Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Would solar radiation modification reduce the a...

Would solar radiation modification reduce the adaptation burden from shifting climate zones?

Presentation given at the Degrees Global Forum in Cape Town, South Africa, on 15 May 2025 in the Impacts Modelling 2 session, based on work by then-FSU undergraduate student Jaylynn Brunelli.

Avatar for Michael Diamond

Michael Diamond

August 04, 2026

Other Decks in Science

Transcript

  1. Would solar radiation modification reduce the adaptation burden from shifting

    climate zones? Jaylynn Brunelli & Michael Diamond ([email protected]) Department of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Science Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA Degrees Global Forum: Impacts Modelling 2 Cape Town, South Africa // 15 May 2025
  2. SRM could (a) successfully cool temperatures from a high greenhouse

    gas (GHG) emissions scenario to a lower GHG one… …but it would • (b) “overcorrect” precipitation; and • (c) not stop ocean acidification High GHGs Lower GHGs SAI + high GHGs Diamond, Wanser, & Boucher (2023), “Cooling credits” are not a viable climate solution, Climatic Change
  3. Approach • G6sulfur experiment in CESM2-WACCM • Equatorial SO2 injection

    to keep climate with high SSP58.5 greenhouse gas emissions near same mean temperature as under “middle-of-the-road” SSP2-4.5 emissions
  4. Approach • G6sulfur experiment in CESM2-WACCM • Köppen-Trewartha climate classification

    system Lohmann et al. (1994), The Köppen climate classification as a diagnostic tool for general circulation models, Climate Research
  5. Approach • G6sulfur experiment in CESM2-WACCM • Köppen-Trewartha climate classification

    system • Hypotheses: 1. Stratospheric aerosol injection will reduce shifts in climate zones similar to mitigation of GHGs (i.e., broadly as a function of reduced global mean surface temperature) • SAI “works” to reduce the adaptation burden from shifting climate zones 2. Stratospheric aerosol injection will result in shifts in climate zones rivaling those in SSP5-8.5, but non-systematically in temperature (regional variability) and systematically dryer (lower precipitation) • SAI does not “work” to reduce the adaptation burden from shifting climate zones
  6. Cold arid Cold semi-arid Hot arid Hot semi-arid B: Arid

    Class B: Arid Precipitation below potential evapotranspiration A: Trop. C: Subtrop. D: Temp. E-F: Sub- Polar
  7. Class A: Tropical All months warmer than 18 °C Rainforest

    Savanna B: Arid A: Trop. C: Subtrop. D: Temp. E-F: Sub- Polar
  8. Subtropical humid Mediterranean Class C: Subtropical >8 months warmer than

    10 °C B: Arid A: Trop. C: Subtrop. D: Temp. E-F: Sub- Polar
  9. Temperate continental Temperate oceanic Class D: Temperature >4 months warmer

    than 10 °C B: Arid A: Trop. C: Subtrop. D: Temp. E-F: Sub- Polar
  10. Subpolar Class E: Subpolar >1 month warmer than 10 °C

    B: Arid A: Trop. C: Subtrop. D: Temp. E-F: Sub- Polar
  11. Tundra Class F: Polar No months warmer than 10 °C

    Ice cap (no months above freezing) B: Arid A: Trop. C: Subtrop. D: Temp. E-F: Sub- Polar
  12. Hypotheses: 1. Stratospheric aerosol injection will reduce shifts in climate

    zones similar to mitigation of GHGs (i.e., broadly as a function of reduced global mean surface temperature) • SAI “works” to reduce the adaptation burden from shifting climate zones 2. Stratospheric aerosol injection will result in shifts in climate zones rivaling those in SSP5-8.5, but non-systematically in temperature (regional variability) and systematically dryer (lower precipitation) • SAI does not “work” to reduce the adaptation burden from shifting climate zones