Share
Embed
is3b2014
Leonardo Collado-Torres
August 04, 2014
Transcript
45 slides
-
Developmental regulation of human cortex transcription at base-pair resolution Leonardo
Collado-Torres blog: bit.ly/FellBit tweet: @fellgernon #IS3B2014 -
Goal of my work Goal What are the real transcriptional
difference(s) between biological conditions or over time? Problems • Annotation may be incomplete • Assembly with short reads is challenging • Counting is harder than it looks -
Example biological questions What are the differences in transcription: 1.
between cocaine and alcohol addicts in the human hippocampus? 2. in blood in a natural timecourse for a single individual? 3. at multiple developmental stages? 4. in the dorsolateral prefrontal complex over lifespan? Jaffe*, Shin, Collado-Torres, Leek et al, In review, 2014 Zhou et al, PNAS, 2011 Chen et al, Cell, 2012 Xie et al, Cell, 2013 -
Transcription Alberts et al. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 4th
edition 2002 Fig 6-21 -
Data n samples à ~348 million nt 11.24%
Rows with at least 1 sample with coverage > 5 Adapted from @jtleek -
DERs p-values Permute model matrices and find null regions for
all chromosomes. -
derfinder: fast BAM to results • Avoid Input/Output • Work
by chromosome • Reduce memory • Use F-stats • Use multiple cores Raw coverage merge Filtered coverage Models Analysis Merge results Report 1.1 0.5 1.2 0.2 41.2 0.1 2.7 10.3 39.7 9.5 34.2 140.3 8.6 42 36 samples, 1000 permutations à 47 hrs Mean: 102 mi mapped reads Sd: 53.5, Min: 20.9, Max: 284.9 Data from Jaffe et al, In review, 2014 Hrs: Mem GB: -
Counting & region finding are complementary RNA-seq data from Zhou
et al, PNAS, 2011 -
Lessons learned • Balancing memory + speed + disk usage
is challenging • Base-pair resolution DE analysis doable – 487 samples: 61 GB & 9 days with 1000 permutations, 20 cores for 15,880,729,865 F-stats (6.37% chr1 * 1001) -
What’s next for derfinder? 1. Convert to parametric tests 2.
Build base-resolution models for artifacts: – RNA quality, cell composition, batch effects 3. Improve annotation of DERs 4. Make available via Bioconductor https://blogs.warwick.ac.uk/nichols/entry/spm5_gem_6 Nichols and Holmes, Human Brain Mapping, 2001 -
LIBD Postmortem Brain Collection • Clinically characterized postmortem human brains
from >1300 individuals from DC/VA/MD Medical Examiners Offices • Non-psychiatric controls from across the lifespan (fetal through aged) and individuals with brain disorders (schizophrenia, bipolar, major depression) • Generating genomic data from brain regions of interest: genotypes, gene expression microarrays, RNA-seq, DNA methylation, etc -
• Human brain transcriptome changes dramatically across development and aging
Colantuoni 2011, Kang 2011 • Previous approaches relied on microarray technologies à pre-defined probe sequences that capture only a limited proportion of transcriptome diversity Background -
Background • Existing published RNAseq-based characterizations of brain development have
utilized gene- and/or exon-level count- based summarizations (www.brainspan.org) • Feature-based read counts lack the ability to reliably identify novel transcriptional activity • Transcript assembly using short reads or counting are hard -
Data Fetal Infant Child Teen Adult
50+ 6 / group, N = 36 Discovery data • Gender balanced • Similar other covariates like RNA Integrity Number (RIN) Jaffe et al, In review, 2014 -
Data Fetal Infant Child Teen Adult
50+ 6 / group, N = 36 Discovery data Fetal Infant Child Teen Adult 50+ 6 / group, N = 36 Independent samples! Jaffe et al, In review, 2014 Replication data -
Data Fetal Infant Child Teen Adult
50+ 6 / group, N = 36 Discovery data Fetal Infant Child Teen Adult 50+ 6 / group, N = 36 Replication data Fetal Adult 3 / group, N = 6 Total mRNA Fetal Adult 3 / group, N = 6 Cytosolic fraction N individuals sequenced: 36 + 36 + 6 = 78 N samples: 36 + 36 + 6 * 2 = 84 Jaffe et al, In review, 2014 Validation data -
Identifying DERs Fetal Infant Child Teen
Adult 50+ 6 / group, N = 36 Discovery data Null: Alt: Models Cutoff Details • Rank DERs by area • 1000 permutations • Control FWER (≤ 5%) by max area per permutation Results 63,135 DERs 20.509 Corresponds to p-value 10-08 Jaffe et al, In review, 2014 -
Replicating DERs Fetal Infant Child Teen
Adult 50+ 6 / group, N = 36 Replication data Null: Alt: Models Cutoff Details • Per sample and per DER calculate average expression • Use the 36 numbers to calculate F-statistic Results 50,650 DERs replicated Single F-statistic per DER p-value < 0.05 Jaffe et al, In review, 2014 -
Non-replicated DERs characteristics • Narrower: – 83.0 bp vs 170.3 bp,
p < 10-100 • Smaller areas: – 2633.9 vs 7034.9, p<10-100 mean expected diff: 1790 – therefore lower ranks • Lower coverage: – 6.6 reads vs 108.7 reads, p<10-100 Jaffe et al, In review, 2014 -
Identification of extensive transcriptional changes across brain development • Majority
of the DERs have the highest expression levels in fetal life (81.7%) • Overlap genes enriched for neurogenesis, signaling, development; genes involved in brain development, e.g. SOX11, DCX, GAT1, NRGN, CAMK2A, CNTNAP1 Jaffe et al, In review, 2014 -
DERs validate: Cytosolic vs total mRNA fractions Jaffe et al,
In review, 2014 Developmental regulaSon of potenSally unspliced mRNA in the cytosolic fracSon of the human frontal cortex -
Confirmation in BrainSpan Data • ~40 individuals across the lifespan
in many brain regions (www.brainspan.org) – Gene/exon counts – Coverage-level data • Downloaded and processed RNA-seq data from ~500 samples in 16 brain regions (11 from neocortex), extracting coverage levels within the DERs Coverage Data from BrainSpan: h3p://download.alleninsStute.org/brainspan/MRF_BigWig_Gencode_v10/ -
Age-associated DERs lack regional specificity in the human brain Jaffe
et al, In review, 2014 -
Age-associated DERs lack regional specificity in the human brain Jaffe
et al, In review, 2014 -
Age-associated DERs are conserved in the developing mouse cortex Mouse
cerebral cortex, comparing E17 (N=4) to adult (N=3) C57BL/6 mice Data from Dillman 2013 Jaffe et al, In review, 2014 -
Age-associated DERs are expressed in other cell and tissue types
• Downloaded and reprocessed RNA-seq data from stem cell and somatic tissue • Majority of the DERs had on average > 5 reads in at least one stem cell (86.4%) or tissue (84.0%) type • 53.3% of all DERs, and 26.5% of non- exonic DERs were expressed in all five stem cell conditions Jaffe et al, In review, 2014 Illumina BodyMap data -
Age-associated DERs are expressed in other cell and tissue types
Postnatal Brain Fetal Brain Stem Cell Tissues Jaffe et al, In review, 2014 -
Age-associated DERs are expressed in other cell and tissue types
Jaffe et al, In review, 2014 -
Expression changes across development represent a changing neuronal phenotype •
Utilized DNA methylation data from: – flow-sorted cortex GuinSvano 2013 – and stem cell developmental system Kim 2014 • Performed composition estimation using recently published approaches for Illumina 450k Houseman et al 2012, Jaffe and Irizarry 2014 Jaffe et al, In review, 2014 -
ProporSon of Cells Jaffe et al, In review, 2014
Expression changes across development represent a changing neuronal phenotype -
LIBD Human DLPFC Development • UCSC “Track Hub” Jaffe et
al, In review, 2014 -
Analysis summary • Found DERs associated with age and development
• Identified DERs that replicate • Validated DERs (cytosol vs total mRNA) • Confirmed with BrainSpan data • Identified DERs conserved in mouse • DERs expressed in other tissues (BodyMap data) • Estimated cell composition from DNA methylation -
• Highlights conserved molecular signatures of transcriptional dynamics across brain
development • Incomplete annotation of the human brain transcriptome • Differences in expression occurring across birth, may be driven principally by changing neuronal phenotypes, rather than the rise of non-neuronal cell types Discussion -
• Future biological experiments may better characterize the functional roles
of these DERs, particularly intronic and intergenic regions • Data will soon be publicly available Discussion -
Acknowledgements Leek Group Jeffrey Leek Alyssa Frazee Hopkins Sarven Sabunciyan
Ben Langmead LIBD Andrew Jaffe Jooheon Shin Nikolay Ivanov Amy Deep Ran Tao Yankai Jia Thomas Hyde Joel Kleinman Daniel Weinberger Harvard Rafael Irizarry Funding NIH LIBD CONACyT México