Black hole primer for undergraduate students (physics/astronomy)
Lecture: black hole primer for undergraduate students and first year grad students in physics and astronomy. Prepared and taught by Prof. Rodrigo Nemmen at IAG USP.
Credit for the slides/figures belongs to Rodrigo Nemmen, unless otherwise stated.
nothing gets out Black hole event horizon singularity Region inside event horizon causally cut-off from outside RS = 2GM c2 = 2.95 ✓ M M ◆ km Radius of event horizon: Schwarzschild radius
general relativity are classical objects Quantum BHs: need quantum gravity theory Quantum BHs have weird properties: Hawking radiation Information paradox Will not talk about them
general relativity are classical objects Quantum BHs: need quantum gravity theory Quantum BHs have weird properties: Hawking radiation Information paradox Will not talk about them
≳ 3 Msun form naturally by gravitational collapse of massive stars No other stable equilibrium available at these masses Open question: Do low-mass BHs form naturally?
in every galactic nucleus 5-60 solar masses ~107 per galaxy Stellar Open question: Do intermediate-mass BHs exist? How massive are the initial seeds of supermassive BHs?
< few Rs Must be massive: M > several Msun, too massive to be a neutron star (Mns,crit ≤ Msun) These are strong reasons for BH candidates It is possible to empirically prove the existence of event horizons Prove that BHs have event horizons (soon: Event Horizon Telescope, LIGO) How do we know they are black holes?
universe A black hole has no-hair (no-hair theorem) Made only of spacetime warpage Mass M Spin: angular momentum J Charge Q J = a GM2/c 0 |a| 1 RS = 2GM c2
mass in astronomy Test particle in circular orbit M m v Best mass estimates are dynamical ) M = v2r G Alternatively, Kepler’s third law P2 r3 = 4⇡2 G(M + m) ) M ⇡ 4⇡2r3 GP2
mass in astronomy Test particle in circular orbit M m v Fc=Fg Best mass estimates are dynamical ) M = v2r G Alternatively, Kepler’s third law P2 r3 = 4⇡2 G(M + m) ) M ⇡ 4⇡2r3 GP2
release enormous amounts of light ⌘ rad = Erad out Egas in = 10 40% 100x more efficient than nuclear fusion! Most efficient radiators in the universe Radiate across all eletromagnetic spectrum!
release enormous amounts of light ⌘ rad = Erad out Egas in = 10 40% 100x more efficient than nuclear fusion! Most efficient radiators in the universe Radiate across all eletromagnetic spectrum!
British journal Nature announced on July 16, 1992 the discovery of a microquasar in the Galactic center region [22]. The image shows the synchrotron emission at a radio wavelength of 6 cm produced by relativistic particles jets ejected from some tens of kilometers to light years Black hole binaries (microquasars) ~1 pc 1E1740.7-2942 ~1 Mpc ~100 kpc Active galactic nuclei ~10-4 pc? Tidal disruption events
can be extracted Rotational energy of spacetime (frame dragging) Thought experiment by Penrose that demonstrates the principle, probably not important in astrophysics But magnetized accretion disks is promising Penrose 1969 Ruffini & Wilson 1975; Blandford & Znajek 1977
can be extracted Rotational energy of spacetime (frame dragging) Thought experiment by Penrose that demonstrates the principle, probably not important in astrophysics But magnetized accretion disks is promising Penrose 1969 Ruffini & Wilson 1975; Blandford & Znajek 1977
accretion + B Semenov+04, Science possibilities remain to be better explored in future simula- tions of accretion flows. Interestingly enough, s is similar to the dispersion of s values obtained in the hydrodynamic RIAF simulations of Yuan, Wu & Bu (2012); Bu et al. (2013) for a range of initial conditions. Range of black hole spins and/or magnetic flux threading the horizon – If powerful jets are produced via the BZ mecha- nism then the two fundamental parameters that regulate the jet power are the black hole spin a and the magnetic flux h threading the horizon, besides the mass (Blandford & Znajek 1977; Semenov, Dyadechkin & Punsly 2004): Pjet / ⇠ ✓ a h M ◆2 ; (9) i.e., a and h are degenerate to some extent (cf. Jet power Blandford & Znajek 77; Komissarov+; Nemmen+07; Tchekhovskoy+ spin magnetic flux Blandford-Znajek mechanism: magnetic flux tube spinning black hole ergosphere ⇠ a2 ˙ Mc2 ⊵
accretion + B Semenov+04, Science possibilities remain to be better explored in future simula- tions of accretion flows. Interestingly enough, s is similar to the dispersion of s values obtained in the hydrodynamic RIAF simulations of Yuan, Wu & Bu (2012); Bu et al. (2013) for a range of initial conditions. Range of black hole spins and/or magnetic flux threading the horizon – If powerful jets are produced via the BZ mecha- nism then the two fundamental parameters that regulate the jet power are the black hole spin a and the magnetic flux h threading the horizon, besides the mass (Blandford & Znajek 1977; Semenov, Dyadechkin & Punsly 2004): Pjet / ⇠ ✓ a h M ◆2 ; (9) i.e., a and h are degenerate to some extent (cf. Jet power Blandford & Znajek 77; Komissarov+; Nemmen+07; Tchekhovskoy+ spin magnetic flux Blandford-Znajek mechanism: ⇠ a2 ˙ Mc2 ⊵
Fabio Cafardo PhD Raniere Menezes PhD Ivan Almeida Msc http://rodrigonemmen.com/group/ Rodrigo Nemmen Apply to join my group Roberta Pereira undergrad (IC)
D⇢ Dt + ⇢r · v = 0 ⇢ Dv Dt = rp ⇢r + r · T ⇢ D(e/⇢) Dt = pr · v + T2/µ Fluid dynamics conservation equations Mass Momentum Energy D⇢ Dt + ⇢r · v = 0 ⇢ Dv Dt = rp ⇢r + r · T ⇢ D(e/⇢) Dt = pr · v + T2/µ r · Frad r · q D⇢ Dt + ⇢r · v = 0 ⇢ Dv Dt = rp ⇢r + r · T ⇢ D(e/⇢) Dt = pr · v + T2/µ r · Frad r · q D⇢ Dt + ⇢r · v = 0 ⇢ Dv Dt = rp ⇢r + r · T ⇢ D(e/⇢) Dt = pr · v + T2/µ Maxwell equations
MHD condition Kerr metric Conservation of Particle number Energy-momentum r⌫(⇢u⌫) = 0 r⌫Tµ⌫ = 0 r⌫ ⇤ Fµ⌫ = 0 r⌫Fµ⌫ = Jµ Maxwell equations r⌫ ⇤ Fµ⌫ = 0 r⌫Fµ⌫ = Jµ Fµ⌫u⌫ = 0 ds 2 = ↵ 2 dt 2 + ij( dx i + p = ( 1)⇢✏ ;l s the stress energy tensor. In a coordinate basis, ffiffiffiffiffiffiffi Àg p Tt Á ¼ À@i ffiffiffiffiffiffiffi Àg p Ti À Á þ ffiffiffiffiffiffiffi Àg p T À ; ð4Þ notes a spatial index and À is the connection. rgy momentum equations have been written with dex down for a reason. Symmetries of the metric conserved currents. In the Kerr metric, for exam- xisymmetry and stationary nature of the metric o conserved angular momentum and energy cur- eneral, for metrics with an ignorable coordinate rce terms on the right-hand side of the evolution or Tt l vanish. These source terms do not vanish quation is written with both indices up. ss energy tensor for a system containing only a id and an electromagnetic field is the sum of a Tl fluid ¼ ð þ u þ pÞulu þ pgl ð5Þ The rest of M and are not n MHD. Maxwell’s by taking the Here FÃ l ¼ 1 2 tensor (MTW which can be The comp blul ¼ 0. Fol where i denotes a spatial index and À is the The energy momentum equations have bee the free index down for a reason. Symmetrie give rise to conserved currents. In the Kerr me ple, the axisymmetry and stationary nature give rise to conserved angular momentum a rents. In general, for metrics with an ignora xl the source terms on the right-hand side o equation for Tt l vanish. These source terms when the equation is written with both indices The stress energy tensor for a system con perfect fluid and an electromagnetic field is fluid part, Tl fluid ¼ ð þ u þ pÞulu þ pgl (here u internal energy and p press electromagnetic part, Tl EM ¼ Fl F À 1 4 glF F :
4×106 resolution elements Need to evolve to t>15000 M (4 yrs for a 109 BH) Global, general relativistic MHD (GRMHD) simulations of gas around spinning BHs HARM code + MPI + 3D = HARMPI Gammie+03; Tchekhovskoy
can escape (once inside) Astrophysical labs of general relativity, fluid dynamics and electrodynamics that can’t be found on Earth Brightest systems in the universe Important for galaxy formation/evolution Open questions in the field Very soon: first image of event horizon LIGO is opening new observational windows If you are interested in doing research in these topics, please talk to me