Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

An Efficient and Parallel Abstract Interpreter in Scala — Second Presentation

An Efficient and Parallel Abstract Interpreter in Scala — Second Presentation

More Decks by 🌳 Olivier Pirson — OPi 🇧🇪🇫🇷🇬🇧 🐧 👨‍💻 👨‍🔬

Other Decks in Science

Transcript

  1. Universit´
    e Libre de Bruxelles
    Computer Science Department
    MEMO-F524 Masters thesis
    An Efficient and Parallel
    Abstract Interpreter in Scala
    — Second Presentation —
    Olivier Pirson — [email protected]
    orcid.org/0000-0001-6296-9659
    March 20, 2018
    (Little corrections: July 1st, 2018)
    https://bitbucket.org/OPiMedia/efficient-parallel-abstract-interpreter-in-scala
    Vrije Universiteit Brussel
    Promotors Coen De Roover
    Wolfgang De Meuter
    Advisor Quentin Stievenart

    View Slide

  2. An Efficient and
    Parallel Abstract
    Interpreter
    in Scala

    Second
    Presentation
    The context:
    Abstract
    Interpretation for
    Static Analysis
    The problematic:
    Too heavy for
    real programs
    Parallel
    algorithms
    Done and todo
    References
    1 The context: Abstract Interpretation for Static Analysis
    2 The problematic: Too heavy for real programs
    3 Parallel algorithms
    4 Done and todo
    5 References
    An Efficient and Parallel Abstract Interpreter in Scala — Second Presentation 2 / 21

    View Slide

  3. An Efficient and
    Parallel Abstract
    Interpreter
    in Scala

    Second
    Presentation
    The context:
    Abstract
    Interpretation for
    Static Analysis
    The problematic:
    Too heavy for
    real programs
    Parallel
    algorithms
    Done and todo
    References
    The context: Abstract Interpretation for Static Analysis
    We need tools to help us to build correct programs.
    Figure:
    First “flight” of
    Ariane 5 in 1996.
    Testing is not enough.
    Static Analysis:
    study the behaviour of programs without executing them.
    Not trivial questions about the behaviour of a program
    are undecidable (Rice’s theorem).
    Abstract Interpretation:
    approximation technique to perform static analysis.
    Trade-off:
    approximation must be enough precise to have an useful analysis,
    and enough imprecise to make the problem decidable.
    An Efficient and Parallel Abstract Interpreter in Scala — Second Presentation 3 / 21

    View Slide

  4. An Efficient and
    Parallel Abstract
    Interpreter
    in Scala

    Second
    Presentation
    The context:
    Abstract
    Interpretation for
    Static Analysis
    The problematic:
    Too heavy for
    real programs
    Parallel
    algorithms
    Done and todo
    References
    From Concrete Interpretation. . .
    Trace: concrete interpretation with small-step semantics, for one instance.
    e
    s0 s1 s2 s3 s4 · · ·
    injection
    function
    concrete transition function
    Program is executed by interpreter,
    described by an Abstract Machine (AM).
    One execution is for one instance on this program.
    e is for one expression, i.e. a program.
    si
    are the successive states during this execution.
    An Efficient and Parallel Abstract Interpreter in Scala — Second Presentation 4 / 21

    View Slide

  5. An Efficient and
    Parallel Abstract
    Interpreter
    in Scala

    Second
    Presentation
    The context:
    Abstract
    Interpretation for
    Static Analysis
    The problematic:
    Too heavy for
    real programs
    Parallel
    algorithms
    Done and todo
    References
    From Concrete Interpretation to Abstract Interpretation
    Trace: concrete interpretation with small-step semantics, for one instance.
    e
    s0 s1 s2 s3 s4 · · ·
    s0 s1 s2 s3 s4
    s3′
    injection
    function
    injection
    function
    abstract transition function
    abstraction
    function α
    Abstracting Abstract Machine (AAM).
    2 over-approximations:
    on addresses: by modulo; give a finite state space
    on values: abstraction
    Abstract transition function returns all directly reachable states.
    State graph: abstract interpretation, for all instances.
    “The abstract simulates the concrete” (Might).
    An Efficient and Parallel Abstract Interpreter in Scala — Second Presentation 5 / 21

    View Slide

  6. An Efficient and
    Parallel Abstract
    Interpreter
    in Scala

    Second
    Presentation
    The context:
    Abstract
    Interpretation for
    Static Analysis
    The problematic:
    Too heavy for
    real programs
    Parallel
    algorithms
    Done and todo
    References
    Approximation of values: abstraction
    Based on mathematical notion of lattice
    (partially ordered sets with additional properties).
    Examples of abstraction for the set of integer values:
    Figure: Ren´
    e Magritte,
    Le Calcul Mental. 1940.
    the type integer
    intervals
    sign: {. . . , −3, −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3, . . .}
    abstracted by {⊥, −, 0, +, (− and 0), (0 and +), ⊤}
    ⊤ (top, no information)
    (− and 0) (0 and +)
    − 0 +
    ⊥ (bottom, no information yet)
    Figure: Hasse diagram of the complete lattice of signs.
    Properties of a lattice are such that it contains the join of 2 elements
    and the succession of operation give a fixed point.
    An Efficient and Parallel Abstract Interpreter in Scala — Second Presentation 6 / 21

    View Slide

  7. An Efficient and
    Parallel Abstract
    Interpreter
    in Scala

    Second
    Presentation
    The context:
    Abstract
    Interpretation for
    Static Analysis
    The problematic:
    Too heavy for
    real programs
    Parallel
    algorithms
    Done and todo
    References
    Example of a state graph on a very simple program
    ev((letrec ((abs (lambda (x) (if (>= x 0) x (- x))))) (abs -42)))
    0
    ev((abs -42))
    1
    ev((if (>= x 0) x (- x)))
    2
    ev((>= x 0))
    3
    ko(Bool)
    4
    ev(x)
    5
    ev((- x))
    6
    ko(Int)
    7
    #nodes: 8
    #edges: 8
    graph density: 0,143
    outdegree min: 1
    outdegree max: 2
    outdegree avg: 1,000
    language: Scheme
    machine: AAM
    lattice: TypeSet
    address: Classical
    Figure: State graph of the abs program with a type lattice.
    Algorithm 1: Absolute value of −42
    ( Ò ( × x )
    ( i f (>= x 0)
    x
    (− x ) ) )
    ( × −42)
    An Efficient and Parallel Abstract Interpreter in Scala — Second Presentation 7 / 21

    View Slide

  8. An Efficient and
    Parallel Abstract
    Interpreter
    in Scala

    Second
    Presentation
    The context:
    Abstract
    Interpretation for
    Static Analysis
    The problematic:
    Too heavy for
    real programs
    Parallel
    algorithms
    Done and todo
    References
    1 The context: Abstract Interpretation for Static Analysis
    2 The problematic: Too heavy for real programs
    3 Parallel algorithms
    4 Done and todo
    5 References
    An Efficient and Parallel Abstract Interpreter in Scala — Second Presentation 8 / 21

    View Slide

  9. An Efficient and
    Parallel Abstract
    Interpreter
    in Scala

    Second
    Presentation
    The context:
    Abstract
    Interpretation for
    Static Analysis
    The problematic:
    Too heavy for
    real programs
    Parallel
    algorithms
    Done and todo
    References
    Example of a state graph on a other very simple program
    ev((letrec ((fibonacci (lambda (n) (if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))))) (fibonacci 10)))
    0
    ev((fibonacci 10))
    1
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    2
    ev((<= n 1))
    3
    ko(Bool)
    4
    ev(n)
    5
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    6
    ko(Int)
    7
    ev((fibonacci (- n 1)))
    8
    ev((- n 1))
    9
    ko(Int)
    10
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    11
    ev((<= n 1))
    12
    ko(Bool)
    13
    ev(n)
    14
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    15
    ev(n)
    16
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    17
    ko(Int)
    18
    ev((fibonacci (- n 1)))
    19
    ko(Int)
    20
    ev((fibonacci (- n 1)))
    21
    ev((- n 1))
    22
    ev((fibonacci (- n 2)))
    23
    ev((- n 1))
    24
    ko(Int)
    25
    ev((- n 2))
    26
    ko(Int)
    27
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    28
    ko(Int)
    29
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    30
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    31
    ev((<= n 1))
    32
    ev((<= n 1))
    33
    ko(Bool)
    34
    ko(Bool)
    35
    ev(n)
    36
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    37
    ev(n)
    38
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    39
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    40
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    41
    ev(n)
    42
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    43
    ev(n)
    44
    ev(n)
    45
    ko(Int)
    46
    ko(Int)
    47
    ev((fibonacci (- n 1)))
    49
    ev((fibonacci (- n 1)))
    52
    ko(Int)
    48
    ev((fibonacci (- n 1)))
    51
    ko(Int)
    50
    ko(Int)
    53
    ev((fibonacci (- n 2)))
    54
    ev((fibonacci (- n 2)))
    55
    ev((- n 1))
    56
    ev((- n 1))
    57
    ev((- n 1))
    58
    ev((fibonacci (- n 2)))
    59
    ev((- n 2))
    60
    ev((- n 2))
    61
    ko(Int)
    62
    ko(Int)
    63
    ko(Int)
    64
    ev((- n 2))
    65
    ko(Int)
    66
    ko(Int)
    67
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    68
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    69
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    70
    ko(Int)
    71
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    72
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    73
    ev((<= n 1))
    74
    ev((<= n 1))
    75
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    76
    ev((<= n 1))
    77
    ko(Bool)
    78
    ko(Bool)
    79
    ko(Bool)
    80
    ev(n)
    81
    ev(n)
    82
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    83
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    84
    ev(n)
    85
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    86
    ev(n)
    87
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    88
    ev(n)
    89
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    90
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    91
    ev(n)
    92
    ev(n)
    93
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    94
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    95
    ev(n)
    96
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    97
    ev(n)
    98
    ko(Int)
    100
    ko(Int)
    99
    ev((fibonacci (- n 1)))
    101
    ko(Int)
    102
    ko(Int)
    103
    ko(Int)
    105
    ko(Int)
    104
    ko(Int)
    109
    ev((fibonacci (- n 1)))
    106
    ev((fibonacci (- n 1)))
    110
    ko(Int)
    108
    ko(Int)
    107
    ev((fibonacci (- n 2)))
    111
    ev((fibonacci (- n 2)))
    112
    ev((- n 1))
    113
    ev((fibonacci (- n 2)))
    114
    ev((fibonacci (- n 2)))
    115
    ev((- n 1))
    116
    ev((fibonacci (- n 2)))
    117
    ev((- n 1))
    118
    ev((- n 2))
    119
    ev((- n 2))
    120
    ko(Int)
    121
    ev((- n 2))
    122
    ev((- n 2))
    123
    ko(Int)
    124
    ev((- n 2))
    125
    ko(Int)
    126
    ko(Int)
    127
    ko(Int)
    128
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    129
    ko(Int)
    130
    ko(Int)
    131
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    132
    ko(Int)
    133
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    134
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    135
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    136
    ev((<= n 1))
    137
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    138
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    139
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    140
    ev((<= n 1))
    141
    ev((<= n 1))
    142
    ko(Bool)
    143
    ev((<= n 1))
    144
    ko(Bool)
    145
    ko(Bool)
    146
    ev(n)
    147
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    148
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    149
    ev(n)
    150
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    151
    ev(n)
    152
    ko(Bool)
    153
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    154
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    155
    ev(n)
    156
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    157
    ev(n)
    158
    ev(n)
    159
    ev(n)
    160
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    161
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    162
    ev(n)
    163
    ev(n)
    164
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    165
    ko(Int)
    167
    ko(Int)
    168
    ko(Int)
    166
    ev(n)
    169
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    170
    ev(n)
    171
    ev(n)
    172
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    173
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    174
    ko(Int)
    177
    ko(Int)
    175
    ko(Int)
    176
    ko(Int)
    178
    ev((fibonacci (- n 1)))
    180
    ko(Int)
    181
    ko(Int)
    179
    ev((fibonacci (- n 1)))
    182
    ev((fibonacci (- n 2)))
    183
    ev((fibonacci (- n 2)))
    184
    ev((fibonacci (- n 2)))
    185
    ko(Int)
    190
    ev((fibonacci (- n 1)))
    187
    ko(Int)
    189
    ko(Int)
    188
    ev((fibonacci (- n 1)))
    186
    ev((fibonacci (- n 2)))
    191
    ev((fibonacci (- n 2)))
    192
    ev((- n 1))
    193
    ev((- n 1))
    194
    ev((- n 2))
    195
    ev((- n 2))
    196
    ev((- n 2))
    197
    ev((- n 1))
    198
    ev((- n 1))
    199
    ev((- n 2))
    200
    ev((- n 2))
    201
    ko(Int)
    202
    ko(Int)
    203
    ko(Int)
    204
    ko(Int)
    205
    ko(Int)
    206
    ko(Int)
    207
    ko(Int)
    208
    ko(Int)
    209
    ko(Int)
    210
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    211
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    212
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    213
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    214
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    215
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    216
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    217
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    218
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    219
    ev((<= n 1))
    220
    ev((<= n 1))
    221
    ev((<= n 1))
    222
    ko(Bool)
    223
    ko(Bool)
    224
    ko(Bool)
    225
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    226
    ev(n)
    227
    ev(n)
    228
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    229
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    230
    ev(n)
    231
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    232
    ev(n)
    233
    ev(n)
    234
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    235
    ev(n)
    236
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    237
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    238
    ev(n)
    239
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    240
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    241
    ev(n)
    242
    ev(n)
    243
    ko(Int)
    246
    ko(Int)
    244
    ko(Int)
    245
    ko(Int)
    248
    ko(Int)
    249
    ko(Int)
    247
    ev((fibonacci (- n 1)))
    251
    ko(Int)
    253
    ko(Int)
    250
    ko(Int)
    252
    ev((fibonacci (- n 2)))
    254
    ev((- n 1))
    255
    ev((- n 2))
    256
    ko(Int)
    257
    ko(Int)
    258
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    259
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    260
    ev((<= n 1))
    261
    ko(Bool)
    262
    ev(n)
    263
    ev(n)
    264
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    265
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    266
    ev(n)
    267
    ev((+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2))))
    268
    ko(Int)
    271
    ko(Int)
    269
    ev((fibonacci (- n 1)))
    270
    ko(Int)
    272
    ev((- n 1))
    273
    ko(Int)
    274
    ev((if (<= n 1) n (+ (fibonacci (- n 1)) (fibonacci (- n 2)))))
    275
    #nodes: 276
    #edges: 346
    graph density: 0,005
    outdegree min: 1
    outdegree max: 6
    outdegree avg: 1,254
    language: Scheme
    machine: AAM
    lattice: TypeSet
    address: Classical
    Figure: State graph of the Fibonacci program with a type lattice.
    Algorithm 2: The 10th Fibonacci number.
    ; ; nth number of F i b o n a c c i ( by r e c u r s i v e p r o c e s s )
    ( Ò ( f i b o n a c c i n )
    ( i f (<= n 1)
    n
    (+ ( f i b o n a c c i (− n 1))
    ( f i b o n a c c i (− n 2 ) ) ) ) )
    ( f i b o n a c c i 10)
    An Efficient and Parallel Abstract Interpreter in Scala — Second Presentation 9 / 21

    View Slide

  10. An Efficient and
    Parallel Abstract
    Interpreter
    in Scala

    Second
    Presentation
    The context:
    Abstract
    Interpretation for
    Static Analysis
    The problematic:
    Too heavy for
    real programs
    Parallel
    algorithms
    Done and todo
    References
    Example of a state graph on a other very simple program (bis)
    ev((letrec ((fibonacci2 (lambda (n fn_1 fn) (if (= n 0) (cons fn_1 fn) (fibonacci2 (- n 1) fn (+ fn fn_1))))) (fibonacci (lambda (n) (cdr (fibonacci2 n 1 0))))) (fibonacci 10)))
    0
    ev((fibonacci 10))
    1
    ev((cdr (fibonacci2 n 1 0)))
    2
    ev((fibonacci2 n 1 0))
    3
    ev((if (= n 0) (cons fn_1 fn) (fibonacci2 (- n 1) fn (+ fn fn_1))))
    4
    ev((= n 0))
    5
    ko({#f,#t})
    6
    ev((cons fn_1 fn))
    7
    ev((fibonacci2 (- n 1) fn (+ fn fn_1)))
    8
    ko(Cons(@fn_1-Time(),@fn-Time()))
    9
    ev((- n 1))
    10
    ko(Int)
    11
    ko(Int)
    12
    ev((+ fn fn_1))
    13
    ko(Int)
    14
    ev((if (= n 0) (cons fn_1 fn) (fibonacci2 (- n 1) fn (+ fn fn_1))))
    15
    ev((= n 0))
    16
    ko({#f,#t})
    17
    ev((cons fn_1 fn))
    18
    ev((fibonacci2 (- n 1) fn (+ fn fn_1)))
    19
    ko(Cons(@fn_1-Time(),@fn-Time()))
    20
    ev((- n 1))
    21
    ko(Int)
    22
    ko(Int)
    23
    #nodes: 24
    #edges: 24
    graph density: 0,043
    outdegree min: 1
    outdegree max: 2
    outdegree avg: 1,000
    language: Scheme
    machine: AAM
    lattice: TypeSet
    address: Classical
    Figure: State graph of the Fibonacci program with a type lattice.
    Algorithm 3: The 10th Fibonacci number.
    ; ; nth number of F i b o n a c c i ( by i t e r a t i v e p r o c e s s )
    ( Ò ( f i b o n a c c i 2 n f n 1 fn )
    ( i f (= n 0)
    ( ÓÒ× f n 1 fn )
    ( f i b o n a c c i 2 (− n 1) fn (+ fn f n 1 ) ) ) )
    ( Ò ( f i b o n a c c i n )
    ( c dr ( f i b o n a c c i 2 n 1 0 ) ) )
    ( f i b o n a c c i 10)
    An Efficient and Parallel Abstract Interpreter in Scala — Second Presentation 10 / 21

    View Slide

  11. An Efficient and
    Parallel Abstract
    Interpreter
    in Scala

    Second
    Presentation
    The context:
    Abstract
    Interpretation for
    Static Analysis
    The problematic:
    Too heavy for
    real programs
    Parallel
    algorithms
    Done and todo
    References
    The problematic: Too heavy for real programs
    With an AAM the problem is became decidable.
    But in general an AAM is too slow to analyse real programs.
    One way to have a faster AAM is to
    parallelize generation of the state graph.
    Goal of this master thesis:
    implement and compare several parallelizations of AAM
    in the framework Scala-AM.
    Parallel model for the implementation: actors with Akka.
    Language analysed: Scheme.
    Figure: Ferdinand Hodler, View to Infinity. 1913.
    An Efficient and Parallel Abstract Interpreter in Scala — Second Presentation 11 / 21

    View Slide

  12. An Efficient and
    Parallel Abstract
    Interpreter
    in Scala

    Second
    Presentation
    The context:
    Abstract
    Interpretation for
    Static Analysis
    The problematic:
    Too heavy for
    real programs
    Parallel
    algorithms
    Done and todo
    References
    1 The context: Abstract Interpretation for Static Analysis
    2 The problematic: Too heavy for real programs
    3 Parallel algorithms
    4 Done and todo
    5 References
    An Efficient and Parallel Abstract Interpreter in Scala — Second Presentation 12 / 21

    View Slide

  13. An Efficient and
    Parallel Abstract
    Interpreter
    in Scala

    Second
    Presentation
    The context:
    Abstract
    Interpretation for
    Static Analysis
    The problematic:
    Too heavy for
    real programs
    Parallel
    algorithms
    Done and todo
    References
    Sequential worklist strategy
    s
    s
    s
    s
    s
    worklist
    Figure: K. Dewey, V. Kashyap, B. Hardekopf. A parallel abstract interpreter for JavaScript. 2015.
    An Efficient and Parallel Abstract Interpreter in Scala — Second Presentation 13 / 21

    View Slide

  14. An Efficient and
    Parallel Abstract
    Interpreter
    in Scala

    Second
    Presentation
    The context:
    Abstract
    Interpretation for
    Static Analysis
    The problematic:
    Too heavy for
    real programs
    Parallel
    algorithms
    Done and todo
    References
    Naive worklist parallel strategy
    s
    s
    s
    s
    s
    worklist
    merge
    Figure: K. Dewey, V. Kashyap, B. Hardekopf. A parallel abstract interpreter for JavaScript. 2015.
    An Efficient and Parallel Abstract Interpreter in Scala — Second Presentation 14 / 21

    View Slide

  15. An Efficient and
    Parallel Abstract
    Interpreter
    in Scala

    Second
    Presentation
    The context:
    Abstract
    Interpretation for
    Static Analysis
    The problematic:
    Too heavy for
    real programs
    Parallel
    algorithms
    Done and todo
    References
    Naive worklist parallel strategy
    Redundant computations.
    Synchronization at the merge step.
    Article test on few real JavaScript programs.
    Results show that this adaptation of the sequential algorithm is not optimal.
    Figure: L. Andersen, M. Might. Multi-core Parallelization of Abstracted. 2013.
    Improvements with producer/consumer model.
    An Efficient and Parallel Abstract Interpreter in Scala — Second Presentation 15 / 21

    View Slide

  16. An Efficient and
    Parallel Abstract
    Interpreter
    in Scala

    Second
    Presentation
    The context:
    Abstract
    Interpretation for
    Static Analysis
    The problematic:
    Too heavy for
    real programs
    Parallel
    algorithms
    Done and todo
    References
    Better, per-context parallel strategy
    Authors introduce a per-context parallel strategy.
    The main idea is to separate these two parts:
    state exploration
    control of state space by some merging operations.
    The intuitive idea is to parallelize “functions” instead basic “blocks”.
    Figure: K. Dewey, V. Kashyap, B. Hardekopf. A parallel abstract interpreter for JavaScript. 2015.
    An Efficient and Parallel Abstract Interpreter in Scala — Second Presentation 16 / 21

    View Slide

  17. An Efficient and
    Parallel Abstract
    Interpreter
    in Scala

    Second
    Presentation
    The context:
    Abstract
    Interpretation for
    Static Analysis
    The problematic:
    Too heavy for
    real programs
    Parallel
    algorithms
    Done and todo
    References
    1 The context: Abstract Interpretation for Static Analysis
    2 The problematic: Too heavy for real programs
    3 Parallel algorithms
    4 Done and todo
    5 References
    An Efficient and Parallel Abstract Interpreter in Scala — Second Presentation 17 / 21

    View Slide

  18. An Efficient and
    Parallel Abstract
    Interpreter
    in Scala

    Second
    Presentation
    The context:
    Abstract
    Interpretation for
    Static Analysis
    The problematic:
    Too heavy for
    real programs
    Parallel
    algorithms
    Done and todo
    References
    Work done
    Reading of theoretical background on lattice and AAM.
    Redaction of an introduction to the subject and a lattice presentation
    (preparatory work, last year).
    Reading of some articles on parallelization.
    Learning actors, Akka.
    Learning use of some tools: sbt, Scala environments. . .
    (discovery of GraalVM!)
    Learning functioning of Scala-AM.
    Removed some parts of Scala-AM (other machines or languages),
    implementation of little features.
    An Efficient and Parallel Abstract Interpreter in Scala — Second Presentation 18 / 21

    View Slide

  19. An Efficient and
    Parallel Abstract
    Interpreter
    in Scala

    Second
    Presentation
    The context:
    Abstract
    Interpretation for
    Static Analysis
    The problematic:
    Too heavy for
    real programs
    Parallel
    algorithms
    Done and todo
    References
    Work to be done
    Implement the naive parallel algorithm, and experiment, really ASAP.
    Implement better parallel algorithms.
    Evaluate all of them,
    identify advantages and disadvantages for each of them.
    Reading of other articles on parallelization.
    Have a great idea!
    Final redaction.
    An Efficient and Parallel Abstract Interpreter in Scala — Second Presentation 19 / 21

    View Slide

  20. An Efficient and
    Parallel Abstract
    Interpreter
    in Scala

    Second
    Presentation
    The context:
    Abstract
    Interpretation for
    Static Analysis
    The problematic:
    Too heavy for
    real programs
    Parallel
    algorithms
    Done and todo
    References
    1 The context: Abstract Interpretation for Static Analysis
    2 The problematic: Too heavy for real programs
    3 Parallel algorithms
    4 Done and todo
    5 References
    An Efficient and Parallel Abstract Interpreter in Scala — Second Presentation 20 / 21

    View Slide

  21. An Efficient and
    Parallel Abstract
    Interpreter
    in Scala

    Second
    Presentation
    The context:
    Abstract
    Interpretation for
    Static Analysis
    The problematic:
    Too heavy for
    real programs
    Parallel
    algorithms
    Done and todo
    References
    References
    Thank you! Questions time. . .
    L. Andersen, M. Might. Multi-core Parallelization of Abstracted
    Abstract Machines. 2013.
    Patrick Cousot. Abstract Interpretation in a Nutshell.
    K. Dewey, V. Kashyap, B. Hardekopf. A parallel abstract
    interpreter for JavaScript. 2015.
    Matthew Might. Tutorial: Small-step CFA. 2011.
    Quentin Sti´
    evenart. Static Analysis of Concurrency Constructs
    in Higher-Order Programs. 2014.
    D. Van Horn, M. Might. Abstracting Abstract Machines. 2010.
    Document, L
    A
    TEX sources, complete references and first presentation on
    https:// Ø Ù ØºÓÖ »ÇÈ Å /efficient-parallel-abstract-interpreter-in-scala
    Olivier Pirson. An Efficient and Parallel Abstract Interpreter in
    Scala — Preparatory Work. 2017.
    An Efficient and Parallel Abstract Interpreter in Scala — Second Presentation 21 / 21

    View Slide