Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
extremely defensive coding - rubyconf edition
Search
Penelope Phippen
November 16, 2015
Technology
0
270
extremely defensive coding - rubyconf edition
Penelope Phippen
November 16, 2015
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Penelope Phippen
See All by Penelope Phippen
Introducing Rubyfmt
penelope_zone
0
570
How RSpec Works
penelope_zone
0
6.6k
Quick and easy browser testing using RSpec and Rails 5.1
penelope_zone
1
85
Teaching RSpec to play nice with Rails
penelope_zone
2
140
Little machines that eat strings
penelope_zone
1
110
What is processor (brighton ruby edition)
penelope_zone
0
120
What is processor?
penelope_zone
1
360
Agile, etc.
penelope_zone
2
230
Extremely Defensive Coding
penelope_zone
0
100
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
OCI Network Firewall 概要
oracle4engineer
PRO
1
7.7k
KMP の Swift export
kokihirokawa
0
310
SOC2取得の全体像
shonansurvivors
1
350
Green Tea Garbage Collector の今
zchee
PRO
2
380
Goに育てられ開発者向けセキュリティ事業を立ち上げた僕が今向き合う、AI × セキュリティの最前線 / Go Conference 2025
flatt_security
0
320
OpenAI gpt-oss ファインチューニング入門
kmotohas
2
860
[2025-09-30] Databricks Genie を利用した分析基盤とデータモデリングの IVRy の現在地
wxyzzz
0
440
KAGのLT会 #8 - 東京リージョンでGAしたAmazon Q in QuickSightを使って、報告用の資料を作ってみた
0air
0
190
成長自己責任時代のあるきかた/How to navigate the era of personal responsibility for growth
kwappa
3
230
LLMアプリケーション開発におけるセキュリティリスクと対策 / LLM Application Security
flatt_security
7
1.7k
What is BigQuery?
aizack_harks
0
120
「AI駆動PO」を考えてみる - 作る速さから価値のスループットへ:検査・適応で未来を開発 / AI-driven product owner. scrummat2025
yosuke_nagai
2
500
Featured
See All Featured
Save Time (by Creating Custom Rails Generators)
garrettdimon
PRO
32
1.6k
Exploring the Power of Turbo Streams & Action Cable | RailsConf2023
kevinliebholz
34
6.1k
Speed Design
sergeychernyshev
32
1.1k
Navigating Team Friction
lara
189
15k
Designing for Performance
lara
610
69k
Embracing the Ebb and Flow
colly
88
4.8k
Site-Speed That Sticks
csswizardry
11
870
Code Review Best Practice
trishagee
72
19k
Product Roadmaps are Hard
iamctodd
PRO
54
11k
Visualization
eitanlees
148
16k
JavaScript: Past, Present, and Future - NDC Porto 2020
reverentgeek
52
5.6k
Gamification - CAS2011
davidbonilla
81
5.5k
Transcript
Extremely Defensive Coding
a!/samphippen
Who is having fun?
Who is here for their first time?
I want to start with a story
“When is it OK to override the methods on object?”
I umm’d and ahh’d for a bit
I gave a half explanation and then asked them if
they understood
I eventually came to an answer to do with consistency
Do it when it makes your object more consistent with
Ruby, not less
e.g. an == on a data object
What makes a gem good?
Internals?
Internals?
Interface?
Interface? ✅
More convenient than if I did it myself
And it stays convenient
And it can be used by everyone on a team
And it works with a wide range of Ruby codebases
RSpec
RSpec Definitely always convenient
RSpec Definitely always convenient
User story
As an RSpec user
When I stub an object
I want the original method to be on that object
after the example
So that my objects aren’t broken by my test suite
As an RSpec user
When I stub an object
I want the original method to be on that object
after the example
So that my objects aren’t broken by my test suite
How does that work?
allow(cat).to receive(:meow)
Takes the meow method off cat
Saves it
Executes test
Puts the method back on the original object
How do you save a method?
None
Method object
Put it somewhere else
Put it back at end of test
The end
The end
Defensive coding
RSpec::Support .method_handle_for
Simply invoking the method method is not good enough
Some scenes may have been altered/accelerated for your viewing pleasure
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Users Lie
def method ‘get’ end
Users can redefine anything at any time in Ruby
and that’s fine
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Instance method object Method without a target object
Comes from a class/module not an instance
Grab the Kernel implementation of #method
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Users can and will redefine core methods at any time
Instead we use Kernel’s implementation
Nobody screws with Kernel
Ruby interpreters lie
Some objects do not have Kernel in their inheritance chain
None
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Rebinding module methods
c
c
RSpec does not support Rubinius
None
We tried, we really really tried
So anyway, dealing with module methods
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Ruby interpreters behave differently.
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Sometimes users don’t lie
None
None
None
None
`method': undefined method `foo' for class `Foo' (NameError)
This is a catch 22
Solution: trust but verify
None
None
None
Let’s put it all together
None
Wrapping up
This is why I love RSpec
Please file bugs
Your gem should be defensive
Users lie Redefinitions come from anywhere, expect them
Ruby interpreters lie Your code will run on non-MRI, old
MRI, etc
Sometimes users don’t lie Users are weird, trust but verify
What makes a gem good?
Internals?
That explanation made no sense
Internals?
Interface?
allow(cat).to receive(:meow)
You get the complexity of RSpec working with any object
for free
You probably didn’t even know it was there until I
just told you
Interface? ✅
Gems
Gems provide strong abstraction boundaries
Done badly they cause an even more extreme mess
Done correctly they hide huge complexity behind well defined barriers
Defending against users helps your gem be convenient
Write defensively, and your users will never know what’s inside
the box
Remember the story?
This talk is born out of Ruby’s power
We need our code to defend today, against the mistakes
of our tomorrow
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Minitest Mock is 169 lines of code
I just showed you more code than that
For a tiny feature that isn’t a complete mocking library
and that’s fine
Please check out https://browserpath.co
None
Let’s have some questions a!/samphippen
[email protected]