Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
My Problem, My Solution
Search
Penelope Phippen
September 12, 2014
Technology
1
46
My Problem, My Solution
A talk about typing I gave at Frozen Rails 2014
Penelope Phippen
September 12, 2014
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Penelope Phippen
See All by Penelope Phippen
Introducing Rubyfmt
penelope_zone
0
530
How RSpec Works
penelope_zone
0
6.4k
Quick and easy browser testing using RSpec and Rails 5.1
penelope_zone
1
75
Teaching RSpec to play nice with Rails
penelope_zone
2
120
Little machines that eat strings
penelope_zone
1
80
What is processor (brighton ruby edition)
penelope_zone
0
94
What is processor?
penelope_zone
1
340
extremely defensive coding - rubyconf edition
penelope_zone
0
250
Agile, etc.
penelope_zone
2
210
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
君は隠しイベントを見つけれるか?
mujyun
0
290
「視座」の上げ方が成人発達理論にわかりやすくまとまってた / think_ perspective_hidden_dimensions
shuzon
2
1.5k
カメラを用いた店内計測におけるオプトインの仕組みの実現 / ai-optin-camera
cyberagentdevelopers
PRO
1
120
Gradle: The Build System That Loves To Hate You
aurimas
2
140
フルカイテン株式会社 採用資料
fullkaiten
0
36k
Jr. Championsになって、強く連携しながらAWSをもっと使いたい!~AWSに対する期待と行動~
amixedcolor
0
190
omakaseしないための.rubocop.yml のつくりかた / How to Build Your .rubocop.yml to Avoid Omakase #kaigionrails
linkers_tech
3
730
バクラクにおける可観測性向上の取り組み
yuu26
3
410
生成AIの強みと弱みを理解して、生成AIがもたらすパワーをプロダクトの価値へ繋げるために実践したこと / advance-ai-generating
cyberagentdevelopers
PRO
1
180
10分でわかるfreee エンジニア向け会社説明資料
freee
18
520k
Shift-from-React-to-Vue
calm1205
3
1.3k
来年もre:Invent2024 に行きたいあなたへ - “集中”と“つながり”で楽しむ -
ny7760
0
470
Featured
See All Featured
Refactoring Trust on Your Teams (GOTO; Chicago 2020)
rmw
31
2.7k
Building Applications with DynamoDB
mza
90
6.1k
Fantastic passwords and where to find them - at NoRuKo
philnash
50
2.8k
ReactJS: Keep Simple. Everything can be a component!
pedronauck
664
120k
Fashionably flexible responsive web design (full day workshop)
malarkey
404
65k
Build your cross-platform service in a week with App Engine
jlugia
229
18k
What’s in a name? Adding method to the madness
productmarketing
PRO
22
3.1k
Building an army of robots
kneath
302
42k
GraphQLの誤解/rethinking-graphql
sonatard
66
9.9k
The Pragmatic Product Professional
lauravandoore
31
6.3k
[RailsConf 2023] Rails as a piece of cake
palkan
51
4.9k
The Success of Rails: Ensuring Growth for the Next 100 Years
eileencodes
43
6.6k
Transcript
The maybe monad as a replacement for nil
My Problem My Solution
Everyone Stand Up
None
a!/samphippen
My Problem
Type Checking is the Antithesis of Object Oriented Programming
Type
Types
What is a type?
What is a data type?
A type is a set of possible values and operations
Class
Terms are literally interchangeable in Ruby
Terms are literally interchangeable in Ruby Konstantin
Fixnum
✕
+
/
—
1.class # => Fixnum
You know what all these things do
1+1 # => 2
Array
count
each
In Ruby some types are interchangeable
Typeclass
A set of types and common operations
There is some expectation of what the operations will do
Duck typing
All number types in Ruby form a typeclass
Fixnum Float BigDecimal
Numeric Op Numeric = Numeric
Positive Numeric + Positive Numeric = Positive Numeric =
Also collections
Hash Set Array
Type Checking is the Antithesis of Object Oriented Programming
Type Checking is the Antithesis of Object Oriented Programming
Type Checking
This term has two meanings
Compile time type checking
public static final List<string> seriouslyiamsoboredwh ocares
Like in Java
Clearly we don’t do this in Ruby
So what do I mean?
ActiveRecord::Base #find_by
pony = Pony.find_by(:id => smth) pony.neigh
pony = Pony.find_by(:id => smth) if pony pony.neigh else puts
“No Pony can’t neigh” end
The problem here is two return types
nil Pony < AR::Base
We’re forced to add a type check
Also, I think this is the wrong type check
pony = Pony.find_by(:id => smth) if !pony.nil? pony.neigh else puts
“No Pony can’t neigh” end
A more explicit type check
But still wrong
pony = Pony.find_by(:id => smth) if !pony.nil? pony.neigh else puts
“No Pony can’t neigh” end
pony = Pony.find_by(:id => smth) if pony.respond_to?(:neigh) pony.neigh else puts
“No Pony can’t neigh” end
This type checking adds unnecessary complexity to our app
Type Checking is the Antithesis of Object Oriented Programming
Type Checking is the Antithesis of Object Oriented Programming
Antithesis
I am using it to mean “DOING IT WRONG”
Type Checking is the Antithesis of Object Oriented Programming
Type Checking is the Antithesis of Object Oriented Programming
Object oriented programming
Konstantin Haase says:
Data abstraction and control abstraction
Alan Kay says:
Everything is an object
Objects communicate by sending and receiving messages
def bees if :bar == a.foo else end end
def bees a.foo nil end
Tell don’t ask
Objects have their own memory (in terms of objects).
Data hiding
Every object is an instance of a class (which must
be an object).
The class holds the shared behavior for its instances (in
the form of objects in a program list)
To eval a program list, control is passed to the
first object and the remainder is treated as its message.
Type Checking is the Antithesis of Object Oriented Programming
Type Checking is the Antithesis of Object Oriented Programming
My Problem
My Problem
My Solution
Just always make your methods return things of a consistent
type class
Thanks!
No obviously there’s more
Third party APIs do this all the time
pony = Pony.find_by(:id => smth) if pony pony.neigh else puts
“No Pony can’t neigh” end
The problem here is two return types
As a client of this API I am forced to
add a type check
nil is such a common case
How do we fix it?
Null object pattern
I think this one is quite well known
class Pony def horse_power 0.5 end end
Pony.find_by( :key => value ) || NullPony.new
class NullPony def horse_power 0 end end
NullPony quacks the same as Pony
Solves the typing problem
Summing over ponies will only count Pony objects
0 might be the wrong default
Pony * NullPony = 0
Decided the default for horse_power when defining the class
Change is inevitable
Can’t predict how NullPony will be used in the future
Maybe Typeclass
Solves same problem
Allows for runtime defaults
#map(&blk) -> Maybe #value_or(a) -> a
class Just def initialize(value) @value = value end def map(&blk)
def value_or(x) Just.new(blk.call(@value)) @value end end end
class Nothing def map(&blk) self end def value_or(x) x end
end
A consistent interface for dealing with missing values
NoMethodError: undefined method `foo' for nil:NilClass
NoMethodError: undefined method `foo' for nil:NilClass
[Maybe, Nothing, Maybe]
call map on all of them
collapse with value_or
To Recap:
Null object can replace nils if you know the defaults
at class definition time
Maybe if you want defaults at run time
Your job is not to make Alan Kay happy
RSpec RSpec ! ! RSpec 3
tinyurl.com/ samfr2014
Let’s have some questions a!/samphippen
[email protected]