Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
ブロックチェーン 2.0 / Blockchains 2.0
Search
Kenji Saito
PRO
December 07, 2017
Technology
0
270
ブロックチェーン 2.0 / Blockchains 2.0
2017年12月7日(木)、ブロックチェーンアカデミー「ブロックチェーン基盤技術 ブロックチェーン 2.0」にて使用したスライドです
Kenji Saito
PRO
December 07, 2017
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Kenji Saito
See All by Kenji Saito
コバヤシマルテスト ─ 勝ち目のないゲームに抗いながら旅する心の旅路 / Kobayashi Maru Test - a mental journey of defiance against a game that cannot be won
ks91
PRO
0
3
セキュリティ戦略・発表と総括 / Security Strategies, Presentation and Conclusions
ks91
PRO
1
32
暗号資産の経済学・イントロダクション / Economics of Cryptocurrencies (Introduction)
ks91
PRO
0
20
AI とデジタルトランスフォーメーション / AI and Digital Transformation
ks91
PRO
0
10
インシデントレスポンス演習 II / Incident Response Exercise II
ks91
PRO
0
36
A思考の自動化とX 思考の行方 / Automation of A Thinking and the Future of X Thinking
ks91
PRO
0
23
サイバー戦の現在と未来 / Present and Future of Cyber Warfare
ks91
PRO
0
70
サイバー攻撃・防御とサイバー法 / Cyber Attacks, Defenses and Cyber Law
ks91
PRO
0
50
インシデントレスポンス演習I / Incident Response Exercise I
ks91
PRO
0
65
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
[NIKKEI Tech Talk]Bias for Action!! 実践から学ぶための仕組とコミュニティ / Community for Practice and Learning
kanamasa
0
280
データ分析を支える技術 生成AI再入門
ishikawa_satoru
0
380
フルリモートワークはエンジニアの夢を叶えたか? #cm_odyssey
mamohacy
2
600
【基調講演】変える、今ここから ― IoTとAIで紡ぐ未来
soracom
PRO
0
320
年間一億円削減した時系列データベースのアーキテクチャ改善~不確実性の高いプロジェクトへの挑戦~
lycorptech_jp
PRO
3
2.9k
Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAPのパフォーマンスチューニング要素をまとめてみた #cm_odyssey #devio2024
non97
0
220
CEL(Common Expression Language)で書いた条件にマッチしたIAM Policyを見つける / iam-policy-finder
fujiwara3
0
720
Datadog Cloud SIEMを使ってAWS環境の脅威を可視化した話/lifeistech-datadog-cloud-siem
gidajun
0
480
スレットハンティングについて知っておきたいこと
hacket
0
130
エンジニア向け会社紹介資料
caddi_eng
14
230k
[I/O Extended Android 2024] What`s new in Android 2024
kyeongwan
0
220
MySQLのロックの種類とその競合
yoku0825
6
1.6k
Featured
See All Featured
For a Future-Friendly Web
brad_frost
173
9.2k
Dealing with People You Can't Stand - Big Design 2015
cassininazir
360
22k
Speed Design
sergeychernyshev
9
270
Writing Fast Ruby
sferik
623
60k
Fight the Zombie Pattern Library - RWD Summit 2016
marcelosomers
228
16k
Designing on Purpose - Digital PM Summit 2013
jponch
113
6.6k
Making Projects Easy
brettharned
111
5.7k
Intergalactic Javascript Robots from Outer Space
tanoku
266
26k
Practical Orchestrator
shlominoach
185
10k
Clear Off the Table
cherdarchuk
89
320k
The Straight Up "How To Draw Better" Workshop
denniskardys
229
130k
Rebuilding a faster, lazier Slack
samanthasiow
78
8.5k
Transcript
2.0 CSO / SFC
[email protected]
2.0 — — 2017-09-07 –
p.1/41
( ) SFC ( ) CSO (Chief Science Officer) 1993
M.Eng ( ) 2006 ( ) SFC 17 P2P 2011 → ( ) 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.2/41
/ Segregated Witness Proof of Stake 2.0 — — 2017-09-07
– p.3/41
2.0 1. 2. Segregated Witness 3. 4. Proof of Stake
( ) 5. 6. 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.4/41
1. 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.5/41
BTC / . . . 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 –
p.6/41
EPOBC (Open Assets) OP_RETURN 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.7/41
Open Assets Protocol (OAP) ( = ) 2.0 — —
2017-09-07 – p.8/41
ID ID (asset ID) 1. 2. 3. 160 = ID
( ) 4. base58check ‘A’ ( = 23) (asset quantity) BTC 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.9/41
OP_RETURN PUSH 0x4f41 (‘OA’) = 2 0x0100 2 1∼9 LEB128
1∼9 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.10/41
2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.11/41
2. Segregated Witness ( = ) (malleability) 2.0 — —
2017-09-07 – p.12/41
(witness) 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.13/41
OP_RETURN PUSH 0xaa21a9ed 4 (witness) SHA-256 32 Merkle 2.0 —
— 2017-09-07 – p.14/41
Merkle Tree (Bitcoin) Digest = double SHA-256 value Existence of
a TX can be verified if a relevant subtree is provided 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.15/41
(1) P2WPKH (version 0) (pay-to-(witnessed)-public-key-hash) witness ( ): < >
< > scriptSig ( ): scriptPubKey ( ) 0 <20-byte > 20-byte < > < > CHECKSIG 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.16/41
(2) P2WSH (version 0) (pay-to-(witnessed)-script-hash) witness: < 1 > <1
< 1 > < 2 > 2 CHECKMULTISIG> scriptSig: scriptPubKey 0 <32-byte > 32-byte 1-out-of-2 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.17/41
SegWit https://bitcoincore.org/en/2016/01/26/segwit-benefits/ 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.18/41
SegWit 2016 100 SegWit (95% ) . . . 2017
8 24 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.19/41
3. 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.20/41
BIP (Bitcoin Improvement Proposal) ex. BIP 1 : BIP Purposes
and Guidelines https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0001.mediawiki ex. BIP 9 : Version bits with timeout and delay ex. BIP 141 : Segregated Witness (Consensus layer) TCP/IP RFC XMPP XEP 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.21/41
Block Header Data Structure Field Description Size (bytes) Version 4
Digest Double SHA-256 value 32 Merkle root Double SHA-256 value 32 Time Seconds (since 1970-01-01T00:00 UTC) 4 Target Compressed format 4 Nonce Appropriate value 4 Merkle root is the digest of all TXs 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.22/41
BIP 9 SegWit https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0009/assignments.mediawiki MTP : Median Time Past (
11 ) 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.23/41
4. Proof of Stake ( ) 2.0 — — 2017-09-07
– p.24/41
Proof of Stake ( ) ( ) 2.0 — —
2017-09-07 – p.25/41
Proof of Stake Hn (PD + id + t +
. . .) ≤ 2n × balance d H n : n (ex. SHA-256 (n = 256)) PD : id : (ex. ) t : (ex. UNIX ( )) balance : d : (ex. ) PoW 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.26/41
Proof of Stake 3 1. 2. “Nothing at Stake” 3.
51% 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.27/41
: Proof of Stake Velocity Reddcoin 2.0 — — 2017-09-07
– p.28/41
Nothing at Stake - = 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 –
p.29/41
Nothing at Stake - 100% Proof of Stake 2.0 —
— 2017-09-07 – p.30/41
51% 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.31/41
Nothing at Stake ⇒ 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.32/41
5. . . . 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.33/41
2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.34/41
2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.35/41
→ ⇒ A. Back, et. al., “Enabling Blockchain Innovations with
Pegged Sidechains”, 2014 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.36/41
6. 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.37/41
1 1 10 2 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.38/41
A-B 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.39/41
2 2 ( ) Ripple Path 2.0 — — 2017-09-07
– p.40/41
2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.41/41