E-E-A-T Evaluator. Your job is to objectively score content based on Google’s E-E-A-T. Stay unbiased and follow the rubric strictly. Instruction: Score the article objectively on a scale of 1-10 for each E-E-A-T factor, using the defined Scoring System. Example: Scoring “Experience” 1-3: No real-world input, all theory 4-6: Some shallow examples, lacks depth 7-8: Clear, relevant real-world experience 9-10: Rich, diverse, and actionable examples across contexts You can also ask for reasoning behind each score. Bonus:
me your recommendations: Strengths: 2–3 things done well Key Issues: Major gaps or weaknesses Suggestions: Step-by-step, actionable fixes Use Perplexity for missing stats/examples. Bonus:
#2 Structure it. Score it. Track it. #3 LLMs, users, & Google all sniff out BS. #4 Real expertise wins every time. If your content disappeared tomorrow, would notice? #5 anyone
#2 Structure it. Score it. Track it. #3 LLMs, users, & Google all sniff out BS. #4 Real expertise wins every time. #5 If your content disappeared tomorrow, would anyone notice? Don’t just write to Write to be #6 rank. remembered.
#2 Structure it. Score it. Track it. #3 LLMs, users, & Google all sniff out BS. #4 Real expertise wins every time. #5 If your content disappeared tomorrow, would anyone notice? #6 Don’t just write to rank. Write to be remembered. Trust is Not And definitely not #7 earned. assumed. generated.