Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Making Sure Your Forms Don't Suck
Search
Sponsored
·
Your Podcast. Everywhere. Effortlessly.
Share. Educate. Inspire. Entertain. You do you. We'll handle the rest.
→
Damian Nicholson
October 23, 2017
Technology
220
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Making Sure Your Forms Don't Suck
Damian Nicholson
October 23, 2017
More Decks by Damian Nicholson
See All by Damian Nicholson
Designing form validation the right way
damian
0
330
Chrome DevTools tips and tricks
damian
0
190
Writing testable, scalable, maintainable rock-solid JavaScript
damian
5
1.6k
Ten Things You Should Know About Jasmine
damian
2
1.1k
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
AmplifyHostingConstructからSSRフレームワークのためのホスティング設計を考察する/amplify-hosting-construct
fossamagna
1
230
実践!既存 Project への AI-Driven Development 適用〜 一ヶ月で Project 唯一のフロントエンドエンジニアを作り出せ〜
lycorptech_jp
PRO
0
230
タスクの複雑さでモデルを選ぶ ── Thompson Samplingで動かす“トークン/コスト最適化
satohy0323
0
560
しくみを学んで使いこなそう GitHub Copilot app
torumakabe
2
290
「ちゃんとやっている」は独りよがりだった ― 不安に寄り添うインシデント対応へ / Towards incident response that addresses anxieties
chmikata
1
5.9k
AI時代の闇と光
tatsuya1970
0
110
End-to-Endで考える信頼性 —LINEアプリにおけるクライアント開発×SRE連携の実践
maruloop
4
4.6k
AIが実装を自走する時代の認知負債との戦い
lycorptech_jp
PRO
0
180
Genie Ontologyは銀の弾丸かを考える / Is Genie Ontology a Silver Bullet?
nttcom
0
400
SREとQA 二人三脚で進めるSLO運用/sre-qa-slo
sugitak
0
880
Claude Code公式skillで 自分の仕事を少しずつ手放そう!(Claude Code開発ノウハウ大公開スペシャル by クラスメソッド)
kaym
1
490
Control Planeで育てるBtoB SaaSの認証基盤 - SRE NEXT 2026
pokohide
1
2.6k
Featured
See All Featured
Put a Button on it: Removing Barriers to Going Fast.
kastner
60
4.4k
技術選定の審美眼(2025年版) / Understanding the Spiral of Technologies 2025 edition
twada
PRO
118
120k
The SEO Collaboration Effect
kristinabergwall1
1
510
The agentic SEO stack - context over prompts
schlessera
0
850
The Pragmatic Product Professional
lauravandoore
37
7.4k
Digital Projects Gone Horribly Wrong (And the UX Pros Who Still Save the Day) - Dean Schuster
uxyall
1
2k
Impact Scores and Hybrid Strategies: The future of link building
tamaranovitovic
0
340
The untapped power of vector embeddings
frankvandijk
2
1.8k
Navigating Team Friction
lara
192
16k
SEO Brein meetup: CTRL+C is not how to scale international SEO
lindahogenes
1
2.8k
I Don’t Have Time: Getting Over the Fear to Launch Your Podcast
jcasabona
34
2.8k
DevOps and Value Stream Thinking: Enabling flow, efficiency and business value
helenjbeal
1
260
Transcript
MAKING SURE YOUR FORMS DON'T SUCK @damian
None
None
None
ACCURATE FASTER CONFIDENT SATISFIED https://alistapart.com/article/inline-validation-in-web-forms
https://baymard.com/blog/inline-form-validation E-Commerce sites containing client side validation 40% 60%
https://baymard.com/blog/inline-form-validation E-Commerce sites containing client side validation 12% 40% 48%
THIS LEADS ME TO BELIEVE IT'S PURELY AN IMPLEMENTATION ISSUE
None
None
None
None
WHY IS IT SO HARD TO DO RIGHT?
BUILT TO BE UNRELIABLE
BUILT TO COMPLEMENT SERVER SIDE VALIDATION
ALIGN* AND SYNCHRONISE VALIDATIONS DECLARED ON THE SERVER
RECONCILE SERVER GENERATED VALIDATIONS WITH THOSE ON THE CLIENT
onKeypress - onChange - onBlur RECONCILE ERRORS MANIFESTED ACROSS DIFFERENT
EVENT PHASES
CONDITIONAL VALIDATIONS DEPENDANT ON OTHER FIELD VALUES
ASYNCHRONOUS VALIDATION
HOW DO WE FIX IT?
JUST BEING AWARE THAT SERVER SIDE VALIDATIONS EXIST
RECONCILE ERRORS MANIFESTED ACROSS DIFFERENT EVENT PHASES onKeypress - onChange
- onBlur
onKeypress - onChange - onBlur RECONCILE ERRORS MANIFESTED ACROSS DIFFERENT
EVENT PHASES
REACT CONCEPT OF INTERNAL STATE MANAGEMENT MAKES MORE SENSE AND
IS EASIER TO MANAGE
const fieldAlias = 'userLogin'; this.setState({ [fieldAlias]: { ...this.state[fieldAlias], value: changeFn('
[email protected]
'),
touched: true, } }, () => { Promise.all(validations.map((fn) => { return fn(this.state.values, this.serverErrors(), fieldAlias, 'onChange'); })) .then(() => { this.setValid() }) .catch((errors) => { this.setInvalid(errors) }); });
REMOVE 1 to 1 MAPPING BETWEEN FIELD VALUES AND VALIDATIONS
const validationFn = (values, serverErrors = {}, fieldUpdated, eventPhase) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => { const errors = {}; if (!values.userLogin) { errors.userLogin = 'Please enter your email address'; } Object.assign(errors, serverErrors); if (Object.keys(errors).length === 0) { return resolve(errors); } return reject(errors); }); }; CONDITIONAL VALIDATIONS DEPENDANT ON OTHER FIELDS
const SignInForm = ({ ...props }) => { const {
handleChange, handleBlur, form, method, fields, ...other } = props; const { userLogin, password } = form; return ( <form method={method} action="POST" {...other}> <input type="text" data-alias="userLogin" onChange={handleChange} onBlur={handleBlur} value={userLogin.value} /> {userLogin.touched && userLogin.errors.length > 0 && <span>{userLogin.errors}</span> } ... <button>Sign in</button> </form> ); }; export default conferizeForm(SignInForm, validationFn);
Consolidated event handling - either onChange or onBlur Conditional validations
Sync and async validations declared and resolved using Promise API Composable validations Developers own their form and it's fields Synchronising server and client side validations
MAKES USERS HAPPY BUT ONLY IF DONE RIGHT
REACT MAKES THAT A LOT EASIER
THE END