Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Black Holes in Astrophysics

Black Holes in Astrophysics

Plenary review talk I gave the Annual Meeting of the Brazilian Astronomical Society. Aug 31st 2016, Ribeirão Preto.

Some of the results presented are not yet available for public release.

Rodrigo Nemmen

August 31, 2016
Tweet

More Decks by Rodrigo Nemmen

Other Decks in Science

Transcript

  1. Rodrigo Nemmen
    IAG USP
    Black Holes in
    Astrophysics
    Aug. 31st 2016

    Reunião SAB

    Ribeirão Preto
    M. Weiss, CfA

    View Slide

  2. Collaborators
    R. Nemmen
    G. Soares
    F. Cafardo R. Menezes
    H. Gubolin I. Almeida
    A. Vemado
    Sasha Tchekhovskoy Berkeley
    Vasilis Paschalidis Princeton
    Jack Hewitt UNF
    Markos Georganopoulos, Eileen Meyer
    UMBC
    Neil Gehrels, Sylvain Guiriec,
    Francesco Tombesi NASA GSFC
    Thaisa Storchi Bergmann, Jaderson
    Schimoia UFRGS
    Elisabete de Gouveia dal Pino USP
    Mike Brotherton UWyoming
    Mike Eracleous Penn State
    Rita Sambruna NASA

    View Slide

  3. Black holes are the most perfect macroscopic
    objects in the universe
    R. Nemmen
    No-hair theorem: fully
    described by mass M, spin a
    (Kerr metric)
    J = a GM2/c
    0  |a|  1
    Event horizon: Once
    inside, nothing escapes
    Made only of spacetime warpage
    RS =
    2GM
    c2

    View Slide

  4. Black holes are the most perfect macroscopic
    objects in the universe
    R. Nemmen
    No-hair theorem: fully
    described by mass M, spin a
    (Kerr metric)
    J = a GM2/c
    0  |a|  1
    Event horizon: Once
    inside, nothing escapes
    Made only of spacetime warpage
    RS =
    2GM
    c2

    View Slide

  5. Black holes are the most perfect macroscopic
    objects in the universe
    No-hair theorem: fully
    described by mass M, spin a
    (Kerr metric)
    J = a GM2/c
    0  |a|  1
    Event horizon: Once
    inside, nothing escapes
    Made only of spacetime warpage
    RS =
    2GM
    c2
    R. Nemmen

    View Slide

  6. Black holes are the most perfect macroscopic
    objects in the universe
    No-hair theorem: fully
    described by mass M, spin a
    (Kerr metric)
    J = a GM2/c
    0  |a|  1
    Event horizon: Once
    inside, nothing escapes
    Made only of spacetime warpage
    RS =
    2GM
    c2
    R. Nemmen

    View Slide

  7. Black holes are the most perfect macroscopic
    objects in the universe
    R. Nemmen
    No-hair theorem: fully
    described by mass M, spin a
    (Kerr metric)
    J = a GM2/c
    0  |a|  1
    Event horizon: Once
    inside, nothing escapes
    Made only of spacetime warpage
    RS =
    2GM
    c2

    View Slide

  8. Black holes are the most perfect macroscopic
    objects in the universe
    R. Nemmen
    No-hair theorem: fully
    described by mass M, spin a
    (Kerr metric)
    J = a GM2/c
    0  |a|  1
    Event horizon: Once
    inside, nothing escapes
    Made only of spacetime warpage
    RS =
    2GM
    c2

    View Slide

  9. A black hole in vacuum is quite boring
    Hawking
    evaporation
    takes >1067 years
    (3 MSun)
    Why are black holes so
    interesting for astrophysics?

    View Slide

  10. Supermassive
    106-1010 solar masses
    one in every galactic nucleus
    5-30 solar masses
    ~107 per galaxy
    Stellar black holes
    ~1 Mpc ~100 kpc
    Active galactic nuclei
    Quasars
    Radio
    galaxies
    black holes
    Gamma-
    ray bursts
    Microquasars
    1 pc = 3×1013 km

    View Slide

  11. https://xkcd.com/681/

    View Slide

  12. View Slide

  13. VENUS
    MERCURY
    EARTH
    6,379 KM
    To sun,
    far
    down

    View Slide

  14. sun
    MERCURY

    View Slide

  15. sun
    MERCURY
    Radii of objects not to scale
    100x
    deeper
    Mercury
    depth
    gravity
    well
    To black
    hole, very
    VERY far
    down

    View Slide

  16. sun
    VENUS
    MERCURY
    EARTH
    6,379 KM
    To sun,
    far
    down
    Radii of objects not to scale
    100x
    deeper
    Mercury
    depth
    gravity
    well
    To black
    hole, very
    VERY far
    down

    View Slide

  17. ç
    depth
    gravity
    well
    ç
    Black holes have
    deep, relativistic
    gravity wells
    ç
    BLACK
    HOLE
    sun
    106x
    deeper

    View Slide

  18. ç
    depth
    gravity
    well
    ç
    Black holes have
    deep, relativistic
    gravity wells
    ç
    BLACK
    HOLE
    sun
    106x
    deeper

    View Slide

  19. ç
    depth
    gravity
    well
    ç
    Black holes have
    deep, relativistic
    gravity wells
    ç
    BLACK
    HOLE
    sun
    106x
    deeper

    View Slide

  20. Credit: ESO
    Radiative
    efficiency:
    Deep gravity wells → BH accretion disks are
    the most efficient radiators in the universe

    rad
    =
    Erad
    out
    Egas
    in
    = 10 40%
    100x more efficient
    than nuclear fusion!

    View Slide

  21. Credit: ESO
    Radiative
    efficiency:
    Deep gravity wells → BH accretion disks are
    the most efficient radiators in the universe

    rad
    =
    Erad
    out
    Egas
    in
    = 10 40%
    100x more efficient
    than nuclear fusion!

    View Slide

  22. Black holes spin → spin generates spacetime
    whirlwind (non-Newtonian effect)
    Huge energy stored in rotating spacetime
    black hole

    View Slide

  23. Huge energy stored in rotating spacetime
    Black holes spin → spin generates spacetime
    whirlwind (non-Newtonian effect)
    spinning
    BH
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MHuhcFQsBg

    View Slide

  24. Huge energy stored in rotating spacetime
    Black holes spin → spin generates spacetime
    whirlwind (non-Newtonian effect)
    spinning
    BH
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MHuhcFQsBg

    View Slide

  25. Black hole outflows and jets from Kerr
    spacetime + accretion + B
    Semenov+04, Science
    possibilities remain to be better explored in future simula-
    tions of accretion flows. Interestingly enough, s is similar
    to the dispersion of s values obtained in the hydrodynamic
    RIAF simulations of Yuan, Wu & Bu (2012); Bu et al. (2013)
    for a range of initial conditions.
    Range of black hole spins and/or magnetic flux threading the
    horizon –
    If powerful jets are produced via the BZ mecha-
    nism then the two fundamental parameters that regulate the
    jet power are the black hole spin a and the magnetic flux
    h
    threading the horizon, besides the mass (Blandford &
    Znajek 1977; Semenov, Dyadechkin & Punsly 2004):
    Pjet /


    a
    h
    M
    ◆2
    ; (9)
    i.e., a and
    h
    are degenerate to some extent (cf.
    Jet power Blandford &
    Znajek 77;
    Komissarov+;
    Nemmen+07;
    Tchekhovskoy+
    spin magnetic flux
    Blandford-Znajek mechanism:
    magnetic
    flux tube
    spinning
    black hole ergosphere
    ⇠ a2 ˙
    Mc2

    View Slide

  26. Black hole outflows and jets from Kerr
    spacetime + accretion + B
    Semenov+04, Science
    possibilities remain to be better explored in future simula-
    tions of accretion flows. Interestingly enough, s is similar
    to the dispersion of s values obtained in the hydrodynamic
    RIAF simulations of Yuan, Wu & Bu (2012); Bu et al. (2013)
    for a range of initial conditions.
    Range of black hole spins and/or magnetic flux threading the
    horizon –
    If powerful jets are produced via the BZ mecha-
    nism then the two fundamental parameters that regulate the
    jet power are the black hole spin a and the magnetic flux
    h
    threading the horizon, besides the mass (Blandford &
    Znajek 1977; Semenov, Dyadechkin & Punsly 2004):
    Pjet /


    a
    h
    M
    ◆2
    ; (9)
    i.e., a and
    h
    are degenerate to some extent (cf.
    Jet power Blandford &
    Znajek 77;
    Komissarov+;
    Nemmen+07;
    Tchekhovskoy+
    spin magnetic flux
    Blandford-Znajek mechanism:
    ⇠ a2 ˙
    Mc2

    View Slide

  27. Gamma-ray bursts
    3C 31
    4 I.F. Mirabel
    Fig. 1.2 The British journal Nature announced on July 16, 1992 the discovery of a microquasar in
    the Galactic center region [22]. The image shows the synchrotron emission at a radio wavelength
    of 6 cm produced by relativistic particles jets ejected from some tens of kilometers to light years
    Black hole binaries
    (microquasars)
    ~1 pc
    1E1740.7-2942
    ~1 Mpc ~100 kpc
    Active
    galactic
    nuclei
    ~10-4
    pc?
    Tidal disruption
    events

    View Slide

  28. Energy release from supermassive BHs impact
    large scale structure formation (“AGN feedback”)
    galaxy
    time

    View Slide

  29. Energy release from supermassive BHs impact
    large scale structure formation (“AGN feedback”)
    <10-4 pc
    galaxy
    time
    SMBH

    View Slide

  30. Energy release from supermassive BHs impact
    large scale structure formation (“AGN feedback”)
    time
    BH accretion

    View Slide

  31. Energy release from supermassive BHs impact
    large scale structure formation (“AGN feedback”)
    time
    outflows

    View Slide

  32. Energy release from supermassive BHs impact
    large scale structure formation (“AGN feedback”)
    time

    View Slide

  33. 10 Mpc
    Fabian 12 ARAA; Tombesi+15 Nature; Cheung
    +16 Nature; Vogelsberger+14 Nature
    Energy release from supermassive BHs impact
    large scale structure formation (“AGN feedback”)
    “BH explosions”
    in the simulation

    View Slide

  34. 10 Mpc
    Fabian 12 ARAA; Tombesi+15 Nature; Cheung
    +16 Nature; Vogelsberger+14 Nature
    Energy release from supermassive BHs impact
    large scale structure formation (“AGN feedback”)
    “BH explosions”
    in the simulation

    View Slide

  35. “HR-diagram” for BHs: stellar BHs change states
    in Δt ~ days; AGNs in Δt ≳105 years?
    phase, the behavior of
    by infrared and radio
    so begins to change.
    mission drops almost
    tate transition begins
    a change in the jet
    ty andmagneticfield)
    ck hole.
    mission begins to vary
    lly, showing oscilla-
    vents superposed on
    ne (8, 15). At a cer-
    are one or more large
    h can be two or more
    tude more luminous
    s existing, steadier jet
    e. In several notable
    lution radio observa-
    flares have directly
    r even x-ray–emitting
    way from the central
    17), which can be
    ced back to the time
    hard transition
    ing a range of
    can occur (eve
    generally occu
    few percent o
    nosity (24). In
    never been co
    in any BHXR
    low 1% Eddin
    source reache
    state again, w
    same spectral
    istics as the in
    has reappeare
    disc wind is g
    state, the sou
    typically belo
    of all-sky or re
    and are obser
    until their next
    phases are not
    ever, for it is
    that—without
    X-ray spectrum
    X-ray luminosity
    SOFT HARD
    A
    B
    C
    D
    E
    F
    oles
    Fender & Belloni 12 Science
    X-ray luminosity
    During this phase, the behavior of
    the jet, revealed by infrared and radio
    observations, also begins to change.
    hard transition, although also
    ing a range of luminosities at w
    can occur (even in the same s
    X-ray spectrum
    SOFT HARD
    B
    C
    Black Holes
    soft X-ray spectrum hard
    During this phase, the behavior of
    the jet, revealed by infrared and radio
    observations, also begins to change.
    The infrared emission drops almost
    as soon as the state transition begins
    (14), indicating a change in the jet
    properties(density andmagneticfield)
    close to the black hole.
    The radio emission begins to vary
    more dramatically, showing oscilla-
    tions and flare events superposed on
    an overall decline (8, 15). At a cer-
    tain point, there are one or more large
    radio flares, which can be two or more
    orders of magnitude more luminous
    than the previous existing, steadier jet
    in the hard state. In several notable
    cases, high-resolution radio observa-
    tions after such flares have directly
    resolved radio- or even x-ray–emitting
    blobs moving away from the central
    black hole (16, 17), which can be
    kinematically traced back to the time
    of the state transition. It has been re-
    cently shown that in some cases, the
    ejection is coincident in time with the
    appearance of the strong QPOs (15).
    The soft state (D → E). As the
    spectral transition continues, these
    strong QPOs disappear, and the over-
    all level of x-ray variability drops as
    X-ray spectrum
    X-ray luminosity
    SOFT HARD
    A
    B
    C
    D
    E
    F
    Black Holes

    View Slide

  36. “HR-diagram” for BHs: stellar BHs change states
    in Δt ~ days; AGNs in Δt ≳105 years?
    phase, the behavior of
    by infrared and radio
    so begins to change.
    mission drops almost
    tate transition begins
    a change in the jet
    ty andmagneticfield)
    ck hole.
    mission begins to vary
    lly, showing oscilla-
    vents superposed on
    ne (8, 15). At a cer-
    are one or more large
    h can be two or more
    tude more luminous
    s existing, steadier jet
    e. In several notable
    lution radio observa-
    flares have directly
    r even x-ray–emitting
    way from the central
    17), which can be
    ced back to the time
    hard transition
    ing a range of
    can occur (eve
    generally occu
    few percent o
    nosity (24). In
    never been co
    in any BHXR
    low 1% Eddin
    source reache
    state again, w
    same spectral
    istics as the in
    has reappeare
    disc wind is g
    state, the sou
    typically belo
    of all-sky or re
    and are obser
    until their next
    phases are not
    ever, for it is
    that—without
    X-ray spectrum
    X-ray luminosity
    SOFT HARD
    A
    B
    C
    D
    E
    F
    oles
    Fender & Belloni 12 Science
    X-ray luminosity
    During this phase, the behavior of
    the jet, revealed by infrared and radio
    observations, also begins to change.
    hard transition, although also
    ing a range of luminosities at w
    can occur (even in the same s
    X-ray spectrum
    SOFT HARD
    B
    C
    Black Holes
    soft X-ray spectrum hard
    During this phase, the behavior of
    the jet, revealed by infrared and radio
    observations, also begins to change.
    The infrared emission drops almost
    as soon as the state transition begins
    (14), indicating a change in the jet
    properties(density andmagneticfield)
    close to the black hole.
    The radio emission begins to vary
    more dramatically, showing oscilla-
    tions and flare events superposed on
    an overall decline (8, 15). At a cer-
    tain point, there are one or more large
    radio flares, which can be two or more
    orders of magnitude more luminous
    than the previous existing, steadier jet
    in the hard state. In several notable
    cases, high-resolution radio observa-
    tions after such flares have directly
    resolved radio- or even x-ray–emitting
    blobs moving away from the central
    black hole (16, 17), which can be
    kinematically traced back to the time
    of the state transition. It has been re-
    cently shown that in some cases, the
    ejection is coincident in time with the
    appearance of the strong QPOs (15).
    The soft state (D → E). As the
    spectral transition continues, these
    strong QPOs disappear, and the over-
    all level of x-ray variability drops as
    X-ray spectrum
    X-ray luminosity
    SOFT HARD
    A
    B
    C
    D
    E
    F
    Black Holes
    low/hard XRB
    low-luminosity
    AGNs, Sgr A*
    N+06; N+14

    View Slide

  37. 1. Usually not in vacuum: accretion flows
    2. Deep potential wells → Relativistic effects,
    spacetime whirlwind → Powerful outflows/jets
    3. Impact galaxy evolution
    4. Complicated “HR-diagrams”: state transitions
    Black holes are very rich for
    astrophysics
    During this phase, the behavior of
    the jet, revealed by infrared and radio
    observations, also begins to change.
    The infrared emission drops almost
    as soon as the state transition begins
    (14), indicating a change in the jet
    properties(density andmagneticfield)
    close to the black hole.
    The radio emission begins to vary
    more dramatically, showing oscilla-
    tions and flare events superposed on
    an overall decline (8, 15). At a cer-
    tain point, there are one or more large
    radio flares, which can be two or more
    orders of magnitude more luminous
    than the previous existing, steadier jet
    in the hard state. In several notable
    cases, high-resolution radio observa-
    tions after such flares have directly
    resolved radio- or even x-ray–emitting
    blobs moving away from the central
    black hole (16, 17), which can be
    kinematically traced back to the time
    hard transitio
    ing a range of
    can occur (eve
    generally occu
    few percent o
    nosity (24). In
    never been c
    in any BHXR
    low 1% Eddi
    source reache
    state again, w
    same spectral
    istics as the in
    has reappeare
    disc wind is g
    state, the sou
    typically belo
    of all-sky or re
    and are obser
    until their nex
    phases are not
    ever, for it is
    that—withou
    X-ray spectrum
    X-ray luminosity
    SOFT HARD
    A
    B
    C
    D
    E
    F
    Black Holes
    galaxy

    View Slide

  38. Black Holes, Big Questions
    ρ, B, v, T of accretion/jets near BHs?
    What regulates BH HR-diagram and state
    transitions?
    Nature of outflows and how they impact
    galaxies?
    BH spin astrophysically relevant?
    ⊵ ⊵

    View Slide

  39. Gustavo Soares
    PhD
    Artur Vemado
    undergrad (IC)
    Henrique Gubolin
    Msc
    Fabio Cafardo
    PhD
    Raniere Menezes
    Msc
    Ivan Almeida
    undergrad (IC)
    http://rodrigonemmen.com/group/
    Rodrigo Nemmen
    Open
    positions for
    postdocs:
    Join our team!

    View Slide

  40. 1. Population studies of AGNs
    2. Time-domain astronomy in
    gamma-rays
    3. Numerical simulations of BH
    accretion
    Research strategies

    View Slide

  41. Population studies of
    supermassive black holes (AGNs)

    View Slide

  42. log jet
    power
    (erg/s)
    BH astrophysics is scale-free: same
    behaviour for stellar and supermassive BHs
    Pre-Swift
    Swift BAT
    Fermi GBM/LAT
    BL Lacs
    FSRQs
    log Lγ-rays (erg/s)
    Nemmen et al.
    2012, Science
    cf. also Merloni+03; Falcke
    +04; McHardy+06
    ~10
    MSun
    10 8
    -10 9
    M
    Sun

    View Slide

  43. E
    out
    E
    in
    Credit: Perley & Cotton (NRAO/AUI/NSF)
    ˙
    Mc2
    BH energy
    efficiency
    Measurements of efficiency of BH engine
    Pjet
    Pjet
    ˙
    Mc2
    =
    =
    Radio galaxy

    View Slide

  44. Using latest constraints
    on density profiles
    ˙
    M(R) / R0.5
    BH energy efficiency (%)
    ⇢(R) / R 1
    Nemmen & Tchekhovskoy 2015, MNRAS ⌘jet
    ⌘ Pjet/( ˙
    M•c2)
    BH energy output efficiency from X-rays
    (nearby AGNs)

    View Slide

  45. Using latest constraints
    on density profiles
    ˙
    M(R) / R0.5
    BH energy efficiency (%)
    ⇢(R) / R 1
    Nemmen & Tchekhovskoy 2015, MNRAS ⌘jet
    ⌘ Pjet/( ˙
    M•c2)
    median
    BH energy output efficiency from X-rays
    (nearby AGNs)

    View Slide

  46. Using latest constraints
    on density profiles
    ˙
    M(R) / R0.5
    BH energy efficiency (%)
    ⇢(R) / R 1
    Nemmen & Tchekhovskoy 2015, MNRAS ⌘jet
    ⌘ Pjet/( ˙
    M•c2)
    median
    BH energy output efficiency from X-rays
    (nearby AGNs)
    Getting more energy out from
    black holes than is flowing in

    View Slide

  47. Using latest constraints
    on density profiles
    ˙
    M(R) / R0.5
    BH energy efficiency (%)
    ⇢(R) / R 1
    Nemmen & Tchekhovskoy 2015, MNRAS ⌘jet
    ⌘ Pjet/( ˙
    M•c2)
    median
    BH energy output efficiency from X-rays
    (nearby AGNs)
    Getting more energy out from
    black holes than is flowing in
    How? Extraction of BH
    spin energy

    View Slide

  48. Kerr black holes surrounded by thin
    accretion disks: η up to 40%

    View Slide

  49. Kerr black holes surrounded by thin
    accretion disks: η up to 40%

    View Slide

  50. Kerr black holes surrounded by thin
    accretion disks: η up to 40%

    View Slide

  51. Nemmen & Tchekhovskoy 2015, MNRAS;
    Tchekhovskoy & Nemmen, in prep.
    Kerr black holes surrounded by magnetically
    arrested disks (MADs): η up to 300%

    View Slide

  52. Nemmen & Tchekhovskoy 2015, MNRAS;
    Tchekhovskoy & Nemmen, in prep.
    Kerr black holes surrounded by magnetically
    arrested disks (MADs): η up to 300%

    View Slide

  53. Nemmen & Tchekhovskoy 2015, MNRAS;
    Tchekhovskoy & Nemmen, in prep.
    Kerr black holes surrounded by magnetically
    arrested disks (MADs): η up to 300%

    View Slide

  54. Time-domain astronomy in
    gamma-rays

    View Slide

  55. Fermi Gamma Ray Telescope: LSST for high-energy
    sky, 20 MeV - 300 GeV, whole sky every 3 hours
    ace based gamma-ray astronomy
    Diffuse galactic gamma-ray emission
    Fermi 7-year all sky, >600 MeV
    Bühler+15

    View Slide

  56. Fermi Gamma Ray Telescope: LSST for high-energy
    sky, 20 MeV - 300 GeV, whole sky every 3 hours
    ace based gamma-ray astronomy
    Diffuse galactic gamma-ray emission
    Fermi 7-year all sky, >600 MeV
    Bühler+15

    View Slide

  57. Monitoring γ-rays for many nearby AGNs: rich
    variability of central engine; BH heartbeats?
    Menezes+, in prep.; Nemmen+, in prep.
    MSc, Raniere Menezes

    View Slide

  58. Monitoring γ-rays for many nearby AGNs: rich
    variability of central engine; BH heartbeats?
    Menezes+, in prep.; Nemmen+, in prep.
    PhD, Fabio cafardo
    poster 121
    MSc, Raniere Menezes
    Results not available yet
    for public release

    View Slide

  59. Numerical simulations of black
    hole accretion: BH weather

    View Slide

  60. What is “black hole weather”?
    Atmosphere: charged plasma
    magnetic fields (magnetosphere)
    Gravity: general
    relativity (Kerr metric)

    View Slide

  61. What is “black hole weather”?
    Atmosphere: charged plasma
    magnetic fields (magnetosphere)
    Gravity: general
    relativity (Kerr metric)

    View Slide

  62. What is “black hole weather”?
    Atmosphere: charged plasma
    magnetic fields (magnetosphere)
    Gravity: general
    relativity (Kerr metric)

    View Slide

  63. BLACK
    HOLE
    WEATHER
    Big BH
    questions

    View Slide

  64. oh wait, Can’t create
    black holes in lab
    BLACK
    HOLE
    WEATHER
    Big BH
    questions
    sigh…

    View Slide

  65. oh wait, Can’t create
    black holes in lab
    Virtual lab of relativistic
    astrophysics
    BLACK
    HOLE
    WEATHER
    Big BH
    questions
    sigh…

    View Slide

  66. Gammie+03; Mizuno+06; McKinney+14; Sadowski+14
    BH weather has complex physics:
    Analytical models cannot handle
    Need numerical simulations,
    computationally intensive
    Magnetic fields (MRI – “viscosity”) ➾ MHD
    Multi-dimensional 3D
    General relativity (BH) ➾ 3D GRMHD
    Radiation ➾ 3D GRRMHD
    cture
    ture
    C
    C

    View Slide

  67. Global simulations of weather around
    spinning BHs: “hurricanes” (jets)
    a/M = 0.94
    Spinning BH
    •2D
    •no radiation

    View Slide

  68. Global simulations of weather around
    spinning BHs: “hurricanes” (jets)
    Units of GM/c2

    View Slide

  69. Global simulations of weather around
    spinning BHs: “hurricanes” (jets)
    phd, Gustavo soares
    poster 120
    Units of GM/c2

    View Slide

  70. Global simulations of weather around
    spinning BHs: “hurricanes” (jets)
    phd, Gustavo soares
    poster 120
    MSc, Henrique gubolin
    poster 79
    Pseudo-
    Newtonian MHD
    simulations
    Units of GM/c2

    View Slide

  71. Chan+15a,b ApJ
    radio 10 GHz 1.3mm IR 2.1μm X-rays
    Soon: Radiative transfer and GPU-
    accelerated ray tracing in BH spacetimes

    View Slide

  72. Chan+15a,b ApJ
    radio 10 GHz 1.3mm IR 2.1μm X-rays
    Soon: Radiative transfer and GPU-
    accelerated ray tracing in BH spacetimes

    View Slide

  73. What will the first photograph of a black
    hole look like?
    Primary targets:
    Center of Our Galaxy, M = 4×106 Msun
    Radiogalaxy M87, M = 6×109 Msun
    resolution better than 60 μa.s.
    (orange on the Moon)

    View Slide

  74. Summary: Black holes
    Deep gravity wells = relativity, spin, accretion, jets,
    outflows ➾ severe black hole weather
    Important for galaxy formation/evolution
    soon: first
    image of an
    event horizon
    Numerical
    simulations:
    GR+gas+B
    +radiation
    BH weather is complicated: need numerical
    simulations, computationally intensive

    Multiwavelength pop.
    studies, time-domain,
    BH “HR-diagram”

    View Slide

  75. Github
    Twitter
    Web
    E-mail
    Bitbucket
    Facebook
    Blog
    Delicious
    [email protected]
    http://rodrigonemmen.com
    @nemmen
    rsnemmen
    http://facebook.com/rodrigonemmen
    nemmen
    http://astropython.blogspot.com
    http://delicious.com/rsnemmen

    View Slide