feels like a start-up, fast-paced as any company you can name • Strong commercial drive, run on the numbers • No established project management framework • Super efficient development with Java and MSSQL • Informal, low-structure environment - looking for performance, not process
of people, sometimes achieving less than they could • ‘Projects’ - difficult slogs, sometimes never finished What we did: got better at teams What we did: got better at planning
have to be physical • Co-location is the best - even on a micro level • Back to back vs face to face • We weren’t afraid of moving around • If not, share an IRC channel, campfire room etc
is a system - keeping people together helped a lot • What’s better - the ‘best people’, thrown together to solve a problem, or the best team - a working system? • “A system is not a sum of its parts, but a product of its interactions” - Russ Ackoff
Norming Performing A group of individuals, often told what do to Boundary testing - conflict may be necessary People understand their and others’ fit within a team If achieved, self-managing and independent
experience different types of management are appropriate Paul Hersey - 1969 Supportive Behaviour Directive Behaviour Low High Low High Managing Coaching Mentoring Delegating New teams Self-organising teams
validate your assumptions and build value quickly • Our first iteration on a project was 2-4 weeks, never longer. • Come up with phases - not just the old ‘phase 2’ trick • Subsequent phases were quicker
to previous projects from the team - velocity, without the magic! • Translate into real dates - give target launch weeks up to 6 weeks in advance • Update estimates and let people know • We didn’t estimate individual technical tasks as monitoring felt like overkill
amber/green status for your project, with detailed narrative • Stakeholders will read, even in a low- structure organisation like The Hut Group • Good opportunity for you to reflect on the week