(Extremely) Low frequencies PRO CONTRA • Radio emission cone broadening • High DM, RM… resolution • Possible “off-pulse” emission • Increasing of flux density at low frequencies (for some pulsars) High Scattering in ISM. Big dispersion delay Bad Signal/Noise due to galactic background Interference ~ 70-80 dB more than background.
3 Decametric North Sky Survey for Searching of Pulsars and Transients. Beam positions. Advantages: 5 beams, tracking ~1 hour. Nearest beam data combining possibility Ў = 0° Ў = 60°
6 Main goals of 1st stage: only ~10 PSRs with given parameters were detected in the decameter range - identification of disturbing factors for detection - ways to eliminate their influence - Fraction (Fr) of KNOWN pulsar (detected in the decameter range) for estimation: Fr * (N of PSRs)*(cone broad.-1) ≅ NEW PSRs
SED spectrum, S/N vs time, compressed spectrogram and (apparent) dispersion delay with DM ≈ 2105 pc/cm3 “Off-pulse” emission: directivity diagram(s). B0809+74
17 Conclusion: The high efficiency of pulsar and transient detection has been shown at decameter range Parameters of emission of more than 40 pulsars were refined or obtained for the first time New emission characteristics New sources ...
18 Why only ~ 10 known pulsars at lowest frequencies? Big dispersion delay (?) (DM=10 pc/cm3 ~100 s in Δf=16…30MHz). But with optimum DM compensations it is NOT a problem Scattering in ISM. But in [Popov M.V. et al. Astronomy Reports. – 2006. – Vol. 50, – P. 562–568. ] shown that for Crab pulsar ("plerion“, Galaxy plane, DM≈57 pc/cm3) at 24 MHz τsc ≈ 3 s.
23 Of course Signal/Noise! 25 vs 100 MHz (ratio = 4) 25000 vs 500 K (galactic background ratio ~ 4 2…3 times) 0.5 vs 2 Jy (ratio ~ 4 1…2) Resulted ratio ~ 100…200 times. But Aeff UTR-2 =150 000 sq m Interference ~ 70-80 dB more than background. But high interference immunity and filtering let us to clean raw data.