you're not tired of the whole Internet looking the same (or at least 90% of open source projects) *if you do it for prototyping. *if you do it for fast bootstraping project for a client *you have a well explained documentation (more less) ...
~6700 lines of css + responsive: 320 KB and ~8200 lines of css + overrides: 362 KB and ~9200 lines of css + custom comp.: 445 KB and ~11000 lines of code + site specific: 556 KB and ~13780 lines of code
much overriding you have to do? *are you sure your devs understand Bootstrap? *we haven't styled 100screens (I won't tell you how many of them we covered ;-)
Are you sure it enforces some conventions? Do you really think you know it that good to build something on top of it? Are you sure it's easy for your devs to understand it?
Are you sure it enforces some conventions? Do you really think you know it that good to build something on top of it? Are you sure it's easy for your devs to understand it? Are you sure it's easy for your devs to understand components build on top of it?
- minimize selectors (you know how browser reads selectors?) - extend classes - 'style' separate from content - 'content' separate from container https://speakerdeck.com/anotheruiguy/module-design-ui-dev-patterns
the code bloat problems that mixins or regular @extend calls have. That makes placeholders perfect for creating non-semantic CSS modules. http://ianstormtaylor.com/oocss-plus-sass-is-the-best-way-to-css/