Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Hipster Tech, Cargo Culting, and you being of n...
Search
Sebastian von Conrad
December 13, 2015
Programming
160
1
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Hipster Tech, Cargo Culting, and you being of no use (to me)
I gave this talk at Railscamp 18 in Canberra, 11th–14th of December 2015.
Sebastian von Conrad
December 13, 2015
More Decks by Sebastian von Conrad
See All by Sebastian von Conrad
The Influential Architect
vonconrad
0
140
An In-Depth Look at Event Sourcing with CQRS
vonconrad
2
1.6k
Handwaving about Dependencies
vonconrad
0
280
Event Sourcing, or Why ActiveRecord Must Die
vonconrad
8
2.3k
Reporting and the First Law of Holes
vonconrad
2
350
Other Decks in Programming
See All in Programming
AWS DevOps AgentのAzure接続機能を検証して見えた活用法/Use Cases Verified for the AWS DevOps Agent's Azure Connectivity Feature
masakiokuda
1
230
S3 を使うアプリケーションをローカル完結で動かすことに全力を注いでみた / Running S3 Apps Offline
contour_gara
0
460
php-fpmのプロセスが枯渇した日-調査・対処・そして本当にやるべきだったこと-
shibuchaaaan
0
280
Augmenting AI with the Power of Jakarta EE
ivargrimstad
0
560
yield再入門 #phpcon
o0h
PRO
0
1k
2年かけて Deno に DOMMatrix を実装した話 / How I implemented DOMMatrix in Deno over two years
petamoriken
0
210
型も通る、synthも通る、それでも危ない 〜AIのCDKの権限とコストを機械で検証する〜 / It Passes Type Checks, It Passes Synth Checks, but It’s Still Risky — Automatically Verifying Permissions and Costs in AI’s CDK —
seike460
PRO
1
550
人間の目はかわらない、だからJPEGは30年もつ
yuzneri
12
18k
VibeCodingからAgenticWorkflowへ
starfish719
0
430
【QA Test Talk Vol.8】AI-DLC による Whole Team Approach の加速
pkshadeck
PRO
0
180
運用ダッシュボードの設計を誰も教えてくれないのだけどみなさんどうしてるんですか? - チームに監視するという文化を根付かせるための第一歩を踏みたい -
satoshi256kbyte
1
110
Go 1.27 における memory allocation の高速化
andpad
0
170
Featured
See All Featured
Product Roadmaps are Hard
iamctodd
55
12k
Digital Ethics as a Driver of Design Innovation
axbom
PRO
1
360
Sharpening the Axe: The Primacy of Toolmaking
bcantrill
46
2.9k
State of Search Keynote: SEO is Dead Long Live SEO
ryanjones
0
240
Context Engineering - Making Every Token Count
addyosmani
9
1k
Tips & Tricks on How to Get Your First Job In Tech
honzajavorek
1
690
Imperfection Machines: The Place of Print at Facebook
scottboms
270
14k
Amusing Abliteration
ianozsvald
1
240
A Modern Web Designer's Workflow
chriscoyier
698
190k
Tell your own story through comics
letsgokoyo
1
1k
Facilitating Awesome Meetings
lara
57
7.1k
The SEO identity crisis: Don't let AI make you average
varn
0
530
Transcript
Hipster Tech, Cargo Culting, and you being of no use
(to me).
Sebastian von Conrad @vonconrad
None
None
None
None
None
Cargo
Cult
cult |kʌlt| noun a religion or sect considered to be
false, unorthodox, or extremist, with members often living outside of conventional society under the direction of a charismatic leader.
cult |kʌlt| noun a religion or sect considered to be
false, unorthodox, or extremist, with members often living outside of conventional society under the direction of a charismatic leader.
cult |kʌlt| noun a religion or sect considered to be
false, unorthodox, or extremist, with members often living outside of conventional society under the direction of a charismatic leader.
under the direction of a charismatic leader
None
Rails is the best and worst thing that happened to
Ruby.
Let me explain...
Rails propelled the popularity of Ruby...
...but Rails itself was too popular.
We all want to build web apps quickly.
And Rails seemed like a good way to build web
apps quickly.
Build web apps quickly Cargo
Cult Rails
But while Rails allows rapid development, what about maintainability?
History has proven this to be (generally) false.
RubyConf AU 2015 (aka SOA Conf)
People who have worked with 5+ years Rails apps have
seen some shit.
Maintainable web apps Cargo
Cult? Service-Oriented Architecture
(I happen to agree with them but that’s not the
point.)
So, should we just stop using Rails?
It’s not quite that simple.
I would still use Rails.
Mostly because I have no choice.
It’s (close to) impossible to find Ruby devs who don’t
do Rails.
In many cases, Rails is all of the Ruby developers
know.
Rails’ toolset has become the toolset of Ruby developers.
This talk is actually all about Tools.
(Sorry for the link bait.)
(#sorrynotsorry)
Context.
In preparing this talk, 3 things collided in my head.
1.
I got a new job.
None
Architecture Grand Master High Guild Wizard Poobah* * or some
combination thereof.
Envato has 75 devs.
My job is improving: - Software architecture - Software modeling
- Software design
Rails’ tools. MVC.
ActiveRecord Must die.
ActionView Too weak an interface.
ActionController Roda is (already) better.
ActionMailer Use literally anything else.
ActiveSupport Monkey-patches everything.
Turbolinks Abomination.
Concerns Congratulations! You just made it easier to violate SRP.
Asset Pipeline “Terrible.” - Tim Lucas
Model, View, Controller. Ranges from to .
Envato has 75 Rails devs.
None
Actually, that’s not quite right.
We have a bit of everything in production.
Rails, non-Rails Ruby, Node.js, Elixir, Go, MySQL, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, Redis,
Memcache, ElasticSearch, Sphinx.
I cannot control this language proliferation. Nor do I intend
to try.
Still, my job is improving: - Software architecture - Software
modeling - Software design
How do software developers get better?
Be a better software developer Cargo
2.
I talked to someone who wouldn’t apply for a job.
Why? No Ruby experience.
Lots of solid OO experience.
Do I actually care? No.
Rails is a hammer.
If the person has other tools, they are still very
valuable.
In fact, not knowing Rails can be a benefit.
Diversity of experiences and opinions lead to better outcomes.
Be a better software developer Cargo
Cult Mastery of a single language and/or framework
3.
None
None
None
None
None
I fundamentally disagree. (But I wasn’t looking for a shitfight.)
is neither: new, nor shiny, nor hipster. New Shiny Hipster
Technology
It might seem that way, but most are reinventions of
the wheel.
Examples!
Node.js
NoSQL
React
Elixir/Go/Swift
(Our Rails “hacks” aren’t new either.)
But perhaps more importantly…
Elixir is a hammer.
Go is a hammer.
None
React is a… ?
None
Seriously, though, who would have thought it would be the
JS community who would get excited about immutability?
But I digress…
Be a better software developer Cargo
Cult Learn new languages and/or frameworks
Now, this feels like a catch-22.
Be a better software developer Cargo
Cult Mastery of a single language and/or framework
Cult Learn new languages and/or frameworks
The thing with languages…
…it’s hard to use more than one at a time.
Elixir won’t do you much good if I need to
drop you into a Rails monolith.
Kind of like hammers. They might be somewhat different, but
you typically only need one.
If all you have is hammers in your tool belt,
then you are of no use to me.
Diversify your toolset.
No tool, no matter how great, is right for every
occasion.
Accumulate more, and learn when to apply each one.
None
Learn patterns that translate.
Patterns are language agnostic and can be applied in different
situations with different tech.
Languages/frameworks can be be a way to learn patterns.
But you don’t have to.
Learn new languages and frameworks because of the patterns they
employ. (Not because they’re the New Shiny.)
Be explicit about what those patterns are.
If you can't extrapolate the pattern(s), it's not a useful
tool.
Because you can’t use it independently to the language/ framework
you learnt it from.
(Now, I have a list.)
Rather than New Shiny Hipster Tech, I want you to
learn about: I’ll tweet out a link to all of them later.
OLID
(SOLID without the S.)
(Not that S isn’t important.)
OLID: Open/closed principle.
Poor fella is very misunderstood.
Can’t modify existing code, only extend it.
Code that doesn’t have to be changed every time our
requirements change.
OLID: Liskov substitution principle.
OLID: Interface segregation.
Small, isolated interfaces.
High cohesion/low coupling.
(Law of Demeter.)
(Postel’s Law.)
OLID: Dependency inversion.
Depend on things that are of the same, or higher
level, of abstraction.
Inversion != Injection.
Dependency injection is about how to acquire dependencies.
Dependency inversion is about what should depend on what.
(By all means, learn about Dependency Injection as well.)
Separation of Concerns.
Not the same as ActiveSupport::Concern.
Modularity via encapsulation.
Interface design.
Event sourcing.
Don’t store current state of an object. Store events that
have happened to it.
Derive an object’s current state by replaying its events.
(I’m talking about this at RubyConf.)
CQS. CQRS.
Command Query (Responsiblity) Segregation.
CQS: A method can either mutate state or return state.
Never both.
CQRS: A class can either mutate state or return state.
Never both.
Immutable data structures.
Gateway to concurrency.
Now, immutable data structures in the application layer is nice
and all…
…but not as awesome as an immutable, append-only persistence layer.
(You can do this with any database, don’t have to
hipster around with Datomic.)
Functional vs. Object-oriented.
Only exception that I’ll make.
But you don’t actually have to learn a new language
to do functional programming.
Functional Ruby. It’s a thing.
Service-Oriented Architecture.
Ewww, Microservices.
Not always, but sometimes. Form your own opinion.
Asynchronous communication by default.
Pseudo-synchronous.
Message-oriented middleware (message buses).
Idempotent operations.
Exactly once. At most once or At least once.
Do stuff with data.
Data warehousing. Star schemas.
MapReduce.
And, you know, the actual “patterns.”
Read the “Gang of Four” book. (I know it’s old.)
Reactor pattern.
Strategy pattern.
Memento pattern.
Factory pattern.
Adapter pattern.
Observer pattern.
At this point I’m just throwing words at you.
My point is: all of these are language agnostic.
They can be just as fun and interesting as the
New Shiny Hipster Tech.
And they’re more useful.
Learning and understanding these will allow you to consider more
than one solution to a problem.
If you can only think of one way to solve
a problem, the only way you can succeed is by luck.
Luck is not a strategy.
If you have options, you increase your chance of success.
Be a better software developer Cargo
(Probably) Cult Evolve language/framework agnostic skills.
Languages, frameworks, and all the shiny hipster tech will come
and go.
Wouldn’t you rather bet on adding more generic software development
tools?
I would, and I am.
Thank you. Questions? Please follow me on the Twitter: @vonconrad