Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
My Problem, My Solution
Search
Penelope Phippen
September 12, 2014
Technology
1
49
My Problem, My Solution
A talk about typing I gave at Frozen Rails 2014
Penelope Phippen
September 12, 2014
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Penelope Phippen
See All by Penelope Phippen
Introducing Rubyfmt
penelope_zone
0
540
How RSpec Works
penelope_zone
0
6.5k
Quick and easy browser testing using RSpec and Rails 5.1
penelope_zone
1
77
Teaching RSpec to play nice with Rails
penelope_zone
2
120
Little machines that eat strings
penelope_zone
1
84
What is processor (brighton ruby edition)
penelope_zone
0
95
What is processor?
penelope_zone
1
340
extremely defensive coding - rubyconf edition
penelope_zone
0
250
Agile, etc.
penelope_zone
2
210
Other Decks in Technology
See All in Technology
プルリクエストレビューを終わらせるためのチーム体制 / The Team for Completing Pull Request Reviews
nekonenene
3
1.5k
JAWS FESTA 2024「バスロケ」GPS×サーバーレスの開発と運用の舞台裏/jawsfesta2024-bus-gps-serverless
ma2shita
3
350
ディスプレイ広告(Yahoo!広告・LINE広告)におけるバックエンド開発
lycorptech_jp
PRO
0
600
Introduction to OpenSearch Project - Search Engineering Tech Talk 2025 Winter
tkykenmt
2
220
スクラムというコンフォートゾーンから抜け出そう!プロジェクト全体に目を向けるインセプションデッキ / Inception Deck for seeing the whole project
takaking22
3
170
大規模アジャイルフレームワークから学ぶエンジニアマネジメントの本質
staka121
PRO
3
1.7k
Amazon Athenaから利用時のGlueのIcebergテーブルのメンテナンスについて
nayuts
0
120
株式会社Awarefy(アウェアファイ)会社説明資料 / Awarefy-Company-Deck
awarefy
3
12k
2025/3/1 公共交通オープンデータデイ2025
morohoshi
0
110
Snowflake ML モデルを dbt データパイプラインに組み込む
estie
0
120
OPENLOGI Company Profile
hr01
0
60k
Ruby on Railsで持続可能な開発を行うために取り組んでいること
am1157154
3
170
Featured
See All Featured
How GitHub (no longer) Works
holman
314
140k
Building Adaptive Systems
keathley
40
2.4k
RailsConf & Balkan Ruby 2019: The Past, Present, and Future of Rails at GitHub
eileencodes
134
33k
How to train your dragon (web standard)
notwaldorf
91
5.9k
Large-scale JavaScript Application Architecture
addyosmani
511
110k
The Success of Rails: Ensuring Growth for the Next 100 Years
eileencodes
44
7.1k
Easily Structure & Communicate Ideas using Wireframe
afnizarnur
193
16k
GitHub's CSS Performance
jonrohan
1030
460k
The Art of Delivering Value - GDevCon NA Keynote
reverentgeek
11
1.3k
The Web Performance Landscape in 2024 [PerfNow 2024]
tammyeverts
4
440
Rebuilding a faster, lazier Slack
samanthasiow
80
8.9k
10 Git Anti Patterns You Should be Aware of
lemiorhan
PRO
656
59k
Transcript
The maybe monad as a replacement for nil
My Problem My Solution
Everyone Stand Up
None
a!/samphippen
My Problem
Type Checking is the Antithesis of Object Oriented Programming
Type
Types
What is a type?
What is a data type?
A type is a set of possible values and operations
Class
Terms are literally interchangeable in Ruby
Terms are literally interchangeable in Ruby Konstantin
Fixnum
✕
+
/
—
1.class # => Fixnum
You know what all these things do
1+1 # => 2
Array
count
each
In Ruby some types are interchangeable
Typeclass
A set of types and common operations
There is some expectation of what the operations will do
Duck typing
All number types in Ruby form a typeclass
Fixnum Float BigDecimal
Numeric Op Numeric = Numeric
Positive Numeric + Positive Numeric = Positive Numeric =
Also collections
Hash Set Array
Type Checking is the Antithesis of Object Oriented Programming
Type Checking is the Antithesis of Object Oriented Programming
Type Checking
This term has two meanings
Compile time type checking
public static final List<string> seriouslyiamsoboredwh ocares
Like in Java
Clearly we don’t do this in Ruby
So what do I mean?
ActiveRecord::Base #find_by
pony = Pony.find_by(:id => smth) pony.neigh
pony = Pony.find_by(:id => smth) if pony pony.neigh else puts
“No Pony can’t neigh” end
The problem here is two return types
nil Pony < AR::Base
We’re forced to add a type check
Also, I think this is the wrong type check
pony = Pony.find_by(:id => smth) if !pony.nil? pony.neigh else puts
“No Pony can’t neigh” end
A more explicit type check
But still wrong
pony = Pony.find_by(:id => smth) if !pony.nil? pony.neigh else puts
“No Pony can’t neigh” end
pony = Pony.find_by(:id => smth) if pony.respond_to?(:neigh) pony.neigh else puts
“No Pony can’t neigh” end
This type checking adds unnecessary complexity to our app
Type Checking is the Antithesis of Object Oriented Programming
Type Checking is the Antithesis of Object Oriented Programming
Antithesis
I am using it to mean “DOING IT WRONG”
Type Checking is the Antithesis of Object Oriented Programming
Type Checking is the Antithesis of Object Oriented Programming
Object oriented programming
Konstantin Haase says:
Data abstraction and control abstraction
Alan Kay says:
Everything is an object
Objects communicate by sending and receiving messages
def bees if :bar == a.foo else end end
def bees a.foo nil end
Tell don’t ask
Objects have their own memory (in terms of objects).
Data hiding
Every object is an instance of a class (which must
be an object).
The class holds the shared behavior for its instances (in
the form of objects in a program list)
To eval a program list, control is passed to the
first object and the remainder is treated as its message.
Type Checking is the Antithesis of Object Oriented Programming
Type Checking is the Antithesis of Object Oriented Programming
My Problem
My Problem
My Solution
Just always make your methods return things of a consistent
type class
Thanks!
No obviously there’s more
Third party APIs do this all the time
pony = Pony.find_by(:id => smth) if pony pony.neigh else puts
“No Pony can’t neigh” end
The problem here is two return types
As a client of this API I am forced to
add a type check
nil is such a common case
How do we fix it?
Null object pattern
I think this one is quite well known
class Pony def horse_power 0.5 end end
Pony.find_by( :key => value ) || NullPony.new
class NullPony def horse_power 0 end end
NullPony quacks the same as Pony
Solves the typing problem
Summing over ponies will only count Pony objects
0 might be the wrong default
Pony * NullPony = 0
Decided the default for horse_power when defining the class
Change is inevitable
Can’t predict how NullPony will be used in the future
Maybe Typeclass
Solves same problem
Allows for runtime defaults
#map(&blk) -> Maybe #value_or(a) -> a
class Just def initialize(value) @value = value end def map(&blk)
def value_or(x) Just.new(blk.call(@value)) @value end end end
class Nothing def map(&blk) self end def value_or(x) x end
end
A consistent interface for dealing with missing values
NoMethodError: undefined method `foo' for nil:NilClass
NoMethodError: undefined method `foo' for nil:NilClass
[Maybe, Nothing, Maybe]
call map on all of them
collapse with value_or
To Recap:
Null object can replace nils if you know the defaults
at class definition time
Maybe if you want defaults at run time
Your job is not to make Alan Kay happy
RSpec RSpec ! ! RSpec 3
tinyurl.com/ samfr2014
Let’s have some questions a!/samphippen sam@funandplausible.com