VII Colloquium on Computational Simulations in Sciences

Transcript

1. Strategies to boost electrical conductivity in porous materials: a computational perspective computational-experimental VII Colloquium on Computational Simulation in Sciences
2. Zn(II) ⇒ d0 benzene MOF-5 Physical and chemical processes: Gas adsorption & separation, catalysis Electro-inactive porous materials
3. Electroactivation Sensors Photocatalysis Electrocatalysis Batteries Supercapacitors
4. Electroactivation Sensors Photocatalysis Electrocatalysis Batteries Supercapacitors
5. Charge transport e.g. π-π stacking conducting pathways
6. Charge transport polaron e.g. π-π stacking conducting pathways
7. Computational materials design in a nutshell Methodologies Density Functional Theory High-correlated methods Semiempirical methods Molecular Mechanics Big-data Science Properties Geometry Electronic structure REDOX and magnetism Excited states Charge and energy transport
8. Tetrathiafulvalene (TTF) Electron donor molecule Facile oxidation π−π interactions 166º
9. Tetrathiafulvalene (TTF) Electron donor molecule Facile oxidation π−π interactions Charge Transport Model Molecular Electronics Supramolecular Chemistry 166º
10. Hydrogen-bonded Organic Frameworks H4 TTFTB MUV-20a MUV-20b MUV-21 σ = 6.07 × 10–7 S cm–1 σ = 1.35 × 10–6 S cm–1 σ = 6.23 × 10–9 S cm–1 Guillermo Mínguez (UV) María Vicent (UV)
11. Hydrogen-bonded Organic Frameworks H4 TTFTB MUV-20a MUV-20b MUV-21 σ = 6.07 × 10–7 S cm–1 σ = 1.35 × 10–6 S cm–1 σ = 6.23 × 10–9 S cm–1 PBEsol // HSE06 | FO-DFT
12. Hydrogen-bonded Organic Frameworks EPR MUV-20a MUV-21 MUV-20b The TTF has an unpaired e― HOFs are charge neutral There is no countercation non-radical
13. Hydrogen-bonded Organic Frameworks EPR MUV-20a MUV-21 MUV-20b The TTF has an unpaired e― HOFs are charge neutral There is no countercation non-radical + ‒
14. Hydrogen-bonded Organic Frameworks vacuum dielectric continuum SPIN DENSITY EPR MUV-20a MUV-21 MUV-20b The TTF has an unpaired e― HOFs are charge neutral There is no countercation non-radical + ‒
15. Hydrogen-bonded Organic Frameworks vacuum dielectric continuum SPIN DENSITY EPR MUV-20a MUV-21 MUV-20b The TTF has an unpaired e― HOFs are charge neutral There is no countercation SPIN DENSITY accumulated charge non-radical + ‒
16. Hydrogen-bonded Organic Frameworks vacuum dielectric continuum SPIN DENSITY EPR MUV-20a MUV-21 MUV-20b The TTF has an unpaired e― HOFs are charge neutral There is no countercation SPIN DENSITY accumulated charge non-radical + ‒
17. Hydrogen-bonded Organic Frameworks benzene naphthalene porosity electronic properties
18. Hydrogen-bonded Organic Frameworks benzene naphthalene porosity electronic properties
19. Perylene-based MOFs Perylene
20. Perylene-based MOFs Manel Souto (UA) Gonçalo Valente (UA) Perylene K+ PTC 8.6 Å Per-MOF Mol. Syst. Des. Eng., 2022,7, 1065-1072 σ = 10‒8 S·cm‒1
21. Perylene-based MOFs Manel Souto (UA) Gonçalo Valente (UA) σ = 10‒8 S·cm‒1 Iodine doping Perylene K+ PTC 8.6 Å Per-MOF Mol. Syst. Des. Eng., 2022,7, 1065-1072 Distances in Å I2 "I3 "
22. Per-MOF: ̅ 𝑱𝑱 = 11.78 meV [Per-MOF@I2 ]: ̅ 𝑱𝑱 = 11.16 meV [Per-MOF@I3 ]: ̅ 𝑱𝑱 = 8.56 meV Perylene-based MOFs
23. Per-MOF: ̅ 𝑱𝑱 = 11.78 meV [Per-MOF@I2 ]: ̅ 𝑱𝑱 = 11.16 meV [Per-MOF@I3 ]: ̅ 𝑱𝑱 = 8.56 meV Perylene-based MOFs
24. Per-MOF: ̅ 𝑱𝑱 = 11.78 meV [Per-MOF@I2 ]: ̅ 𝑱𝑱 = 11.16 meV [Per-MOF@I3 ]: ̅ 𝑱𝑱 = 8.56 meV I3 Spin density Perylene-based MOFs TD-HSE06/def2-SVP ─
25. Per-MOF: ̅ 𝑱𝑱 = 11.78 meV [Per-MOF@I2 ]: ̅ 𝑱𝑱 = 11.16 meV [Per-MOF@I3 ]: ̅ 𝑱𝑱 = 8.56 meV Spin density Perylene-based MOFs Per-MOF: σ = 10‒8 S·cm‒1 I2 -doped Per-MOF: σ = 10‒5 S·cm‒1 TD-HSE06/def2-SVP I3 ─
26. Perylene-based MOFs σRT ~10-10 S/cm (pressed pellets) PerMOF: σRT ~10-8 S/cm (two-contact single-crystal)
27. Perylene-based MOFs σRT ~10-10 S/cm (pressed pellets) PerMOF: σRT ~10-8 S/cm (two-contact single-crystal) < 1m0 No relevant porosity
28. Perylene-based MOFs No relevant porosity Absorption and emission properties
29. Perylene-based MOFs ‒30 meV +70 meV +60 meV 559 nm 673 nm 663 nm excitonic coupling TD-DFT/PBE0/6-31G(d,p) Lowest-lying singlet excited state
30. Iron-based MOFs Chem. Sci., 2017, 8, 4450–4457 Mixed-valency Fe(II)/Fe(III)
31. Iron-based MOFs Chem. Sci., 2017, 8, 4450–4457 Mixed-valency Fe(II)/Fe(III) Fe2 (BDT)3 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 7411–7414 Fe(II) σ = 10–4 – 1.8 S/cm
32. N N N NH N N N HN H2 BDT Iron-based MOFs BDT2– Fe(II) Fe2 (H0.67 BDT)3 (II) (2–) P2 P3 P1
33. Fe2 (BDT)3 Protonated Deprotonated (Cmmm) P1 Bandgap: ca. 2 eV
34. Fe2 (BDT)3 Protonated Deprotonated m* = 1.45 0.49 Bandgap: ca. 2 eV 2.52 (Cmmm) P1
35. Fe2 (BDT)3 Protonated 1.45 80.31 Γ to Z direction VBM T to Z direction CBM hole transport electron transport Deprotonated (Cmmm) P1
36. Fe2 (BDT)3 Protonated 1.45 80.31 Γ to Z direction VBM T to Z direction CBM hole transport electron transport Deprotonated Charge transport pathways (Cmmm) P1
37. Fe2 (BDT)3 Deprotonated (Fddd) 1.44 0.75 all flat Bandgap: ca. 3.1 eV P2
38. Fe2 (BDT)3 1.45 80.31 Γ to Z direction VBM CBM hole transport electron transport Deprotonated (Fddd) P2 Partially protonated directions
39. Fe2 (BDT)3 1.45 80.31 Γ to Z direction VBM CBM hole transport electron transport Deprotonated Partially protonated directions Charge transport pathways (Fddd) P2
40. Fe2 (BDT)3 (R-3m) Random distribution of protonated ligands 2.46 2.43 2.96 2.46 all flat Bandgap: ca. 2.2 eV P3
41. Fe2 (BDT)3 1.45 80.31 VBM CBM hole transport electron transport Random distribution of protonated ligands (R-3m) P3
42. Fe2 (BDT)3 1.45 80.31 VBM CBM hole transport electron transport Charge transport pathways Random distribution of protonated ligands h+ (R-3m) P3
43. Fe2 (BDT)3 Protonated axes Protonated axis Random protonation P3 P2 P1
44.  Cooperation between experiments and theoretical modelling allows boosting the development of electrically conducting porous materials.  TTF and perylene are interesting and versatile organic moieties as well as Fe(II)/Fe(III) pair for designing electroactive materials.  Strategies to enhance conductivity in porous frameworks: o Zwitterion species in a π-stacked assembly o Electroactive guests (charge transfer and carrier formation) o Mixed-valence and appropriate protonation pattern Conclusions
45.  Cooperation between experiments and theoretical modelling allows boosting the development of electrically conducting porous materials.  TTF and perylene are interesting and versatile organic moieties as well as Fe(II)/Fe(III) pair for designing electroactive materials.  Strategies to enhance conductivity in porous frameworks: o Zwitterion species in a π-stacked assembly o Electroactive guests (charge transfer and carrier formation) o Mixed-valence and appropriate protonation pattern Conclusions
46.  Cooperation between experiments and theoretical modelling allows boosting the development of electrically conducting porous materials.  TTF and perylene are interesting and versatile organic moieties as well as Fe(II)/Fe(III) pair for designing electroactive materials.  Strategies to enhance conductivity in porous frameworks: o Zwitterion species in a π-stacked assembly o Electroactive guests (charge transfer and carrier formation) o Mixed-valence and appropriate protonation pattern Conclusions
47. Guillermo Mínguez (UV) Acknowledgements Manel Souto (UA) María Esteve PID2020-119748GA-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033