the official CAADP M&E report • A chapter is dedicated in the ATOR: tracking progress on CAADP core indicators. • Since 2015, ReSAKSS tracks and reports progress made in CAADP using the CAADP RF (2015-2025)
the official CAADP M&E report • A chapter is dedicated in the ATOR: tracking progress on CAADP core indicators. • Since 2015, ReSAKSS tracks and reports progress made in CAADP using the CAADP RF (2015-2025) • The CAADP RF combines a logical flow of three levels of results.
the official CAADP M&E report • A chapter is dedicated in the ATOR: tracking progress on CAADP core indicators • Since 2015, ReSAKSS tracks and reports progress made in CAADP using the CAADP RF (2015-2025) • The CAADP RF combines a logical flow of three levels of results • 27 of the 38 CAADP RF indicators are reported in the ATOR and the ReSAKSS website [considerable overlap with the BR indicators] • Some indicators and subgroups are discussed
growth observed • Strongest growth was seen during early CAADP period • GDP per capita growth slowed since 2008 Level I Indicators GDP percapita growth (%)
during the Malabo period. • Major contributing factors: climate shocks, conflicts, and reduced commodity prices. Level I Indicators Prevalence of undernourishment (%)
For Africa, it remained steady during the Malabo period (at 30%) • Dependency is highest in north Africa and lowest in east Africa. • High dependency ratio can reflect high vulnerability to global market shocks. Level I Indicators Cereal Import Dependency Ratio(%)
• Agriculture value added almost doubled during the CAADP period • The 6% CAADP target is not met Level II Indicators Agriculture value added (annual average growth, %)
• Agriculture value added almost doubled during the CAADP period • The 6% CAADP target is not met • Few countries were able to meet the 6% target Level II Indicators Agriculture value added (annual average growth, %)
Grew < 50% in the Malabo period • Remained less than 20% of the total Ag import in the continent Level II Indicators Agriculture value added (annual average growth, %)
Grew < 50% in the Malabo period • Remained less than 20% of the total Ag import in the continent • Southern Africa dominates intra-African agricultural trade Level II Indicators Intra-African agricultural export (US$, Billion)
(GAE) • GAE grew at a slower rate • GAE share in total government expenditure remained below the 10 percent target for Africa and subregions. Level III Indicators Share of GAE in total government expenditure (%) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Africa Central Eastern Northern Southern Western 2003-2008 2008-2014 2014-2023
(GAE) • GAE grew at a slower rate • GAE share in total government expenditure remained below the 10 percent target for Africa and subregions. • Few countries meet the 10% target Level III Indicators Share of GAE in total government expenditure (%)
(GAE) • GAE relative to the size of the agriculture sector remained small for Africa and the subgroups • GAE is small compared to the wealth created by the agriculture sector. Level III Indicators Share of GAE in Ag. value added(%)
progress in several areas in the last two decades • Progress on many of the indicators has either slowed or reversed in recent years. • Africa remained below the CAADP spending and ag. growth targets • There is a needs to ✓improve agricultural production and productivity ✓Boost intra-African ag. Trade ✓Efficient allocation of GAE