in historical linguistics N. E. Schweikhard Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History Department of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution CALC Project May 30th, 2019 1 / 20
more inclusive: common ancestry and contact sometimes no difference between relations Dimensions of lexical change sound change borrowing word formation semantic shift Borrowing across Indo-European languages (Boc et al. 2010) 4 / 20
word formation both are not regular like sound changes → difficult to detect by algorithms Word formation unpredictable but follows tendencies patterns can show us the most likely history involves considering large amounts of data there is software for this in evolutionary biology → adopting tree reconciliation into linguistics 5 / 20
by e.g. Boc et al. 2010 Willems et al. 2016 big-data focus on borrowing yet only surface similarity no regular sound change, no word formation → A more exhaustive model is needed 10 / 20
*h₂ai̯-u-on- *h₂oi̯-u- *h₂i̯-u-h₃on- *h₂i̯-u-h₃n-on- *dl̩h₁gʰ-ó-h₂oi̯-u- OHG Greek Old Avestan Vedic Latin A family tree of *h₂ei-u- (based on Wodtko et al. 2008 and Mallory/Adams 2006) 14 / 20
sound correspondences and change directions of semantic shift word formation patterns through time interrelations between meaning and morphological productivity and supports us in consistency of etymological reconstruction making etymological data accessible 19 / 20
: Dr. Johann-Mattis List (Group leader) Dr. Yunfan Lai (Post-Doc) Dr. Tiago Tresoldi (Post-Doc) Mei-Shin Wu (Doctorate student) Nathanael E. Schweikhard (Doctorate student) Associated: Martin J. Kümmel 20 / 20