Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
BcH-blockchain2.0-20160401a.pdf
Search
Kenji Saito
PRO
April 05, 2016
0
42
BcH-blockchain2.0-20160401a.pdf
Kenji Saito
PRO
April 05, 2016
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Kenji Saito
See All by Kenji Saito
FinTech 7-8 : Blockchain
ks91
PRO
0
16
スマートコントラクトプログラミング / Smart Contract Programming
ks91
PRO
0
10
AI が研究する時代に、人はどう育つのか? — GAMER PAT にみる "シリアスゲームとしての知的訓練" / In an era where AI conducts research, how will humans develop? — "Intellectual Training as a Serious Game" Seen in GAMER PAT
ks91
PRO
0
38
FinTech 5-6 : The World of Apps
ks91
PRO
0
92
生成AI による論文執筆サポート・ワークショップ ─ サーベイ/リサーチクエスチョン編 / Workshop on AI-Assisted Paper Writing Support: Survey/Research Question Edition
ks91
PRO
0
69
ブロックチェーン概論とインストール大会 / Introduction to Blockchain and Installation Workshop
ks91
PRO
0
2
FinTech 3-4 : Internet Technology and Governance
ks91
PRO
0
75
民主主義と博愛(Humanitarianism) / Democracy and Humanitarianism
ks91
PRO
0
8
ブロックチェーン概論 / Introduction to Blockchain
ks91
PRO
0
12
Featured
See All Featured
The Invisible Side of Design
smashingmag
302
51k
Optimizing for Happiness
mojombo
379
70k
Why Our Code Smells
bkeepers
PRO
340
57k
The Myth of the Modular Monolith - Day 2 Keynote - Rails World 2024
eileencodes
26
3.1k
We Have a Design System, Now What?
morganepeng
53
7.8k
Easily Structure & Communicate Ideas using Wireframe
afnizarnur
194
16k
Typedesign – Prime Four
hannesfritz
42
2.8k
Visualization
eitanlees
149
16k
XXLCSS - How to scale CSS and keep your sanity
sugarenia
249
1.3M
Mobile First: as difficult as doing things right
swwweet
225
10k
VelocityConf: Rendering Performance Case Studies
addyosmani
332
24k
The Power of CSS Pseudo Elements
geoffreycrofte
79
6k
Transcript
2.0 6 SFC
[email protected]
6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.1/42
2.0 / Proof of Stake 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 –
p.2/42
2.0 1. 2. 3. 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.3/42
1. Abra – Uber – as is Proof of Existence
– – 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.4/42
Abra Uber https://www.goabra.com Abra cf. Uber cf. Airbnb 6 2.0
— 2016-04-01 – p.5/42
Abra P2P ( ) ( ) (teller) → ATM →
ATM BTC 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.6/42
Abra 1.5% Abra 0.25% Abra (by CEO) 6 2.0 —
2016-04-01 – p.7/42
BTC (USD 3 ) Abra UI ( ) “Don’t lose
your phone!” ( ) Abra 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.8/42
Proof of Existence ( ) https://proofofexistence.com 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01
– p.9/42
Proof of Existence ( ) ( ) OP_RETURN OP_RETURN =
⇒ (burn = ( ) ) 0x444f4350524f4f46 (‘DOCPROOF’) SHA-256 Bitcoin blockchain explorer 5 mBTC (0.005 BTC) 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.10/42
2. Segregated Witness 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.11/42
BTC / . . . 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 –
p.12/42
(Colored Coins) BTC ← 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.13/42
EPOBC (Open Assets) OP_RETURN 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.14/42
Open Assets Protocol (OAP) ( = ) 6 2.0 —
2016-04-01 – p.15/42
ID ID (asset ID) 1. 2. 3. 160 = ID
( ) 4. base58check ‘A’ ( = 23) (asset quantity) BTC 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.16/42
OP_RETURN PUSH 0x4f41 (‘OA’) = 2 0x0100 2 1∼9 LEB128
1∼9 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.17/42
6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.18/42
Segregated Witness ( = ) (malleability) 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01
– p.19/42
(witness) 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.20/42
OP_RETURN PUSH 0xaa21a9ed 4 (witness) SHA-256 32 Merkle 6 2.0
— 2016-04-01 – p.21/42
(1) P2WPKH (version 0) (pay-to-(witnessed)-public-key-hash) witness ( ): < >
< > scriptSig ( ): scriptPubKey ( ) 0 <20-byte > 20-byte < > < > CHECKSIG 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.22/42
(2) P2WSH (version 0) (pay-to-(witnessed)-script-hash) witness: < 1 > <1
< 1 > < 2 > 2 CHECKMULTISIG> scriptSig: scriptPubKey 0 <32-byte > 32-byte 1-out-of-2 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.23/42
6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.24/42
BIP (Bitcoin Improvement Proposal) ex. BIP 1 : BIP Purposes
and Guidelines https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0001.mediawiki ex. BIP 141 : Segregated Witness (Consensus layer) TCP/IP RFC XMPP XEP 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.25/42
3. Proof of Stake ( ) 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01
– p.26/42
Proof of Stake ( ) 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 –
p.27/42
Proof of Stake ( ) ( ) 6 2.0 —
2016-04-01 – p.28/42
Proof of Stake Hn (PD + id + t +
. . .) ≤ 2n × balance d H n : n (ex. SHA-256 (n = 256)) PD : id : (ex. ) t : (ex. UNIX ( )) balance : d : (ex. ) POW 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.29/42
Proof of Stake 3 1. 2. “Nothing at Stake” 3.
51% 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.30/42
: Proof of Stake Velocity Reddcoin 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01
– p.31/42
Nothing at Stake - 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.32/42
Nothing at Stake - 100% Proof of Stake 6 2.0
— 2016-04-01 – p.33/42
51% 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.34/42
. . . 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.35/42
6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.36/42
6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.37/42
→ ⇒ A. Back, et. al., “Enabling Blockchain Innovations with
Pegged Sidechains”, 2014 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.38/42
6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.39/42
( ) 1. 2. ( ) 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01
– p.40/42
OP_RETURN DNS ⇒ 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.41/42
6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.42/42