Share
Embed
Big and young SMBHs in the early Universe
Colloquium talk given at ASTRON/JIVE (Dwingeloo, The Netherland)
Tullia Sbarrato
November 12, 2015
Transcript
39 slides
-
BIG AND YOUNG SMBHS IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE TULLIA SBARRATO
UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI MILANO-BICOCCA in collaboration with: G. Ghisellini, G. Tagliaferri, F. Haardt, and the NuSTAR blazar scientific team ASTRON/JIVE, 12 November 2015 -
BLAZAR: SPECTRAL ENERGY DISTRIBUTION Fossati et al. 1998 Donato et
al. 2001 ASTRON/JIVE, 12 November 2015 -
QUESTIONS What do we observe at very high redshift? Looking
for blazars at high redshift … What can we learn about formation of the first SMBHs? ASTRON/JIVE, 12 November 2015 what is the population of jetted quasars at high z? what is the role of the jet in SMBH early formation? -
WHAT DO WE OBSERVE AT VERY HIGH REDSHIFT? THE HIGHEST
REDSHIFT ASTRON/JIVE, 12 November 2015 Mortlock et al. 2011 M ⇠ 2 ⇥ 109M z = 7.085 -
WHAT DO WE OBSERVE AT VERY HIGH REDSHIFT? THE MOST
MASSIVES ASTRON/JIVE, 12 November 2015 -
WHAT DO WE OBSERVE AT VERY HIGH REDSHIFT? THE MOST
MASSIVES ASTRON/JIVE, 12 November 2015 non-jetted quasar: SDSS J0100+2802 M ' 1010M z = 6.30 { Wu et al. 2015 -
WHAT DO WE OBSERVE AT VERY HIGH REDSHIFT? THE MOST
MASSIVES ASTRON/JIVE, 12 November 2015 jetted quasar: SDSS J0306+1853 M ' 1010M z = 5.363 { Wang et al. 2015 -
WHAT DO WE OBSERVE AT VERY HIGH REDSHIFT? FOCUS ON
JETTED SOURCES ASTRON/JIVE, 12 November 2015 extremely massive blazars at z>4 efficiently trace their parent population project to systematically look for and classify new blazars! M > 109M -
LOOKING FOR BLAZARS AT HIGH Z WHY BLAZARS? finding extremely
massive SMBHs hosted in jetted AGN constraints on SMBH formation models clues on jets role in SMBH formation M > 109M z > 4 ✓b = 1/ ✓v ASTRON/JIVE, 12 November 2015 -
LOOKING FOR BLAZARS AT HIGH Z WHY BLAZARS? finding extremely
massive SMBHs hosted in jetted AGN constraints on SMBH formation models clues on jets role in SMBH formation M > 109M z > 4 ✓b = 1/ ✓v ✓v < 1/ 2 2 ⇠ 340 450 ASTRON/JIVE, 12 November 2015 viewing angle: analogous jetted AGN, randomly oriented: -
LOOKING FOR BLAZARS AT HIGH Z each blazar counts for
~340-450 jetted AGN not aligned efficiently provide clues on jet-accretion relation But: very few blazars known at z>4, all serendipitous ASTRON/JIVE, 12 November 2015 WHY BLAZARS? -
LOOKING FOR BLAZARS AT HIGH Z each blazar counts for
~340-450 jetted AGN not aligned efficiently provide clues on jet-accretion relation But: very few blazars known at z>4, all serendipitous SYSTEMATIC SEARCH! ASTRON/JIVE, 12 November 2015 WHY BLAZARS? -
LOOKING FOR BLAZARS AT HIGH Z SERENDIPITOUS LOW Z HIGH
Z ASTRON/JIVE, 12 November 2015 high redshift most powerful most massive -
LOOKING FOR BLAZARS AT HIGH Z SERENDIPITOUS LOW Z HIGH
Z ASTRON/JIVE, 12 November 2015 high redshift most powerful most massive -
LOOKING FOR BLAZARS AT HIGH Z SERENDIPITOUS LOW Z HIGH
Z ASTRON/JIVE, 12 November 2015 high redshift most powerful most massive -
LOOKING FOR BLAZARS AT HIGH Z SYSTEMATIC SEARCH ASTRON/JIVE, 12
November 2015 naked disc blazars found in optical quasar catalogs SDSS + FIRST quasar catalog z > 4 radio—detected >1mJy R > 100 105783 1248 53 31 R = F5GHz /FB -
LOOKING FOR BLAZARS AT HIGH Z SYSTEMATIC SEARCH ASTRON/JIVE, 12
November 2015 Sbarrato et al. 2013a disc emission fitted with Shakura—Sunyaev model standard accretion on a non—spinning BH? -
LOOKING FOR BLAZARS AT HIGH Z SUCCESSFUL CLASSIFICATIONS ASTRON/JIVE, 12
November 2015 Sbarrato et al. 2012; 2013b best blazar candidate: z = 5.3 R ⇠ 5200 F1.4GHz = 260mJy log Ld = 46 . 95 MBH = 2.8 ⇥ 109M NuSTAR + Swift/XRT observations: hard and strong X-ray flux = 13 ✓v = 3 blazar!! -
LOOKING FOR BLAZARS AT HIGH Z B2 1023+25: seen under
viewing angle smaller than beaming angle SUCCESSFUL CLASSIFICATIONS ASTRON/JIVE, 12 November 2015 BUT: SDSS+FIRST covers ~1/4 of the sky = 13 ✓v = 3 } ✓v < 1/ 2 2 = 338 by classifying B2 1023+25 we can infer the presence of at least ~1540 analogous jetted quasars, randomly oriented -
WHAT CAN WE LEARN? ASTRON/JIVE, 12 November 2015 HOW MANY
SMBHS DO THEY TRACE? SDSS+FIRST @ z>4: 11 blazars expected parents: ~3700 jetted quasars -
WHAT CAN WE LEARN? ASTRON/JIVE, 12 November 2015 HOW MANY
SMBHS DO THEY TRACE? SDSS+FIRST @ z>4: 11 blazars expected parents: ~3700 jetted quasars -
WHAT CAN WE LEARN? ASTRON/JIVE, 12 November 2015 WHY DON’T
WE SEE THE PARENT POPULATION? HOW MANY SMBHS DO THEY TRACE? SDSS+FIRST @ z>4: 11 blazars expected parents: ~3700 jetted quasars -
WHAT CAN WE LEARN? ASTRON/JIVE, 12 November 2015 LACK OF
MISALIGNED JETS are we missing radio or optical emission? discrepancy of a factor ~70 arises already at z~3, even if less pronounced -
WHAT CAN WE LEARN? ASTRON/JIVE, 12 November 2015 CMB QUENCHING
Ghisellini et al. 2014 UCMB / (1 + z)4 CMB energy density at z~3 becomes competitive with magnetic energy density of quasar lobes -
WHAT CAN WE LEARN? ASTRON/JIVE, 12 November 2015 CMB QUENCHING
Ghisellini et al. 2014 UCMB / (1 + z)4 CMB energy density at z~3 becomes competitive with magnetic energy density of quasar lobes -
WHAT CAN WE LEARN? ASTRON/JIVE, 12 November 2015 CMB QUENCHING
Ghisellini et al. 2014 UCMB / (1 + z)4 CMB energy density at z~3 becomes competitive with magnetic energy density of quasar lobes RADIO EMISSION IS QUENCHED! blazars: best tracer for jetted quasars! -
WHAT CAN WE LEARN? ASTRON/JIVE, 12 November 2015 INNER JET
NOT QUENCHED! Frey et al. 2015 B2 1023+25 @ 1.7 GHz @ 5 GHz -
WHAT CAN WE LEARN? ASTRON/JIVE, 12 November 2015 HIGH MASSES
AT HIGH REDSHIFT! -
WHAT CAN WE LEARN? ASTRON/JIVE, 12 November 2015 HIGH MASSES
AT HIGH REDSHIFT! updated from Sbarrato et al. 2015 -
WHAT CAN WE LEARN? ASTRON/JIVE, 12 November 2015 HIGH MASSES
AT HIGH REDSHIFT! updated from Ghisellini et al. 2013 Ld = ⌘d ˙ Mc2 standard accretion at Eddington rate -
WHAT CAN WE LEARN? ASTRON/JIVE, 12 November 2015 HIGH MASSES
AT HIGH REDSHIFT! updated from Ghisellini et al. 2013 Ld = ⌘d ˙ Mc2 ⌘ = ⌘d + ⌘B standard accretion at Eddington rate … but what about the jet? -
CONCLUSIONS blazars are efficient tracers of jetted AGN hosting extremely
massive BHs at high redshift two different formation epochs for highly massive BHs: jetted systems preferentially form at z ~ 4 non-jetted systems at z ~ 2-2.5 it’s hard to form such massive BHs in the early Universe the presence of a jet speeds up the process huge lack of misaligned AGN: CMB quenching? ASTRON/JIVE, 12 November 2015