Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Sign up for free
Menu
Search
Features
All features
Private URLs
Password Protection
Custom URLS
Scheduled publishing
Remove Branding
Restrict embedding
Deck Collections
Notes
Features
All features
Private URLs
Password Protection
Custom URLS
Scheduled publishing
Remove Branding
Restrict embedding
Deck Collections
Notes
Explore
Featured decks
Featured speakers
Programming
Technology
Storyboards
Explore
Featured decks
Featured speakers
Programming
Technology
Storyboards
Pricing
Search
Sign in
Sign up for free
ブロックチェーン 2.0 / Blockchains 2.0
Search
Kenji Saito
PRO
December 07, 2017
Technology
280
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
ブロックチェーン 2.0 / Blockchains 2.0
2017年12月7日(木)、ブロックチェーンアカデミー「ブロックチェーン基盤技術 ブロックチェーン 2.0」にて使用したスライドです
Kenji Saito
PRO
December 07, 2017
More Decks by Kenji Saito
See All by Kenji Saito
アカデミーキャンプ 2026秋「位置ゲーに秀でよ!ウチらとヤツらのゲーム・デザイン」DAY 4 / Academy Camp 2026 Fall - Excel at Location-Based Games! Our and Their Game Design DAY 4
ks91
PRO
0
6
アカデミーキャンプ 2026秋「位置ゲーに秀でよ!ウチらとヤツらのゲーム・デザイン」DAY 3 / Academy Camp 2026 Fall - Excel at Location-Based Games! Our and Their Game Design DAY 3
ks91
PRO
0
37
アカデミーキャンプ 2026秋「位置ゲーに秀でよ!ウチらとヤツらのゲーム・デザイン」DAY 2 / Academy Camp 2026 Fall - Excel at Location-Based Games! Our and Their Game Design DAY 2
ks91
PRO
0
83
アカデミーキャンプ 2026秋「位置ゲーに秀でよ!ウチらとヤツらのゲーム・デザイン」DAY 1 / Academy Camp 2026 Fall - Excel at Location-Based Games! Our and Their Game Design DAY 1
ks91
PRO
0
33
責任2.0/3.0 ∼ 知的創造過程の脱領土化 / Responsibility 2.0 and 3.0: The Deterritorialization of the Intellectual Creative Process
ks91
PRO
0
37
国と地域のマネジメントと AGI / National and Regional Management and AGI
ks91
PRO
0
26
2026 年度「AI による研究・教育サポート」ワークショップ (教員向け) / AY 2026 “AI-Based Research and Education Support” Workshop (For Faculty)
ks91
PRO
0
54
エージェント化するAI:現在地とその先に起きる変化 / AI as Agents: The Current State and the Changes Ahead
ks91
PRO
0
220
文化的ループ (推論, エージェント) と思考プロセスの検証可能性 / Cultural Loops (Inference, Agents) and the Verifiability of Thought Processes
ks91
PRO
0
50
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
銀行勘定系システムにおける開発プロセス刷新×AIによる環境モダナイゼーション / Development Process Transformation and AI-Driven Environment Modernization
muit
1
2.4k
HHKBエバンジェリストになる方法
941
0
110
すぐできる衛星通信対応 あとは山奥に行くだけ
tatetate55
0
140
アプリをもっと"iOSアプリっぽく"する小さな工夫 / Small Touches That Make Your App Feel More Like an iOS App
matsuji
2
960
AIを活用するために決めた "やらないこと" - 価値に注目する / Not betting on AI
soudai
PRO
3
560
SREへの勘違いに気づいた後の話
tomodakengo
0
110
AIエージェントの自己改善をどう設計するか / How to Design Self-Improvement for AI Agents
22mi
25
16k
開発投資の期待値を上げるプロダクトロードマップづくり ~プロダクトエンジニアが越境して事業を伸ばす~
kekekenta
1
220
Cloudflare Workers 向けアプリを C# で構築する ~WASM Native AOT への道~
nenonaninu
1
480
負債のメタファと2026年 / Debt Metaphor in Agentic Engineering Age 202609 Edition
twada
PRO
10
4.2k
AIエージェントの一手は 誰も見ていない - Falco拡張OSS「Prempti」とeBPFで サーバーレス実行基盤を二層防御する
keitah
0
240
目の前の楽しいが人生を変える - コミュニティの螺旋の歩き方と楽しむコツ / change your life
soudai
PRO
5
640
Featured
See All Featured
Testing 201, or: Great Expectations
jmmastey
46
8.3k
More Than Pixels: Becoming A User Experience Designer
marktimemedia
3
520
Docker and Python
trallard
47
4.2k
Conquering PDFs: document understanding beyond plain text
inesmontani
PRO
4
3.1k
Dominate Local Search Results - an insider guide to GBP, reviews, and Local SEO
greggifford
PRO
0
330
Navigating Algorithm Shifts & AI Overviews - #SMXNext
aleyda
1
1.6k
<Decoding/> the Language of Devs - We Love SEO 2024
nikkihalliwell
1
330
Crafting Experiences
bethany
1
340
Practical Tips for Bootstrapping Information Extraction Pipelines
honnibal
25
2.1k
Believing is Seeing
oripsolob
1
220
I Don’t Have Time: Getting Over the Fear to Launch Your Podcast
jcasabona
35
2.8k
Learning to Love Humans: Emotional Interface Design
aarron
275
41k
Transcript
2.0 CSO / SFC
[email protected]
2.0 — — 2017-09-07 –
p.1/41
( ) SFC ( ) CSO (Chief Science Officer) 1993
M.Eng ( ) 2006 ( ) SFC 17 P2P 2011 → ( ) 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.2/41
/ Segregated Witness Proof of Stake 2.0 — — 2017-09-07
– p.3/41
2.0 1. 2. Segregated Witness 3. 4. Proof of Stake
( ) 5. 6. 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.4/41
1. 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.5/41
BTC / . . . 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 –
p.6/41
EPOBC (Open Assets) OP_RETURN 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.7/41
Open Assets Protocol (OAP) ( = ) 2.0 — —
2017-09-07 – p.8/41
ID ID (asset ID) 1. 2. 3. 160 = ID
( ) 4. base58check ‘A’ ( = 23) (asset quantity) BTC 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.9/41
OP_RETURN PUSH 0x4f41 (‘OA’) = 2 0x0100 2 1∼9 LEB128
1∼9 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.10/41
2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.11/41
2. Segregated Witness ( = ) (malleability) 2.0 — —
2017-09-07 – p.12/41
(witness) 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.13/41
OP_RETURN PUSH 0xaa21a9ed 4 (witness) SHA-256 32 Merkle 2.0 —
— 2017-09-07 – p.14/41
Merkle Tree (Bitcoin) Digest = double SHA-256 value Existence of
a TX can be verified if a relevant subtree is provided 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.15/41
(1) P2WPKH (version 0) (pay-to-(witnessed)-public-key-hash) witness ( ): < >
< > scriptSig ( ): scriptPubKey ( ) 0 <20-byte > 20-byte < > < > CHECKSIG 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.16/41
(2) P2WSH (version 0) (pay-to-(witnessed)-script-hash) witness: < 1 > <1
< 1 > < 2 > 2 CHECKMULTISIG> scriptSig: scriptPubKey 0 <32-byte > 32-byte 1-out-of-2 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.17/41
SegWit https://bitcoincore.org/en/2016/01/26/segwit-benefits/ 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.18/41
SegWit 2016 100 SegWit (95% ) . . . 2017
8 24 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.19/41
3. 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.20/41
BIP (Bitcoin Improvement Proposal) ex. BIP 1 : BIP Purposes
and Guidelines https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0001.mediawiki ex. BIP 9 : Version bits with timeout and delay ex. BIP 141 : Segregated Witness (Consensus layer) TCP/IP RFC XMPP XEP 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.21/41
Block Header Data Structure Field Description Size (bytes) Version 4
Digest Double SHA-256 value 32 Merkle root Double SHA-256 value 32 Time Seconds (since 1970-01-01T00:00 UTC) 4 Target Compressed format 4 Nonce Appropriate value 4 Merkle root is the digest of all TXs 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.22/41
BIP 9 SegWit https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0009/assignments.mediawiki MTP : Median Time Past (
11 ) 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.23/41
4. Proof of Stake ( ) 2.0 — — 2017-09-07
– p.24/41
Proof of Stake ( ) ( ) 2.0 — —
2017-09-07 – p.25/41
Proof of Stake Hn (PD + id + t +
. . .) ≤ 2n × balance d H n : n (ex. SHA-256 (n = 256)) PD : id : (ex. ) t : (ex. UNIX ( )) balance : d : (ex. ) PoW 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.26/41
Proof of Stake 3 1. 2. “Nothing at Stake” 3.
51% 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.27/41
: Proof of Stake Velocity Reddcoin 2.0 — — 2017-09-07
– p.28/41
Nothing at Stake - = 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 –
p.29/41
Nothing at Stake - 100% Proof of Stake 2.0 —
— 2017-09-07 – p.30/41
51% 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.31/41
Nothing at Stake ⇒ 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.32/41
5. . . . 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.33/41
2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.34/41
2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.35/41
→ ⇒ A. Back, et. al., “Enabling Blockchain Innovations with
Pegged Sidechains”, 2014 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.36/41
6. 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.37/41
1 1 10 2 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.38/41
A-B 2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.39/41
2 2 ( ) Ripple Path 2.0 — — 2017-09-07
– p.40/41
2.0 — — 2017-09-07 – p.41/41