Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
BcH-blockchain2.0-20160401a.pdf
Search
Kenji Saito
PRO
April 05, 2016
0
42
BcH-blockchain2.0-20160401a.pdf
Kenji Saito
PRO
April 05, 2016
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Kenji Saito
See All by Kenji Saito
アナログAI からの逃走とメタ・ネイチャーポジティブ / Escape from Analog AI, and Meta-Nature Positive
ks91
PRO
0
4
AI 前提社会におけるトラスト / Trust in an AI-Driven Society
ks91
PRO
0
14
非営利組織の起業/発表と総括 / Starting up a Nonprofit Organization, Presentation and Summary
ks91
PRO
0
57
自己開発 / Self-Development
ks91
PRO
1
22
あなたは何によって憶えられたいですか? / What Do You Want to be Remembered for?
ks91
PRO
0
28
ボランティアと理事会 / Volunteers and Board of Directors
ks91
PRO
0
48
メタ・ネイチャーポジティブへの道 / The Path to Meta Nature Positive
ks91
PRO
0
35
アカデミーキャンプ2026 初春「ミライ、ゲーミファイ」DAY 3 / Academy Camp 2026 Early Spring "GAMIFY THE FUTURE!!" DAY 3
ks91
PRO
0
52
アカデミーキャンプ2026 初春「ミライ、ゲーミファイ」DAY 2 / Academy Camp 2026 Early Spring "GAMIFY THE FUTURE!!" DAY 2
ks91
PRO
0
87
Featured
See All Featured
Designing Dashboards & Data Visualisations in Web Apps
destraynor
231
54k
Testing 201, or: Great Expectations
jmmastey
46
8k
Navigating the Design Leadership Dip - Product Design Week Design Leaders+ Conference 2024
apolaine
0
180
Digital Ethics as a Driver of Design Innovation
axbom
PRO
1
180
How to optimise 3,500 product descriptions for ecommerce in one day using ChatGPT
katarinadahlin
PRO
0
3.4k
BBQ
matthewcrist
89
10k
Art, The Web, and Tiny UX
lynnandtonic
304
21k
Design of three-dimensional binary manipulators for pick-and-place task avoiding obstacles (IECON2024)
konakalab
0
350
Large-scale JavaScript Application Architecture
addyosmani
515
110k
コードの90%をAIが書く世界で何が待っているのか / What awaits us in a world where 90% of the code is written by AI
rkaga
60
42k
Accessibility Awareness
sabderemane
0
53
Product Roadmaps are Hard
iamctodd
PRO
55
12k
Transcript
2.0 6 SFC
[email protected]
6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.1/42
2.0 / Proof of Stake 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 –
p.2/42
2.0 1. 2. 3. 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.3/42
1. Abra – Uber – as is Proof of Existence
– – 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.4/42
Abra Uber https://www.goabra.com Abra cf. Uber cf. Airbnb 6 2.0
— 2016-04-01 – p.5/42
Abra P2P ( ) ( ) (teller) → ATM →
ATM BTC 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.6/42
Abra 1.5% Abra 0.25% Abra (by CEO) 6 2.0 —
2016-04-01 – p.7/42
BTC (USD 3 ) Abra UI ( ) “Don’t lose
your phone!” ( ) Abra 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.8/42
Proof of Existence ( ) https://proofofexistence.com 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01
– p.9/42
Proof of Existence ( ) ( ) OP_RETURN OP_RETURN =
⇒ (burn = ( ) ) 0x444f4350524f4f46 (‘DOCPROOF’) SHA-256 Bitcoin blockchain explorer 5 mBTC (0.005 BTC) 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.10/42
2. Segregated Witness 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.11/42
BTC / . . . 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 –
p.12/42
(Colored Coins) BTC ← 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.13/42
EPOBC (Open Assets) OP_RETURN 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.14/42
Open Assets Protocol (OAP) ( = ) 6 2.0 —
2016-04-01 – p.15/42
ID ID (asset ID) 1. 2. 3. 160 = ID
( ) 4. base58check ‘A’ ( = 23) (asset quantity) BTC 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.16/42
OP_RETURN PUSH 0x4f41 (‘OA’) = 2 0x0100 2 1∼9 LEB128
1∼9 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.17/42
6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.18/42
Segregated Witness ( = ) (malleability) 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01
– p.19/42
(witness) 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.20/42
OP_RETURN PUSH 0xaa21a9ed 4 (witness) SHA-256 32 Merkle 6 2.0
— 2016-04-01 – p.21/42
(1) P2WPKH (version 0) (pay-to-(witnessed)-public-key-hash) witness ( ): < >
< > scriptSig ( ): scriptPubKey ( ) 0 <20-byte > 20-byte < > < > CHECKSIG 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.22/42
(2) P2WSH (version 0) (pay-to-(witnessed)-script-hash) witness: < 1 > <1
< 1 > < 2 > 2 CHECKMULTISIG> scriptSig: scriptPubKey 0 <32-byte > 32-byte 1-out-of-2 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.23/42
6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.24/42
BIP (Bitcoin Improvement Proposal) ex. BIP 1 : BIP Purposes
and Guidelines https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0001.mediawiki ex. BIP 141 : Segregated Witness (Consensus layer) TCP/IP RFC XMPP XEP 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.25/42
3. Proof of Stake ( ) 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01
– p.26/42
Proof of Stake ( ) 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 –
p.27/42
Proof of Stake ( ) ( ) 6 2.0 —
2016-04-01 – p.28/42
Proof of Stake Hn (PD + id + t +
. . .) ≤ 2n × balance d H n : n (ex. SHA-256 (n = 256)) PD : id : (ex. ) t : (ex. UNIX ( )) balance : d : (ex. ) POW 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.29/42
Proof of Stake 3 1. 2. “Nothing at Stake” 3.
51% 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.30/42
: Proof of Stake Velocity Reddcoin 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01
– p.31/42
Nothing at Stake - 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.32/42
Nothing at Stake - 100% Proof of Stake 6 2.0
— 2016-04-01 – p.33/42
51% 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.34/42
. . . 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.35/42
6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.36/42
6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.37/42
→ ⇒ A. Back, et. al., “Enabling Blockchain Innovations with
Pegged Sidechains”, 2014 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.38/42
6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.39/42
( ) 1. 2. ( ) 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01
– p.40/42
OP_RETURN DNS ⇒ 6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.41/42
6 2.0 — 2016-04-01 – p.42/42