Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Sign up for free
Menu
Search
Features
All features
Private URLs
Password Protection
Custom URLS
Scheduled publishing
Remove Branding
Restrict embedding
Deck Collections
Notes
Features
All features
Private URLs
Password Protection
Custom URLS
Scheduled publishing
Remove Branding
Restrict embedding
Deck Collections
Notes
Explore
Featured decks
Featured speakers
Programming
Technology
Storyboards
Explore
Featured decks
Featured speakers
Programming
Technology
Storyboards
Pricing
Search
Sign in
Sign up for free
ブロックチェーン 2.0 / Blockchains 2.0
Search
Kenji Saito
PRO
December 07, 2017
Technology
280
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
ブロックチェーン 2.0 / Blockchains 2.0
2017年12月7日(木)、ブロックチェーンアカデミー「ブロックチェーン基盤技術 ブロックチェーン 2.0」にて使用したスライドです
Kenji Saito
PRO
December 07, 2017
More Decks by Kenji Saito
See All by Kenji Saito
アカデミーキャンプ 2026秋「位置ゲーに秀でよ!ウチらとヤツらのゲーム・デザイン」DAY 4 / Academy Camp 2026 Fall - Excel at Location-Based Games! Our and Their Game Design DAY 4
ks91
PRO
0
15
アカデミーキャンプ 2026秋「位置ゲーに秀でよ!ウチらとヤツらのゲーム・デザイン」DAY 3 / Academy Camp 2026 Fall - Excel at Location-Based Games! Our and Their Game Design DAY 3
ks91
PRO
0
41
アカデミーキャンプ 2026秋「位置ゲーに秀でよ!ウチらとヤツらのゲーム・デザイン」DAY 2 / Academy Camp 2026 Fall - Excel at Location-Based Games! Our and Their Game Design DAY 2
ks91
PRO
0
89
アカデミーキャンプ 2026秋「位置ゲーに秀でよ!ウチらとヤツらのゲーム・デザイン」DAY 1 / Academy Camp 2026 Fall - Excel at Location-Based Games! Our and Their Game Design DAY 1
ks91
PRO
0
38
責任2.0/3.0 ∼ 知的創造過程の脱領土化 / Responsibility 2.0 and 3.0: The Deterritorialization of the Intellectual Creative Process
ks91
PRO
0
39
国と地域のマネジメントと AGI / National and Regional Management and AGI
ks91
PRO
0
27
2026 年度「AI による研究・教育サポート」ワークショップ (教員向け) / AY 2026 “AI-Based Research and Education Support” Workshop (For Faculty)
ks91
PRO
0
54
エージェント化するAI:現在地とその先に起きる変化 / AI as Agents: The Current State and the Changes Ahead
ks91
PRO
0
220
文化的ループ (推論, エージェント) と思考プロセスの検証可能性 / Cultural Loops (Inference, Agents) and the Verifiability of Thought Processes
ks91
PRO
0
50
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
Azure Serverless 2026:Production-ready な AI エージェント基盤 / Azure Serverless 2026: Production-Ready AI Agent Platform
miyake
2
460
事業課題から技術的負債に向き合う
sansantech
PRO
2
2.1k
beyond jj: config & tools ecosystem
indirect
0
5.6k
今話題のAI「Jev」って何? 宇宙最速で学ぶ会
minorun365
PRO
30
18k
株式会社シーエーシー エンジニア向け会社紹介資料
cac
0
57k
バイブコーディング時代のWebアプリ開発入門~Cloud Runで学ぶセキュアなビルドとデプロイ
waiwai2111
1
140
人間はどの意思決定を手放せるのか
kawasima
15
7.8k
Goodbye ShellScript, Hello File-based App
shunsock
0
530
LLMに渡さなかった仕事
nanaism
0
1.3k
作って終わりじゃないサーバーレス 〜9年運用する大規模EC物流API基盤の設計・運用のリアル〜
zozotech
PRO
0
390
2026_devsumi_ozono.pdf
o3
3
550
山手線を徒歩で一周してわかった、 位置情報アプリは「足」が最強のデバッガー
hinakko
0
180
Featured
See All Featured
Building an army of robots
kneath
307
46k
Code Reviewing Like a Champion
maltzj
528
40k
How People are Using Generative and Agentic AI to Supercharge Their Products, Projects, Services and Value Streams Today
helenjbeal
1
330
Embracing the Ebb and Flow
colly
88
5.2k
The Success of Rails: Ensuring Growth for the Next 100 Years
eileencodes
47
8.3k
Efficient Content Optimization with Google Search Console & Apps Script
katarinadahlin
PRO
1
870
The #1 spot is gone: here's how to win anyway
tamaranovitovic
4
1.2k
Leveraging Curiosity to Care for An Aging Population
cassininazir
1
500
Beyond borders and beyond the search box: How to win the global "messy middle" with AI-driven SEO
davidcarrasco
3
240
Jamie Indigo - Trashchat’s Guide to Black Boxes: Technical SEO Tactics for LLMs
techseoconnect
PRO
0
680
Agile Leadership in an Agile Organization
kimpetersen
PRO
0
240
First, design no harm
axbom
PRO
2
1.3k
Transcript
2.0 CSO / SFC
[email protected]
2.0 — — 2017-09-07 –
p.1/41
( ) SFC ( ) CSO (Chief Science Officer) 1993
M.Eng ( ) 2006 ( ) SFC 17 P2P 2011 → ( ) 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.2/41
/ Segregated Witness Proof of Stake 2.0 — — 2017-09-07
– p.3/41
2.0 1. 2. Segregated Witness 3. 4. Proof of Stake
( ) 5. 6. 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.4/41
1. 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.5/41
BTC / . . . 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 –
p.6/41
EPOBC (Open Assets) OP_RETURN 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.7/41
Open Assets Protocol (OAP) ( = ) 2.0 — —
2017-09-07 – p.8/41
ID ID (asset ID) 1. 2. 3. 160 = ID
( ) 4. base58check ‘A’ ( = 23) (asset quantity) BTC 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.9/41
OP_RETURN PUSH 0x4f41 (‘OA’) = 2 0x0100 2 1∼9 LEB128
1∼9 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.10/41
2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.11/41
2. Segregated Witness ( = ) (malleability) 2.0 — —
2017-09-07 – p.12/41
(witness) 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.13/41
OP_RETURN PUSH 0xaa21a9ed 4 (witness) SHA-256 32 Merkle 2.0 —
— 2017-09-07 – p.14/41
Merkle Tree (Bitcoin) Digest = double SHA-256 value Existence of
a TX can be verified if a relevant subtree is provided 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.15/41
(1) P2WPKH (version 0) (pay-to-(witnessed)-public-key-hash) witness ( ): < >
< > scriptSig ( ): scriptPubKey ( ) 0 <20-byte > 20-byte < > < > CHECKSIG 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.16/41
(2) P2WSH (version 0) (pay-to-(witnessed)-script-hash) witness: < 1 > <1
< 1 > < 2 > 2 CHECKMULTISIG> scriptSig: scriptPubKey 0 <32-byte > 32-byte 1-out-of-2 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.17/41
SegWit https://bitcoincore.org/en/2016/01/26/segwit-benefits/ 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.18/41
SegWit 2016 100 SegWit (95% ) . . . 2017
8 24 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.19/41
3. 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.20/41
BIP (Bitcoin Improvement Proposal) ex. BIP 1 : BIP Purposes
and Guidelines https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0001.mediawiki ex. BIP 9 : Version bits with timeout and delay ex. BIP 141 : Segregated Witness (Consensus layer) TCP/IP RFC XMPP XEP 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.21/41
Block Header Data Structure Field Description Size (bytes) Version 4
Digest Double SHA-256 value 32 Merkle root Double SHA-256 value 32 Time Seconds (since 1970-01-01T00:00 UTC) 4 Target Compressed format 4 Nonce Appropriate value 4 Merkle root is the digest of all TXs 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.22/41
BIP 9 SegWit https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0009/assignments.mediawiki MTP : Median Time Past (
11 ) 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.23/41
4. Proof of Stake ( ) 2.0 — — 2017-09-07
– p.24/41
Proof of Stake ( ) ( ) 2.0 — —
2017-09-07 – p.25/41
Proof of Stake Hn (PD + id + t +
. . .) ≤ 2n × balance d H n : n (ex. SHA-256 (n = 256)) PD : id : (ex. ) t : (ex. UNIX ( )) balance : d : (ex. ) PoW 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.26/41
Proof of Stake 3 1. 2. “Nothing at Stake” 3.
51% 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.27/41
: Proof of Stake Velocity Reddcoin 2.0 — — 2017-09-07
– p.28/41
Nothing at Stake - = 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 –
p.29/41
Nothing at Stake - 100% Proof of Stake 2.0 —
— 2017-09-07 – p.30/41
51% 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.31/41
Nothing at Stake ⇒ 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.32/41
5. . . . 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.33/41
2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.34/41
2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.35/41
→ ⇒ A. Back, et. al., “Enabling Blockchain Innovations with
Pegged Sidechains”, 2014 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.36/41
6. 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.37/41
1 1 10 2 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.38/41
A-B 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.39/41
2 2 ( ) Ripple Path 2.0 — — 2017-09-07
– p.40/41
2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.41/41