Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
extremely defensive coding - rubyconf edition
Search
Penelope Phippen
November 16, 2015
Technology
0
260
extremely defensive coding - rubyconf edition
Penelope Phippen
November 16, 2015
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Penelope Phippen
See All by Penelope Phippen
Introducing Rubyfmt
penelope_zone
0
560
How RSpec Works
penelope_zone
0
6.6k
Quick and easy browser testing using RSpec and Rails 5.1
penelope_zone
1
82
Teaching RSpec to play nice with Rails
penelope_zone
2
140
Little machines that eat strings
penelope_zone
1
99
What is processor (brighton ruby edition)
penelope_zone
0
110
What is processor?
penelope_zone
1
350
Agile, etc.
penelope_zone
2
220
Extremely Defensive Coding
penelope_zone
0
96
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
TLSから見るSREの未来
atpons
2
310
大量配信システムにおけるSLOの実践:「見えない」信頼性をSLOで可視化
plaidtech
PRO
0
390
本当にわかりやすいAIエージェント入門
segavvy
1
300
毎晩の 負荷試験自動実行による効果
recruitengineers
PRO
5
180
20250708オープンエンドな探索と知識発見
sakana_ai
PRO
4
1k
AI Ready API ─ AI時代に求められるAPI設計とは?/ AI-Ready API - Designing MCP and APIs in the AI Era
yokawasa
6
1.7k
Amplify Gen2から知るAWS CDK Toolkit Libraryの使い方/How to use the AWS CDK Toolkit Library as known from Amplify Gen2
fossamagna
1
350
第64回コンピュータビジョン勉強会「The PanAf-FGBG Dataset: Understanding the Impact of Backgrounds in Wildlife Behaviour Recognition」
x_ttyszk
0
240
サービスを止めるな! DDoS攻撃へのスマートな備えと最前線の事例
coconala_engineer
1
180
AI エージェントと考え直すデータ基盤
na0
20
7.9k
データ戦略部門 紹介資料
sansan33
PRO
1
3.3k
無理しない AI 活用サービス / #jazug
koudaiii
0
100
Featured
See All Featured
How to Create Impact in a Changing Tech Landscape [PerfNow 2023]
tammyeverts
53
2.9k
Fantastic passwords and where to find them - at NoRuKo
philnash
51
3.3k
The Myth of the Modular Monolith - Day 2 Keynote - Rails World 2024
eileencodes
26
2.9k
What’s in a name? Adding method to the madness
productmarketing
PRO
23
3.5k
Dealing with People You Can't Stand - Big Design 2015
cassininazir
367
26k
Designing for humans not robots
tammielis
253
25k
Practical Orchestrator
shlominoach
189
11k
Gamification - CAS2011
davidbonilla
81
5.4k
Done Done
chrislema
184
16k
Git: the NoSQL Database
bkeepers
PRO
430
65k
XXLCSS - How to scale CSS and keep your sanity
sugarenia
248
1.3M
Cheating the UX When There Is Nothing More to Optimize - PixelPioneers
stephaniewalter
282
13k
Transcript
Extremely Defensive Coding
a!/samphippen
Who is having fun?
Who is here for their first time?
I want to start with a story
“When is it OK to override the methods on object?”
I umm’d and ahh’d for a bit
I gave a half explanation and then asked them if
they understood
I eventually came to an answer to do with consistency
Do it when it makes your object more consistent with
Ruby, not less
e.g. an == on a data object
What makes a gem good?
Internals?
Internals?
Interface?
Interface? ✅
More convenient than if I did it myself
And it stays convenient
And it can be used by everyone on a team
And it works with a wide range of Ruby codebases
RSpec
RSpec Definitely always convenient
RSpec Definitely always convenient
User story
As an RSpec user
When I stub an object
I want the original method to be on that object
after the example
So that my objects aren’t broken by my test suite
As an RSpec user
When I stub an object
I want the original method to be on that object
after the example
So that my objects aren’t broken by my test suite
How does that work?
allow(cat).to receive(:meow)
Takes the meow method off cat
Saves it
Executes test
Puts the method back on the original object
How do you save a method?
None
Method object
Put it somewhere else
Put it back at end of test
The end
The end
Defensive coding
RSpec::Support .method_handle_for
Simply invoking the method method is not good enough
Some scenes may have been altered/accelerated for your viewing pleasure
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Users Lie
def method ‘get’ end
Users can redefine anything at any time in Ruby
and that’s fine
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Instance method object Method without a target object
Comes from a class/module not an instance
Grab the Kernel implementation of #method
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Users can and will redefine core methods at any time
Instead we use Kernel’s implementation
Nobody screws with Kernel
Ruby interpreters lie
Some objects do not have Kernel in their inheritance chain
None
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Rebinding module methods
c
c
RSpec does not support Rubinius
None
We tried, we really really tried
So anyway, dealing with module methods
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Ruby interpreters behave differently.
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Sometimes users don’t lie
None
None
None
None
`method': undefined method `foo' for class `Foo' (NameError)
This is a catch 22
Solution: trust but verify
None
None
None
Let’s put it all together
None
Wrapping up
This is why I love RSpec
Please file bugs
Your gem should be defensive
Users lie Redefinitions come from anywhere, expect them
Ruby interpreters lie Your code will run on non-MRI, old
MRI, etc
Sometimes users don’t lie Users are weird, trust but verify
What makes a gem good?
Internals?
That explanation made no sense
Internals?
Interface?
allow(cat).to receive(:meow)
You get the complexity of RSpec working with any object
for free
You probably didn’t even know it was there until I
just told you
Interface? ✅
Gems
Gems provide strong abstraction boundaries
Done badly they cause an even more extreme mess
Done correctly they hide huge complexity behind well defined barriers
Defending against users helps your gem be convenient
Write defensively, and your users will never know what’s inside
the box
Remember the story?
This talk is born out of Ruby’s power
We need our code to defend today, against the mistakes
of our tomorrow
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Let’s have some questions !/samphippen
[email protected]
Minitest Mock is 169 lines of code
I just showed you more code than that
For a tiny feature that isn’t a complete mocking library
and that’s fine
Please check out https://browserpath.co
None
Let’s have some questions a!/samphippen
[email protected]