$30 off During Our Annual Pro Sale. View Details »
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
SWIM: Scalable Weakly Consistent Infection Styl...
Search
Paul Hinze
July 22, 2015
Technology
2
370
SWIM: Scalable Weakly Consistent Infection Style Process Group Membership Protocol
Papers We Love, Chicago
July 22, 2015
Paul Hinze
July 22, 2015
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Paul Hinze
See All by Paul Hinze
Getting Good at System Failure Analysis
phinze
0
460
Applying Graph Theory to Infrastructure As Code
phinze
6
2.1k
Infrastructure as Code with Terraform and Friends
phinze
2
300
Smoke & Mirrors: The Primitives of High Availability
phinze
1
670
Git: Everybody's Favorite MMO
phinze
0
180
Shut Up and Pipe! Unix-style Object Collaboration in Rack and Vagrant
phinze
0
160
Freighthop: Vagrant on Rails
phinze
0
310
Puppet Modules Are Our Friends
phinze
0
110
Who Needs Clouds?: HA in Your Datacenter
phinze
1
520
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
Kiro Autonomous AgentとKiro Powers の紹介 / kiro-autonomous-agent-and-powers
tomoki10
0
480
大企業でもできる!ボトムアップで拡大させるプラットフォームの作り方
findy_eventslides
1
770
ログ管理の新たな可能性?CloudWatchの新機能をご紹介
ikumi_ono
1
720
WordPress は終わったのか ~今のWordPress の制作手法ってなにがあんねん?~ / Is WordPress Over? How We Build with WordPress Today
tbshiki
1
770
Database イノベーショントークを振り返る/reinvent-2025-database-innovation-talk-recap
emiki
0
170
5分で知るMicrosoft Ignite
taiponrock
PRO
0
360
AI 駆動開発勉強会 フロントエンド支部 #1 w/あずもば
1ftseabass
PRO
0
360
生成AIでテスト設計はどこまでできる? 「テスト粒度」を操るテーラリング術
shota_kusaba
0
760
mairuでつくるクレデンシャルレス開発環境 / Credential-less development environment using Mailru
mirakui
5
470
会社紹介資料 / Sansan Company Profile
sansan33
PRO
11
390k
re:Inventで気になったサービスを10分でいけるところまでお話しします
yama3133
1
120
Power of Kiro : あなたの㌔はパワステ搭載ですか?
r3_yamauchi
PRO
0
140
Featured
See All Featured
I Don’t Have Time: Getting Over the Fear to Launch Your Podcast
jcasabona
34
2.6k
KATA
mclloyd
PRO
32
15k
Save Time (by Creating Custom Rails Generators)
garrettdimon
PRO
32
1.8k
[Rails World 2023 - Day 1 Closing Keynote] - The Magic of Rails
eileencodes
37
2.6k
Let's Do A Bunch of Simple Stuff to Make Websites Faster
chriscoyier
508
140k
CSS Pre-Processors: Stylus, Less & Sass
bermonpainter
359
30k
Understanding Cognitive Biases in Performance Measurement
bluesmoon
32
2.7k
Automating Front-end Workflow
addyosmani
1371
200k
RailsConf 2023
tenderlove
30
1.3k
Making Projects Easy
brettharned
120
6.5k
Visualizing Your Data: Incorporating Mongo into Loggly Infrastructure
mongodb
48
9.8k
実際に使うSQLの書き方 徹底解説 / pgcon21j-tutorial
soudai
PRO
196
70k
Transcript
SWIM Scalable Weakly Consistent Infection Style Process Group Membership Protocol
Paul Hinze phinze
Paul Hinze phinze death stare
Armon Dadgar armon creator of Serf and Consul
ma
None
None
Process Group Membership Protocol Who is alive
None
Process Group Membership Protocol
SWIM Scalable Weakly Consistent Infection Style Process Group Membership Protocol
Scalable The SWIM effort is motivated by the unscalability of
traditional heartbeating protocols.
Heartbeating A B C A A B B Failure Detection
+ Membership
Heartbeating
Evaluating Protocols Completeness Speed Accuracy Overhead
Evaluating Protocols Completeness Speed Accuracy Overhead heartbeating Yes Limit *
Interval High Nodes2 !
Key Insight Failure Detection State Updates. Solve separately from
Failure Detection ping! ack! A B C D {B,C,D}
Failure Detection ping! ack! A B C D {B,C,D}
Indirect Ping ping(C)! ack! B C D ping(C)! ping ack
fail {B,C,D}
Indirect Ping ping(C)! B C D ping(C)! fail ...C is
dead! fail
Key Insight Failure Detection State Updates. Solve separately from
Key Insight State Updates Failure Detection Piggyback onto messages.
State Updates ping! (B is dead) ack! (D just joined)
A B C D {B,C} {D}
Infection Style A B C D {B,C} {A,B,D} {A,B} weakly
consistent
Evaluating Protocols Completeness Speed Accuracy Overhead SWIM Yes, eventually 1
* Interval High-ish O(N)
Improvements Time Bounded Completeness Increased Accuracy
Completeness A B {B, C, D, ..., N} N
Completeness A B {B, C, D, ..., N} N 1.
Shuffle List 2. Iterate
Completeness Fixed Time
Evaluating Protocols Completeness Speed Accuracy Overhead SWIM Yes, fixed time
1 * Interval High-ish O(N)
Accuracy B C D ...C is MAYBE dead! A
Accuracy B C D I heard C might be dead.
A
Accuracy B C D I'm not dead! A
Accuracy
Evaluating Protocols Completeness Speed Accuracy Overhead SWIM Yes, fixed time
1 * Interval High O(N)
Evaluating Protocols Completeness Speed Accuracy Overhead SWIM Yes, fixed time
1 * Interval High O(N)
None
Limitations Update Latency Problem Solution Separate Gossip Timer
Limitations Cannot Handle Network Partitions Problem Solution Track and Retry
Recently Dead Nodes
Limitations No Concept of Graceful Leave (vs Failure) Problem Solution
Broadcast and Tracking of "Intents"
Limitations New Nodes Take Too Long Materialize Initial State Problem
Solution Anti-entropy TCP State Syncs
Limitations No built-in facility for user data Problem Solution Implement
user payloads (ordering via lamport clocks)
Limitations No peer metadata, only IP Addresses Problem Solution Inject
versioned peer metadata into state messages
Limitations No encryption Problem Solution Implement AES-GCM with key rotation
56 nodes 2K nodes Performance
Implementations Memberlist https://github.com/hashicorp/memberlist Serf lib https://github.com/hashicorp/serf Serf http://www.serfdom.io Consul http://www.consul.io
Implementations events, queries, and scripts serf CLI serf lib memberlist
Implementations service discovery, K/V, health checks consul serf lib memberlist
Implementations service discovery, K/V, health checks
Thanks Cloud icons by Julien Deveaux from the Noun Project