Twin Higgs at finite temperature
Decreasing coolness implies increasing conformity
Sivaramakrishnan Swaminathan
Theory Group, Department of Physics and Texas Cosmology Center,
The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712 U.S.A.
Acknowledgements
This work is done in collaboration with Can Kilic. This research is supported by the
National Science Foundation under Grant Numbers PHY-1315983 and PHY-1316033.
References
[1] J. R. Espinosa, M. Losada and A. Riotto, Phys. Rev. D 72, 043520 (2005)
[2] Z. Chacko, H. S. Goh and R. Harnik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 231802 (2006)
[3] J. I. Kapusta and C. Gale, Cambridge, UK: Univ. Pr. (2006) 428 p
Can A Broken Phase of Electroweak Symmetry Exist At High Temperature In Models With Same-Spin Partners?
Boson-fermion cancellations protecting Higgs mass naturalness at zero temperature fail to extend to finite temperature. This miscancellation is
expected to drive symmetry restoration at high temperatures. In alternative paradigms (SM extensions with same-spin partners) the possibility of
non-restoration of electroweak symmetry at high temperatures is left open. It was argued in [1] that a Little Higgs model has a symmetry broken phase
at high temperature, using a truncated high-temperature approximation of the effective potential. However, we believe that it is important to keep
track of the higher order terms, which point to a restoration of symmetry at high temperature, in a Twin Higgs inspired model we consider.
A Twin-Higgs inspired model
Twin the standard model [2]: SMA
Z2 symmetry
←
−
−
−
−
−
→ SMB
SM Higgs doublet h among the SU(4)/SU(3) pNGBs
V (H) =
λ
4
|H|2 − f2
2
, H ≡
HA
HB
=
if h
√
h†h
sin
√
h†h
f
if h
√
h †h
cos
√
h†h
f
One-loop corrections to the Higgs effective potential from the scalar
sector must respect the SU(4) symmetry
Z2
symmetry ensures that Λ2 contributions from fermions and gauge
bosons respect SU(4) symmetry
V1
(H) ⊃ −
3y2Λ2
8π2
+
9g2Λ2
64π2
H†
A
HA
+ H†
B
HB
HA H†
A
HB H†
B
h h
y
y
h
h
× yf
− y
2f
+
h
h
×
yf
− y
2f
No quadratically divergent contribution to mass of Higgs particle!
Phenomenological considerations prefer a small hierarchy vEW
f;
break the Z2
symmetry softly with L ⊃ µH†
A
HA
HB
HA
vEW
√
2
v
√
2
f
Note that the partners have no SM charges. In particular, the top
partner is uncoloured.
Finite temperature effective potential
Finite temperature effective potential (see [3] for details)
∆V T
1
(φ, T) ≡ STr
T4
2π2
Jb/f
m2(φ)
T2
For T > m(φ), we can expand these as an asymptotic series in x,
with af
= π2e−2γE+3
2 and ab
= 16π2e−2γE+3
2
Jb
(x) = −
π2
45
+
x
12
−
πx3
2
6
−
x2
32π2
log
x
ab
+ . . .
−Jf
(x) = −
7π2
360
+
x
24
+
x2
32π2
log
x
af
+ . . .
Finite temperature breaks SUSY, but same-spin cancellation
mechanisms carry through to finite temperature
bosons: +
Λ2
16π2
−→ +
T2
12
fermions: −
Λ2
16π2
−→ +
T2
24
.
Therefore, subleading terms could play an important role!
Complexities due to IR divergences and non-perturbative effects.
δm2
T
∼ {λ, g2, y2}T2
Conclusion: Electroweak symmetry does get restored
A numerical study of the one-loop effective potential indicates symmetry restoration,
driven by the log term. Truncating the same to O(T2) completely misses the transition.
In the UV completed linear theory, the radial mode VEV is driven to the origin at high
temperature, so VEV of the Goldstones is rendered moot.
Restoration of electroweak symmetry seems a robust conclusion, since two broad
paradigms for enforcing naturalness: supersymmetry and pNGB mechanisms, both lead
to symmetry restoration.