tot
    = 0.770 ± 0.039 M
    ¤
    L
    GW
    = 2.85 L
    ¤
    L
    EM
    = 0.05 L
    ¤
    SDSSJ0651+2844 is a 12.75-min WD+WD binary

    View Slide

  7. JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 7
    There should be many merger byproducts masquerading as
    ‘normal’ white dwarfs in the field
    M
    tot
    = 0.770 ± 0.039 M
    ¤
    that will merge in less than 1 million years
    D. Berry, GSFC
    SDSSJ0651+2844 is a 12.75-min WD+WD binary

    View Slide

  8. JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 8
    ZTF has found >15 WD+WD binaries with Porb
    < 1 hr that will all merge
    within 60 Myr, but none have total mass >1.1 M¤
    Burdge et al. 2020
    There should be many merger byproducts masquerading as
    ‘normal’ white dwarfs in the field

    View Slide

  9. Gaia revolutionized our ability to find white dwarfs
    Gaia Collaboration,
    Babusiaux et al. 2018
    JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 9
    Sun-like stars
    white dwarfs
    Bluer (hotter) Redder (cooler)
    Absolute G Magnitude (Distance Normalized)
    • Before Gaia we knew of
    ~35,000 white dwarfs
    (mostly from SDSS)
    • Gentile Fusillo et al. 2021
    catalog of ~359,000 high-
    confidence WDs from
    Gaia eDR3

    View Slide

  10. JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 10
    What is a normal ‘White Dwarf’?
    Composition | Mass | Rotation
    4000 4500 5000 5500 6500
    DA DA: H
    DB: He
    DQ: C2 (‘Swan bands’)
    DC: [continuum]
    DZ: [metals]
    DB
    DZ
    DQ
    DC
    adapted from Wesemael
    et al. 1993
    The majority (>2/3) of white dwarfs are H dominated
    Mostly H-dominated

    View Slide

  11. JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 11
    What is a normal ‘White Dwarf’?
    Composition | Mass | Rotation
    Tremblay et al. 2016
    Mostly H-dominated ~0.6 M
    ¤
    The vast majority
    of white dwarfs
    have a mass near
    0.55-0.65 M¤

    View Slide

  12. JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 12
    What is a normal ‘White Dwarf’?
    Composition | Mass | Rotation
    Winget & Kepler
    2008
    Mostly H-dominated ~0.6 M
    ¤
    maximum associated with the onset of significant partial ionization.
    Observations soon caught up. A systematic survey of the DB white dwarf stars de
    that the brightest DB with the broadest He I lines, GD 358, did indeed pulsate i
    g-modes—remarkably similar to the large-amplitude DAV pulsators (Winget et al. 19
    The observed pulsating white dwarf stars lie in three strips in the H-R diagram,
    in Figure 3. The pulsating pre-white dwarf PG 1159 stars, the DOVs, around 7
    170,000 K have the highest number of detected modes. The first class of pulsating
    5.5 5.0 4.5
    Planetary Nebula
    Main
    sequence
    DOV
    DBV
    DAV
    4.0 3.5 3.0
    log [T
    eff
    (K)]
    4
    2
    0
    –2
    –4
    log (L/L )
    Figure 3
    A 13-Gyr isochrone with z = 0.019 from Marigo et al. (2007), on which we have drawn the ob
    Annu. Rev. Astro. Astrophys. 2008.46:157-199. Downloaded from arjour
    by University of Texas - Austin on 01/28/09. For personal
    Asteroseismology can probe
    core composition, mass, and
    WD rotation

    View Slide

  13. JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 13
    What is a normal ‘White Dwarf’?
    Hermes et al. 2017
    1000 s 200 s
    500 s 125 s
    Typical K2 data from a
    pulsating white dwarf
    345.3 s
    l = 1
    n = 6
    Prot
    = 0.9 ±
    0.2 day
    Composition | Mass | Rotation
    Mostly H-dominated ~0.6 M
    ¤
    Asteroseismology can probe
    core composition, mass, and
    WD rotation

    View Slide

  14. JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 14
    What is a normal ‘White Dwarf’?
    Prot
    = 0.5-2 days
    1 10 100
    WD Rotation Period (hr)
    0.4
    0.5
    0.6
    0.7
    0.8
    0.9
    WD Mass (MØ)
    1.0
    1.5
    2.0
    2.5
    3.0
    3.5
    4.0
    ZAMS Progenitor Mass (MØ)
    1 10 100
    White Dwarf Rotation Period (hr)
    0
    2
    4
    6
    8
    10
    12
    14
    16
    N
    TESS
    Kepler/K2
    pre-Kepler
    1 d 2 d 4 d
    Hermes et al. 2017
    The vast majority of pulsating
    white dwarfs rotate between
    0.5-2 days
    Composition | Mass | Rotation
    Mostly H-dominated ~0.6 M
    ¤
    TESS update from
    Romero et al. 2021, in prep.

    View Slide

  15. JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 15
    What is a normal ‘White Dwarf’?
    A ‘typical’ 0.6 solar-mass
    white dwarf
    H-dominated atmosphere
    ~0.6 M
    ¤
    Prot
    = 0.5-2 days
    The majority of white dwarfs
    are pretty boring – that’s why
    they’re great flux standards!

    View Slide

  16. JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 16
    What are possible signposts of merged WDs?
    Composition | Mass | Rotation | Kinematics
    Mostly H-dominated ~0.6 M
    ¤ Prot
    = 0.5-2 days
    4000 4500 5000 5500 6500
    DA: H
    Some strongly
    magnetic white
    dwarfs show large
    Zeeman splitting of
    the Balmer lines
    Gaensicke et al. 2002

    View Slide

  17. JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 17
    An extreme example of a clear merger remnant
    Composition | Mass | Rotation | Kinematics
    Mostly H-dominated ~0.6 M
    ¤ Prot
    = 0.5-2 days
    Caiazzo et al. 2021
    P
    rot
    = 416.2 s
    B = 600-900 MG R ~ 2100 km
    M > 1.3 M
    ¤
    ZTF J1901+1458
    "A highly magnetized and rapidly rotating
    white dwarf as small as the Moon"

    View Slide

  18. JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 18
    Photometric variability can select for WD mergers
    Gaia’s empirical photometric uncertainties can select variables
    n
    obs
    Gaia Collaboration,
    Evans et al. 2018
    Guidry et al. 2021

    View Slide

  19. JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 19
    Photometric variability can select for WD mergers
    Gaia’s empirical photometric uncertainties can select variables
    Bluer (hotter) Redder (cooler)
    0.6 M¤
    0.9 M
    ¤
    1.2 M¤
    Guidry et al. 2021

    View Slide

  20. Guidry et al. 2021
    Gaia’s empirical photometric uncertainties can select variables
    JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 20
    Photometric variability can select for WD mergers
    3800 4000 4200 4400 4600 4800 5000
    Wavelength [˚
    A] (from SOAR: 2018-06-01)
    0.6
    0.8
    1.0
    1.2
    1.4
    1.6
    1.8
    2.0
    f∏
    £ 1015 [ergs cm°2 s°1 ˚
    A°1]
    0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
    Time [s] (from CTIO: 2018-05-19)
    °5
    0
    5
    10
    15
    ±I/I0
    [%]
    Bluer (hotter) Redder (cooler)
    0.6 M¤
    0.9 M
    ¤
    1.2 M¤

    View Slide

  21. JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 21
    Photometric variability can select for WD mergers
    A 28-min strongly magnetic WD,
    likely a merger remnant
    3800 4000 4200 4400 4600 4800 5000
    Wavelength [˚
    A] (from SOAR: 2018-06-01)
    1.0
    1.5
    2.0
    2.5
    3.0
    f∏
    £ 1015 [ergs cm°2 s°1 ˚
    A°1]
    0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
    Time [s] (from CTIO: 2018-05-23)
    °2
    °1
    0
    1
    2
    ±I/I0
    [%]
    Bluer (hotter) Redder (cooler)
    0.6 M¤
    0.9 M
    ¤
    1.2 M¤

    View Slide

  22. JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 22
    (Scatter in survey photometry is uncovering
    interesting remnant planetary systems)
    Guidry et al. 2021

    View Slide

  23. JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 23
    Farihi et al. 2021
    "Relentless and Complex Transits
    from a Planetesimal Debris Disk"
    WD 1054-226

    View Slide

  24. JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 24
    How can we start to put estimates on merger rates?
    Temmink et al. 2020
    Population synthesis expects >25% of all
    white dwarfs to arise from stellar mergers

    View Slide

  25. JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 25
    Dunlap & Clemens 2015
    see also
    Wegg & Phinney 2012
    Most hot, massive WDs were
    formed recently (<1 Gyr)
    à low velocity dispersions
    M < 0.75 M¤
    Teff > 15,000 K
    M > 0.90 M¤
    Teff > 15,000 K
    within 100 pc
    How can we start to put estimates on merger rates?

    View Slide

  26. JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 26
    Cheng et al. 2020
    Modeling WDs with anomalous kinematics reveals objects with
    older kinematics than cooling age suggests: mergers
    How can we start to put estimates on merger rates?
    "Double White Dwarf Merger Products
    among High-mass White Dwarfs"

    View Slide

  27. Henry Giclas
    (1910-2007)
    Lowell Observatory,
    Flagstaff, AZ
    JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 27
    Kinematics reveal the most exciting merger remnants

    View Slide

  28. JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 28
    • Before Gaia we found
    white dwarfs by looking
    for blue stars with high
    proper motion

    View Slide

  29. GD 10
    1975
    GD: “Giclas Dwarf”
    GD 10: 10th Giclas dwarf

    View Slide

  30. GD 10
    1988

    View Slide

  31. GD 10
    2011

    View Slide

  32. The GD catalog as seen by Gaia
    JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 32
    °0.50 °0.25 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25
    GBP
    ° GRP
    [mag]
    0
    2
    4
    6
    8
    10
    12
    14
    MG
    = G + 5 £ log $ ° 10 [mag]
    DA, log(g) = 8.0
    Z=0.019
    Z=10°2
    Z=10°3
    0
    100
    200
    300
    400
    500
    v?
    [km s°1]
    • Gaia CMD: <400 WDs among 1700
    WD suspects in Giclas Dwarf catalog
    (Giclas, Burnham & Thomas 1980)
    Sun-like stars
    white dwarfs
    Bluer (hotter) Redder (cooler)
    Absolute G Magnitude (Distance Normalized)

    View Slide

  33. The GD catalog as seen by Gaia
    JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 33
    °0.50 °0.25 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25
    GBP
    ° GRP
    [mag]
    0
    2
    4
    6
    8
    10
    12
    14
    MG
    = G + 5 £ log $ ° 10 [mag]
    DA, log(g) = 8.0
    Z=0.019
    Z=10°2
    Z=10°3
    0
    100
    200
    300
    400
    500
    v?
    [km s°1]
    • Gaia CMD: <400 WDs among 1700
    WD suspects in Giclas Dwarf catalog
    (Giclas, Burnham & Thomas 1980)
    GD 492
    Sun-like stars
    white dwarfs
    Bluer (hotter) Redder (cooler)
    Absolute G Magnitude (Distance Normalized)

    View Slide

  34. discovery: Vennes et al. 2017
    follow-up: Raddi et al. 2018a, 2018b
    • LP 40-365 has vrad
    = +499 km/s; vrf
    = 852 +/- 10 km/s
    • It is unbound, a hyper-runaway not from Galactic center
    GD 492 = LP 40-365: A Hyper-Runaway WD
    JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 34

    View Slide

  35. GD 492 = LP 40-365: A Hyper-Runaway WD
    • LP 40-365 is one of the most
    metal-rich stars known
    • No H or He detected (< 10-5)
    • Heavy elements indicate
    core C, Si burning
    discovery: Vennes et al. 2017
    follow-up: Raddi et al. 2018a, 2018b
    He
    H
    Ne
    O
    Mg
    all else
    all else
    <0.005% H
    GD 492: The Sun:
    JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 35

    View Slide

  36. GD 492: first of a class of partly burnt runaways
    • These are the most metal-
    rich stars ever found:
    No H, He detected
    • All have similar abundances
    • All have extremely fast
    space motion
    • Hypothesis: These are the
    slung-shot remnants of an
    incomplete Type Ia
    supernova, ejected from
    <30-min binary! Raddi et al. 2019
    JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 36

    View Slide

  37. GD 492: rst of a class of partly burnt runaways
    • These are the most metal-
    rich stars ever found:
    No H, He detected
    • All have similar abundances
    • All have extremely fast
    space motion
    • Hypothesis: These are the
    slung-shot remnants of an
    incomplete Type Ia
    supernova, ejected from
    <30-min binary!
    JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 37
    Mark Garlick

    View Slide

  38. GD 492: TESS suggests it is a surviving white dwarf
    JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 38 Hermes, Putterman, et al. 2021
    • TESS FFI data of GD 492
    showed 8.9-hr variability

    View Slide

  39. GD 492: TESS suggests it is a surviving white dwarf
    JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 39 Hermes, Putterman, et al. 2021
    "8.9 hr Rotation in the Partly Burnt Runaway
    Stellar Remnant LP 40-365 (GD 492)"
    • TESS FFI data of GD 492
    showed 8.9-hr variability
    • Variability confirmed from
    five orbits of archival time-
    tagged HST ultraviolet data

    View Slide

  40. GD 492: TESS suggests it is a surviving white dwarf
    JJ Hermes, Boston University | MIT | 40 Hermes, Putterman, et al. 2021
    • If angular momentum is
    mostly conserved rotation is
    likely too slow for it to have
    been the donor
    • More evidence its radius
    has increased substantially
    and it is actually a bound
    remnant from an
    underluminous supernova
    roughly 5 Myr ago
    Prot,i
    = Porb
    = minutes
    Prot,f
    = 8.9 hr

    View Slide

  41. • Roughly 25% of all field white dwarfs have interacted or
    merged in their past
    • We can pick some merger byproducts individually via:
    strong magnetism, fast rotation, and/or high mass
    • High space motion (fast kinematics) can reveal
    apparently young but actually old systems
    • We are now also finding more partly burnt runaway
    supernova shards
    D. Berry, GSFC

    View Slide

  42. Mark Garlick

    View Slide