Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
SWIM: Scalable Weakly Consistent Infection Styl...
Search
Sponsored
·
Your Podcast. Everywhere. Effortlessly.
Share. Educate. Inspire. Entertain. You do you. We'll handle the rest.
→
Paul Hinze
July 22, 2015
Technology
410
2
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
SWIM: Scalable Weakly Consistent Infection Style Process Group Membership Protocol
Papers We Love, Chicago
July 22, 2015
Paul Hinze
July 22, 2015
More Decks by Paul Hinze
See All by Paul Hinze
Getting Good at System Failure Analysis
phinze
0
480
Applying Graph Theory to Infrastructure As Code
phinze
6
2.2k
Infrastructure as Code with Terraform and Friends
phinze
2
340
Smoke & Mirrors: The Primitives of High Availability
phinze
1
770
Git: Everybody's Favorite MMO
phinze
0
220
Shut Up and Pipe! Unix-style Object Collaboration in Rack and Vagrant
phinze
0
190
Freighthop: Vagrant on Rails
phinze
0
340
Puppet Modules Are Our Friends
phinze
0
150
Who Needs Clouds?: HA in Your Datacenter
phinze
1
560
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
新しいUbuntu/GNOMEが使いたいからXからWaylandへ移行頑張ってるの巻 2026-06-20
nobutomurata
0
160
AIAU_UMEMOGU_ninomiya_slide
ninomiya_ii
0
260
LayerX コーポレートエンジニアリング室におけるサプライチェーンセキュリティへの取り組み / Supply Chain Security at LayerX Corporate Engineering
yuyatakeyama
3
840
クラウドファンディング版StackChan 3体(4体)をインタラクティブな体験型作品にして展示もした話 / スタックチャンお誕生日会2026
you
PRO
0
180
週末にループ・エンジニアリングの理解を深めるためのスライド
nagatsu
0
290
10年間のブログ発信を振り返って見えたWebアプリケーションエンジニアとしての軌跡
stefafafan
0
190
FPC(フレキシブル)基板にZephyr実装してみた。
iotengineer22
0
170
When Platform Engineering Meets GenAI
sucitw
0
170
Claude Codeをどのように キャッチアップしているか
oikon48
13
8.9k
PostgreSQL 19 新機能概要 OSC Hokkaido 2026
nori_shinoda
0
250
【FinOps】データドリブンな意思決定を目指して
z63d
0
360
40代で“やっとエンジニアになれた”――閉じた学びを開き、空の青さを知る / 20260628 Naoki Takahashi
shift_evolve
PRO
4
880
Featured
See All Featured
10 Git Anti Patterns You Should be Aware of
lemiorhan
PRO
659
62k
Automating Front-end Workflow
addyosmani
1370
210k
Building Adaptive Systems
keathley
44
3.1k
Un-Boring Meetings
codingconduct
0
320
Java REST API Framework Comparison - PWX 2021
mraible
34
9.4k
The Pragmatic Product Professional
lauravandoore
37
7.3k
Rails Girls Zürich Keynote
gr2m
96
14k
Avoiding the “Bad Training, Faster” Trap in the Age of AI
tmiket
0
180
[RailsConf 2023] Rails as a piece of cake
palkan
59
6.7k
Paper Plane (Part 1)
katiecoart
PRO
0
9.2k
Speed Design
sergeychernyshev
33
1.9k
sira's awesome portfolio website redesign presentation
elsirapls
0
280
Transcript
SWIM Scalable Weakly Consistent Infection Style Process Group Membership Protocol
Paul Hinze phinze
Paul Hinze phinze death stare
Armon Dadgar armon creator of Serf and Consul
ma
None
None
Process Group Membership Protocol Who is alive
None
Process Group Membership Protocol
SWIM Scalable Weakly Consistent Infection Style Process Group Membership Protocol
Scalable The SWIM effort is motivated by the unscalability of
traditional heartbeating protocols.
Heartbeating A B C A A B B Failure Detection
+ Membership
Heartbeating
Evaluating Protocols Completeness Speed Accuracy Overhead
Evaluating Protocols Completeness Speed Accuracy Overhead heartbeating Yes Limit *
Interval High Nodes2 !
Key Insight Failure Detection State Updates. Solve separately from
Failure Detection ping! ack! A B C D {B,C,D}
Failure Detection ping! ack! A B C D {B,C,D}
Indirect Ping ping(C)! ack! B C D ping(C)! ping ack
fail {B,C,D}
Indirect Ping ping(C)! B C D ping(C)! fail ...C is
dead! fail
Key Insight Failure Detection State Updates. Solve separately from
Key Insight State Updates Failure Detection Piggyback onto messages.
State Updates ping! (B is dead) ack! (D just joined)
A B C D {B,C} {D}
Infection Style A B C D {B,C} {A,B,D} {A,B} weakly
consistent
Evaluating Protocols Completeness Speed Accuracy Overhead SWIM Yes, eventually 1
* Interval High-ish O(N)
Improvements Time Bounded Completeness Increased Accuracy
Completeness A B {B, C, D, ..., N} N
Completeness A B {B, C, D, ..., N} N 1.
Shuffle List 2. Iterate
Completeness Fixed Time
Evaluating Protocols Completeness Speed Accuracy Overhead SWIM Yes, fixed time
1 * Interval High-ish O(N)
Accuracy B C D ...C is MAYBE dead! A
Accuracy B C D I heard C might be dead.
A
Accuracy B C D I'm not dead! A
Accuracy
Evaluating Protocols Completeness Speed Accuracy Overhead SWIM Yes, fixed time
1 * Interval High O(N)
Evaluating Protocols Completeness Speed Accuracy Overhead SWIM Yes, fixed time
1 * Interval High O(N)
None
Limitations Update Latency Problem Solution Separate Gossip Timer
Limitations Cannot Handle Network Partitions Problem Solution Track and Retry
Recently Dead Nodes
Limitations No Concept of Graceful Leave (vs Failure) Problem Solution
Broadcast and Tracking of "Intents"
Limitations New Nodes Take Too Long Materialize Initial State Problem
Solution Anti-entropy TCP State Syncs
Limitations No built-in facility for user data Problem Solution Implement
user payloads (ordering via lamport clocks)
Limitations No peer metadata, only IP Addresses Problem Solution Inject
versioned peer metadata into state messages
Limitations No encryption Problem Solution Implement AES-GCM with key rotation
56 nodes 2K nodes Performance
Implementations Memberlist https://github.com/hashicorp/memberlist Serf lib https://github.com/hashicorp/serf Serf http://www.serfdom.io Consul http://www.consul.io
Implementations events, queries, and scripts serf CLI serf lib memberlist
Implementations service discovery, K/V, health checks consul serf lib memberlist
Implementations service discovery, K/V, health checks
Thanks Cloud icons by Julien Deveaux from the Noun Project