Squeezing PNG and JPEG

Transcript

1. 1.

   Squeezing PNG & JPEG The Lazy Person's Guide https://unsplash.com/photos/srd-rZ5fcFw

2. 2.

   None
3. 3.

   None
4. 4.

   Objective Deliver a two-dimensional array of colors in the smallest

   possible PNG/JPEG file without any noticeable loss in visual quality
5. 5.

   Optimal File size Visual quality Ideal Unacceptable

6. 6.

   010110010101 01011001010101 0100 1001010110010101010100 1001 0101100101010101001001 01011001010101010010010 101 Encoding Decoding

7. 7.

   010110010101 01011001010101 0100 1001010110010101010100 1001 0101100101010101001001 01011001010101010010010 101 010110010101 01011001010101

   0100 1001010110010101010100 1001 0101100101010101001001 01011001010101010010010 101 Lossless Lossy Not identical vs the original
8. 8.

   .jpg 8 megapixels JPEG Quality 95 2,210 KB MozJPEG Q

   = 84 879 KB 2 seconds .jpg Guetzli 5 minutes 877 KB
9. 9.

   https://unsplash.com/photos/Zh6C3GydNBA Squeezing PNG

10. 10.

    Portable Network Graphics Lossless encoding Truecolor RGB RGB+A Indexed Color

    Grayscale RFC 2083 http://www.w3.org/TR/PNG/ Good compression (using DEFLATE) 8 bits/channel
11. 11.

    DEFLATE = Lempel-Ziv + Huffman RFC 1951

12. 12.

    Lempel-Ziv: De-duplication 'Cause the players gonna play, play, play, play,

    play 'Cause the players gonna play, play, play, play, play 'Cause the players gonna[5:14], play, play, play, play 'Cause the players gonna[5:14], [6:6]play, play, play
13. 13.

    None
14. 14.

    Color Deduplication

15. 15.

    PNG Color Channels

16. 16.

    PNG Compression Efficiency https://encode.ru/threads/1725-pngthermal-pseudo-thermal-view-of-PNG-compression-efficiency

17. 17.

    Duplication Search Trade-offs 'Cause the players gonna play, play, play,

    play, play 'Cause the players gonna[5:14], [6:6] [6:6] [6:6] [6:6] 'Cause the players gonna[5:14], [6:6] [12:12] [6:6]
18. 18.

    Zopfli: Exhaustive DEFLATE https://ariya.io/2016/06/using-zopfli-to-optimize-png-images github.com/google/zopfli > zopflipng tiger.png tiger-small.png Optimizing

    tiger.png Input size: 197220 (192K) Result size: 135325 (132K). Percentage of original: 68.616% Result is smaller
19. 19.

    0 50 100 150 200 Original Zopfli KB PNG File

    Size
20. 20.

    Quantization of Colors https://ariya.io/2016/07/shrinking-png-images-with-quantization 9734 distinct colors only 256 colors

21. 21.

    9734 distinct colors

22. 22.

    only 256 colors

23. 23.

    None
24. 24.

    pngquant.org > pngquant --speed 1 --verbose tiger.png tiger.png: read 193KB

    file made histogram...9734 colors found selecting colors...2% selecting colors...4% selecting colors...17% selecting colors...29% selecting colors...31% selecting colors...44% selecting colors...57% selecting colors...70% selecting colors...82% selecting colors...95% selecting colors...100% moving colormap towards local minimum eliminated opaque tRNS-chunk entries...59 entries transparent mapped image to new colors...MSE=1.048 (Q=96) writing 256-color image as tiger-fs8.png Quantized 1 image.
25. 25.

    0 50 100 150 Full colors Reduced colors KB PNG

    File Size
26. 26.

    https://unsplash.com/photos/5bdKZLqeySU Squeezing JPEG

27. 27.

    JPEG Color Space: YCbCr Luminance Chroma

28. 28.

    Block Splitting: 8 × 8 Pixels

29. 29.

    Spatial → Frequency Domain 40 24 15 19 28 24

    19 15 38 34 35 35 31 28 27 29 40 47 49 40 33 29 32 43 42 49 50 39 34 30 32 46 40 47 46 35 31 32 35 43 38 43 42 31 27 27 28 33 39 33 25 17 14 15 19 26 29 16 6 1 -4 0 7 18 239 32 27 -12 3 -5 3 1 34 -3 -19 6 3 0 -1 1 -70 2 8 23 9 6 -1 -1 5 0 -6 11 -2 0 -1 1 -17 -3 6 6 3 -1 0 0 2 4 2 2 1 -2 0 1 -3 0 0 -1 -1 -1 0 0 1 -1 3 1 0 0 0 0 Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT)
30. 30.

    Effects of different Quality Factor Q = 60 Q =

    20 Q = 5
31. 31.

    Quantization of DCT Coefficients 92 3 -9 -7 3 -1

    0 2 -39 -58 12 17 -2 2 4 2 -84 62 1 -18 3 4 -5 5 -52 -36 -10 14 -10 4 -2 0 -86 -40 49 -7 17 -6 -2 5 -62 65 -12 -2 3 -8 -2 0 -17 14 -36 17 -11 3 3 -1 -54 32 -9 -9 22 0 1 3 90 0 -7 0 0 0 0 0 -35 -56 9 11 0 0 0 0 -84 54 0 -13 0 0 0 0 -45 -33 -0 0 0 0 0 0 -77 -39 45 0 0 0 0 0 -52 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 -15 0 -19 0 0 0 0 0 -51 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 Affected by the Q factor https://cs.stanford.edu/people/eroberts/courses/soco/projects/data-compression/lossy/jpeg/coeff.htm
32. 32.

    Reduce Quality, Lose Details github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg > cjpeg –quality 84 original.jpg

    > output.jpg 2,210 KB → 879 KB 8 megapixels Original Q=95
33. 33.

    Alternative JPEG Encoder: Guetzli > guetzli –-quality 84 original.jpg output.jpg

    github.com/google/guetzli 2,210 KB → 877 KB 8 megapixels Original Q=95
34. 34.

    Pyschovisual Similarity github.com/google/butteraugli https://medium.com/@duhroach/reducing-jpg-file-size-e5b27df3257c MozJPEG Butteraugli score: 2.3 Guetzli Butteraugli

    score: 1.9
35. 35.

    Blurring the Background Photo by Kaizen Nguyễn on https://unsplash.com/photos/jcLcWL8D7AQ 116

    KB 105 KB
36. 36.

    https://unsplash.com/photos/FCrgmqqvl-w Summary

37. 37.

    None
38. 38.

    Identify trade-offs Reduce details Encode exhaustively

39. 39.

    File size Visual quality

40. 40.

    Further Exploration

41. 41.

    Thank You shapesecurity.com Some artworks are from https://unsplash.com/ and http://openclipart.org.

    speakerdeck.com/ariya @ariyahidayat