Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Masters Presentation

Emad7474
August 06, 2024

Masters Presentation

Emad7474

August 06, 2024
Tweet

Other Decks in Science

Transcript

  1. Imperial College London 2 Background: Why focus on photovoltaics (PV)?

    Why use earth-abundant elements? Methodology: Screening process Crystal structure prediction Results: Electronic properties of a candidate material Overview I am a solar panel made from 100% earth abundant elements!
  2. Imperial College London Limitation of current semiconductors 6 • Silicon:

    • Indirect band gap. • energy- intensive fabrication. • Gallium Arsenide: • Direct band gap. • More expensive to fabricate relative to Silicon. • Perovskite: • Direct band gap. • Contains toxic lead. • Degrades under environmental conditions. A. Polman, et al, Science 352, 307 (2016). DOI: 10.1126/science.aad4424.
  3. Imperial College London Desired PV semiconductor properties § Direct band

    gap in the range 1.1 – 1.55 eV. § Low electron and hole effective masses. § High optical absorption. § Minimise defects (less radiative recombination). § Good band alignment with charge collection contacts in the device. § Composed of low-cost earth-abundant elements. 7
  4. Imperial College London Scalable, non-toxic, earth abundant elements 9 Vesborg,

    P. et al . (2012). Addressing the terawatt challenge: scalability in the supply of chemical elements for renewable energy
  5. Imperial College London Hypothesis 10 Can we find a stable

    earth-abundant chemical composition, so that its ground state crystal structure exhibits ideal solar cell properties? Steps: § Find all the chemically sensible compositions. § Thorough screening process to identify candidate compositions. § Predict the ground state crystal structure. § Determine the electronic properties to validate their suitability as PV semiconductors.
  6. Imperial College London Finding neutral compositions § We have chosen

    12 elements: Si, O, Mg, Al, K, Na, F, S, Cl, P, Ca, Ti. 𝑆𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑐ℎ 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑒 = 𝑛! 𝑘! 𝑛! − 𝑘! (𝑟!) 11 § All compositions must be neutral:
  7. Imperial College London Finding neutral compositions § We have chosen

    12 elements: Si, O, Mg, Al, K, Na, F, S, Cl, P, Ca, Ti. 𝑆𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑐ℎ 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑒 = 𝑛! 𝑘! 𝑛! − 𝑘! (𝑟!) 12 140,800 Initial size of the combinatorial search space
  8. Imperial College London Finding neutral compositions 13 140,800 § All

    compositions must be neutral: 𝐴" 𝐵# 𝐶$ : 𝑥 𝑞% + 𝑦 𝑞& + 𝑧(𝑞' ) = 0 § Electronegativity must follow: 𝜒()*+,- > 𝜒-./)*+0. § Apply these constraints using SMACT. § Specific cations exhibit specific oxidation states in the presence of specific anions. SMACT filtered search space 13,633
  9. Imperial College London Finding unique compositions § We use the

    Materials Project dataset to filter out known compositions. 14 § We use the Materials Project dataset to filter out known compositions. 140,800 SMACT filtered search space 13,633
  10. Imperial College London Finding unique compositions § We use the

    Materials Project dataset to filter out known compositions. 15 § We use the Materials Project dataset to filter out known compositions. § Earth Mover’s Distance to measure chemical similarity 140,800 13,633 13,095 Compositions unrecorded in MP database
  11. Imperial College London Finding unique compositions § Earth Mover’s Distance

    to measure chemical similarity 16 140,800 13,633 13,095 Compositions unrecorded in MP database Hargreaves, C.J.,(2020). Chemistry of Materials, 32(24), pp.10610–10620.
  12. Imperial College London Compositional search space 18 140,800 13,633 13,095

    Compositions ranked with probability and distance 1496
  13. Imperial College London Property prediction 19 140,800 13,633 13,095 Compositions

    ranked with probability and distance 1496 § Crabnet uses a self-attention- based transformer to calculate composition properties.
  14. Imperial College London Property prediction 20 140,800 13,633 13,095 Compositions

    with ideal predicted band gap 1496 § We use Crabnet to predict band gap without crystal structure. 765
  15. Imperial College London Property prediction 21 140,800 13,633 13,095 Stable

    Compositions 1496 § We also predict thermodynamic stability 765 81
  16. Imperial College London Finding the crystal structure 25 Pickard, C.

    J, “Ephemeral data derived potentials for random structure search.” PRB (2022).
  17. Imperial College London Ab Initio Random Structure Searching (AIRSS) 26

    Noble, E. (2021). Ab initio random structure searching empowers cathode material discovery for batteries. [online] FutureCat. Available at: https://futurecat.ac.uk/abinitiorandomstructuresearch/ [Accessed 30 May 2024]. P4 Cl2 O K4 P2 S3 K4 SiS4 P3 Cl2 F Na3 TiP3 S4
  18. Imperial College London Summary of AIRSS results 27 Composition Number

    of relaxations P4 Cl2 O 955 K4 P2 S3 556 K4 SiS4 833 P3 Cl2 F 1585 Na3 TiP3 S4 1082
  19. Imperial College London Summary § Screened over 140,000 compositions implementing

    simple chemical theory, machine learning and statistical analysis. § Identified crystal structure for our candidate compositions. § Validated electronic properties through DFT. § The chosen compositions were not suitable for photovoltaic cells. 30
  20. Imperial College London Future work Must incorporate further validation steps:

    § Calculate thermodynamic stability using DFT. § Calculate electronic properties using DFT with a hybrid exchange-correlation functional. § Calculate phonon dispersion for dynamic stability. § Explore defect properties to understand recombination. § Calculating spectroscopic limited maximum efficiency. 31
  21. Imperial College London Acknowledgements § Dr Alex Ganose § The

    Virtual Atoms group including Ruiqi Wu, Leo Lou, Shirui Wang § Imperial HPC. 32