Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
etcd - mission-critical key-value store - OSCON...
Search
Sponsored
·
Ship Features Fearlessly
Turn features on and off without deploys. Used by thousands of Ruby developers.
→
Brandon Philips
May 20, 2016
Programming
190
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
etcd - mission-critical key-value store - OSCON 2016
Brandon Philips
May 20, 2016
More Decks by Brandon Philips
See All by Brandon Philips
Node.js Workflow with Minikube and Skaffold
philips
0
300
Manage the App on Kubernetes
philips
0
370
Production Backbone Monitoring Containerized Apps
philips
0
230
KubeCon EU 2017: Dancing on the Edge of a Volcano
philips
1
860
rkt - KubeCon EU keynote - 2017
philips
1
310
FOSDEM_Keynote_2017-_.pdf
philips
0
170
Tectonic Summit Day 2 Keynote
philips
0
410
Kubernetes: Simple to Manage Anywhere (self-hosted, Tectonic upgrade demo)
philips
0
440
KubeCon Keynote 2016- Distributed Systems Simplified on Kubernetes
philips
2
590
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
Datadog LLM Observabilityで実現する 安全なLLM Usage 管理
3150
0
120
LLMによるContent Moderationの本番運用の裏側と品質担保への挑戦
suikabar
3
800
どこまでゆるくて許されるのか
tk3fftk
0
270
Signal Forms: Details & Live Coding @enterJS 2026 in Mannheim
manfredsteyer
PRO
0
200
Performance Engineering for Everyone
elenatanasoiu
0
240
軽量Java基盤の設計 DIコンテナに頼らない、長期保守と1秒起動の実現 JJUG CCC 2026 Spring
macha64
0
610
エンジニアと一緒にテストコードの設計と実装を改善した話
mototakatsu
0
230
トークンをケチるな、設計しろ:GitHub Copilotを賢く使うコンテキスト戦略
ochtum
0
240
Observability in Practice:Grafana 與 Edge Device SRE 的那些事
blueswen
0
180
はてなアカウント基盤 State of the Union
cockscomb
1
1.1k
LLM本来の能力を解き放つサンドボックス技術とAI民主化への適用
yukukotani
3
4.6k
正しくソフトウェアを作る、前提を疑うための認知の視点 / doubt-premise
minodriven
21
7.1k
Featured
See All Featured
Design in an AI World
tapps
1
250
Java REST API Framework Comparison - PWX 2021
mraible
34
9.4k
Why Your Marketing Sucks and What You Can Do About It - Sophie Logan
marketingsoph
0
180
Being A Developer After 40
akosma
91
590k
The Pragmatic Product Professional
lauravandoore
37
7.3k
Evolution of real-time – Irina Nazarova, EuRuKo, 2024
irinanazarova
9
1.4k
[SF Ruby Conf 2025] Rails X
palkan
2
1.1k
Building Applications with DynamoDB
mza
96
7.1k
Reality Check: Gamification 10 Years Later
codingconduct
0
2.2k
Beyond borders and beyond the search box: How to win the global "messy middle" with AI-driven SEO
davidcarrasco
3
170
Hiding What from Whom? A Critical Review of the History of Programming languages for Music
tomoyanonymous
2
870
Money Talks: Using Revenue to Get Sh*t Done
nikkihalliwell
0
260
Transcript
Brandon Philips @BrandonPhilips |
[email protected]
etcd - mission-critical key-value store
Demos https://github.com/philips/2016-OSCON-etcd
Uncoordinated Upgrades
... ... ... ... ... ... Unavailable Uncoordinated Upgrades
Motivation CoreOS cluster reboot lock - Decrement a semaphore key
atomically - Reboot and wait... - After reboot increment the semaphore key
3 CoreOS updates coordination
CoreOS updates coordination 3
... CoreOS updates coordination 2
... ... ... CoreOS updates coordination 0
... ... ... CoreOS updates coordination 0
... ... CoreOS updates coordination 0
... ... CoreOS updates coordination 0
... ... CoreOS updates coordination 1
... ... ... CoreOS updates coordination 0
CoreOS updates coordination
Store Application Configuration config
config Start / Restart Start / Restart Store Application Configuration
config Update Store Application Configuration
config Unavailable Store Application Configuration
Requirements Strong Consistency - mutual exclusive at any time for
locking purpose Highly Available - resilient to single points of failure & network partitions Watchable - push configuration updates to application
Requirements CAP - We want CP - We want something
like Paxos
Common problem GFS Paxos Big Table Spanner CFS Chubby Google
- “All” infrastructure relies on Paxos
Common problem Amazon - Replicated log powers ec2 Microsoft -
Boxwood powers storage infrastructure Hadoop - ZooKeeper is the heart of the ecosystem
COMMON PROBLEM #GIFEE and Cloud Native Solution
10,000 Stars on Github 250 contributors Google, Red Hat, EMC,
Cisco, Huawei, Baidu, Alibaba...
THE HEART OF CLOUD NATIVE Kubernetes, Cloud Foundry Diego, Project
Calico, many others
ETCD KEY VALUE STORE Fully Replicated, Highly Available, Consistent
PUT(foo, bar), GET(foo), DELETE(foo) Watch(foo) CAS(foo, bar, bar1) Key-value Operations
DEMO play.etcd.io
Runtime Reconfiguration Point-in-time Backup Extensive Metrics etcd Operationality
ETCD v3 Successor of etcd v2
ETCD v3 Better Performance
ETCD v3 More Efficient APIs
Multi-Version Put(foo, bar) Put(foo, bar1) Put(foo, bar2) Get(foo) -> bar2
Multi-Version Put(foo, bar) Put(foo, bar1) Put(foo, bar2) Get(foo, 1) ->
bar
Tx.If( Compare(Value("foo"), ">", "bar"), Compare(Version("foo"), "=", 2), ... ).Then( Put("ok","true")...
).Else( Put("ok","false")... ).Commit() Mini-Transactions
l = CreateLease(15 * second) Put(foo, bar, l) l.KeepAlive() l.Revoke()
Leases
w = Watch(foo) for { r = w.Recv() print(r.Event) //
PUT print(r.KV) // foo,bar } Streaming Watch
Synchronization LoC
ETCD v2 machine coordination -> O(10k)
ETCD v3 app/container coordination -> O(1M)
Performance 1K keys
Performance Snapshot caused performance degradation etcd2 - 600K keys
Performance etcd2 - 600K keys Snapshot triggered elections
ZooKeeper Performance Non-blocking full snapshot Efficient memory management
Performance ZooKeeper default
Performance Snapshot triggered election ZooKeeper default
Performance Snapshot ZooKeeper default
Performance GC ZooKeeper snapshot disabled
Reliable Performance - Similar to ZooKeeper with snapshot disabled -
Incremental snapshot - No Garbage Collection Pauses - Off-heap storage
Performance etcd3 /ZooKeeper snapshot disabled
Performance etcd3 /ZooKeeper snapshot disabled
Memory 10GB 2.4GB 0.8GB 512MB data - 2M 256B keys
Reliability 99% at small scale is easy - Failure is
infrequent and human manageable 99% at large scale is not enough - Not manageable by humans 99.99% at large scale - Reliable systems at bottom layer
HOW DO WE ACHIEVE RELIABILITY WAL, Snapshots, Testing
Write Ahead Log Append only - Simple is good Rolling
CRC protected - Storage & OSes can be unreliable
Snapshots Torturing DBs for Fun and Profit (OSDI2014) - The
simpler database is safer - LMDB was the winner Boltdb an append only B+Tree - A simpler LMDB written in Go
Testing Clusters Failure Inject failures into running clusters White box
runtime checking - Hash state of the system - Progress of the system
Testing Cluster Health with Failures Issue lock operations across cluster
Ensure the correctness of client library
TESTING CLUSTER dash.etcd.io
etcd/raft Reliability Designed for testability and flexibility Used by large
scale db systems and others - Cockroachdb, TiKV, Dgraph
etcd vs others Do one thing
etcd vs others Only do the One Thing
etcd vs others Do it Really Well
etcd Reliability Do it Really Well
ETCD v3.0 BETA Efficient and Scalable
BETA AVAILABLE TODAY github.com/coreos/etcd
FUTURE WORK Proxy, Caching, Watch Coalescing, Secondary Index
GET INVOLVED github.com/coreos/etcd
The smartest way to run your container infrastructure. tectonic.com @tectonic
QUAY Secure hosting for private Docker repositories quay.io @quayio
Brandon Philips @BrandonPhilips |
[email protected]
etcd - mission-critical key-value store
Thank you!