$30 off During Our Annual Pro Sale. View Details »

ICT for Sustainability: Wisdom from Models and Data?

ICT for Sustainability: Wisdom from Models and Data?

Introductory talk given at the 1st International Summer School on ICT for Sustainability (ICT4S), Leiden, NL, July-August 2017.

Steve Easterbrook

July 31, 2017
Tweet

More Decks by Steve Easterbrook

Other Decks in Education

Transcript

  1. ICT for Sustainability:
    Wisdom from models and data?
    Steve Easterbrook, University of Toronto
    Email: [email protected]
    Blog: www.easterbrook.ca/steve
    Twitter: @SMEasterbrook

    View Slide

  2. 2
    Computing and Sustainability?
    1. How can we support more responsible disposal of electronic waste?
    2. How can we reduce CO2 emissions?
    3. How can we better monitor the state of the natural environment?
    4. How can we use technology to foster environmentally responsible
    behaviour?
    5. How can we make better use of renewable resources?
    6. How can we make more efficient use of resources?
    7. How can we improve operational and process efficiency?
    8. How can we use technology to make society more efficient?
    9. What is the role of technology?
    10. How can we promote less destructive and more satisfying patterns of
    consumption?
    Knowles, B., Blair, L., Hazas, M., & Walker, S. (2013). Exploring sustainability research in computing. Proceedings
    of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing - UbiComp’13, 305

    View Slide

  3. 3
    The Idea of Progress
    •3
    Image Source: http://trolldens.blogspot.ca/2013/02/visions-of-future.html

    View Slide

  4. 4
    Outline
    ❍ Climate Change
    ● Brief history of the science
    ● Role of Models
    ● Implications
    ❍ Energy
    ❍ Sustainability
    ● Sustainability as a systems condition
    ● Footprints and Overshoot
    ● The Progress Myth and Limits to Growth
    ❍ The Role of Technology
    ● Progress Traps (technology that is too successful)
    ● Designing Resilient Communities

    View Slide

  5. 5
    Discovery of the Greenhouse Effect
    1850s: John Tyndall discovers through a series of experiments that
    certain gases absorb infrared radiation;
    Demonstrated existence of the “greenhouse effect”

    View Slide

  6. 6
    What are models?
    ❍ Models of Phenomena ❍ Models of Data
    ❍ Idealized; Scaled; Simplified
    ❍ Typically represented as mathematical equations
    •Incoming
    shortwave
    •energy
    from the sun
    •Infra-red
    is radiated
    in all directions
    •some sunlight
    •Is reflected
    •Atmosphere
    •(not to scale!)

    View Slide

  7. 7
    The First Computational Climate Model
    1895: Svante Arrhenius constructs an energy balance model to test his
    hypothesis that the ice ages were caused by a drop in CO2;
    (Predicts global temperature rise of 5.7°C if we double CO2)
    •Stockholm

    View Slide

  8. 8
    Schematic of the model equations
    Image source: Easterbrook, S. M. (2017) Computing the Climate. Cambridge University Press. Forthcoming

    View Slide

  9. 9
    Arrhenius’s Model Outputs
    Arrhenius, S. (1896). On the Influence of Carbonic Acid in the Air upon the Temperature of the Ground.

    View Slide

  10. 10
    Source: http://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/science/causes.html
    Exponential rise of GHGs

    View Slide

  11. 11
    First Computer Model of Weather
    1950s: John Von Neumann develops a killer app for ENIAC, the first
    programmable electronic computer: weather forecasting
    Imagines uses in weather control, geo-engineering, etc.

    View Slide

  12. 12
    Basic physical equations
    •Zonal (East-West) Wind:
    •Meridional (North-South) Wind:
    •Temperature:
    •Precipitable Water:
    •Air pressure:
    1904: Vilhelm Bjerknes identified the “primitive equations”
    These capture the flow of mass and energy in the atmosphere;
    Sets out a manifesto for practical forecasting

    View Slide

  13. 13
    Lynch, P. (2008). The ENIAC Forecasts: A Recreation. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

    View Slide

  14. 14
    •?
    •Model
    •Weakness
    •Develop
    •Hypothesis
    •Run
    •Experiment
    •Interpret
    •Results
    •Peer
    Review
    •Try another hypothesis
    •OK?
    •New Model
    Version
    Model building is “doing science”

    View Slide

  15. 15
    Observations
    1. Causal Models need Data Models and vice versa
    ● When the model and the data disagree, it’s often the data that are wrong
    2. A model is never complete, but is sometimes good
    enough
    ● Models are for improving our understanding and asking “what-if”
    questions.
    ● Models enable close cross-disciplinary collaboration.
    3. Model integration is difficult and inevitable.
    ● A solitary model has very little value
    ● A model won’t make sense out of context
    4. Complex models have emergent phenomena…
    …and a model is most valuable when it surprises you

    View Slide

  16. 16
    A Climate
    Model
    Configuration
    ?
    Scientific
    Question
    Model
    Development,
    Selection &
    Configuration
    Running
    Model
    Interpretation
    of results
    Papers &
    Reports
    Scope of typical
    model evaluations
    Scope of fitness-for-purpose
    validation of a modeling system
    Is this model configuration
    appropriate to the
    question?
    Are the model outputs
    used appropriately?
    From models to modeling systems

    View Slide

  17. 17
    Understanding What-if Experiments
    •E.g. How do volcanoes
    •affect climate?
    Sources: (a) http://www.imk-ifu.kit.edu/829.php
    (b) IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, 2007. Working Group 1, Fig 9.5.

    View Slide

  18. 18
    Knutti, R., & Sedláček, J. (2012). Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections.
    Nature Climate Change, (October), 1–5.

    View Slide

  19. 19
    Warming is linear with cumulative emissions
    Source:
    IPCC AR5 WG1
    Fig SPM10

    View Slide

  20. 20
    Will the Paris Agreement Help?
    Source: http://www.easterbrook.ca/steve/2016/10/missing-the-target-canadas-deplorable-record-on-carbon-emissions/

    View Slide

  21. 21
    Slide shamelessly borrowed from Sir David King of Oxford University’s Smith School of Enterprise and Environment

    View Slide

  22. 22
    Outline
    ❍ Climate Change
    ● Brief history of the science
    ● Role of Models
    ● Implications
    ❍ Energy
    ❍ Sustainability
    ● Sustainability as a systems condition
    ● Footprints and Overshoot
    ● The Progress Myth and Limits to Growth
    ❍ The Role of Technology
    ● Progress Traps (technology that is too successful)
    ● Designing Resilient Communities

    View Slide

  23. 23
    The story of cheap energy
    Source: https://www.e-education.psu.edu/earth104/node/1347

    View Slide

  24. 24
    The story of cheap energy consumption
    Source: https://www.e-education.psu.edu/earth104/node/1347

    View Slide

  25. 25
    Can we live on 100% renewables?
    Sources: Jacobson, et al (2015). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(49), 15060–15065.
    Clack, et al (2017). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(26), 6722–6727.

    View Slide

  26. 26
    Outline
    ❍ Climate Change
    ● Brief history of the science
    ● Role of Models
    ● Implications
    ❍ Energy
    ❍ Sustainability
    ● Sustainability as a systems condition
    ● Footprints and Overshoot
    ● The Progress Myth and Limits to Growth
    ❍ The Role of Technology
    ● Progress Traps (technology that is too successful)
    ● Designing Resilient Communities

    View Slide

  27. 27
    What do we mean “sustainable”?
    ❍ Tainter (2006) suggests we should ask:
    (i) Sustain what?
    (ii) For whom?
    (iii) How long?
    (iv) At what cost?
    ❍ There are are often trade-offs:
    ● E.g. we might sustain a profitable company by using up social or
    environmental capital
    ● E.g. we might sustain a healthy ecosystem by preventing human
    development in the region
    J. A. Tainter, “Social complexity and sustainability,” Journal of Ecological Complexity, no. 3, pp. 91–103, 2006.

    View Slide

  28. 28
    Sterman, J. D. (2012). Sustaining Sustainability: Creating a Systems Science in a Fragmented Academy and
    Polarized World. In M. P. Weinstein & R. E. Turner (Eds.), Sustainability Science: The Emerging Paradigm and the
    Urban Environment (pp. 21–58). Springer.
    Sustainability as a System Condition

    View Slide

  29. 29
    Environmentally-
    Sustainable-
    Use$of$Natural$Resources$
    Absorp2on$of$Wastes$
    (air,$water,$land,$climate,$…)$
    Economically-
    Sustainable-
    Financial$prosperity$
    Investment$&$Profit$
    (jobs,$income,$$
    capital,$taxes,$…)$$
    Socially--
    Sustainable$
    Standard$of$Living$
    Equity$&$Trust$
    (community,$educa2on,$$
    opportunity,$$
    mobility,$…)$$
    Social3Environmental-
    Environmental$Jus2ce;$
    Equitable$access$to$$
    resources.$
    Environmental3Economic-
    Energy$Efficiency;$
    Subsidies$&$incen2ves;$
    Carbon$Pricing.$
    Social3Economic-
    Business$Ethics;$
    Social$Responsibility;$
    Workplace$democracy;$
    -
    Fully-
    Sustain3-
    able-

    View Slide

  30. 30
    5 dimensions of sustainability
    Human
    ● sustaining health, well-being, and
    human dignity
    Social
    ● sustaining a just and equitable society
    Economic
    ● sustaining the flow of resources and
    capital
    Technical
    ● sustaining physical and digital
    infrastructures
    Environmental
    ● sustaining healthy ecosystems and a
    stable climate

    View Slide

  31. 31
    Environmental Footprint of Progress
    •I = P x A x T
    •Impact = Population x Affluence x Technology
    •# persons consumption emissions
    •person consumption
    •Emissions = Population × Wealth × Energy × Carbon
    • per capita Intensity Intensity
    Total
    emissions
    = population X GDP
    /population
    X Energy
    /GDP
    X Emissions
    /energy
    •Kaya Identity:

    View Slide

  32. 32
    Steffen, W., et. al. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223).
    Planetary Boundaries

    View Slide

  33. 33
    Overshoot
    http://www.footprintnetwork.org/images/article_uploads/National_Footprint_Accounts_2012_Edition_Report.pdf

    View Slide

  34. 34
    How is overshoot possible?
    Images: http://www.pinterest.com/smeasterbrook/big102y-images/
    •What happens if you spend
    more than you earn each year?
    •What happens if a farmer uses
    more water than falls in rain each
    year?
    •What happens if we
    produce more CO2 each
    year than the soils and
    oceans can absorb?

    View Slide

  35. 35
    Threats to Progress
    1. Exhaustion of finite non-renewable resources on 'spaceship
    earth’
    2. Build up of environmental pollutants that threaten human
    health
    3. Global environmental change, e.g. loss of biodiversity and
    climate change
    4. Inability to scale up food production to feed a growing world
    population
    5. Social disintegration arising from our inability to deal with the
    complexity of modern civilization
    6. Highly unequal income levels and a growing gap between rich
    and poor
    7. The rate of change of population and the corresponding high
    rate of growth in consumption
    •3
    Source: Brooks, H. "Can Technology Assure Unending Material Progress?". In Almond, G.A., Chodorow, M., and
    Pearce, R. H., Progress and Its Discontents. University of California Press, 1982.

    View Slide

  36. 36
    Outline
    ❍ Climate Change
    ● Brief history of the science
    ● Role of Models
    ● Implications
    ❍ Energy
    ❍ Sustainability
    ● Sustainability as a systems condition
    ● Footprints and Overshoot
    ● The Progress Myth and Limits to Growth
    ❍ The Role of Technology
    ● Progress Traps (technology that is too successful)
    ● Designing Resilient Communities

    View Slide

  37. 37
    Can a Technology Be Too Successful?
    The Automobile Antibiotics
    Cheap Energy The Computer

    View Slide

  38. 38
    Progress Traps
    •…an idea or a technology that
    generates splendid results at
    first but leads to a deadly,
    impossible end.

    View Slide

  39. 39
    1st, 2nd and 3rd Order Effects
    •Smart signals respond to
    internet devices in cars to
    improve traffic flow
    through intersections
    •People perceive an
    improvement in traffic
    flows through the city
    •More people choose
    to drive, so congestion
    gets worse again

    View Slide

  40. 40
    What if the internet is too successful?
    Image source: http://www.digitalistmag.com/digital-economy/iot/internet-of-things-is-everywhere-01562372

    View Slide

  41. 41
    Erinn G. Ryen; Callie W. Babbitt; Eric Williams; 2015. Consumption-weighted life cycle assessment of a consumer
    electronic product community. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 (4): 2549-2559.

    View Slide

  42. 42
    Source: http://www.ericsson.com/res/docs/2015/ericsson-mobility-report-june-2015.pdf

    View Slide

  43. 43
    Technology Debt?
    http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2013/10/inside-ghana-electronic-wasteland-2013103012852580288.html

    View Slide

  44. 44
    Other Perspectives
    ❍ The Club of Rome
    ● Limits to Growth
    ❍ No-Growth Economists
    ● E.g. Tim Jackson
    ❍ Neo-Luddites
    ● E.g. Chellis Glendinning
    ❍ Deep Ecologists
    ● E.g. James Lovelock
    ❍ Transition Town Movement
    ● E.g. Rob Hopkins

    View Slide

  45. 45
    Key Points
    ❍ Progress is a dominant modern myth
    ❍ Need to distinguish ‘progress’ and ‘growth’
    ❍ Most measures of innovation are growth measures
    ● E.g. Moore’s Law
    ● E.g. Number of patents
    ● E.g. Number of internet users
    ❍ Unlimited growth is impossible on a finite planet
    ❍ We have different cultural expectations about progress
    (including its absence)
    ❍ There is no simple measure of progress
    ❍ Rates of change may be the greatest threat

    View Slide

  46. 46
    Conclusions?
    ❍ Sustainability is a systems concept
    ● Need a robust boundary critique
    ● Need trans-disciplinary thinking
    ❍ Computational modeling enables trans-disciplinarity
    ● Integrated model makes the shared understanding explicit
    ● Resolving model integration questions deepens understanding of feedback
    loops and emergent behaviour
    ● The hard questions are in the gaps between disciplines
    ❍ Models need data; data need models
    ● Data analytics reveals correlations
    ● Simulation models explore causality
    ● Each without the other is unwise

    View Slide