Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Interpretable Representations for Affect and Se...

Interpretable Representations for Affect and Semantics

While NLP has advanced considerably in recent years, state-of-the-art models can no longer easily be inspected and understood directly. This talk presents a series of interpretable approaches for affect and semantics-related settings.

The first part of the talk will present interpretable vectors custom-tailored for emotions and their connections to words, fonts, and colors. Subsequently, I will discuss NLP approaches for emojis and their connection to emotion. The final part of the talk will consider structured representations to better model the structure of a sentence or other kinds of knowledge that may be useful in downstream applications.

Gerard de Melo

July 01, 2021
Tweet

More Decks by Gerard de Melo

Other Decks in Technology

Transcript

  1. Interpretable Representations for Affect and Semantics Gerard de Melo http://gerard.demelo.org

    Interpretable Representations for Affect and Semantics Gerard de Melo http://gerard.demelo.org
  2. Probably Incorrect! Prediction Prediction Classifier Model Model Examples Learning Learning

    Negative Positive Machine Learning Machine Learning Image: Method Matters Blog
  3. Machine Learning Nowadays Machine Learning Nowadays Probably Positive! Classifier Model

    Model Examples Negative Positive Prediction Prediction Learning Learning Deep neural network Deep neural network
  4. AI as a Black Box AI as a Black Box

    Probably Positive! Prediction Prediction Classifier Model Model Labelled Examples Learning Learning Negative Positive
  5. Why Explainable AI (XAI)? Why Explainable AI (XAI)? Why Explainable

    AI (XAI)? Why Explainable AI (XAI)? https://www.idealrole.com/blog/cv-bias
  6. Modern AI Modern AI Probably Positive! Classifier Model Model Examples

    Negative Positive Prediction Prediction Learning Learning Deep neural network Deep neural network
  7. Modern AI Modern AI Probably Positive! Classifier Model Model Examples

    Negative Positive Prediction Prediction Learning Learning Deep neural network Deep neural network
  8. 0.00 0.23 0.03 0.31 0.01 0.03 0.91 ... 0.31 0.50

    Embeddings Embeddings 0.01 0.23 0.01 0.29 0.00 0.03 0.92 ... 0.30 0.51 “dry” “arid” ≈ x x x x amazing awesome unbearable horrible x terrible xstupendous Vector space in which similar words have similar vectors Vector space in which similar words have similar vectors
  9. Question Question Question Question Image: https://www.synthesio.com/blog/social-sentiment-and-your-business/ Can we have vector

    representations that are interpretable and provide detailed information about the sentiment/emotion of a word? Can we have vector representations that are interpretable and provide detailed information about the sentiment/emotion of a word? 0.00 0.23 0.03 0.31 0.01 0.03 0.91 ... 0.31 0.50 0.01 0.23 0.01 0.29 0.00 0.03 0.92 ... 0.30 0.51 “stupendous” “amazing” ≈ ??
  10. Multi-Dimensional Multi-Dimensional Sentiment Embeddings Sentiment Embeddings Multi-Dimensional Multi-Dimensional Sentiment Embeddings

    Sentiment Embeddings Xin Dong, Gerard de Melo. Cross-Lingual Propagation for Deep Sentiment Analysis. AAAI 2018 Music Laptops Image: http://www.thewilliamnyc.com/william-gallery/ 0.97 -0.30 ... 0.90 0.94 ... “hot” “amazing”
  11. Method: Data-Driven Method: Data-Driven Sentiment Embeddings Sentiment Embeddings Method: Data-Driven

    Method: Data-Driven Sentiment Embeddings Sentiment Embeddings Transfer Learning using Supervised Linear Models Train n linear models Xin Dong, Gerard de Melo. Cross-Lingual Propagation for Deep Sentiment Analysis. AAAI 2018
  12. Method: Data-Driven Method: Data-Driven Sentiment Embeddings Sentiment Embeddings Method: Data-Driven

    Method: Data-Driven Sentiment Embeddings Sentiment Embeddings Transfer Learning using Supervised Linear Models Train n linear models Xin Dong, Gerard de Melo. Cross-Lingual Propagation for Deep Sentiment Analysis. AAAI 2018 f Feature Value “horrible” 1 “great” 2 “inside” 1 “cat” 3 ... ...
  13. Method: Data-Driven Method: Data-Driven Sentiment Embeddings Sentiment Embeddings Method: Data-Driven

    Method: Data-Driven Sentiment Embeddings Sentiment Embeddings Transfer Learning using Supervised Linear Models Train n linear models Xin Dong, Gerard de Melo. Cross-Lingual Propagation for Deep Sentiment Analysis. AAAI 2018 f Feature Value Weight “horrible” 1 -5.2 “great” 2 4.4 “inside” 1 -0.1 “cat” 3 1.2 ... ... ...
  14. Method: Data-Driven Method: Data-Driven Sentiment Embeddings Sentiment Embeddings Method: Data-Driven

    Method: Data-Driven Sentiment Embeddings Sentiment Embeddings Xin Dong, Gerard de Melo. Cross-Lingual Propagation for Deep Sentiment Analysis. AAAI 2018 Train n linear models Used 25 different domains from Amazon Books, Electronics, Movies, Kitchen, etc. Used 25 different domains from Amazon Books, Electronics, Movies, Kitchen, etc.
  15. Method: Data-Driven Method: Data-Driven Sentiment Embeddings Sentiment Embeddings Method: Data-Driven

    Method: Data-Driven Sentiment Embeddings Sentiment Embeddings Xin Dong, Gerard de Melo. Cross-Lingual Propagation for Deep Sentiment Analysis. AAAI 2018 0.0 0.8 0.2 ... –0.8 0.1 hot Train n linear models For each word, turn its linear coefficients across different n models into a single vector ...
  16. Emotion Analysis Emotion Analysis Emotion Analysis Emotion Analysis “What the

    hell is going on?! I've been waiting for 2 weeks now!!” “What the hell is going on?! I've been waiting for 2 weeks now!!”
  17. Emotion Models Emotion Models Emotion Models Emotion Models Image: Paul

    Ekman Ekman's 6 Basic Emotion Ekman's 6 Basic Emotion
  18. Even More Emotions Even More Emotions Even More Emotions Even

    More Emotions Cowen & Keltner (2017) Are 8 basic emotions really sufficient? Are 8 basic emotions really sufficient?
  19. AffectVec AffectVec AffectVec AffectVec https://www.flickr.com/photos/ill-padrino/6437837857/ joy sadness anger guilt suspense

    0.5 0.1 0.4 ... 0.3 0.1 prank Shahab Raji, Gerard de Melo. What Sparks Joy: The AffectVec Emotion Database Matej Kren: Idiom. Prague Municipal Library Prank Image: CollegeHumor
  20. AffectVec AffectVec AffectVec AffectVec Download: http://emotionlexicon.org/ Download: http://emotionlexicon.org/ Shahab Raji,

    Gerard de Melo. What Sparks Joy: The AffectVec Emotion Database Also: Experiments on Unsupervised Document-Level Emotion Prediction
  21. Cross-Lingual Cross-Lingual Emotion Lexicon Induction Emotion Lexicon Induction Cross-Lingual Cross-Lingual

    Emotion Lexicon Induction Emotion Lexicon Induction Over 300 languages http://emotionlexicon.org/ Over 300 languages http://emotionlexicon.org/ Arun Ramachandran, Gerard de Melo. COLING 2020
  22. Application: Application: Fonts Fonts Application: Application: Fonts Fonts Tugba Kulahcioglu,

    Gerard de Melo. Predicting Semantic Signatures of Fonts Van Rompay and Pruyn (2011) Choice of font affects assumed brand credibility price expectations Choice of font affects assumed brand credibility price expectations
  23. Application: Application: Fonts Fonts Application: Application: Fonts Fonts Tugba Kulahcioglu,

    Gerard de Melo. Predicting Semantic Signatures of Fonts de Sousa et al. (2020). Journal of Sensory Studies Choice of font affects intent to purchase and assumed acidity, sweetness Choice of font affects intent to purchase and assumed acidity, sweetness
  24. Application: Application: Fonts Fonts Application: Application: Fonts Fonts Tugba Kulahcioglu,

    Gerard de Melo. Predicting Semantic Signatures of Fonts Shaikh (2007) O’Brien Louch & Stork (2014) Choice of font affects assumed attributes of people using them Choice of font affects assumed attributes of people using them
  25. Font Selection Font Selection Font Selection Font Selection Tugba Kulahcioglu,

    Gerard de Melo. Predicting Semantic Signatures of Fonts
  26. Learning Representations of Fonts Learning Representations of Fonts Learning Representations

    of Fonts Learning Representations of Fonts Tugba Kulahcioglu, Gerard de Melo. Predicting Semantic Signatures of Fonts
  27. Learning Representations of Fonts Learning Representations of Fonts Learning Representations

    of Fonts Learning Representations of Fonts Tugba Kulahcioglu, Gerard de Melo. Predicting Semantic Signatures of Fonts
  28. Learning Representations of Fonts Learning Representations of Fonts Learning Representations

    of Fonts Learning Representations of Fonts Tugba Kulahcioglu, Gerard de Melo. Predicting Semantic Signatures of Fonts fontjoy.com
  29. Learning Representations of Fonts Learning Representations of Fonts Learning Representations

    of Fonts Learning Representations of Fonts http://fontjoy.com/projector/ Visual Representation Space Visual Representation Space
  30. Learning Representations of Fonts Learning Representations of Fonts Learning Representations

    of Fonts Learning Representations of Fonts Tugba Kulahcioglu, Gerard de Melo. Predicting Semantic Signatures of Fonts fontjoy.com Infer Attribute-Based Representations Infer Attribute-Based Representations
  31. Learning Representations of Fonts Learning Representations of Fonts Learning Representations

    of Fonts Learning Representations of Fonts Tugba Kulahcioglu, Gerard de Melo. Predicting Semantic Signatures of Fonts
  32. FontLex FontLex FontLex FontLex Tugba Kulahcioglu, Gerard de Melo. FontLex:

    A Typographical Lexicon based on Affective Associations Infer font–emotion mapping using seed data + word2vec Infer font–emotion mapping using seed data + word2vec
  33. FontLex FontLex FontLex FontLex via Sentiment/Emotions associations of words Tugba

    Kulahcioglu, Gerard de Melo. FontLex: A Typographical Lexicon based on Affective Associations
  34. FontLex: FontLex: Complex Emotions Complex Emotions FontLex: FontLex: Complex Emotions

    Complex Emotions Tugba Kulahcioglu, Gerard de Melo. Semantics-Aware Typographical Choices via Affective Associations Extension by using more fonts for FontLex data
  35. Emotions vs. Emotions vs. Font and Color Font and Color

    Emotions vs. Emotions vs. Font and Color Font and Color Tugba Kulahcioglu, Gerard de Melo. Paralinguistic Recommendations for Affective Word Clouds. Proc. IUI Fonts: best for serious, trustworthy, disturbing Color palettes: best for calm, negative, playful
  36. Emotions vs. Emotions vs. Font and Color Font and Color

    Emotions vs. Emotions vs. Font and Color Font and Color Tugba Kulahcioglu, Gerard de Melo. Paralinguistic Recommendations for Affective Word Clouds. Proc. IUI United Nations
  37. Emotions vs. Emotions vs. Font and Color Font and Color

    Emotions vs. Emotions vs. Font and Color Font and Color Tugba Kulahcioglu, Gerard de Melo. FontLex: A Typographical Lexicon based on Affective Associations / Tugba Kulahcioglu, Gerard de Melo. Paralinguistic Recommendations for Affective Word Clouds. Proc. IUI The Smurfs Scream
  38. Emojis are ubiquitous Emojis are ubiquitous Emojis are ubiquitous Emojis

    are ubiquitous Image: https://www.theverge.com/2016/2/24/11105250/facebook-reactions-emoji-how-to Very prominent on social media, instant messaging email subject lines etc. Very prominent on social media, instant messaging email subject lines etc. Face with Tears of Joy: Oxford Dictionaries Word of the Year 2015 Face with Tears of Joy: Oxford Dictionaries Word of the Year 2015
  39. Emojis vs. Emotions Emojis vs. Emotions Emojis vs. Emotions Emojis

    vs. Emotions Abu Awal Md Shoeb, Shahab Raji, Gerard de Melo. EmoTag – Towards an Emotion-Based Analysis of Emojis. Proc. RANLP Same parts of brain activated as when seeing a real face Same parts of brain activated as when seeing a real face “Emoji” is Japanese for “picture character” but clearly closely linked to emotions Image: from Petra Kralj Novak. Sentiment of Emojis
  40. Emoji-Based Emoji-Based Word Embeddings Word Embeddings Emoji-Based Emoji-Based Word Embeddings

    Word Embeddings Image: https://www.theverge.com/2016/2/24/11105250/facebook-reactions-emoji-how-to 0.8 0.4 0.0 ... 0.0 0.1 prank Abu Awal Md Shoeb, Shahab Raji, Gerard de Melo. EmoTag – Towards an Emotion-Based Analysis of Emojis. Proc. RANLP
  41. Use Case: Deep Neural Network for Use Case: Deep Neural

    Network for Tweet Emotion Classification Tweet Emotion Classification Use Case: Deep Neural Network for Use Case: Deep Neural Network for Tweet Emotion Classification Tweet Emotion Classification Abu Awal Md Shoeb, Shahab Raji, Gerard de Melo. EmoTag – Towards an Emotion-Based Analysis of Emojis. Proc. RANLP Methods Anger Fear Joy Sadness Average Dim Interpretable Affective Tweets 0.65 0.66 0.60 0.69 0.65 n/a EmoTag 0.70 0.73 0.69 0.75 0.72 620 Non-Interpretable Random Int. 0.68 0.72 0.66 0.73 0.70 300 word2vec 0.70 0.72 0.67 0.75 0.71 300 GloVe 0.70 0.73 0.68 0.76 0.72 300 GloVe Twitter 0.72 0.74 0.68 0.76 0.73 200
  42. Use Case: Emoji Sentiment Use Case: Emoji Sentiment Use Case:

    Emoji Sentiment Use Case: Emoji Sentiment Abu Awal Md Shoeb, Shahab Raji, Gerard de Melo. EmoTag – Towards an Emotion-Based Analysis of Emojis. Proc. RANLP
  43. Dataset and Study: Dataset and Study: Emoji Emotions Emoji Emotions

    Dataset and Study: Dataset and Study: Emoji Emotions Emoji Emotions Abu Shoeb, Gerard de Melo. EmoTag1200 : Understanding the Association between Emojis and Emotions . EMNLP 👍 😄 😻 Abu Shoeb, Shahab Raji, Gerard de Melo. EmoTag – Towards an Emotion-Based Analysis of Emojis. Proc. RANLP Online: emoji.nlproc.org Online: emoji.nlproc.org
  44. Dataset and Study: Dataset and Study: Emoji Emotions Emoji Emotions

    Dataset and Study: Dataset and Study: Emoji Emotions Emoji Emotions Abu Shoeb, Gerard de Melo. EmoTag1200 : Understanding the Association between Emojis and Emotions . EMNLP 👍 😄 😻 Abu Shoeb, Shahab Raji, Gerard de Melo. EmoTag – Towards an Emotion-Based Analysis of Emojis. Proc. RANLP
  45. Emojis in NLP: Emojis in NLP: Sentiment Analysis Sentiment Analysis

    Emojis in NLP: Emojis in NLP: Sentiment Analysis Sentiment Analysis Abu Shoeb, Gerard de Melo. Assessing Emoji Use in Modern Text Processing Tools . ACL-IJCNLP 2021
  46. Emojis in NLP: Emojis in NLP: Tokenization Tokenization Emojis in

    NLP: Emojis in NLP: Tokenization Tokenization Abu Shoeb, Gerard de Melo. Assessing Emoji Use in Modern Text Processing Tools . ACL-IJCNLP 2021
  47. Complex Emojis Complex Emojis Complex Emojis Complex Emojis Abu Shoeb,

    Gerard de Melo. Assessing Emoji Use in Modern Text Processing Tools . ACL-IJCNLP 2021
  48. Emojis in NLP: Emojis in NLP: POS Tagging POS Tagging

    Emojis in NLP: Emojis in NLP: POS Tagging POS Tagging Abu Shoeb, Gerard de Melo. Assessing Emoji Use in Modern Text Processing Tools . ACL-IJCNLP 2021
  49. Emojis in NLP: Emojis in NLP: Dependency Parsing Dependency Parsing

    Emojis in NLP: Emojis in NLP: Dependency Parsing Dependency Parsing Abu Shoeb, Gerard de Melo. Assessing Emoji Use in Modern Text Processing Tools . ACL-IJCNLP 2021
  50. What are they capturing? What are they capturing? What are

    they capturing? What are they capturing? Image: Adapted from http://www.cse.unt.edu/people/StudentNewsletters/2013_Apr_StudentEmailNewsletter.html you can't cram the meaning of a whole ***ing sentence into a single ***ing vector
  51. Evaluation via Evaluation via Probing Probing Evaluation via Evaluation via

    Probing Probing Also: Adi et al. ICLR 2016 These test whether enough information is kept to learn something from 100,000 training examples. These test whether enough information is kept to learn something from 100,000 training examples.
  52. Our Approach: Our Approach: Inspect Proximity Structure Inspect Proximity Structure

    Our Approach: Our Approach: Inspect Proximity Structure Inspect Proximity Structure A person is slicing an onion. A person is cutting an onion. A person is not slicing an onion. S0 S= S* sim(S0,S=) sim(S0,S=) Zhu, Li, de Melo. Exploring Semantic Properties of Sentence Embeddings. Proc. ACL 2018
  53. Our Approach: Our Approach: Inspect Proximity Structure Inspect Proximity Structure

    Our Approach: Our Approach: Inspect Proximity Structure Inspect Proximity Structure A person is slicing an onion. A person is cutting an onion. A person is not slicing an onion. S0 S= S* sim(S0,S=) sim(S0,S=) sim(S0,S*) sim(S0,S*) sim(S0,S=) > sim(S0,S*) ?
  54. Negation Detection Negation Detection Negation Detection Negation Detection A person

    is slicing an onion. A person is cutting an onion. A person is not slicing an onion. S0 S= S* Zhu, Li, de Melo. Exploring Semantic Properties of Sentence Embeddings. Proc. ACL 2018
  55. Negation Variant Negation Variant Negation Variant Negation Variant A man

    is not standing on his head under water. There is no man standing on his head under water. A man is standing on his head under water. S0 S= S* (Negation) (Negated Existential) Zhu, Li, de Melo. Exploring Semantic Properties of Sentence Embeddings. Proc. ACL 2018
  56. Clause Relatedness Clause Relatedness Clause Relatedness Clause Relatedness Octel said

    the purchase was expected. The purchase was expected. Octel said the purchase was not expected. S0 S= S* Clause Extraction (for suitable head verbs only) Zhu, Li, de Melo. Exploring Semantic Properties of Sentence Embeddings. Proc. ACL 2018
  57. Argument Sensitivity Argument Sensitivity Argument Sensitivity Argument Sensitivity Francesca teaches

    Adam to adjust the microphone on his stage. Adam is taught to adjust the microphone on his stage. Adam teaches Francesca to adjust the microphone on his stage. S0 S= S* (Passive) (Argument Inversion) Zhu, Li, de Melo. Exploring Semantic Properties of Sentence Embeddings. Proc. ACL 2018
  58. Argument Sensitivity Argument Sensitivity Argument Sensitivity Argument Sensitivity Zhu, Li,

    de Melo. Exploring Semantic Properties of Sentence Embeddings. Proc. ACL 2018 Who-did-what- to-whom not reflected in topology Who-did-what- to-whom not reflected in topology
  59. R2D2: R2D2: Differentiable Tree Language Model Differentiable Tree Language Model

    R2D2: R2D2: Differentiable Tree Language Model Differentiable Tree Language Model Hu et al. R2D2: Recursive Transformer based on Differentiable Tree for Interpretable Hierarchical Language Modeling
  60. R2D2: R2D2: Differentiable Tree Language Model Differentiable Tree Language Model

    R2D2: R2D2: Differentiable Tree Language Model Differentiable Tree Language Model Hu et al. R2D2: Recursive Transformer based on Differentiable Tree for Interpretable Hierarchical Language Modeling black cat black cat the black the black cat the Which composition makes more sense? Which composition makes more sense?
  61. R2D2: R2D2: Differentiable Tree Language Model Differentiable Tree Language Model

    R2D2: R2D2: Differentiable Tree Language Model Differentiable Tree Language Model Hu et al. R2D2: Recursive Transformer based on Differentiable Tree for Interpretable Hierarchical Language Modeling the black cat black cat jumped away the black cat jumped the black the black cat jumped away black cat jumped cat jumped away black cat cat jumped jumped away the black cat jumped away black cat black cat the black the black cat the
  62. R2D2: R2D2: Differentiable Tree Language Model Differentiable Tree Language Model

    R2D2: R2D2: Differentiable Tree Language Model Differentiable Tree Language Model Hu et al. R2D2: Recursive Transformer based on Differentiable Tree for Interpretable Hierarchical Language Modeling the black cat black cat jumped away the black cat jumped the black the black cat jumped away black cat jumped cat jumped away black cat cat jumped jumped away the black cat jumped away black cat black cat the black the black cat the
  63. R2D2: R2D2: Differentiable Tree Language Model Differentiable Tree Language Model

    R2D2: R2D2: Differentiable Tree Language Model Differentiable Tree Language Model Hu et al. R2D2: Recursive Transformer based on Differentiable Tree for Interpretable Hierarchical Language Modeling the black cat black cat jumped away the black cat jumped the black the black cat jumped away black cat jumped cat jumped away black cat cat jumped jumped away the black cat jumped away
  64. R2D2: R2D2: Differentiable Tree Language Model Differentiable Tree Language Model

    R2D2: R2D2: Differentiable Tree Language Model Differentiable Tree Language Model Hu et al. R2D2: Recursive Transformer based on Differentiable Tree for Interpretable Hierarchical Language Modeling the black cat black cat jumped away the black cat jumped the black the black cat jumped away black cat jumped cat jumped away black cat cat jumped jumped away the black cat jumped away
  65. R2D2: R2D2: Differentiable Tree Language Model Differentiable Tree Language Model

    R2D2: R2D2: Differentiable Tree Language Model Differentiable Tree Language Model Hu et al. R2D2: Recursive Transformer based on Differentiable Tree for Interpretable Hierarchical Language Modeling the black cat black cat jumped away the black cat jumped the black the black cat jumped away black cat jumped cat jumped away black cat cat jumped jumped away the black cat jumped away
  66. R2D2: R2D2: Differentiable Tree Language Model Differentiable Tree Language Model

    R2D2: R2D2: Differentiable Tree Language Model Differentiable Tree Language Model Hu et al. R2D2: Recursive Transformer based on Differentiable Tree for Interpretable Hierarchical Language Modeling the black cat black cat jumped away the black cat jumped the black the black cat jumped away black cat jumped cat jumped away black cat cat jumped jumped away the black cat jumped away
  67. R2D2: R2D2: Differentiable Tree Language Model Differentiable Tree Language Model

    R2D2: R2D2: Differentiable Tree Language Model Differentiable Tree Language Model Hu et al. R2D2: Recursive Transformer based on Differentiable Tree for Interpretable Hierarchical Language Modeling Local Probability Compositional Embedding For each split point k of T1,3
  68. R2D2: R2D2: Differentiable Tree Language Model Differentiable Tree Language Model

    R2D2: R2D2: Differentiable Tree Language Model Differentiable Tree Language Model Hu et al. R2D2: Recursive Transformer based on Differentiable Tree for Interpretable Hierarchical Language Modeling Local Probability Compositional Embedding For each split point k of T1,3 Weighted sum over all split points
  69. R2D2: R2D2: Differentiable Tree Language Model Differentiable Tree Language Model

    R2D2: R2D2: Differentiable Tree Language Model Differentiable Tree Language Model Hu et al. R2D2: Recursive Transformer based on Differentiable Tree for Interpretable Hierarchical Language Modeling Unsupervised Language Model Pre-Training Unsupervised Language Model Pre-Training
  70. R2D2: R2D2: Differentiable Tree Language Model Differentiable Tree Language Model

    R2D2: R2D2: Differentiable Tree Language Model Differentiable Tree Language Model Hu et al. R2D2: Recursive Transformer based on Differentiable Tree for Interpretable Hierarchical Language Modeling
  71. Universal Wordnet Universal Wordnet Universal Wordnet Universal Wordnet cmn: “

    ” 机构 http://lexvo.org/uwn/ Gerard de Melo. Towards a Universal Wordnet by Learning from Combined Evidence.
  72. Explainable Inference in Graphs Explainable Inference in Graphs Fu et

    al. Fairness-Aware Explainable Recommendation over Knowledge Graphs. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 2020. http://gerard.demelo.org/publications.html
  73. Explainable Inference in Graphs Explainable Inference in Graphs Fu et

    al. Fairness-Aware Explainable Recommendation over Knowledge Graphs. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 2020. http://gerard.demelo.org/publications.html
  74. Explainable Inference in Graphs Explainable Inference in Graphs Fu et

    al. Fairness-Aware Explainable Recommendation over Knowledge Graphs. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 2020. http://gerard.demelo.org/publications.html In reality, there are many possible paths. Which to choose? In reality, there are many possible paths. Which to choose?
  75. Explainable Inference in Graphs Explainable Inference in Graphs Fu et

    al. Fairness-Aware Explainable Recommendation over Knowledge Graphs. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 2020. http://gerard.demelo.org/publications.html Reward if you guessed correctly! Reward if you guessed correctly!
  76. Explainable Inference in Graphs Explainable Inference in Graphs Xian et

    al. Reinforcement Knowledge Graph Reasoning for Explainable Recommendation. SIGIR 2019
  77. x x 감사합니다 gracias xthank you Summary Summary Summary Summary

    Vectors for Sentiment and Emotion ►Interpretable Vectors ►Font Affect Embeddings Emojis ►Interpretable Vectors ►NLP Analysis Trees for Sentences ►Analysis ►R2D2 Differentiable Tree Model Graphs for Knowledge ►Reinforcement Learning over Knowledge Graphs for Explainable AI Get in Touch! http://gerard.demelo.org [email protected] Get in Touch! http://gerard.demelo.org [email protected] x 谢谢 x Vielen Dank спаси́бо x x obrigado