Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
分散システムのリテラシー / Distributed Systems Literacy
Search
Kenji Saito
PRO
July 05, 2017
Technology
0
190
分散システムのリテラシー / Distributed Systems Literacy
ブロックチェーンハブ主催で開催しているブロックチェーン基盤技術講義『分散システムのリテラシー』のスライドです。2017年7月5日(水) に使用しました。
Kenji Saito
PRO
July 05, 2017
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Kenji Saito
See All by Kenji Saito
AI 前提社会におけるトラスト / Trust in an AI-Driven Society
ks91
PRO
0
12
非営利組織の起業/発表と総括 / Starting up a Nonprofit Organization, Presentation and Summary
ks91
PRO
0
56
自己開発 / Self-Development
ks91
PRO
1
20
あなたは何によって憶えられたいですか? / What Do You Want to be Remembered for?
ks91
PRO
0
25
ボランティアと理事会 / Volunteers and Board of Directors
ks91
PRO
0
42
メタ・ネイチャーポジティブへの道 / The Path to Meta Nature Positive
ks91
PRO
0
35
アカデミーキャンプ2026 初春「ミライ、ゲーミファイ」DAY 3 / Academy Camp 2026 Early Spring "GAMIFY THE FUTURE!!" DAY 3
ks91
PRO
0
51
アカデミーキャンプ2026 初春「ミライ、ゲーミファイ」DAY 2 / Academy Camp 2026 Early Spring "GAMIFY THE FUTURE!!" DAY 2
ks91
PRO
0
86
アカデミーキャンプ2026 初春「ミライ、ゲーミファイ」DAY 1 / Academy Camp 2026 Early Spring "GAMIFY THE FUTURE!!" DAY 1
ks91
PRO
0
84
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
ファインディの横断SREがTakumi byGMOと取り組む、セキュリティと開発スピードの両立
rvirus0817
1
1.3k
Contract One Engineering Unit 紹介資料
sansan33
PRO
0
13k
Introduction to Bill One Development Engineer
sansan33
PRO
0
360
プロダクト成長を支える開発基盤とスケールに伴う課題
yuu26
4
1.3k
Webhook best practices for rock solid and resilient deployments
glaforge
1
280
Ruby版 JSXのRuxが気になる
sansantech
PRO
0
150
Introduction to Sansan for Engineers / エンジニア向け会社紹介
sansan33
PRO
6
68k
Amazon S3 Vectorsを使って資格勉強用AIエージェントを構築してみた
usanchuu
3
450
ブロックテーマでサイトをリニューアルした話 / 2026-01-31 Kansai WordPress Meetup
torounit
0
460
GitLab Duo Agent Platform × AGENTS.md で実現するSpec-Driven Development / GitLab Duo Agent Platform × AGENTS.md
n11sh1
0
130
Introduction to Sansan, inc / Sansan Global Development Center, Inc.
sansan33
PRO
0
3k
広告の効果検証を題材にした因果推論の精度検証について
zozotech
PRO
0
170
Featured
See All Featured
Mobile First: as difficult as doing things right
swwweet
225
10k
Design in an AI World
tapps
0
140
The Art of Delivering Value - GDevCon NA Keynote
reverentgeek
16
1.8k
I Don’t Have Time: Getting Over the Fear to Launch Your Podcast
jcasabona
34
2.6k
BBQ
matthewcrist
89
10k
個人開発の失敗を避けるイケてる考え方 / tips for indie hackers
panda_program
122
21k
Chasing Engaging Ingredients in Design
codingconduct
0
110
Building Flexible Design Systems
yeseniaperezcruz
330
40k
Improving Core Web Vitals using Speculation Rules API
sergeychernyshev
21
1.4k
The Success of Rails: Ensuring Growth for the Next 100 Years
eileencodes
47
7.9k
For a Future-Friendly Web
brad_frost
182
10k
Put a Button on it: Removing Barriers to Going Fast.
kastner
60
4.2k
Transcript
SFC / CSO
[email protected]
— — 2017-07-05 – p.1/38
( ) SFC ( ) CSO (Chief Science Officer) CEO
1993 M.Eng ( ) 2006 ( ) SFC 16 P2P 2011 → ( ) — — 2017-07-05 – p.2/38
FLP CAP CUP ( ) P2P — — 2017-07-05 –
p.3/38
1. 2. 3. Paxos 4. 5. P2P 6. — —
2017-07-05 – p.4/38
1. FLP CAP — — 2017-07-05 – p.5/38
A, B A-B m A B A B A B
. . . — — 2017-07-05 – p.6/38
1. X 2. X C 3. C 1. 2. 3.
reliable multicast — — 2017-07-05 – p.7/38
: — — 2017-07-05 – p.8/38
(safety) (liveness) ( ) ( = ) — — 2017-07-05
– p.9/38
→ / (benign) → (Byzantine) (malicious) — — 2017-07-05 –
p.10/38
FLP Fischer, Lynch, Paterson — — 2017-07-05 – p.11/38
CAP Consistency ( ) Availability ( ) Partition tolerance (
) ⇒ 3 C Eventual consistency ( ) . . . — — 2017-07-05 – p.12/38
Consistency ( ) Strong consistency ( ) (safety) Eventual consistency
( ) (liveness) ↑ Weak consistency ( ) ↑ ( ) — — 2017-07-05 – p.13/38
2. — — 2017-07-05 – p.14/38
n = f ( ) ⇒ — — 2017-07-05 –
p.15/38
(1) 1 1, 2 n ≤ 3f — — 2017-07-05
– p.16/38
(2) — — 2017-07-05 – p.17/38
3. Paxos Paxos Paxos — — 2017-07-05 – p.18/38
CS1 : CS2 : CS3 : CL1 : CL2 :
: : (e.g. ) ( ) — — 2017-07-05 – p.19/38
Paxos (1) : (The Part-Time Parliament) Paxos ( ) ↔
↔ ↔ ⇒ — — 2017-07-05 – p.20/38
Paxos (2) (proposers), (acceptors), (learners) 1. 2. Paxos ( )
— — 2017-07-05 – p.21/38
Paxos Paxos 2f + 1 Paxos f “byzantizing” Byzantine Paxos
PBFT (Practical Byzantine Fault-Tolerance) PBFT — — 2017-07-05 – p.22/38
4. CUP (Consensus with Unknown Participants) vs. — — 2017-07-05
– p.23/38
(B)FT-CUP (Consensus with Unknown Participants) ( / ) : FT
(Fault-Tolerant) : BFT (Byzantine Fault-Tolerant) P2P n FT/BFT — — 2017-07-05 – p.24/38
State Machine Replication ( ) (by ) (since 1984) (
) ( ) . . . ( ) — — 2017-07-05 – p.25/38
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (by )
⇒ ( ) — — 2017-07-05 – p.26/38
5. P2P P2P - - — — 2017-07-05 – p.27/38
P2P : P2P 3 3 ( ) strategyproof group strategyproof
— — 2017-07-05 – p.28/38
(Sybil) 16 — — 2017-07-05 – p.29/38
again n > 3f R F R > 2F ⇒
— — 2017-07-05 – p.30/38
( ) f = 1 ⇒ R — — 2017-07-05
– p.31/38
6. — — 2017-07-05 – p.32/38
3 1. ( : UTXO ) ⇒ ( ) 2.
( : ) ⇒ 3. ( : ) TX ⇒ 2 3 — — 2017-07-05 – p.33/38
10 ATM 1 ATM 1 : http://www.slideshare.net/yamaz2/ss-58813038 ⇒ KVS —
— 2017-07-05 – p.34/38
— — 2017-07-05 – p.35/38
vs. — — 2017-07-05 – p.36/38
(centralized) (decentralized) (distributed) Paul Baran, “On Distributed Communications Networks”, 1964
(C) (A) — — 2017-07-05 – p.37/38
— — 2017-07-05 – p.38/38